Connect with us

Business

Govt mulls Rs31b spending on wheat stocks | The Express Tribune

Published

on

Govt mulls Rs31b spending on wheat stocks | The Express Tribune


ECC approves food ministry’s proposal of building strategic reserves amid regional situation


ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan’s economic managers have underscored the need for maintaining strategic reserves of wheat with an expenditure of Rs31 billion to ward off the threat posed by the Middle East conflict to the country’s food security.

In addition to building the wheat buffer, they have also proposed incentives for wheat farmers to encourage them to invest in local plantations and reduce the need for imports.

During discussions in a recent meeting of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC), the Ministry of National Food Security and Research presented the wheat stock position in provinces and at the federal level and called for procuring the commodity to keep strategic reserves to meet future consumption needs, particularly in line with the National Wheat Policy.

The economic decision-making body highlighted the significance of achieving the objectives of the roadmap by purchasing additional wheat stocks. The food ministry stressed the importance of maintaining reserves based on best practices, including incentivising farmers to invest in wheat cultivation and avoiding imports.

The committee asked the food ministry to prioritise the utilisation of wheat available with the Pakistan Agricultural Storage and Supplies Corporation (Passco) and commercial reserves before considering imports. It approved the procurement of one million metric tons of wheat to maintain federal strategic reserves, including the annual requirement of Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B), through transparent competitive bidding among private sector stakeholders.

The food ministry briefed the ECC that wheat, being a staple food, plays a critical role in national food security, rural livelihoods and economic stability. It is cultivated on an average area of 22 million acres with average annual production of 28-30 million metric tons.

The ministry mentioned that, in pursuance of the wheat policy, the federal and provincial governments had been mandated to procure 6.5 million tons for strategic reserves through private sector participation. The federal government will procure 1.5 million tons, including the annual requirement of AJK and G-B, while the remaining 4.75 million tons will be procured by the provincial governments. Punjab will procure 2.5 million tons, Sindh one million tons, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa 0.75 million tons and Balochistan 0.5 million tons.

The food ministry said that in order to ensure a transparent, competitive and market-driven procurement process, it had prepared the Request for Proposal (RFP) by adopting the single-stage, single-envelope procedure. It was noted that since there was no policy framework for that process, the RFP terms and conditions would provide the necessary framework.

The quantity of 1.5 million tons will be divided into 150 lots of 10,000 metric tons each and will be geographically dispersed. A bidder can bid for a minimum of one lot and a maximum of 25 lots, except where there are lots that have received no bids. Bidders must have a minimum annual turnover of Rs1 billion, calculated as an average over the last three financial years. Each bid will comprise procurement services, storage services and associated financial costs.

If any lot receives no bid, the ministry may, without initiating fresh bidding, offer such lots to successful bidders subject to their operational capacity and the maximum cap of 25 lots per bidder. Among the successful bidders who express the willingness and have not reached the maximum cap of 25 lots, these lots will be allocated based on the lowest evaluated rate.

The ECC approved the procurement of one million metric tons of wheat for federal strategic reserves, including the annual requirement of AJK and G-B, through a transparent competitive bidding process. Regarding funding of Rs31 billion, it gave the directive to hold detailed consultations between the food ministry and the Finance Division with input from the coordinator to the PM on food security for refining the proposal and resubmission to the ECC by mid-May.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Market recap: 6 of top-10 most-valued firms add Rs 74,111 crore; Reliance biggest winner

Published

on

Market recap: 6 of top-10 most-valued firms add Rs 74,111 crore; Reliance biggest winner


The combined market valuation of six of India’s top-10 most valued companies rose by Rs 74,111.57 crore last week, with Reliance Industries emerging as the biggest gainer. The rally came during a volatile trading week in which the BSE Sensex advanced 177.36 points, or 0.23%.According to news agency ANI, Reliance Industries added Rs 24,696.89 crore to its valuation, taking its total market capitalisation to Rs 18,33,117.70 crore.Tata Consultancy Services saw its valuation jump by Rs 19,338.68 crore to Rs 8,38,401.33 crore, while ICICI Bank added Rs 14,515.93 crore to reach a market capitalisation of Rs 9,06,901.32 crore.The valuation of Life Insurance Corporation of India climbed Rs 9,076.37 crore to Rs 5,14,443.69 crore.Meanwhile, Bajaj Finance gained Rs 3,797.83 crore, taking its valuation to Rs 5,70,515.57 crore, while Larsen & Toubro added Rs 2,685.87 crore to Rs 5,40,228.21 crore.

Airtel, HUL among laggards

On the losing side, Bharti Airtel witnessed the sharpest erosion in market value, losing Rs 20,229.67 crore to settle at Rs 11,40,295.49 crore.The market valuation of Hindustan Unilever declined by Rs 16,212.18 crore to Rs 5,17,380 crore, while State Bank of India lost Rs 12,784.4 crore in valuation to Rs 8,76,077.92 crore.HDFC Bank also saw its market capitalisation dip by Rs 2,094.35 crore to Rs 11,79,974.90 crore.Reliance Industries retained its position as India’s most valued company, followed by HDFC Bank, Bharti Airtel, ICICI Bank, State Bank of India, TCS, Bajaj Finance, Larsen & Toubro, Hindustan Unilever and LIC.

