Business
2026: Pakistan must choose growth | The Express Tribune
Pakistan’s real per capita income has risen 4.5 times since 1947 while the sub-continent, which once comprised Pakistan, India and Bangladesh, achieved an average growth of around 5%. photo: file
ISLAMABAD:
Year 2026 could be a defining period for Pakistan’s economy. After the hard-won stabilisation of 2025, the country faces a clear test: whether stability can be converted into lasting progress.
For more than a decade, GDP growth has barely kept pace with population growth, leaving incomes stagnant and widening the gap with regional peers. If stabilisation fails to deliver jobs and rising incomes, public support for reform will inevitably weaken. The central challenge of 2026, therefore, is to pivot from stabilisation to inclusive, accelerated growth and turn fragile stability into broad-based prosperity.
Encouragingly, a narrow but meaningful window of opportunity exists. Low international commodity prices, particularly petroleum, have helped contain inflation. Record remittances are supporting the current account and easing external vulnerabilities. At the same time, strong stock-market performance reflects improved investor sentiment and ample domestic liquidity. The task now is to channel these favourable conditions into sustained growth that reaches households across the income spectrum.
To move decisively into a growth phase, four priorities demand attention: revitalising industry and agriculture, lowering the government’s footprint in the services sector, deepening global integration, and fixing governance.
Boosting industrial growth requires a decisive shift in mindset, from reliance on textiles to the development of higher-value engineering goods such as mobile phones, defence equipment, and consumer durables. Defence manufacturing illustrates this opportunity clearly. Despite a mature production base, Pakistan accounted for just 0.019% of global defence exports in 2023, even as growing international interest in platforms such as the JF-17 Thunder points to significant untapped potential.
Similarly, mobile phone manufacturing and consumer durables must move beyond import substitution towards export orientation. CPEC Phase-II offers a timely opportunity to support this transition by prioritising industrial upgrading, technology transfer, and export-led growth, allowing Pakistan to break out of low-value production patterns and integrate into global engineering value chains.
Agriculture was among the weakest performers in 2025, reflecting deep structural constraints. Opening the sector to competition, rather than prolonged protection, is essential to raise productivity, farmer incomes, and exports. Yet access to modern seeds, inputs, and technologies remains constrained by policy.
Heavy subsidisation of traditional crops crowds out higher-value segments such as horticulture, pulses, and oilseeds, where Pakistan runs large trade deficits. Livestock, which accounts for nearly 60% of agricultural GDP, receives less than 1% of public investment. Redirecting support towards livestock and high-value crops would attract private investment, diversify incomes, reduce imports, and unlock billions of dollars in export potential, while strengthening food security.
A similar challenge exists in services, where a heavy government footprint has kept key sectors, particularly telecoms and energy, underperforming. The privatisation of PIA demonstrates that private capital is willing to invest when processes are transparent and the state does not insist on excessive upfront returns. By prioritising short-term spectrum revenues, Pakistan has delayed broadband expansion and a credible 5G roadmap, costing the economy an estimated $1 billion a year in lost GDP.
An investment-first approach, accepting lower upfront prices in exchange for binding rollout and efficiency commitments, should also be applied to power distribution companies, whose losses are estimated at around Rs400 billion annually. Reducing energy-sector losses and expanding affordable digital infrastructure would sharply improve industrial competitiveness, unlock tech-led jobs and exports, and place Pakistan on a more sustainable growth path. Year 2026 should also mark a year of deeper global integration and renewed regional trade. Pakistan’s trade-to-GDP ratio remains among the lowest in the world, reflecting a degree of economic isolation that is increasingly costly.
Recent tariff reforms are a necessary first step, but they must be followed by more ambitious engagement with global markets. Accession to major blocs such as the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership should be seen as essential, not optional, if Pakistani firms are to compete in an increasingly integrated global economy.
None of these objectives can be achieved without confronting Pakistan’s deep-rooted governance weaknesses. The IMF’s Governance and Corruption Diagnostic Assessment provides a clear, evidence-based diagnosis of what needs to be fixed. What remains missing is an effective mechanism for execution. If Pakistan addresses these governance gaps, IMF estimates suggest that GDP growth could rise by roughly 5% to 6.5% above current trends over a five-year period.
The path from stabilisation to sustained growth is now clearly defined. It requires continuity in sound macroeconomic management, combined with bold and targeted structural reform. The priorities are unmistakable: unlock the potential of farms and factories, scale services and digital exports, integrate more deeply with the global economy, and fix the governance failures the IMF has identified.
If this moment is seized with urgency and resolve, 2026 can be remembered not as a year of cautious optimism, but as the turning point when Pakistan reignited its engine of inclusive prosperity and began to close the gap with a rapidly advancing world.
The writer is a member of the steering committee for the implementation of National Tariff Policy 2025-30. Previously, he served as Pakistan’s ambassador to the World Trade Organisation
Business
Trump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors
Danielle KayeBusiness reporter
Houston Chronicle via Getty ImagesUS President Donald Trump has said he will move to ban big corporate investors from buying single-family homes, in a bid to make housing more affordable for Americans.
In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump said he would ask Congress to “codify” the plan and would discuss it further at the Davos World Economic Forum later this month.
The pledge bolstered an idea that has been circulating for years among housing advocates and lawmakers, in response to Wall Street’s increased role in America’s residential housing market. But some analysts question the extent to which a ban would affect prices.
Shares of Blackstone, one of the largest private equity buyers, fell more than 5% on Wednesday.
“That American Dream is increasingly out of reach for far too many people, especially younger Americans,” Trump said on social media, referring to home ownership.
“People live in homes, not corporations.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the details of a possible ban, including whether it would require congressional approval.
Trump’s comments on Wednesday come as his administration faces growing public pessimism about his handling of the economy. He has in recent weeks sought to allay voter anxiety about the cost of living in the US, with home affordability high on the list of Americans’ concerns.
Sam Garin, a spokesperson for an advocacy group that has raised alarm about the effect of private equity ownership on renters, said her group welcomed Trump’s move.
“We eagerly await the details of what this policy will actually entail,” said Garin, of the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, adding: “But we urge policymakers not to stop there.”
Since the 2008 financial crisis led to a wave of foreclosures, Wall Street investors such as Blackstone and other private equity firms have bought tens of thousands of homes to rent out, becoming major landlords, especially in certain markets.
Their role has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers in both political parties, who have blamed the firms for helping to push up the cost of renting and buying.
On Wednesday, Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno, said he would introduce legislation to codify Trump’s proposal.
Shares of property firms fell on Wednesday after Trump’s comments. Builders FirstSource, a building products supplier, dropped more than 5%, while Invitation Homes, which owns single-family homes, fell 6%.
But some housing industry analysts questioned whether a ban would make much of a dent in home prices, given the relatively small role of institutional investors in the overall market.
Laurie Goodman, a fellow at the Urban Institute, said the impact of a ban would depend in part on how “large” investors are defined.
Blackstone has said that institutions own 0.5% of all single-family homes in the US.
Goodman said that her research found that institutional investors, when defined as those that own at least 1,000 units in three or more locations, own about 4% of the single-family market.
That number, she added, has held steady over the past few years, as purchases have slowed amid high interest rates and high home prices.
Goodman said a proposal for a ban raised other questions, such as how existing properties owned by institutional investors would be handled.
She said instead of an outright ban, “institutional investors should be required to provide more for their tenants”.
Business
US will control Venezuela oil sales ‘indefinitely’, official says
The US will control sales of sanctioned Venezuelan oil “indefinitely” as it prepares to roll back restrictions on the country’s crude in global markets, the White House said.
Officials said sales were expected to start with 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil and the revenue would be controlled by the US government in order to maintain leverage over the Venezuelan government.
“We’re going to let the oil flow,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said at a conference with oil and gas executives in Miami.
It’s not clear what portion of the revenues from the sale – which analysts expect to raise about $2.8bn (£2.1bn) – would be shared with Venezuela.
“We need to have that leverage and control of those oil sales to drive the changes that simply must happen in Venezuela,” Wright said, while adding that some of the money would then “flow back into Venezuela”.
White House officials said on Wednesday that they had already taken steps to start marketing the oil and the administration was working with key banks and commodity firms to execute the sales.
The comments offered more insight into plans US President Donald Trump announced on social media on Tuesday.
He said that Venezuela would be “turning over” up to 50 million barrels of oil to the US, and it would be sold at its market price.
The money is set to be deposited into US controlled accounts, which Trump said he as president would control and use to benefit the people of Venezuela and the US.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the aim was to disburse the money “in a way that benefits the Venezuelan people – not corruption, not the regime – so we have a lot of leverage to move on the stabilisation front”.
Analysts said the impact of the change in policy would depend on details, like the pace of the sales.
Venezuela has some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but disinvestment, mismanagement and decades of US sanctions have left it with output of only about a million barrels per day – less than 1% of global production.
That supply, which provided critical resources to the Venezuelan government, in recent years has been going primarily to China.
But that too has been disrupted in recent months after the US ramped up strikes and a blockade of Venezuelan tankers as part of its pressure campaign against Maduro.
On Wednesday, Beijing’s foreign minister condemned the US seizure of Maduro and US plans to exert control over Venezuela’s oil resources.
Trump is due to meet with oil executives at the White House on Friday.
Analysts said that in the short term, US oil firm Chevron and US oil refineries, which are set up to process the kind of “heavy” crude that is characteristic of Venezuela’s output, are well placed to benefit from increased flow of oil from Venezuela.
Such a shift could put pressure on Mexico and Canada, which produce similar crude and are currently the main sellers to US refineries.
Oil prices, which are already relatively low amid steady supply and muted demand expectations, slipped further over the last week on the prospect that Venezuela might have increased access to the global market.
But analysts have warned that meaningful expansion of the country’s output will take years and billions of dollars in investment, which firms may be hesitant to undertake, given less risky opportunities in the US and in other countries such as Guyana.
Business
IndiGo disruptions: CCI seeks details from airline, DGCA; probe on dominant position under way – The Times of India
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has sought information from IndiGo and aviation regulator DGCA to assess whether the country’s largest airline indulged in unfair business practices following widespread flight cancellations last month, PTI reported citing sources.In early December, IndiGo, which commands over 63% share of the domestic aviation market, faced major operational disruptions that led to the cancellation of thousands of flights before services stabilised. In response, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) curtailed the airline’s winter schedule by 10%.Sources said the anti-trust regulator has sent a set of queries to IndiGo as part of its preliminary examination of the airline’s conduct. The CCI has also sought information from the DGCA, including data on airfares, to gain a broader understanding of market conditions before deciding its next course of action.The Competition Commission is currently assessing whether there is prima facie evidence that IndiGo violated competition norms by abusing its dominant position in the market. As part of its process, the watchdog first undertakes an initial assessment before ordering a detailed investigation by its Director General (DG), if required.On December 18, the CCI said it had taken cognisance of information filed against IndiGo in connection with the recent flight disruptions across multiple routes. “Based on the initial assessment, the Commission has decided to proceed further in the matter in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002,” it said in a release.A day later, CCI Chairperson Ravneet Kaur told PTI that the regulator had decided to examine the matter further based on the information available. “We have information which has come to us, and based on that information, the matter was placed before the commission. The commission has taken a view that in the initial assessment, it looks like we can go into further detail,” she said.The DGCA has already completed its probe into the operational disruptions, while the CCI continues to evaluate whether IndiGo’s conduct warrants a full-fledged investigation under competition law.
-
Entertainment1 week agoGeorge Clooney, his wife Amal and their twins granted French citizenship
-
Sports1 week agoMorocco reach AFCON last 16 | The Express Tribune
-
Business1 week agoA major drop in the prices of petroleum products is likely with the arrival of the New Year. – SUCH TV
-
Fashion1 week agoUK year-end review 2025: Seeking new avenues
-
Business7 days agoEnergy price cap rises slightly as temperatures fall
-
Entertainment7 days agoFrance president ‘wants to ban under-15s from social media’
-
Fashion1 week agoSaat & Saat acquires Turkish apparel leader Aydinli Group
-
Sports1 week ago
Tom Wilson’s New Year’s Eve: Two goals, a fight, a win and an Olympic nod
