Connect with us

Business

How investment firms of the ultra-rich partner with PE funds to find top deals and save on fees

Published

on

How investment firms of the ultra-rich partner with PE funds to find top deals and save on fees


A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

Many investment firms of ultra-rich families are keen to buy stakes in private companies directly rather than through private equity funds, which come with fees and less control.

Cutting out the middleman can come at a steep cost, though, and requires hiring an in-house investment team to source proprietary deals.

But family offices have found a way to have their cake and eat it too by backing PE funds while investing directly alongside them.

Under these kind of deals, family offices make large fund commitments in exchange for the right to invest additional capital on their own to individual portfolio companies. They typically pay reduced management or performance fees on their co-investments, and the PE fund handles the burden of sourcing and due diligence.

These co-investing arrangements have grown in popularity over the past decade, lawyers to family offices and fund managers told Inside Wealth. This trend has been fueled by family offices seeking out more direct investments and PE firms facing challenges raising capital.

“The ability to share the burden, share the costs and, in some cases, rely on the private equity funds to source, [perform due] diligence, execute and manage those investments, is extremely attractive to families who want that exposure to direct investing, but don’t necessarily want to build all that on their own balance sheet,” said Scott Beach, who chairs Day Pitney’s corporate and business law department and the family office practice.

By teaming up with private equity funds, family offices are able to get stakes in companies they would not be able to buy outright, according to Michael Schwamm, partner at Duane Morris and co-chair of its family office practice.

“Private equity funds will almost always outbid family offices, at least in the middle market,” he said. “With the vast majority of families we deal with, most of them recognize they will never be highest bidder in the room.”

PE sponsors have become more willing to negotiate co-investment rights as a way to induce family offices to allocate to the fund, according to Kevin Shmelzer, co-leader of Morgan Lewis’ private equity practice and family office strategic initiative. For instance, sponsors may give family offices the right to buy new shares to maintain their ownership percentage when more shares are issued, he said. PE firms may also offer more detailed financial or operational information on portfolio companies than a fund investors would typically get.

However, while family offices are investing alongside PE funds, they are still minority investors. They do not get the same governance or operational rights that they would get if they bought the company themselves.

“These family offices, are not in the room with the PE sponsors, negotiating with the seller,” Shmelzer said. “At the end of the day, the family office is still at the whims of the PE fund.”

Most importantly, family offices rarely have the right to hold onto their equity and prevent the PE firm from exiting. This can be a serious drawback for family offices, which are known for investing for the long term.

“That can create some tension on the back end of a relationship,” Beach said. “The PE firm is going to want to deliver to the buyer preferably 100% of the equity so they want the right to drag along the family office.”

But in turn, family offices are able to deploy capital faster than they would if they relied solely on finding their own deals or allocating to funds, according to Doug Macauley, a partner for the private client practice at investment advisory Cambridge Associates.

Macauley expects family offices to allocate more to co-investing as private markets generally get more attractive. Some family clients have as much as 15% to 20% of their portfolio in co-investments, he said.

He cautioned that families need to watch their liquidity and be selective with fund managers and portfolio companies. When funds invite co-investors to join a deal, it may indicate a lack of conviction by the sponsor or a risky asset, he said.

“I don’t think the rationale to co-invest is that you’re going to get a better return because it’s a co-investment. You might get a better return because the fees are lower,” Macauley said. “It doesn’t make it a bad deal, but it doesn’t make it a better deal than everything else in their fund either.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial

Published

on

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial



A woman has been awarded $6m in a verdict that could have implications for hundreds of other cases in the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Tesco and Sainsbury’s non-loyalty brand prices more expensive than Waitrose

Published

on

Tesco and Sainsbury’s non-loyalty brand prices more expensive than Waitrose



Tesco and Sainsbury’s customers are paying more than Waitrose shoppers for some common branded groceries if they are not using a loyalty scheme, analysis by Which? has found.

The watchdog compared a list of 245 branded items including Heinz, Nescafe and Mr Kipling in February, finding that it was, on average, most expensive for customers at Sainsbury’s and Tesco who were not using the Nectar or Clubcard loyalty schemes.

Which? acknowledged that most shoppers are part of a membership scheme, but said some may be unwilling to sign up to loyalty cards for reasons such as data privacy, while others have no choice because of eligibility criteria.

Tesco customers who are under 18 can not sign up to a Clubcard, although the supermarket has announced it will review this before the end of the year.

The Which? list of items was most expensive at Sainsbury’s for non-Nectar members at £942.66 – 14% more than the cheapest retailer in the study Asda, which cost £823.58.

Tesco followed behind Sainsbury’s, with its non-Clubcard price totalling 11% more than Asda at £916.56.

Which? said it did not include discounters Aldi and Lidl in the study because they did not stock a sufficiently large range of branded goods.

Both Tesco and Sainsbury’s – the UK’s two largest grocers – were more expensive for non-members of their loyalty schemes than Waitrose, which cost £899.05.

Waitrose was 9% more expensive than Asda and emerged as a “more competitive option”, Which? said.

Which? found several products that were cheaper at Waitrose, including Amoy Straight To Wok Noodles, which were on average £1.25 at both Waitrose and Morrisons but most expensive at Sainsbury’s and Tesco without a loyalty card at an average of £2.15 – a 72% difference.

Sea salt and vinegar Ryvita Thins were also cheapest on average at Waitrose at £1.25, but shoppers buying this product at Morrisons, Tesco, and Sainsbury’s without a loyalty card would all have paid an average of £2.30, making them 84% more expensive.

For customers with a Clubcard, Which? found that the same list of groceries at Tesco fell to £837.43 on average – just 2% more expensive than Asda.

Which? found various instances of branded products where the Tesco Clubcard price was the cheapest on average.

Carex Hand Wash was 95p at Tesco with a Clubcard but £1.70 at Waitrose where it was the most expensive.

Another example showed Kellogg’s Crunchy Nut cornflakes was £1.55 on average in February, while the highest average price among the supermarkets was at Waitrose where it cost £2.50.

Which? said the figures showed the “dramatic price gulf” created by loyalty pricing.

In one example at Tesco, Which? found a 200ml bottle of L’Oreal Paris Elvive Bond Repair Shampoo was double the price on average for shoppers without a Clubcard – at £13 compared to £6.50.

The higher price was also found at both Morrisons and Sainsbury’s.

Which? found that a 200g jar of Kenco Smooth coffee cost shoppers at Tesco and Sainsbury’s without a loyalty card £8.35 – the highest price on the market.

In contrast, the same jar was £7 at Waitrose and £6.32 at Asda, on average.

Similarly, Waitrose had the cheapest average price for Nescafe Gold Blend at £6.25, while non-members at Sainsbury’s were asked to pay £8.35.

Meanwhile, Which? found customers who used a Nectar card at Sainsbury’s could expect to pay only 3% more than Asda at £848.56 for the entire list of items.

Morrisons averaged 4% more expensive than Asda when using a More card and 5% more expensive without one.

Ocado was also 5% more expensive than Asda.

Which? retail editor Reena Sewraz said: “Our analysis reveals a shocking truth and shows the impact loyalty schemes have had on grocery pricing.

“Branded favourites can actually be cheaper at Waitrose than at the UK’s biggest supermarkets for shoppers who don’t use a loyalty card – something that would have seemed unthinkable until a few years ago.

“If you’ve got your heart set on specific brands, your best bet is to shop around, keep a close eye on the unit price, and stock up whenever you see a good deal – otherwise, you’re likely to end up paying way over the odds.

“While loyalty cards definitely offer some savings, if you don’t use one you’re better off heading to Asda, where the pricing is usually cheaper on a range of branded goods.”

A Sainsbury’s spokesman said: “We have invested over £1 billion in recent years to help keep prices low and we know more customers are choosing to do their shop at Sainsbury’s.

“We are committed to helping customers access great quality at lower prices and remain focused on offering outstanding value across thousands of products through our Aldi price match scheme, Nectar prices, Your Nectar Prices and our own-brand value lines.”

A spokesman for Tesco said: “It’s no secret that Tesco Clubcard unlocks exceptional savings for the 24 million UK households who have one.

“More than 80% of our sales are made with a Clubcard – but it’s just one of the ways our customers get great value.

