The Michigan synagogue shooter who crashed a truck into Temple Israel in West Bloomfield on Thursday, March 12, has been identified.

The Department of Homeland Security while confirming the name of the suspect as Ayman Mohamad Ghazali, provided his past history.

Ghazali was born in Lebanon in 1985 and entered the U.S. in May 2011 on an immigrant visa as the spouse of the U.S. citizen.

Multiple U.S. media reports have highlighted the alleged attacker had roots in Lebanon and whose family members were hit in an Israeli airstrike there.

The reports add the suspect had shared images of his relatives on WhatsApp hours before the attack.

However, the FBI has not yet determined the motive behind the attack on Michigan synagogue but said the incident is being investigated as a targeted act of violence against the Jewish community.

So far there’s no information that has been provided by the authorities as to how many people were injured during the incident.

The Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard held a news conference on Thursday, March 12, and updated the status of those who were inside Temple Israel.

According to Sheriff Bouchard, no members of the synagogue’s staff, teachers or the roughly 140 children enrolled in its early childhood education center were injured.

Temple Israel in West Bloomfield is the nation’s largest Reform Jewish synagogue, located in suburban Detroit, about 25 miles northwest of the city.

The illegal invasion of Israel and America against Iran may have created a ripple of excitement among the warmongers sitting in the power corridors of Washington and Tel Aviv but it seems to be pushing the Middle East towards a conflagration that might engulf other parts of the world.

The conflict has exposed the hypocrisy of the Western world, besides putting a question mark on the credibility of European leaders who promptly threw their support behind Israel, which has been accused of carrying out war crimes in the occupied territories of Palestine and elsewhere in the region. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Macron, and the much-vaunted new leader of the Western countries, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, all issued statements suggesting that the aggression was not committed by Washington and Tel Aviv but by Tehran. While their statements expressed concerns over Iranian attacks against Arab states, they failed to offer any comments on the decimation of Iranian civilians, including over 160 schoolchildren.

Critics believe that the US has once again resorted to outright lies to justify this invasion, with American President Donald Trump and his tedious acolytes claiming that Iran was a threat to the security of the sole superpower and its allies. This was the same excuse employed in the past by George Bush Junior and former British PM Tony Blair during the Iraq war. Reports of international institutions and global independent bodies proved their claims to be completely concocted, which were employed to grab Iraqi oil.

The Trump administration has used the Iranian nuclear programme as an excuse to impose this illegal invasion, refuting, in a way, its own claim of dismantling Iranian nuclear infrastructure during the 12-day war of last year. Many feel that, in reality, it is Iran’s resources that the US and its companies are dreaming of capturing. There has been tremendous pressure on the Iranian government to open up its markets for the vultures of the capitalist world, which Iran has always resisted. The military strength of the Islamic Republic is said to be the second factor prompting Israel and the US to invade the country, plunging it into death and destruction.

In order to achieve this target, Washington and Tel Aviv are trying to carry out another regime change, which could turn out to be a recipe for disaster not only for the region but also for the world’s sole mighty power. The US managed to install pliant leaders in Libya and Syria by indirectly interfering in the affairs of those countries or carrying out limited intervention in the case of Syria. However, in Iraq and Afghanistan, the US and its allies had to resort to ruthless force to carry out the regime change. Despite this, they were not in a position to prop up new governments.

Sending troops to those countries proved catastrophic. The US and its allies lost thousands of soldiers and thousands of others got maimed or wounded. Washington also had to spend around $8 trillion on the two conflicts, according to the Watson Institute of Brown University. The end result: a humiliating withdrawal from the two countries.

In all these countries, local ethnic and sectarian entities were encouraged by the US to ally with the occupying forces or anti-government elements. This sharpened divisions in these societies, with different sections still fighting each other in countries like Libya and Syria.

It seems Washington is also trying to apply the same formula in Iran which has multiple ethnic and sectarian fault Lines. The Trump administration has reportedly been in contact with Kurds and other ethnic groups who faced repression and crackdown from the Iranian government in the past and seem to be ready to fight the theocratic system. Washington might also try to engage other non-Persian entities in Iran to weaken the government.

The Baloch in the Iranian East could also be a potential collaborator of the invading forces of Israel and the US. Dissident Iranian elements settled in the US and other parts of the world might also use this opportunity to stage a comeback and lead the anti-government battle in a bid to topple the Iranian government

But such an American approach would spell disaster for the entire region and may not go down well with some of America’s allies. Any attempt to strengthen Iranian Kurds risks rejuvenating desires of Kurds in Iraq, Turkey and Syria to create their own homeland, infuriating Baghdad, Damascus and Ankara, which, in one or another way, are American friends. Support for the Iranian Baloch would infuriate Islamabad, which has historically been a close ally of the US.

The US might bomb Iran mercilessly but such aerial strikes would still not cause regime change. That would require ground troops, risking American lives and forcing Iranians to wage a guerrilla war. Such a situation would jeopardise Trump’s popularity, who won elections on the promise of non-intervention.

While sections of Iranian society are not happy with the theocratic government of Iran, it is equally possible that the majority of the Iranians might end up despising the very idea of the intervention and collaboration with the enemies. And, while some ethnic entities like the Kurds and Baloch seek independence from the central authority, there are other ethnic entities inside the Islamic Republic that share the same sect as the majority Persian-speaking Iranians. Despite having different ethnic backgrounds, these national entities share the same name. Therefore, they would not be amenable to the idea of destroying a country that is considered a protector of their faith.

Nonetheless, Israeli and American moves seem to be sowing the seeds of chaos in the region, with far-reaching consequences that might include disruption of aerial and marine transport, as well as skyrocketing prices for energy and other commodities. Their wish to see the Balkanisation of Iran would plunge the country into a protracted civil war, which might cause massive displacement, killings and destruction of infrastructure. Europe has witnessed a 35% rise in gas prices. Oil price is also seeing an upward spiral, while the global chain and supply is facing the risk of great disruption.

If the situation does not normalise, it would also create a migration crisis for the region and Europe. Therefore, American allies in the region and Europe must spring into action to prevent Israel and America from sowing the seeds of chaos in the region.

The writer is a freelance journalist who can be reached at: [email protected]

Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed in this piece are the writer’s own and don’t necessarily reflect Geo.tv’s editorial policy.

Originally published in The News

Kim Kardashian and Kris Jenner have filed court declarations flatly denying accusations from Ray J and his mother that they orchestrated the release of the infamous 2007 tape — and Ray J has fired back, accusing both women of lying under oath.

In declarations filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Wednesday, both Kardashian and Jenner called Ray J’s claims false. 

Jenner stated: “As a mother, the notion that I orchestrated or produced sex tapes involving my daughter, or was in any way involved in the creation or distribution of any sex tapes, is not only entirely untrue but deeply offensive and harmful and has haunted me for decades.” 

She added: “I was absolutely heartbroken, crushed and devastated as a mother to see my daughter in this situation where her most intimate and private moments were exposed to the world.”

Kardashian, 45, said in her own declaration that she had spent considerable money, including therapy and fees for communications, legal, and strategic advisers, to counter what she describes as Ray J’s false narrative. 

“His claim that I had a plan with my mother and others to release a sex tape, defraud the public, and file a ‘fake’ lawsuit against the porn company that released it to ‘create buzz’ is a lie,” she stated.

Ray J, 45, was having none of it. 

Speaking to TMZ, he said the pair had “completely lied about everything” and questioned what consequences should follow. 

“Are [Kim and Kris] out of their f–king minds? The fact of the matter is, if you lie like that under oath, don’t you go to jail? Don’t you get fined?” 

He also cited his two children with estranged wife Princess Love, daughter Melody and son Epik, saying they “don’t deserve to grow up thinking their dad did something like revenge [film] or hurt someone on purpose. That’s not the truth, and I’m not going to let that narrative follow them through their lives.”

His mother, Sonja Norwood, also weighed in via Facebook, directing her comments squarely at Jenner. 

“I am no longer going to sit back and watch my son be ‘dogged’ on social media over this matter when Ray J and I, Kris and Kim, and many others know the truth,” she wrote.

“And Kris, momager, you say you did not orchestrate the commercial release of the tape. Then who did?” 

She vowed to support her son “however long it takes” and “all the way to the doorstep of God’s judgment” if necessary.

The legal battle has been escalating for months. 

Kardashian and Jenner sued Ray J over racketeering claims in October 2025, after which Ray J filed his own lawsuit against them in November 2025, alleging they were responsible for releasing the tape, claims he first made publicly in 2022.