Tech
Identity and AI: Questions of data security, trust and control | Computer Weekly
AI-driven identity solutions are often presented as the grown-up answer to modern access control: smarter verification, less friction, better security, happier users. In principle, yes. In practice, they also drag a fairly hefty suitcase of compliance, privacy and ethical questions in behind them.
The first issue is compliance. Identity is not a side topic in enterprise environments. It sits right in the middle of security, governance, risk and accountability. Once AI is involved in deciding who gets access, who is challenged, who is flagged as suspicious, or who is denied entry altogether, that stops being just a technical control and quickly becomes a governance matter. Many of these solutions rely on large volumes of personal data, sometimes including biometrics, behavioural analysis, device data, location information and patterns of use. That means organisations need to be crystal clear on lawful basis, necessity, proportionality, retention and oversight. In other words, they need to know not just that the tool can do something, but that they should be doing it at all. Like knowing that an iPhone is a tool, not the conversation.
Privacy is where things get a bit soupy. AI identity systems are usually marketed on the basis that they can take more signals into account and make better decisions as a result. That sounds great, and sometimes it is. But it also means more collection, more processing and more potential intrusion. The line between intelligent authentication and overreach can get thin very quickly. Data gathered to confirm identity can easily become data used to monitor behaviour, profile staff, track habits or support broader surveillance if the guardrails are poor. That is where trust starts to wobble. Enterprises need privacy by design, proper impact assessments, transparent notices and disciplined boundaries around how identity data is used. Just because a system can infer more does not mean it should. It’s a potential minefield that should be navigated mindfully and with integrity.
That brings us to is the ethical question, which is where the machine gets a little too smug for its own good. AI models are not neutral simply because they are mathematical. If an identity tool has been trained on incomplete or biased data, it may perform unevenly across different groups. That can lead to higher false rejections, repeated challenges for legitimate users, or decisions that disproportionately affect certain individuals. In a business setting, that is not just inconvenient. It can be unfair, exclusionary and potentially discriminatory. Organisations cannot simply deploy these systems and hope the algorithm behaves itself. That’s magical thinking.
Explainability matters too. If someone is denied access, locked out of a process or flagged as high risk, there must be a way to explain that decision in plain language and to challenge it if necessary. Black box identity decisions are a poor fit for any organisation trying to claim strong governance. Human review, escalation routes and clear accountability all need to be part of the design.
The real implication is that AI-driven identity should never be treated as a shiny bolt-on security upgrade. It is part of a much bigger picture involving data protection, user trust, accountability and control. Used well, it can strengthen resilience and reduce fraud. Used badly, it can create exactly the kind of opaque, over-engineered risk that good governance is supposed to prevent. The smart approach is not to resist the technology, but to govern it properly from the outset. Because in identity, as in most things, clever without controlled is just chaos in a smarter outfit.
Tech
‘Uncanny Valley’: Iran’s Threats on US Tech, Trump’s Plans for Midterms, and Polymarket’s Pop-up Flop
Kate Knibbs: So, you went twice?
Makena Kelly: Yes, Kate. I went twice.
Kate Knibbs: I missed that.
Zoë Schiffer: Wait, is the Pentagon Pizza thing a joke about the pizza predicting the war?
Makena Kelly: Yeah.
Zoë Schiffer: Oh, my God.
Makena Kelly: Because they had these Pentagon pizza trackers up. When I returned the second night, yes, I came back the second night. Everything was working for the most part. There were still some screens that were turned off, but I never saw any actual Bloomberg terminals. There were some monitory Bloomberg type terminal things that it looked like Polymarket had developed themselves, but the real $50,000 Bloomberg terminal was nowhere to be found. And yeah, the second night, again, it was mostly people looking to gawk at the event, except I did find a couple of people who placed some bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. One was named William, and he said he was a member of the military, wouldn’t give me his full name. And he last year got involved in this for the first time by putting in, I think, all of his tax return into Oklahoma City sports betting.
Makena Kelly, archival audio: So, you used Kalshi?
William, archival audio: Yes.
Makena Kelly, archival audio: When did you first start using the service?
William, archival audio: Probably when I got my tax return back.
Makena Kelly, archival audio: OK.
William, archival audio: So, I filed my taxes pretty early and I was like, “Oh, sweet. I got my tax return. What am I going to do with it?” So, I was like, “I’m going to just put it on Kalshi.”
Makena Kelly: He said that he goes up and down 100 dollars, but he hasn’t made any major winnings. Some of the stuff that we’ve heard. Some people making crazy insider bets making millions and millions of dollars. This is just a guy who was interested in this and just plays it for fun, it sounds like.
Brian Barrett: Kate, what do you see when you see a pop-up like this and Polymarket trying to—is it an attempt to legitimize itself to just a marketing stunt? And how does it tie into what you’re seeing with these companies anyway, that there’s the explosive growth that they’ve got trying to reach out to so many people and getting so many people hooked on what they’re offering?
Kate Knibbs: I mean, this particular event definitely seems like a very bald effort to woo DC-based journalists, if nothing else. One thing that Makena said sort of encapsulates what’s going on right now, the thing about the guys in the Palantir hoodies. So, I think it was the same week that this bar opened. Polymarket announced a partnership with Palantir and Palantir is helping them protect the integrity of their sports market. So, Palantir is going to be basically attempting to help Polymarket catch insider traders and market manipulators in all the sports games, which is kind of wild. I actually asked Polymarket last week whether they had any other deals with Palantir when I was trying to get them to say anything about whether they were investigating the Iran bets that have been raising a lot of eyebrows. And they said that Palantir was only helping them with sports, which I thought was freaking weird. And it speaks to how they’re rapidly expanding, but doing so in this really messy ad hoc way that doesn’t really make a lot of sense. Because I was like, “If you’re going to get Palantir involved, why wouldn’t you have them do this geopolitical stuff instead of March Madness?” Yeah, wild, wild times.
Tech
The Google Pixel 10 Is $150 Off
On the hunt for a new Android smartphone? Amazon currently has the 128GB Pixel 10 in Obsidian marked down to just $649, $150 off its usual price. It’s one of our favorite Android smartphones, particularly for users who take a lot of photos.
The biggest advantage to a Pixel over other Android smartphones is that you get the latest features from Google as soon as they’re available, often before other brands implement them. There are special camera modes that let you stitch together multiple group shots, or help you improve the angle and lighting with helpful tips. You’ll also find novel features like real-time translations and spam call screening, and Google even figured out how to let you AirDrop files with iOS users.
All of that functionality is powered by some of the better hardware you can find in an Android phone. The Pixel 10 sports a 6.3-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate for gaming and smoother scrolling. The Tensor G5 is a step up from the 10a’s Tensor G4 chip, and sports 12 GB of memory for better performance. They even support Qi2 wireless charging, making them compatible with existing MagSafe accessories.
While the Pixel 10a will satisfy most folks, the Pixel 10 offers a variety of upgrades over the more basic model, most of which pertain to the cameras and image processing. The rear camera has a proper 5X optical zoom, letting you nail those nature shots without scaring the wildlife, and the front camera sports auto-focus, which will make your big group selfies less of a headache. Oddly, the battery is actually a bit smaller in the Pixel 10, but neither disappointed us when it came to longevity.
If you’re sold on the Pixel 10, I spotted the discounted $649 price point for the 128 GB model in both Obsidian and Lemongrass, or $749 in Indigo. If you need more storage, the Obsidian and Frost colors were both marked down to $749 for the upgraded 256 GB version. If you’re wondering what other Android smartphones we like, make sure to check out our in-depth guide with picks from Google, Samsung, and OnePlus.
Tech
OpenAI Buys Some Positive News
OpenAI announced Thursday that it had acquired the online business talk show TBPN for an undisclosed sum. The move comes as OpenAI struggles with its public image, which has taken a significant hit in recent months.
Since launching in 2024, TBPN has risen in popularity among Silicon Valley circles by offering a daily live stream about the technology industry that’s seen as more tech-friendly than traditional outlets. The show’s two hosts, John Coogan and Jordi Hays, offer real-time commentary on breaking news, cycle through viral social media posts, and interview executives from companies including Meta, Salesforce, Palantir and OpenAI. It’s become especially popular among OpenAI staff and other AI researchers, many of whom are addicted to the social media platform X.
It’s hard to understand how a media startup fits into OpenAI’s core businesses selling ChatGPT, Codex, and a new super app the company is developing to consumers and enterprises. Last month, OpenAI’s CEO of Applications, Fidji Simo, told staff in an all hands meeting that the company needed to cancel its side projects and refocus around its core businesses.
In a memo to staff announcing the acquisition, Simo said the typical communications playbook does not apply to OpenAI. “We’re not a typical company,” she said in the memo, which was also published as a blog. “We’re driving a really big technological shift. And with the mission of bringing AGI to the world comes a responsibility to help create a space for a real, constructive conversation about the changes AI creates—with builders and people using the technology at the center.”
TBPN is a small business compared to OpenAI. The media firm says it generated $5 million in ad revenue last year, and was on track to make more than $30 million in revenue in 2026, according to the The Wall Street Journal. The show reportedly reaches around 70,000 viewers per episode across a variety of platforms. A source close to OpenAI says the company doesn’t expect TBPN to contribute financially to the business, though it will help with OpenAI’s communications strategy.
OpenAI has fallen under increased public scrutiny in recent months. After the company signed a deal with the Department of Defense in February, Anthropic’s Claude surged in downloads and claimed the top spot among Apple’s free apps. OpenAI’s leaders are also dealing with a growing QuitGPT movement which is made up of people who vow to never use OpenAI’s products. OpenAI President Greg Brockman cited AI’s popularity issues as a core reason for his increased political spending.
The acquisition makes OpenAI the latest Silicon Valley player to try owning and operating a news business. In recent decades, there have been several notable examples of technology leaders purchasing media firms, including Jeff Bezos buying The Washington Post, Marc Benioff buying Time Magazine, and Robinhood buying the newsletter company MarketSnacks. In each case, the acquisitions raised immediate questions about whether the outlets would remain truly independent. In her memo, Simo told staff that TBPN will retain editorial independence.
“TBPN is my favorite tech show. We want them to keep that going and for them to do what they do so well,” said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in a post on X. “I don’t expect them to go any easier on us, [and I] am sure I’ll do my part to help enable that with occasional stupid decisions.”
OpenAI said TBPN will continue to “run their programming, choose their guests, and make their own editorial decisions,” according to Simo’s memo The company also said that TBPN will report directly to OpenAI’s VP of global affairs, Chris Lehane. WIRED previously reported how an economic research team under Lehane had struggled to report on AI’s negative impacts on the economy.
-
Fashion1 week agoHo Chi Minh City bizs adjust production plans, seek new supply chains
-
Fashion1 week agoJapan’s apparel imports rise 22.9% to $2 bn in February 2026
-
Fashion1 week agoIndia’s Gen Z to drive half of fashion market by 2030: Reedseer
-
Entertainment1 week agoAndrew holds breath as King Charles plans bombshell move amid probe
-
Business6 days agoHow do you spot a fake online review?
-
Business1 week agoCo-op boss quits after ‘toxic culture’ claims reported by BBC
-
Entertainment6 days agoLee Sang-bo dies at 45: Funeral details revealed
-
Fashion6 days agoChina rolls out tariff cuts on Congo imports from April 1



