Business
Budget 2026: Market Leaders Urge Govt To Reduce STT; What’s This, How Does It Impact Investors?
Last Updated:
Budget 2026: Market participants urge Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to reduce the securities transaction tax (STT), especially on cash market transactions.
The Securities Transaction Tax (STT) is a tax levied on the purchase and sale of securities on recognised stock exchanges. (Photo Credit: Freepik)
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday chaired the fourth pre-Budget consultation with the stakeholders from the capital markets to discuss the next Union Budget 2026-27. According to CNBC-TV18 citing sources, market participants urged the government to reduce the securities transaction tax (STT), especially on cash market transactions.
The industry also pushed for reforms in the buyback taxation, calling for the levy to apply only on the profit component of a buyback instead of the entire amount, according to the report. Steps to boost retail participation in the equities markets were also discussed, along with a proposal to raise retail ownership from the current 5% to 8% over time.
Union Minister for Finance & Corporate Affairs Smt. @nsitharaman chairs the fourth Pre-Budget Consultation with the stakeholders from the capital markets in connection with the forthcoming Union Budget 2026-27, in New Delhi, today.The meeting was also attended by Union… pic.twitter.com/RT5LmWZMrI
— Ministry of Finance (@FinMinIndia) November 18, 2025
What’s STT, And How Does It Impact Investors?
The Securities Transaction Tax (STT) is a tax levied on the purchase and sale of securities on recognised stock exchanges. Introduced in 2004, it applies to equity shares, derivatives, equity-oriented mutual fund units, and ETFs. The tax is collected upfront by the exchange and passed on to the government, making compliance automatic and eliminating the need for separate filing.
Current STT Rates, How STT Works
The rate of STT differs depending on the type of transaction:
- For equity delivery trades, STT is charged on both buy and sell sides.
- For intraday and derivatives, it is typically levied only on the sell side.
- Options attract STT on premium, while futures attract it on the contract value.
Because the tax is charged on every trade, the impact compounds for frequent traders and high-volume participants such as proprietary desks, HNIs, and institutions.
As of now, STT on cash-market delivery trades is 0.1 per cent on both the buy and sell side, which is Rs 100 per Rs 1 lakh of trade value when you buy, and another Rs 100 per Rs 1 lakh when you sell. Intraday equity trades attract STT of 0.025 per cent (Rs 25 per Rs 1 lakh) on the sell leg only. In the derivatives segment, the tax is 0.02 per cent on the sale value of equity futures (Rs 20 per Rs 1 lakh) and 0.1 per cent of the option premium on the sale of equity options; if an option is exercised, a separate STT is levied on the intrinsic value at settlement.
How Can Lower STT Benefit Investors?
STT directly raises the cost of trading. Even a small reduction benefits:
- Retail traders, by increasing net return on intraday and F&O trades.
- Derivatives markets, where margins are already tight and volumes are high.
- Liquidity, as lower trading costs can encourage participation.
In the run-up to Budget 2026, this has become a key demand from market leaders looking to keep transaction costs competitive.

Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h…Read More
Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h… Read More
November 18, 2025, 17:54 IST
Read More
Business
As American Girl turns 40, Mattel grapples with bringing dolls into a new era
The original six American Girl historical characters — Kirsten Larson, Samantha Parkington, Molly McIntire, Felicity Merriman, Addy Walker and Josefina Montoya — are displayed at the brand’s flagship store,
Luke Fountain
The flagship American Girl Place at Rockefeller Center in New York City feels frozen in time.
The air smells faintly of vanilla. Young girls dart between doll displays clutching miniature shirts and sequined shoes. Beneath glittering chandeliers, the brand’s iconic red boxes line shelves with museum-like precision. Blow dryers hum in the Doll Salon, and downstairs, pink-frosted cupcakes land on cafe tables before dolls sitting upright in their miniature highchairs.
“It feels timeless,” said Jamie Cygielman, global head of dolls for Mattel, the brand’s parent company.
And yet, behind the scenes, the business of American Girl dolls is not what it once was.
As American Girl turns 40, the brand is navigating more modern challenges: digital competition, shifting play patterns and an aging, more cost-conscious customer base.
“The anniversary is at precarious moment for American Girl and the whole doll industry,” said Jaime Katz, an analyst who covers Mattel for Morningstar. “Kids are more digital in play, and the [American Girl] brand has struggled.”
Around a decade ago, at its peak, American Girl was recording more than $600 million in annual sales. By 2023, annual sales had fallen to roughly $200 million — just a third of prior levels.
While American Girl has shrunk back considerably from the mid-2010s, the brand has more recently posted five consecutive quarters of sales growth — one of the few steady performers inside Mattel’s portfolio.
“Growing off a base that’s down more than 60% doesn’t mean the brand is back. It means it’s stabilizing,” Katz told CNBC.
Earlier this month, Mattel reported fourth-quarter sales of $1.77 billion, falling short of Wall Street expectations after holiday demand came in lighter than projected and heavier discounting weighed on margins. Earnings per share likewise fell short, and Mattel issued a lower-than-expect profit forecast for 2026.
Mattel shares have fallen roughly 19% since the Feb. 10 report and are down about 20% over the past year. Citi and JPMorgan downgraded the stock after the results, too.
“People are watching Mattel this year … waiting with baited breath, because they are spending a ton and it seems unlikely they will be bringing in big profits,” Katz said.
A doll gets her hair washed, brushed and curled at the American Girl Salon at the brand’s flagship store in Rockefeller Center.
Luke Fountain
Longstanding issues
Even before the Covid pandemic forced American Girl to reduce its retail footprint from about 15 stores in 2019 to seven U.S. locations today, the brand faced mounting competition from lower-priced alternatives at big-box retailers like Target’s “Our Generation” line.
A traditional, 18-inch American Girl typically starts at $135, excluding accessories, which can cost as much as $250 for a bunk bed or $275 for a beach cruiser.
The premium price once signaled to many parents a mark of quality and prestige, said Laura Tretter, co-host of the American Girl Women podcast. But in an inflation-conscious environment, it’s narrowed the customer base, Katz said.
“Parents are more selective about discretionary spending right now,” Katz said. “That price point [for an American Girl doll] looks steep to many households.”
Across the toy industry, companies, including competitors like Hasbro, are grappling with how to get kids interested in their products, particularly amid uneven consumer spending and, recently, trade uncertainty.
“There are so many more things today that a kid might be enticed by to play with,” Cygielman told CNBC. “There’s also more competition today, and we saw in the past that tariffs can make an impact on the toy market, but we adapt.”
For many kids, play has migrated toward tablets, gaming subscriptions and short-form video.
“The definition of ‘toy’ has changed,” Katz said. “A iPad or Nintendo Switch competes directly with a doll. There are simply more claims on the same discretionary dollar.”
Overall, Mattel’s doll and preschool categories have faced steady declines for the last three quarters, even after the halo effect of 2023’s “Barbie” movie. Global dolls sales fell 7% in the latest quarter, while the infant, toddler and preschool segment declined 17%.
Struggling sales for American Girl and Mattel’s Fisher Price brand motivated activist investor Barington Capital in 2024 to push the company to streamline its portfolio and improve returns, floating the possibility of selling off the brands.
“American Girl is not a huge part of Mattel’s overall financial profile,” Katz said. “Still though, for investors, the question isn’t whether the brand is beloved. It’s whether it’s strategically essential. It was a drag on profits.”
A girl waits with her new Truly Me doll at the American Girl flagship store in Rockefeller Center.
Luke Fountain
Capitalizing on loyalty
Inside the Rockefeller Center store, those industry headwinds feel distant.
On a recent visit, Lisa Kandoski stood gazing at Molly McIntire — the World War II-era heroine adorned with round wire-rimmed glasses, a navy argyle sweater and braids tied in red ribbons — just like the doll Kandoski said her grandmother put under the Christmas tree in 1990.
“It’s not just a doll,” Kandoski, now 40, told CNBC, her eyes misty. “I sort of realized the impact Molly had on me as a kid. She taught me that you could be brave even when the world was scary, that you could ‘do your part’ even when you were small. She shaped who I am.”
That emotional alchemy has defined American Girl since it disrupted the doll industry in 1986. At the time, the market was dominated by either fashion dolls mirroring adulthood or baby dolls to rehearse motherhood.
The original six American Girl characters — Samantha, Kirsten, Molly, Felicity, Addy and Josefina — came with books tackling subjects rarely taught to young kids like child labor or racism, and all dolls treated girlhood itself as a formative stage.
“American Girl remains a moral compass for many of us,” said Tretter of the American Girl Women podcast. “I love that girls today are still getting positive messages about inclusivity, friendship and going through difficult changes.”
Over time, American Girl expanded into publishing, film and destination retail while diversifying its characters, like with the 2026 “Girl of the Year,” Raquel Reyes, a biracial DJ and animal rescuer who helps run her family’s Kansas City paleta shop.
The brand’s whimsical seriousness became a differentiator and fostered generational loyalty, said Justine Orlovsky-Schnitzler, a folklorist and author of “An American Girl Anthology: Finding Ourselves in the Pleasant Company Universe.”
Look no further than the Doll Hospital where white-coated “doctors” triage patients, fit wheelchairs, perform eye exams, and apply miniature casts for doll owners of all ages.
“That’s why people return,” Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. “You’re not just buying plastic and fabric. You’re revisiting a version of yourself.”
And even though the dolls remain preserved in childhood innocence, their original owners, now grown up, keep returning to American Girl through podcasts, memes, cosplay and fan fiction.
Some pass their dolls down to their children. Others buy new ones for themselves.
“There’s something powerful about handing your daughter the doll you once slept beside,” Orlovsky-Schnitzler said. “It’s also just as comforting to go back to the days of your youth with your own doll.”
American Girl is releasing modernized version of its original six characters for the brand’s 40th anniversary.
Mattel
A growing base
Mattel is battling to convert that nostalgia into broader sales growth.
So‑called “kidult” consumers — adults who buy toys for themselves — have become a coveted demographic. By late 2024, spending on toys for adults 18 and older had surpassed that for children ages 3 to 5, according to market research firm Circana. That cohort continued to drive industry growth in 2025.
Mattel has increasingly sought to monetize its intellectual property through publishing, collectibles, entertainment and digital platforms. In interviews and on calls with investors, Mattel CEO Ynon Kreiz has said that mobile games and interactive platforms are particularly promising areas.
However, “nostalgia must translate into durable revenue and sales growth,” Katz said. Lean too heavily into adult collectors, and a brand risks “aging alongside its original audience.” Pivot too aggressively toward digital trends, and it “risks diluting what made it distinctive.”
Competitors have been doing the same. For instance, Lego continues to release more brick building sets aimed at adults like flowers, art and collectables based on millennial pop culture favorites such as the 1990s TV hit “Friends.”
For American Girl, its 40th anniversary offers a natural inflection point to strike a balance between kid and adult fans, Cygielman said.
American Girl is releasing modernized versions of its original six characters and publishing its first book for adults, centered on Samantha Parkington and set during her adulthood in the 1920s.
At the same time, the brand is working to keep the next generation engaged through contemporary “Girl of the Year” storylines and investments in digital platforms, including YouTube, TikTok and “American Girl World” on Roblox.
“Nostalgia is an entry point, not the endgame,” Cygielman said. “The question is how we extend that emotional equity into new platforms and new audiences.”
Business
Trump tariffs: The uncertainties facing businesses and consumers after tariff changes
Businesses say questions remain after US President Donald Trump announced he will impose global tariffs of 15%.
Source link
Business
‘Pakistan’s citizens pay high taxes but get nothing in return’
New Delhi: Pakistan’s successive governments, both civil and military, have been imposing higher and regressive taxes, pushing the overwhelming majority of citizens towards an unbearably high cost of living, and adding insult to injury, the state provides nothing in terms of welfare and has total apathy towards the economically vulnerable segments of society, an article in the Pakistani media said.
Pakistan’s fiscal crisis is not simply about deficits and numbers. It is about a broken social contract—a growing disconnect between what citizens pay and what they receive. High taxation without welfare delivery has not only failed to generate effective revenue but also has eroded trust, discouraged investment, and weakened the formal economy, the article in the Lahore-based The Friday Times lamented.
Pakistan’s growth failure is often explained through familiar cliches: low productivity, weak exports, lack of innovation, or insufficient entrepreneurship. These are symptoms, not causes. The real problem lies deeper—in a state-engineered cost structure that has made doing business prohibitively expensive and structurally irrational, it said.
The article cites a recent private sector analysis reported by Nikkei Asia, which has quantified what businesses have been saying for years: operating a business in Pakistan is 34 per cent more expensive than in comparable South Asian economies. According to the study conducted by the Pakistan Business Forum (PBF), the excess cost is not incidental or cyclical. It is structural, cumulative, and policy-induced.
“With only 3.4 million effective taxpayers, a mere 4 per cent of the 85.6 million-strong workforce funding the entire state, we have declared war on the middle class. Having forced this captive minority to bridge a multi-trillion rupee deficit while the informal elite remain untouched, we have classified excellence as a taxable offence and transparency as a path to insolvency, the article states,” the article said.
The tragedy is not that Pakistan collects too little (which is a myth in terms of the tax-to-GDP ratio in our peculiar milieu), it is that it taxes irrationally—high taxes on a narrow tax base with low yield and tax expenditure of nearly Rs 5 trillion. Despite successive mini-budgets, super taxes, levies on petroleum, enhanced withholding regimes, and expanded presumptive taxation, the debt-to-tax ratio remains shocking, over 700 per cent, it noted
A microscopic segment of the population — salaried individuals, documented businesses, corporate entities, and compliant exporters — finances a bloated public apparatus. The informal economy thrives, retail and wholesale sectors remain largely undocumented, agriculture as a sector is scarcely taxed, and real estate speculation continues under preferential regimes. Instead of broadening the base, fiscal managers repeatedly resort to increasing rates on the already documented, it added.
-
Entertainment5 days agoQueen Camilla reveals her sister’s connection to Princess Diana
-
Tech6 days agoRakuten Mobile proposal selected for Jaxa space strategy | Computer Weekly
-
Politics5 days agoRamadan moon sighted in Saudi Arabia, other Gulf countries
-
Entertainment5 days agoRobert Duvall, known for his roles in "The Godfather" and "Apocalypse Now," dies at 95
-
Politics5 days agoTarique Rahman Takes Oath as Bangladesh’s Prime Minister Following Decisive BNP Triumph
-
Business5 days agoTax Saving FD: This Simple Investment Can Help You Earn And Save More
-
Tech6 days agoBusinesses may be caught by government proposals to restrict VPN use | Computer Weekly
-
Sports6 days agoUsman Tariq backs Babar and Shaheen ahead of do-or-die Namibia clash
