Connect with us

Tech

UK government unveils gigabit broadband upgrade tracker | Computer Weekly

Published

on

UK government unveils gigabit broadband upgrade tracker | Computer Weekly


As the steady pace of improvement continues in the UK’s national fixed broadband infrastructure, the UK government has launched an online address checker allowing businesses to see whether they are due to receive a gigabit broadband upgrade, especially giving rural communities clearer visibility over roll-out plans for faster connectivity.

The launch comes as the UK government aims to accelerate broadband roll-out in harder-to-reach areas, claiming more than 750 homes and businesses are now gaining access to gigabit-capable broadband each day through the Project Gigabit scheme.

The £5bn Project Gigabit programme was introduced in 2021 with the aim of accelerating the UK’s recovery from Covid-19, boosting high-growth sectors such as tech and the creative industries, and levelling up the country by spreading wealth and creating jobs through offering access to gigabit broadband across the UK.

At its launch, the previous UK government said the scheme would prioritise areas with slow connections that would otherwise be left behind in commercial broadband companies’ plans, as well as give rural communities access to the fastest internet on the market, helping to grow the economy.

Project Gigabit specifically targets places typically regarded as too expensive for commercial providers to reach in their build and which would otherwise be left with poor digital infrastructure. It was designed from the outset to help meet the growing demand for reliable connectivity, stimulating local rural economies and reducing regional disparities by enabling remote working and attracting new businesses.  

One of the first acts by the new Labour administration that was elected in July 2024 was to reconfirm the original objectives to build a broadband infrastructure that would see 85% of the UK have gigabit-capable connectivity by the end of 2025 and full nationwide coverage by 2030.

A month later, the UK government announced that it was investing up to £800m to modernise broadband infrastructure in rural areas of England, Scotland and Wales and hit the Project Gigabit in a deployment contract with leading UK broadband provider Openreach.

Explaining in May 2025 why it was ramping up the broadband access scheme, the UK government said hundreds of thousands of rural homes and businesses were still struggling to fulfil basic online tasks due to outdated infrastructure, making it necessary to obtain major internet speed upgrades and narrow the existing digital divide.

The upgrade plan is expected to drive productivity gains, support more than 620,000 people back into the workforce and enable more than one million to work from home, contributing an additional £19bn annually. Openreach noted in May 2025 that research by the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) shows that full-fibre broadband could deliver a £66bn boost to the UK economy by 2029.

The tracker service allows users to enter their postcode to see if their property is included in the Project Gigabit programme or in commercial fibre deployments. The government said improved connectivity will help rural communities access digital services, support remote working and boost local economic growth. Faster broadband is also expected to support sectors such as agriculture, tourism and small businesses in remote areas.

Commenting on the launch of the new service, Jennifer Holmes, CEO of the London Internet Exchange, said: “The continued roll-out of gigabit-capable broadband and improved mobile coverage is an important step in strengthening the UK’s digital infrastructure. As demand for online services continues to grow, the networks that underpin the internet must be resilient, efficient and capable of supporting increasing volumes of data.

“Strong infrastructure is essential not only for everyday connectivity, but also for supporting innovation, economic growth and the UK’s wider digital ambitions. Investment in faster and more reliable connectivity will help ensure that businesses, public services and communities can fully participate in an increasingly digital economy.”

Elizabeth Anderson, CEO of the UK’s  Digital Poverty Alliance, added: “The  roll-out … is a welcome step towards closing long-standing connectivity gaps across the UK. However, infrastructure alone will not solve digital poverty. Around 19 million people in the UK experience some form of digital exclusion, and government figures show that around 1.6 million people are still living entirely offline.

“We estimate around two million people lack connectivity due to affordability and gigabit broadband is frequently out of reach due to higher costs. While faster networks are important, they only make a difference if people can afford to use them.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Bose Brings Back Its ‘Lifestyle’ Branding With New Speakers for the Home

Published

on

Bose Brings Back Its ‘Lifestyle’ Branding With New Speakers for the Home


Bose has three new speakers to spice up your home listening. The company’s new “Lifestyle Collection”—designed with a snazzy fabric-wrapped grille and gentle curves—includes the Lifestyle Ultra Speaker, Lifestyle Ultra Subwoofer, and Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar. All of them can be connected to multiple units and third-party speakers via AirPlay and Google Cast for a better multi-room audio experience.

These audio products mark a “reentering” into the home speaker space for the company, bringing back the iconic Lifestyle lineup that originally debuted in 1990—known for simplicity and ease of use—which Bose subsequently discontinued in 2022.

To no surprise, Bose says the Ultra Soundbar is the “best soundbar we have ever made,” and that the Ultra Speaker might even be one of the company’s best in its storied history. The wireless speaker starts at $299, with a $349 limited-edition model in Driftwood Sand; the soundbar costs $1,099, and the subwoofer is $899. They’re available for preorder now and go on sale May 15.

Bose Luxury Ultra Speaker in Driftwood Sand.

Courtesy of Bose

These Wi-Fi-enabled speakers support AirPlay, Google Cast, Spotify Connect, and, uniquely, are the first to integrate with Alexa+ (in the US only), allowing you to ask Amazon’s chatbot to play music through the speakers via voice commands. There’s also Bluetooth support, and even an auxiliary input for connecting the Ultra Speaker to a turntable.

You can group two Lifestyle Ultra Speakers into a stereo system in the Bose app, or group them all together for a home theater system. Sadly, if you hoped to use it as a surround system with your existing Bose soundbar, the company says it’s only backward compatible with the Bass Module 700. And with the new Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar, it can only be used as a wired connection. For multi-room audio, the company has passed those grouping duties to the Google Home app for Google Cast technology, or Apple’s AirPlay for iOS users. Speaking of the app, there’s a redesigned onboarding process that purportedly makes setting up all of these speakers a breeze.

On the audio front, the Ultra Speaker notably features an upward-firing driver for Dolby Atmos–like spatial audio, along with two front-facing drivers. (It doesn’t seem to support Dolby Atmos Music at this time.) The company is also touting its CleanBass technology, which pairs Bose’s QuietPort acoustic opening with the woofer for deep sound that performs better than its size suggests, though we’ll have to hear it for ourselves to see if it lives up to Bose’s claims.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The AI Correction Will Not Be Evenly Distributed | Computer Weekly

Published

on

The AI Correction Will Not Be Evenly Distributed | Computer Weekly


When the numbers coming out of the biggest AI companies get reported, the coverage is almost always the same: revenue up, growth accelerating, the boom is real. What almost nobody asks is what kind of revenue it is. In AI right now, that question is being skipped entirely. It’s the only one that matters.

Any investor who has sat across from a founder in a pitch meeting knows that headline revenue is just the starting point. The real questions come after: Is this B2B or B2C? Is it contracted or casual? Does the use case suggest land-and-expand potential, or is this customer already at their ceiling? Is the product embedded in something the customer cannot easily stop doing, or is it a nice-to-have competing with shrinking budgets and fading attention? These questions are table stakes at the startup level. They have almost completely vanished from the conversation about the companies now defining the AI landscape.

Take Anthropic and OpenAI. By most coverage, OpenAI is the dominant player – larger revenue, broader adoption, a product that has become genuinely cultural. That may all be true. But when you ask what colour that revenue is, the picture gets more complicated. OpenAI’s CFO confirmed that roughly 75% of its revenue comes from consumer subscriptions. ChatGPT has somewhere in the range of 800 million weekly active users – and only about 5% are paying subscribers. That is an enormous base resting on consumer willingness to pay for something most people still access for free, competing with curiosity, with free alternatives, and with whatever captures attention next. Consumer subscriptions cancel quietly and they cancel fast.

Anthropic’s revenue is built on integration

Anthropic’s revenue is smaller. But look at where it comes from. Approximately 80% comes from enterprise customers. Over 500 companies now spend more than $1 million annually on Claude. Eight of the Fortune 10 are customers. Claude Code, a tool embedded directly into developer workflows, went from zero to $2.5 billion in annualized revenue in roughly nine months. The result is a monetization gap that rarely gets discussed: Anthropic generates roughly $211 per monthly user while OpenAI generates roughly $25 per weekly user. That is not a small difference. It reflects what happens when revenue is built on integration rather than attention.

When a business has embedded AI into its compliance process, its coding infrastructure, or its data operations, switching is not a casual decision. It is an engineering project, a procurement process, and an organizational headache. That friction is not a bug; it is the entire point. It is what makes a dollar of Anthropic’s revenue structurally different from a dollar of consumer subscription revenue, regardless of the size of the number attached to it.

Lessons from SaaS

This is not a new lesson. The 2022 SaaS correction made it visible at a category level. When pressure hit, it did not hit evenly. Public SaaS multiples fell an average of 67% from their 2021 peak – but within that average, some companies saw multiples fall 90% while infrastructure and security tools largely held. The companies that took the worst hits were not necessarily bad businesses with bad products. They had the wrong colour revenue for a pressure environment. The market treated them as equivalent until the moment it didn’t.

AI will produce extreme divison

AI will produce a more extreme version of that divergence. Two reasons. First, the hype cycle is larger than anything SaaS produced – the speed of adoption, the scale of investment, and the cultural footprint of these products have created a wider gap between perceived value and embedded value than we have seen before. Second, the consumer-versus-enterprise variance is wider. SaaS was predominantly a business product. AI has gone consumer in a way SaaS never fully did, which means a much larger share of current AI revenue sits in the category most vulnerable to pressure. When that pressure arrives, the disaggregation will be severe and it will not look like a uniform correction. It will look like two completely different industries reporting results in the same earnings cycle.

The boom-or-bust framing that dominates AI coverage is the wrong question. Some of this is a boom. Some of it is not. The difference will not show up in total revenue figures until it is too late to be useful information. The question worth asking now is simpler and harder: which revenue survives pressure? That answer depends entirely on use case, contract structure, and how deeply the tool is actually embedded in how people and businesses work. We do not yet have a clean public way to measure it. That is exactly the problem.

Judah Taub is the founder and managing partner of Hetz Ventures, an Israeli early-stage venture capital firm specializing in cybersecurity, data, and AI infrastructure.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

He Couldn’t Land a Job Interview. Was AI to Blame?

Published

on

He Couldn’t Land a Job Interview. Was AI to Blame?



Armed with some Python and a white-hot sense of injustice, one medical student spent six months trying to figure out whether an algorithm trashed his job application.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending