Connect with us

Business

Deepening Pak-Indonesia ties | The Express Tribune

Published

on

Deepening Pak-Indonesia ties | The Express Tribune


With supportive tariffs, electronics manufacturing can emerge as major pillar of Indonesia’s investment footprint

President of Indonesia Prabowo Subianto and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif Photo: Radio Pakistan


ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan and Indonesia are steadily shaping one of South and Southeast Asia’s most consequential, yet under-reported, economic relationships. What began as a tariff-centred arrangement has matured into a broader commercial partnership driven by commodity flows, rising business-to-business engagement, and an expanding agenda for investment cooperation.

Recent figures underline this momentum. Bilateral trade reached $4.2 billion in 2024, and early 2025 numbers continue to climb. Between January and September 2025, trade volumes touched $2.92 billion, up from $2.69 billion during the same period of last year. This steady rise reflects both the resilience of commodity flows and the gradual expansion of non-traditional product lines entering each other’s markets. Yet the structural imbalance persists – Indonesia remains the dominant exporter, while Pakistan’s outbound shipments largely remain confined to a narrow set of labour-intensive items.

Palm oil remains the anchor of this asymmetry. As one of the world’s largest consumers of imported edible oils, Pakistan depends heavily on Indonesian supply – a reality that shapes pricing, availability, and strategic planning for domestic refiners and food manufacturers. The Indonesian Palm Oil Association reaffirmed in late 2024 and again in 2025 that Indonesia will continue prioritising Pakistan’s edible oil requirements. This stable flow is a valuable assurance for Pakistan, though vulnerability to biodiesel mandates, domestic Indonesian policy shifts, and global price cycles remains.

The policy framework for bilateral trade is robust on paper but under-leveraged in practice. The Indonesia-Pakistan Preferential Trade Agreement (IP-PTA) provides a predictable tariff structure, yet businesses on both sides note that the agreement has not kept pace with evolving supply chain realities. Rules of origin, digital documentation, sanitary and phytosanitary alignment, and services-sector protocols require updating. In short, the scaffolding exists; the operational architecture needs modernisation.

On the export diversification front, opportunities remain substantial but under-exploited. Pakistani exporters identify textiles, home linen, surgical instruments, rice, leather, and processed foods as areas with strong potential in Indonesia’s consumer-driven market. Conversely, Indonesian firms see Pakistan as an attractive destination for electronics, machinery, processed foods, and – significantly – investments in logistics, refining, and distribution infrastructure. Joint ventures in edible oil refining, port-side storage terminals, and downstream food processing plants have been actively discussed at recent business forums.

Business-to-business engagement is deepening faster than government-led initiatives. Delegations from Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad continue to visit Jakarta, Bandung, and Surabaya for sector-specific roundtables and trade fairs. Chambers of commerce on both sides are pushing for SME-focused engagement, with a growing emphasis on using Indonesia as a gateway to Asean and encouraging Indonesian firms to view Pakistan as an entry point to South Asia and Central Asia. This bottom-up momentum is likely to be a major driver of bilateral expansion in the years ahead.

The constraints are equally real. Pakistan’s exporters face high freight costs, fragmented market intelligence, and complex Indonesian non-tariff standards. Indonesian suppliers, meanwhile, must navigate Pakistan’s volatile exchange conditions and inconsistent regulatory signals. Domestic Indonesian policies – particularly biodiesel blending requirements and temporary export curbs – periodically disrupt Pakistan’s edible oil supply chain. For both sides, these frictions complicate long-term planning.

To strengthen and stabilise the partnership, a series of practical measures merit serious consideration. Upgrading the IP-PTA into a broader Free Trade Agreement would be a critical first step, incorporating services, digital trade, clearer investment rules, and mutual recognition of standards. Securing long-term edible oil supply contracts, supported by dedicated storage and port-side infrastructure in Pakistan, would help cushion policy shocks. Joint ventures in refining and downstream processing could add value locally while reducing dollar-based import exposure.

Equally important would be establishing bilateral certification and standards alignment centres to help SMEs meet regulatory requirements more easily. A dedicated Pakistan-Indonesia trade portal could provide real-time tariff data, logistics options, and a digital dispute resolution window – the essential tools for smaller exporters. An investment facilitation desk, jointly staffed by the two governments and linked to export credit agencies, could accelerate approvals and de-risk early-stage projects.

Recent diplomatic and business activity suggests that both sides recognise the importance of moving in this direction. In 2024 and 2025, the Pakistan-Indonesia Business Council and Indonesian diplomatic missions in Karachi engaged in active discussions around agriculture, manufacturing, energy, halal products, and logistics investment. There is also renewed advocacy for finalising a comprehensive trade agreement and introducing direct flights to reduce logistics costs and expand business mobility. These developments signal that investment is becoming a central theme of the bilateral agenda.

A promising new area is Pakistan’s fast-growing electronic appliances market. Demand for air-conditioners, refrigerators, fans, small home appliances, and LED TVs is expanding at a pace that now requires fresh global investment. Indonesian manufacturers – already competitive in mid-range electronics – see Pakistan as an attractive destination due to its large consumer base, improving localisation policies, and lower production costs compared to many Asean peers. Early conversations between Indonesian appliance makers and Pakistani industry groups indicate serious interest in assembling and eventually manufacturing select product lines inside Pakistan.

If realised, Indonesian investment in this sector could have significant spillovers. Local assembly partnerships would reduce import dependence, stabilise prices, and generate jobs across the electrical, metal works, plastic moulding, and logistics value chains. With supportive tariff policies and streamlined approvals, electronics manufacturing could emerge as one of the next major pillars of Indonesia’s investment footprint in Pakistan.

The writer is a Mechanical Engineer



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Frontier Airlines replaces CEO Barry Biffle with carrier’s president

Published

on

Frontier Airlines replaces CEO Barry Biffle with carrier’s president


Barry Biffle, president and chief executive officer Frontier Airlines, prior to a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.

Kent Nishimura | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Frontier Group Holdings, the parent company of budget airline Frontier, replaced its nearly decade-long CEO, Barry Biffle, with the carrier’s president, the company said Monday.

James Dempsey is taking over as interim CEO effective immediately.

“Jimmy has been an invaluable member of Frontier’s senior leadership team for more than 10 years and has played an instrumental role in the company’s evolution and growth during that time,” Board Chair Bill Franke said in a news release. “We believe Jimmy is uniquely qualified to guide our airline into the future.”

Biffle and Frontier declined to comment. Frontier said Biffle would stay on in an “advisory capacity” until the end of the year.

Biffle had been Frontier’s chief executive since March 2016 and has a more than three-decade career in airlines, including at the country’s longtime top budget carrier, Spirit, which is currently in its second bankruptcy in less than a year.

Frontier lost $190 million in the first nine months of the year, compared with net income of $31 million a year earlier.

Frontier had been in talks to merge with Spirit several times since early 2022, but none have solidified thus far.

Smaller budget airlines like Frontier have struggled to produce steady profits in the wake of the pandemic, as higher labor and other costs, as well as consumer tastes shifting to international travel and higher-end seats, and an oversupply of domestic capacity, hurt financial results.

Biffle led some of Frontier’s initiatives in recent months to cater to customers seeking more space on board.

Frontier’s shares are down nearly 19% so far this year, while the NYSE Arca Airline Index, which tracks mostly U.S. airlines, is up more than 6%.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

RBI Holds 879.6 Tonnes Of Gold As Prices Surge Amid Global Uncertainty

Published

on

RBI Holds 879.6 Tonnes Of Gold As Prices Surge Amid Global Uncertainty


New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India, as on March 31 this year, held 879.58 metric tonnes of gold as compared to 822.10 metric tonnes as on March 31, 2024, reflecting an increase of 57.48 metric tonnes, the Parliament was informed on Monday.

These gold holdings contribute to strengthening confidence in the Indian rupee and the overall external stability of the economy, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary told the Lok Sabha in a reply to a question.

To questions about the surge in gold and silver prices in the domestic market, he said that domestic prices of precious metals like gold and silver are primarily determined by their prevailing international prices (in US dollar terms), the exchange rate of the Indian rupee against the US dollar and applicable tariffs.

Add Zee News as a Preferred Source


The recent surge in prices is largely attributable to heightened geopolitical tensions and uncertainty over global growth, which have boosted safe-haven demand, including substantial gold purchases by central banks and major institutions worldwide.

The minister said that the recent rally in gold prices may have differential effects across states or population groups, depending upon the degree of socio-cultural and economic reliance on these precious metals.

“They serve a dual role — not only as a consumption item but also as an investment avenue, as they are considered safe assets for hedging against uncertainties,” he said.

Thus, an increase in the price of gold or silver positively influences household wealth, as the notional value of existing gold or silver holdings appreciates, he added. Chaudhary further stated that the prices of precious metals are determined by the market, and the government is not involved in the price fixation.

However, the government, as a relief measure for consumers, lowered customs duty on gold imports from 15 to 6 per cent in July 2024.

The government introduced measures such as the Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS), Gold exchange‑traded funds (ETFs) and Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme to reduce the demand for physical gold and to mobilise idle domestic gold, so that part of the demand is met from local stocks rather than fresh imports, thereby reducing external vulnerability and price pressures.

“The RBI and government regulation of bullion imports through nominated agencies, banks and refineries improve traceability, reduce grey‑market channels and help domestic prices more smoothly track global benchmarks rather than react to shortages or speculative spikes,” the minister said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Mercosur hurdle: French objections and farm protests freeze EU trade deal; Brussels faces credibility test – The Times of India

Published

on

Mercosur hurdle: French objections and farm protests freeze EU trade deal; Brussels faces credibility test – The Times of India


France’s last-minute opposition and mounting farmer protests are threatening to derail the European Union’s long-delayed free-trade agreement with South America’s Mercosur bloc, raising fresh doubts over whether the pact can be signed this year, AP reported.Angry European farmers, fearing cheaper agricultural imports and tougher competition, have taken to the streets in Brussels just as EU negotiators were hoping to close a deal that has taken nearly 25 years to negotiate. The agreement involves the 27-country EU and five Mercosur nations — Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia — and would gradually remove duties on most goods traded between the two blocs over 15 years.The accord, agreed in principle a year ago, still needs approval from all EU member states and the European Parliament. EU officials had planned for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa to sign the deal in Brazil on December 20, but growing resistance now threatens that timeline.French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said on Sunday that the current deal was “unacceptable” and that the “conditions have not been met” for EU leaders to authorise its signing this week, effectively seeking a delay that could push the decision to 2026 or later. While acknowledging steps taken by the European Commission to protect farmers and tighten food safety checks, Lecornu said France remained unconvinced.Poland, Austria, the Netherlands and France fear Mercosur exporters could undercut EU farmers who operate under stricter labour, environmental and sanitary rules, including pesticide restrictions, analysts told AP. France has been pressing for “mirror clauses” that would require Mercosur producers to meet the same standards — demands that have not been fully accepted.Alicia Gracia-Herrero, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based Bruegel Institute, said the standoff exposed limits to the EU’s political unity and global influence. “If we cannot get this done even with (US President Donald) Trump’s pressure, what can you expect from the EU?” she said, warning that further delays could undermine Brussels’ credibility in talks with partners such as Indonesia and India.The deal comes at a sensitive time for the EU, which has been seeking to diversify trade ties after Trump imposed tariffs of 15% on most EU imports earlier this year, AP reported. Brussels sees the Mercosur pact as a strategic counterweight to aggressive trade tactics by both the US and China.European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said the bloc is pushing to conclude the agreement by year-end, arguing it would strengthen the EU’s geopolitical standing. “We’re talking about bringing together two of the world’s biggest trading blocs,” he said, citing cooperation on climate, economic security and reform of the global rules-based order.Agriculture remains central to the dispute. The EU exported 235.4 billion euros ($272 billion) worth of agricultural goods in 2024, and critics warn the deal could hurt local dairy and beef producers and cause environmental damage. Supporters counter that it would save businesses about $4.26 billion in duties annually and open markets for products ranging from French wine to German pharmaceuticals and Brazilian minerals.To calm opposition, the European Commission has proposed safeguards, including mechanisms allowing farmers to trigger investigations if Mercosur imports are priced at least 10% below EU products, tighter border inspections for banned pesticides, and reforms to distribute agricultural subsidies more equitably.These measures, however, have failed to ease French concerns or quell farmer anger. Agricultural unions are again planning demonstrations in Brussels as EU leaders meet later this week, underlining the political risks surrounding a deal that was once seen as a cornerstone of the bloc’s trade strategy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending