Entertainment
President Zardari assents 27th Constitutional Amendment to law after parliament’s approval
- President gives assent to bill on PM’s advice.
- Assent given to bill after nod from both houses.
- Senate greenlights bill after changes by NA.
ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari on Thursday gave assent to the much-debated 27th Constitutional Amendment after approval from the Parliament.
With the president’s signature, the amendment has now officially become part of the Constitution.
“The Constitution (Twenty-Seventh Amendment) Bill, 2025 is assented to, as advised by the Prime Minister [Shehbaz Sharif], at Para-5 of the Summary,” read a notification issued by the President’s House.
The development came moments after the Senate approved the amendment bill following changes approved by the National Assembly a day earlier, amid noisy protests by the opposition.
Federal Minister for Law Azam Nazeer Tarar presented the constitutional amendment bill today, with the tweaks to the draft earlier approved by the upper house. The amendment bill received 64 votes (two-thirds majority in the 96-member House) in favour and four against.
Senate Chairman Yousuf Raza Gilani announced the result, saying: “So the motion is carried by the votes of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the Senate, and consequently, the bill stands passed.”
The much-touted bill was initially presented in the upper house of parliament on Monday and got a nod on the same day. It was then referred to the NA, which approved it with some amendments. Therefore, the legislation was again presented in the Senate today to approve the latest changes.
New tweaks
A day earlier, the National Assembly passed the amendment bill that seeks to change the judicial structure and military command, with 234 votes in favour and four against amid the opposition’s walkout. It included eight amendments — not part of the Senate-approved previous version — aimed at clarifying the chief justice’s position.
The amended bill fine-tunes the structure of the newly established Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), clarifies the titles and ranking of the country’s top judges, and drops several clauses from the Senate-approved draft that had sought to alter oath-related provisions for various constitutional offices.
One of the most significant updates relates to Clause 2, which modifies Article 6(2A) of the Constitution — the article concerning high treason. The National Assembly’s version adds the term “Federal Constitutional Court” after “the”, thereby explicitly including the new court within the ambit of Article 6. The earlier Senate draft had not mentioned the court by name.
The lower house also introduced a fresh Clause 2A to amend Article 10(4), which deals with preventive detention. This revision adds the words “Supreme Court” within the explanatory portion of that article.
Meanwhile, the National Assembly deleted several provisions that had appeared in the Senate’s version. Clauses 4, 19, 51, and 55 — which collectively proposed to modify the wording of oaths administered to a range of constitutional officeholders — were removed from the final text.
Clause 4 had aimed to revise Article 42, under which the president takes the oath of office before the Chief Justice of Pakistan, by substituting the phrase “Chief Justice of Pakistan” with “Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court.”
Likewise, Clause 19 proposed changes to Article 168, which regulates the appointment and oath of the Auditor General of Pakistan. It would have added the term “Supreme Court” before “Chief Justice of Pakistan,” thereby slightly altering the formal oath text.
Clause 51 mirrored this approach for Article 214, which requires the Chief Election Commissioner to take the oath before the Chief Justice. The Senate draft suggested replacing this with “Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court.”
Similarly, Clause 55 sought to amend Article 255(2), which applies in cases where an oath cannot be administered before the designated official. At present, the Chief Justice of Pakistan can nominate another person; the Senate version proposed transferring this authority to the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court.
All of these oath-related proposals were ultimately omitted by the National Assembly.
Another key modification came in Clause 23, which amends Article 176 to include a proviso specifying that, “notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution, the incumbent Chief Justice shall continue to be known as the Chief Justice of Pakistan during his term in office.”
A further addition was made under Clause 56, which now defines the “Chief Justice of Pakistan” as “the senior among the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,” thereby establishing a formal hierarchy between the two judicial heads.
The multi-clause amendment bill required a two-thirds majority in the 336-member House. The ruling coalition easily secured the required votes, with the PML-N holding 125 seats, the PPP 74, the MQM-P 22, the PML-Q four, the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party four, and one seat each held by the PML-Z, the Balochistan Awami Party, and the National Peoples Party.
However, four members from the JUI-F, once a close ally of the ruling PML-N, were the only lawmakers to register their votes against the amendments.
Entertainment
Justice Aminuddin Khan appointed as Constitutional Court’s first Chief Justice
- President gives approval on PM Shehbaz’s advice.
- Justice Khan served as head of constitutional bench.
- Appointment comes after NA approves to SC Procedure Bill.
ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari has approved the appointment of Justice Aminuddin Khan as the first Chief Justice of the newly established Federal Constitutional Court.
President Zardari approved the appointment of Justice Aminuddin on the advice of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, read a statement.
Justice Khan was serving as the head of the now-dissolved constitutional bench.
His appointment comes shortly after the National Assembly passed amendments to the Practice and Procedure Rules, paving the way for the cessation of the Constitutional Benches. The bill was passed by the lower house with a majority.
The changes were part of the government’s reforms in the judicial structure through the much-touted 27th Constitutional Amendment.
The bill was initially presented in the upper house of parliament on Monday and got a nod on the same day. It was then referred to the NA, which approved it with some amendments. Therefore, the legislation was again presented in the Senate today to approve the latest changes.
Supreme Court Practice, Procedure Bill, 2025
In today’s NA session, Law Minister Tarar introduced the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure (Amendment) Bill 2025. The law minister said the amendments were aimed at aligning the laws governing the judiciary with the 27th Amendment.
Under the tweaks, the government removed Clause 191-A related to the top court’s practice and procedure.
Under the new law, the authority to constitute benches for hearing cases has been vested in a three-member committee headed by the chief justice.
The committee will comprise the chief justice of the Supreme Court, the most senior judge, and a third judge nominated by the country’s top jurist.
In the absence of any member, the chief justice may nominate another judge to serve on the committee.
Decisions regarding the formation of benches by the committee will be made by a majority vote.
Who is Justice Khan?
Born to a noble family of a famous lawyer of the time, Advocate Khan Sadiq Muhammad Ahsan in Multan on December 1, 1960, Justice Khan received his education from a local school in the district, according to the Supreme Court’s website.
After completing his secondary school education in the year 1977 in Multan, he secured his Bachelor’s Degree in subjects of Philosophy in the year 1981 and completed his LLB from University Law College, Multan in 1984 and a diploma in Taxation Law.
Justice Khan started practice as a junior with his father and obtained the license to practice in the lower courts in the year 1985. He enrolled as an advocate of the Lahore High Court in 1987.
Some years later, he was enrolled as an Advocate of the Supreme Court in 2001. He joined a local firm in Multan in the year 2001, till elevation remained there.
He practiced in the civil side — mainly from the trial court up to the Supreme Court — and appeared in the Supreme Court in famous and important cases relating to property, pre-emption, and matters of inheritance. These subjects remained the favourite subjects.
In 2011, Justice Khan was appointed to the Lahore High Court bench, where he soon became noted for resolving long-standing civil cases efficiently. Presiding over cases at the Bahawalpur, Multan, and Lahore benches, he contributed a series of judgments that were frequently upheld by the Supreme Court.
He was elevated to the Supreme Court of Pakistan on October 21, 2019. Notable among Justice Khan’s recent judgments is his dissenting note in the July 12 reserved seats verdict. Justice Khan was also part of the nine-member larger bench that reviewed the presidential reference filed against the hanging of former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
He has also made substantial contributions to legal education, serving as an examiner and lecturer at University Law College, Multan. Additionally, he has held roles on the Syndicate of several universities, including the University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore.
Entertainment
Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce keep their wedding venue ‘top secret’
Taylor Swift is reportedly already working on her wedding plans with Travis Kelce.
After reports of the couple opting for low-key wedding, insiders revealed that Swift has decided to go for “bigger bash.”
The source told Radar Online, “Taylor went back and forth, but she’s decided there’s no sense in doing a wedding on the smaller side. There’s no doubt in her mind that this is the only time she’ll tie the knot, so having a bigger bash is a no-brainer.”
“At least 300 guests, including some of the biggest names in entertainment, will be invited,” the insider added.
On the other hand, the sources also revealed that Swift is set to be walked down the aisle by her dad Scott. Meanwhile, Kelce will have his brother Jason Kelce as his best man.
The venue of the event has not been decided but source revealed that couple are planning to keep it “top secret.”
The insider revealed, “Taylor and Travis may not have started actively working with a wedding planner, but she’s already working on the menu, entertainment, lighting, vows and décor.”
Adding, “Guests will likely be flown to the location, which will be top secret and made known to the guests at the last minute.”
“Money isn’t a factor but Taylor wants to get this absolutely right. At the same time, she realizes there will be some slip-ups. She’s braced for a rollercoaster,” the insider added.
This comes amid wedding excitement among fans ever since Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce announced their engagement in August 2025.
Entertainment
New Delhi urges UN body not to restrict imports of animals by Ambani zoo
NEW DELHI: India has urged a UN wildlife trade body not to curb its imports of endangered species, saying it has tightened oversight amid growing allegations of irregular animal shipments to a large private zoo run by Asia’s richest family.
Vantara, a 3,500-acre zoo in Gujarat state run by the philanthropic arm of a conglomerate led by billionaire Mukesh Ambani and his family, has faced allegations of improper imports of certain animals, triggering higher scrutiny from authorities in Germany and the European Union, Reuters has reported.
Indian investigators tasked by the country’s Supreme Court to examine the allegations by non-profit and wildlife groups cleared the sanctuary of any wrongdoing in September, and Vantara has said it complies with all regulations.

However, after visiting the facility in September, the Secretariat of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) issued a report last week asking India to review its procedures.
The report cited discrepancies between exporter and importer trade data and flagged insufficient checks on the origin of some animals.
In a submission to Cites dated November 10, India said any restrictive or punitive measure at this stage would lack legal foundation and risk unsettling the Cites framework, calling the measure “premature and disproportionate”.
The wildlife body’s request “would constitute a de facto suspension or moratorium on lawful” imports, the government said.
The Indian submission, posted on the Cites website ahead of its convention meeting this month, is first being reported by Reuters. It signals new wrangling over Vantara’s imports.
‘Exceptionally high standards’
Cites is a global treaty that regulates trade in endangered plants and animals, or products derived from them, with the aim of ensuring their survival.
While Cites acknowledged last week that Vantara operates facilities of “exceptionally high standards,” it recommended that India halt new import permits for endangered species until safeguards are tightened.
The body warned that without stricter checks, animals sourced from the wild could be misrepresented as captive-bred.

India countered that it “has strengthened inspection and reporting mechanisms for all recognised zoos and rescue facilities” including Vantara. The government also instructed the Central Zoo Authority to ensure enhanced due diligence for all future acquisitions.
Cites and Vantara did not respond to a Reuters request for comment on the Indian government’s submission on Wednesday.
Vantara — home to 2,000 species
Vantara says it is home to some 2,000 species. That includes imported exotic species from South Africa, Venezuela, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, including snakes, tortoises, tigers, cheetahs, giraffes and chimpanzees.
The shipments were recorded with a declared value of $9 million, which Vantara has said reflected freight and insurance charges, not any payments for wildlife.
The Cites report last week noted that “a number of animals come from established commercial breeding facilities, which would normally sell the animals they breed”.
India has mounted a defence, saying in response that the SC panel’s findings showed imports were carried out in compliance with regulations.
-
Business1 week agoGST rationalisation impact: Higher RBI dividend expected to offset revenue shortfall; CareEdge flags tax pressure – The Times of India
-
Tech1 week agoBlood Tests for Alzheimer’s Are Here
-
Sports1 week agoPeat wows in debut as Arizona beats No. 3 Florida
-
Business1 week agoSetback for expatriates? Delhi HC upholds mandatory EPFO membership; what this means for foreign staff – The Times of India
-
Fashion1 week agoBangladesh Bank allows foreign currency-taka swap facility for dealers
-
Politics1 week agoTrump links Republicans’ election setbacks to record US govt shutdown
-
Tech1 week agoZohran Mamdani Just Inherited the NYPD Surveillance State
-
Tech1 week agoThe AI Data Center Boom Is Warping the US Economy