Markets end volatile week with modest gains

Ajit Mishra, SVP, research at Religare Broking Ltd, said markets ended the week with marginal gains amid a “highly volatile and range-bound trading environment”.“Benchmark indices witnessed sharp intraday swings throughout the week, driven by persistent rupee weakness, mixed global cues, sectoral rotation, and continued uncertainty around inflation and interest rates,” he said, as quoted by ANI.Benchmark indices recovered on Friday, with the Sensex closing 231.99 points higher at 75,415.35 and the NSE Nifty rising 64.60 points to settle at 23,719.30.Analysts cited optimism surrounding possible progress in US-Iran peace negotiations and easing Middle East tensions as factors supporting market sentiment.Vinod Nair, head of research at Geojit Investments, was quoted by news agency PTI as saying that domestic markets traded with a “mild positive bias” due to buying at lower levels and constructive global cues.“Globally, the AI investment theme remained the primary driver, while domestically, financial stocks led the gains,” he said.Brent crude prices climbed 2.3% to $104.7 per barrel, while foreign institutional investors (FIIs) sold equities worth Rs 1,891.21 crore in the previous session.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why essentials like eggs, bread and milk cost so much more now

Published

on

Why essentials like eggs, bread and milk cost so much more now



Six supermarket brand eggs cost £1 in 2022. How much are they now, why have they gone up, and is anyone profiteering?



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Red tape, not bad luck, hits capital | The Express Tribune

Published

on

Red tape, not bad luck, hits capital | The Express Tribune



LAHORE:

Imagine a country sitting at the crossroads of South Asia and Central Asia, with a population of 250 million, abundant natural resources, and a GDP exceeding $450 billion, yet struggling to convince even its own businesspeople to invest at home.

That is Pakistan’s continued uncomfortable reality in 2026, and the way things are going, the business community believes that even after elevating higher, in the past one year due to perfect diplomacy, the government needs to take strict action against those civil servants and state officials, who still try to slow the pace of overseas and local investment as well as development work, which has jeopardised the growth of the country.

“Foreign direct investment (FDI) in Pakistan fell 31% during the first 10 months of financial year 2025-26, with total inflows coming in at $1.409 billion against $2.035 billion during the same period a year earlier,” said Mian Shafqat Ali, Founder of the Pakistan Industrial and Traders Association Front. He raised alarm over what he calls a deepening investment crisis, warning that both local and foreign investment has dipped to one of its lowest levels in recent memory.

He added that the root cause of this decline is not a lack of opportunity, but a system that actively discourages investors at every step. “The real obstacle in the way of investment is the layers upon layers of bureaucratic hurdles. Without removing these barriers, the dream of increasing investment cannot be realised.”

He noted that investors, both domestic and foreign, are deeply sensitive to the environment they operate in, and Pakistan’s current legal and regulatory framework, unpredictable energy policies, fluctuating exchange rates, and ad hoc government decisions have created an atmosphere of uncertainty that keeps capital away.

The business community by and large thinks that once the US-Israel-Iran conflict is settled fully, Pakistan can have better opportunities; however they simultaneously say that to grab those opportunities, “we need to settle our systems, which are dominated by anti-investment and anti-business culture”.

There are systems, which welcome and protect overseas as well as local investment; those societies belong to the first world or second world; “unfortunately here in Pakistan we are still unable to manage the smooth flow of Chinese investments, whom we call ‘iron brothers’,” said Bilal Hanif, a Lahore-based businessman.

“We keep building new institutions and launching new investment windows, but nothing changes on the ground because the real problem is structural. A foreign investor does not just look at your pitch; he looks at your court system, your tax regime, and whether rules will be the same two years from now. On all these counts, we are falling short,” he said.

Pakistan has averaged barely $2 billion in annual FDI over the past 26 years; a figure that expert bodies like the Pakistan Business Council say should be at least $12 billion per year, or roughly 3% of GDP, to meet basic development benchmarks. Meanwhile, regional competitors such as India, Vietnam, Indonesia, and even smaller economies like Bangladesh have consistently attracted far greater inflows, benefiting from predictable regulations, stronger investor protection, and long-term policy continuity.

Mian Shafqat Ali was clear that the failure does not rest with any single institution. He said the problem is not the fault of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) or any other body, but rather the deeply entrenched systems that make doing business in Pakistan unnecessarily complicated.

“Until policymakers are willing to make difficult structural and political decisions, investment will remain weak, no matter how many new institutions are created,” he warned.

What investors consistently ask for is not complicated; it is political stability, simple regulations, and confidence that policies of today will not be reversed tomorrow. Pakistan, unfortunately, has struggled to offer any of these in a reliable manner. Frequent political disruptions, leadership changes, and policy discontinuity have created uncertainty that discourages long-term capital, and the capital does not avoid Pakistan because of a lack of opportunity, it avoids uncertainty.

“Government should move beyond announcements and focus on real structural reforms, overhauling the regulatory framework, simplifying business registration processes, ensuring energy availability at competitive rates and most importantly, providing a stable and consistent policy environment as without fixing the foundation, everything else is meaningless,” Ali added.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending