Fashion
India, France seal treaty revamp giving Paris dividend relief, Delhi tax rights
By
Reuters
Published
December 12, 2025
India and France have struck a deal to revise their 1992 treaty which will halve the tax on dividends paid by Indian units to French parents, potentially saving millions for companies with major operations in the South Asian nation, documents show.
In return, India will get to widen its powers to tax share sales by French investors, and revoke the “most favoured nation” status of France that gave it certain tax advantages, according to confidential Indian government documents reviewed by Reuters.
Bilateral trade between India and France stood at $15 billion last year, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron have been forging warmer ties. The two sides have been working to recast their tax treaty since 2024 to modernise it by adapting global standards on tax transparency.
“The proposed amending protocol will boost flow of investment, technology and personnel between India and France, and will provide tax certainty,” said one of the Indian government documents from August. The new treaty could have implications for large French portfolio investors as well as companies like Capgemini , Accor, Sanofi, Pernod Ricard, Danone, and L’Oreal– all of which have expanded their presence in India in recent years.
A key change is that French companies which hold a stake of more than 10% in any Indian entity will have to pay a 5% tax on the dividends they receive, instead of 10% earlier. For minority French shareholdings of under 10% in Indian companies, however, dividend tax will rise from 10% to 15%.
Many French firms’ Indian units like Capgemini Technology Services India, BNP Paribas Securities India and TotalEnergies Marketing India have declared dividends in the past, their Indian regulatory disclosures show. The Capgemini unit’s dividend stood at $500 million in 2023-24.
France’s tax office said it could not comment for this story given the negotiations are ongoing, while the finance ministry did not respond to Reuters’ queries. India’s foreign and finance ministries also did not respond. Capgemini and Danone declined to comment while the other French companies did not respond to Reuters’ queries.
Currently, India can impose taxes on any French entity’s share sale, but only when it holds more than 10% of an Indian company. The new proposed treaty will remove that threshold.
The new treaty “will provide for full source-based taxation rights in respect of capital gains on equity shares (in India),” said the Indian documents.
France-based foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) own $21 billion worth of shares in Indian companies as of November 2025, a third higher than levels in 2024, Indian share depository data shows.
And more than 40 French companies hold stakes of under 10% in Indian entities, according to an analysis by Indian market intelligence platform Tracxn.
“This will impact French FPIs in India and also French companies holding minority interest in Indian companies. These investments were not subject to tax under the current treaty,” said Riaz Thingna, a partner at Grant Thornton Bharat LLP.
One official familiar with the deliberations told Reuters on condition of anonymity that Indian and French officials have agreed the terms of the new treaty, which will likely be signed in the coming weeks. In New Delhi, the deal is subject to final approval by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s cabinet, according to the documents. Reuters is the first to report the planned changes to India-France treaty.
India has also agreed to France’s demand to limit tax on fees for technical services to cases where a French provider transfers technical know-how, removing most routine consultancy and support services from the scope of India’s tax. “This can help French companies that render services like design consultancy, cybersecurity and market research,” Thingna said.
Differences over how to interpret the so-called most-favoured nation, or MFN, clause were among the main reasons for the renegotiation, the official said. If a country has an MFN clause with India under a signed treaty, it typically starts claiming lower tax rates if New Delhi strikes more favourable tax terms later with another OECD nation. But a landmark Indian Supreme Court decision in late 2023 said countries can’t automatically start doing so, triggering concerns in France.
“This decision led to a sharp deterioration in the legal and economic security of French companies in India. The potential additional tax cost was estimated at 10 billion euros for existing contracts alone,” said the official.
India and France have reached a decision to delete the MFN clause from their treaty which had historically benefitted only France, according to Indian government documents. That was to put an end to disagreements related to its interpretation that have led to “tax uncertainty and protracted litigation,” said one document. Switzerland in January also suspended its application of the MFN clause in its India treaty citing the Supreme Court ruling.
© Thomson Reuters 2025 All rights reserved.
Fashion
More risk from Iran war to Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka: S&P Global
These countries are particularly vulnerable to rising oil prices and potential supply disruptions, it noted in a recent article.
The Iran war poses a greater risk to Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, and to a lesser extent Laos, due to their high dependence on imported energy and limited reserves, S&P Global Ratings said.
These countries are particularly vulnerable to rising oil prices and potential supply disruptions.
All four governments are likely to see significant credit metric deteriorations, if the conflict is prolonged.
In our base case scenario, the war is unlikely to have a material impact on our sovereign ratings on these countries, but a more prolonged price and supply shock in global energy markets could cause more pronounced credit damage.
Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh are showing signs of economic recovery. The three countries have made progress, but sustained high energy prices and potential disruptions to trade and remittances could derail their fragile economies.
S&P Global Ratings believes the higher-income Asia-Pacific (APAC) economies are better placed to weather temporary disruptions to oil and gas supply from the Middle East.
Even where they are highly dependent on imported energy, they generally have more significant oil reserves to meet the shortfall in imports. They also have financial resources to acquire available supply in the spot oil and gas markets to secure needed energy, the rating agency noted.
Lower-income economies in the region do not enjoy such flexibility. The sovereign ratings on some may face pressure if the supply disruption persists longer than our assumptions. Bangladesh, Laos, Pakistan and Sri Lanka are among this group. These economies have one thing in common: a high dependence on imported energy products.
The Middle East war is likely to have a more severe impact on these economies, due to their fuel import bills, and generally weaker fiscal and external reserves to withstand supply shortages and high oil prices.
Among the four sovereigns, Laos is likely to fare better due to the dominance of hydropower in its energy mix.
Bangladesh, with government revenues at only around 9 per cent of gross domestic product, has fewer options to cap electricity and fuel prices through fiscal means.
All four governments are likely to see significant credit metric deteriorations, through inflation and currency channels, if the Middle East conflict is prolonged. However, the impact on the agency’s ratings on these sovereigns may be limited, as the generally low rating levels have already captured a significant share of the risks.
S&P Global Ratings’ base case for the Middle East war assumes that elevated hostilities will persist into early April, with the Strait of Hormuz facing material disruptions.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Fashion
EU Parliament members set conditions for lowering tariffs on US items
On July 27, 2025, in Turnberry, Scotland, US President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a deal on tariff and trade issues, outlined in a joint statement published on August 25.
EU Parliament members have adopted their position on two proposals implementing the tariff aspects of the EU-US Turnberry trade deal.
The texts, if agreed with EU members, will eliminate most tariffs on US industrial goods and offer preferential market access for many US seafood and agricultural goods.
The members strengthened the proposed suspension clause, and introduced ‘sunrise’ and ‘sunset’ clauses.
The texts, if agreed with EU member states, will eliminate most tariffs on US industrial goods and provide preferential market access for a wide range of US seafood and agricultural goods, in line with the commitments made in summer 2025 between the EU and the United States.
The MEPs strengthened the proposed suspension clause, which would allow the tariff preferences with the US to be suspended under a number of conditions.
For instance, the Commission would be able to propose suspending all or some trade preferences if the US were to impose additional tariffs exceeding the agreed 15-per cent ceiling, or any new duties on EU goods, a release from the Parliament said.
The suspension clause could also be activated if the US undermines the objectives of the deal, discriminated against EU economic operators, threatened member states’ territorial integrity, foreign and defence policies, or engaged in economic coercion, it noted.
The MEPs have introduced a ‘sunrise clause’ that means the new tariffs would only become effective if the US respects its commitments. These conditions include the US lowering its tariffs on EU products with a steel and aluminium content below 50 per cent, to a tariff of maximum 15 per cent.
Furthermore, for EU products with a steel and aluminium content of above 50 per cent, unless the US reduces its tariffs to a maximum of 15 per cent, EU tariff preferences for US exports of steel, aluminium and their derivative products would cease to apply six months after the entry into application of the regulation.
The members also agreed on an expiry date for the main regulation on March 31, 2028. This could only be extended via a new legislative proposal, to be submitted following a thorough impact assessment of the effects of the regulation.
The European Commission would be tasked with monitoring the impact of the new rules and would be able to suspend the new tariffs temporarily, should US imports reach a level that could cause serious harm to EU industry.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Fashion
Germany’s ifo index drops to 86.4 in March as uncertainty weighs on
The uncertainty has increased noticeably, with the ongoing conflict involving Iran weighing heavily on corporate confidence. The escalation has effectively stalled hopes of a near-term economic recovery, particularly as energy markets remain volatile, ifo said in a press release.
In the manufacturing sector, sentiment declined after showing improvement in recent months. The drop was driven largely by a significant deterioration in expectations, while firms also reported a less favourable view of their current business situation. Energy-intensive industries were particularly affected, underscoring the pressure from elevated input costs.
Germany’s business sentiment weakened in March, with the ifo business climate index falling to 86.4 from 88.4 amid rising uncertainty and the Iran conflict dampening recovery hopes.
Manufacturing saw a sharp drop in expectations, especially in energy-intensive sectors.
Trade sentiment also declined due to inflation concerns, although current conditions remained relatively stable across sectors.
The trade sector also registered a decline in sentiment, primarily due to a more pessimistic outlook. Concerns over rising inflation among German consumers have led to weaker expectations in both wholesale and retail segments, signalling subdued demand conditions ahead.
Despite the gloomier outlook, businesses in the trade sector reported a slightly improved assessment of their current situation. This suggests that while present activity remains relatively stable, confidence in future performance is deteriorating.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)
-
Entertainment1 week agoVal Kilmer revived 1 year after death through AI
-
Fashion1 week agoUS’ G-III Apparel’s FY26 sales fall 7% to $2.96 bn
-
Business1 week agoBrits cashing in jewellery as gold price hits record high
-
Fashion6 days agoChina’s textile & apparel exports surge 17% to $50 bn in Jan-Feb 2026
-
Business6 days agoFlipkart group CFO to leave co amid IPO plans – The Times of India
-
Sports7 days agoRating Adidas’ 2026 World Cup away shirts: Argentina, Spain, Mexico and more
-
Business1 week agoVideo: The Effects of High Oil Prices
-
Sports7 days agoAmerican Conference Commissioner Tim Pernetti thanks Trump for Army-Navy game executive order