“Though everyday low prices we keep prices consistently low on thousands of branded products, and our Aldi price match ensures shoppers can be confident they’re getting competitive prices.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

MLB faces a historic shift as potential lockout, media rights and other league changes loom

Published

on

MLB faces a historic shift as potential lockout, media rights and other league changes loom


Thursday’s Opening Day may be the calm before the storm for Major League Baseball.

The league’s collective bargaining agreement with its players expires at the end of this season. Owners, with the commissioner’s backing, are almost sure to push for a salary cap (which would likely come with a salary floor to get players to the negotiating table).

MLB owners have never been able to get a cap passed by the players union. It’s unclear if the end of the 2026 season will lead to a different result, but MLB Players Association Interim Executive Director Bruce Meyer told ESPN last month he expects a lockout is “all but guaranteed.”

In addition to the CBA’s expiration, there are major shifts underway for baseball media rights. One-third of the league’s teams didn’t have local TV deals in place for this season until this week. 

Nine MLB teams – the Washington Nationals, Seattle Mariners, Milwaukee Brewers, St. Louis Cardinals, Miami Marlins, Tampa Bay Rays, Cincinnati Reds, Kansas City Royals, and Detroit Tigers – announced Wednesday their brand new MLB-operated team channels will be carried by DirecTV.

Most of those teams had previously been part of Main Street Sports (previously Diamond Sports Group), which operates FanDuel Sports Networks (previously Bally Sports). That entity has been teetering with liquidation, and the teams terminated their contracts with the company due to missed payments earlier this year.

Get the CNBC Sport newsletter directly to your inbox

The CNBC Sport newsletter with Alex Sherman brings you the biggest news and exclusive interviews from the worlds of sports business and media, delivered weekly to your inbox.

Subscribe here to get access today.

A 10th team, the Atlanta Braves, is launching a new network called BravesVision. The Braves and Charter’s Spectrum announced a multiyear distribution agreement earlier this week

MLB ideally wants the rights to all 30 teams in its control by the end of the 2028 season so that it can sell the in-market local games as a national package to a streamer. That would become the modern replacement to regional sports networks, and it would likely be a new, coveted package for streaming services such as ESPN and Amazon Prime Video.

Also at the end of the 2028 season, MLB’s national media rights for all of its packages will expire, allowing the league to redistribute games to its partners and potentially select new ones. 

NBC, ESPN, Fox and a combined CBS/Turner have dominated national rights for the past few decades.

“The key in media negotiations now is having all of your rights available,” MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred told me last year. “If you have all of your content – all of your playoffs, all of your regular season – available, there will be buyers, and I’m confident there will be buyers at a higher price for us.”

Manfred has even floated the idea of expanding to 32 teams and realigning the league geographically, upending or even eliminating the American and National leagues that have existed for more than 100 years. 

Soaring TV ratings

Rob Manfred, Commissioner of the MLB, attends the annual Allen and Co. Sun Valley Media and Technology Conference at the Sun Valley Resort in Sun Valley, Idaho, U.S., on July 9, 2025.

David A. Grogan | CNBC

More than 50 million people in the U.S., Canada and Japan watched Game Seven of the World Series last year – the most-watched baseball game in 34 years. MLB recently wrapped up the World Baseball Classic – a global preseason tournament – which captured nearly 11 million viewers on Fox and Fox Deportes for its final game.

MLB team valuations rose 13% from last year. The average MLB team is now worth $2.95 billion, according to CNBC Sport data.

Still, the profitability of the league is in far worse shape than it is for the NFL, NBA and NHL, according to CNBC’s calculations. In 2025, MLB’s 30 teams had an EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization — margin of under 2%. Team average revenue was $426 million with average EBITDA of $7 million, including non-MLB ballpark events. In contrast, the comparable margin for the NFL was 20%; the NBA, 21% and the NHL, 22%, according to CNBC’s most recent valuations.

The new CBA at the end of this season could be the first significant step toward a very different MLB. But, similar to the WNBA, which announced its new CBA earlier this week, MLB must ensure negotiations to get a new labor agreement don’t jeopardize a wave of positive momentum.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending