Connect with us

Business

Aston Martin in profit warning amid US tariff woes

Published

on

Aston Martin in profit warning amid US tariff woes


Getty Images Aston Martin Vantage car driving on a country roadGetty Images

The firm released a statement on Monday saying it had launched an immediate review into costs

Aston Martin Lagonda has warned of further losses as it faces US tariffs, and also raised fears over supply chain pressures from Jaguar Land Rover’s cyber-attack fallout.

The Warwickshire luxury carmaker said it was now braced for underlying losses greater than £110m, which was the bottom of the previous expected range.

The announcement marks the second downgrade to its outlook since early July.

Aston Martin bosses said they had launched an “immediate” review of costs and spending in light of tougher trading.

It sent shares tumbling by as much as 11% at one point during trading on Monday.

The firm said wholesale volumes were set to drop by a mid-high single-digit percentage due to “heightened challenges in the global macroeconomic environment, including the ongoing impact of tariffs” – with a weaker performance being seen across North America and Asia.

Getty Images Silver coloured Aston Martin Valhalla supercar on a trade stand with plants in the backgroundGetty Images

Aston Martin hopes its Valhalla model will revive its fortunes

In a statement on Monday, the firm said: “The global macroeconomic environment facing the industry remains challenging.

“This includes uncertainties over the economic impact from US tariffs and the implementation of the quota mechanism, changes to China’s ultra-luxury car taxes and the increased potential for supply chain pressures, particularly following the recent cyber incident at a major UK automotive manufacturer.”

Tariff quotas

The group has seen shares come under pressure this year over concerns about the impact of Donald Trump’s tariff war.

The firm limited shipments to the US in the second quarter after the president imposed a 25% tariff on car imports in April.

It then resumed shipments in June as the UK reached an agreement with the US for a lower 10% tariff on UK-made cars for the first 100,000 vehicles per manufacturer.

Anything above that threshold will be hit with a 27.5% duty.

But Aston Martin said the tariffs were still having an impact on performance.

It said: “For UK automotive manufacturers, the introduction of a US tariff quota mechanism adds a further degree of complexity and limits the group’s ability to accurately forecast for this financial year end and, potentially, quarterly from 2026 onwards.

“The group continues to engage with both the US and UK governments to secure greater clarity and certainty.”

Aston Martin said while “positive dialogue” had been achieved with the US government directly, the firm was still seeking proactive support from the UK.

It hopes that profitability and free cash flow will “materially” improve in 2025-26 as it cuts costs and ramps up delayed production of its Valhalla model – the group’s first plug-in hybrid mid-engine supercar.

In February, before tariffs were announced, Aston Martin cut 170 jobs after seeing losses widen by a fifth last year and debts pile up.

Its results for the first half of 2025 showed core profitability (EBIT) slumped to £121m, compared with £99.8m in the same period of 2024.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

‘Zero faith’: If Trump’s tariffs are overturned, how easily will businesses get back billions in refunds? It could be a nightmare! – The Times of India

Published

on

‘Zero faith’: If Trump’s tariffs are overturned, how easily will businesses get back billions in refunds? It could be a nightmare! – The Times of India


Trump has valued the tariff income, declaring it has restored national wealth. (AI image)

Donald Trump administration’s tariff collections – running into billions of dollars – is threatened in case the Supreme Court decides to strike down the US President’s tariff policies. Trump himself has warned that any decision against his tariff policies would spell disaster.Businesses, which have paid huge amounts in the last few months due to country-based tariffs, believe that getting back refunds in case the tariffs are deemed illegal by the Supreme Court, would be a nightmare.

Tariff refund nightmare

To begin with, this would create administrative challenges involving extensive refund processing. If these nation-specific tariffs are ruled unlawful, the United States might need to return most of the $165 billion in customs duties collected in the current fiscal year to the businesses that paid them, according to a Bloomberg report.However, obtaining refunds will be complicated; reimbursements typically come via paper cheques through a slow process, and whilst the government could expedite mass repayments, experts believe this is doubtful.“The customs authorities won’t simply distribute refunds to importers freely,” Lynlee Brown, global trade partner at EY was quoted as saying by Bloomberg.The uncertainty surrounding the potential refund process exemplifies the broader confusion that businesses and financial markets have experienced since the implementation of Trump’s tariff policies.Several importers have abandoned expectations of receiving reimbursements, even if the court rules in their favour.“I have zero faith we’d ever get anything. Just zero,” expressed Harley Sitner, who owns Peace Vans, a Seattle-based classic camper van repair and restoration business.

More than half of tariff revenue at risk of refund

More than half of tariff revenue at risk of refund

Sitner told Bloomberg that the unpredictability of Trump’s trade policies is more problematic than the actual tariff payments, which he views as irretrievable expenses. Following unexpected tariff charges ranging from $221 to $17,000, sometimes arriving months after receiving goods, Sitner has discontinued importing international inventory.“Just yesterday we got a small shipment from Germany worth $2,324 and it came with a $1,164 tariff charge. We can’t back out,” Sitner stated.Various customs brokers report being approached by Wall Street organisations interested in purchasing rights to potential refunds, offering importers an opportunity to recover a portion of their possible entitlements.The significant increase in customs duties – a rise of $95 billion compared to the previous year – is primarily attributed to Trump’s import tariffs affecting multiple economies, which became effective in August, as analysed by Bloomberg Economics. Two lower judicial bodies have ruled that Trump lacked the authority to implement tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.Should the Supreme Court uphold these earlier decisions, approximately 50% of the customs duties collected by the United States this year could be subject to refund. However, the process for businesses to reclaim these funds remains uncertain. Despite the government shutdown, tariff-related operations have largely continued uninterrupted.The United States Customs and Border Protection regularly processes refunds for importers in cases of overpayment or regulatory changes, with the Treasury Department issuing the payments. However, this reimbursement process is not automatically initiated.In line with statutory requirements, importers and their customs brokers must adhere to precise timelines and documentation procedures to maintain eligibility for refunds. Currently, the system predominantly relies on paper cheques for disbursement.Despite the Treasury’s directive from the Trump administration to discontinue cheque payments by September 30, the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) only initiated its first phase last Tuesday in what will be an extended implementation process. The system’s completion before any court decision appears unlikely without accelerated efforts.Tom Gould, a customs consultant from Seattle, suggests that potential refunds might result in “it’s possible that we’ll see millions and millions of paper checks being mailed out because each shipment, each customs entry, will have its own.”The process could be problematic. According to the Bloomberg report, due to regulatory requirements, customs refunds are exclusively sent to sanctioned domestic banks in dollars, requiring foreign importers to receive their refunds through international postal services or utilise a broker’s account within the United States.Worryingly, there has been a series of stolen cheque incidents in recent years. According to Gould, refund cheques were intercepted during postal delivery and traded on the dark web before being encashed.The administration possesses various options to expedite refunds, including automated processing of claims using existing system data. CBP has previously implemented refund rationalisation measures.Customs officials developed a framework to facilitate refund disbursement for items eligible under duty exemptions through the Generalised System of Preferences. Despite Congress allowing this programme to expire multiple times since the 1980s, it was subsequently renewed retroactively.Importers would input specific codes indicating GSP eligibility, even during programme inactivity. Gould suggested that the agency could similarly analyse internal data to identify IEEPA code-related tariff payments.Alternative procedures exist, though they might be complex. Legal experts indicate individual importers could be compelled to initiate separate legal proceedings to recover their funds.The authorities might require submission of protests or post-summary amendments, accompanied by comprehensive payment documentation and importer records, despite the government already possessing this information.EY’s Brown recommends importers maintain complete records from CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment platform, documenting entry dates and deadlines systematically to enhance refund possibilities.Despite potential simplified procedures by CBP, the complex nature of financial transactions within supply chains presents additional challenges.For shipments managed through commercial carriers like FedEx Corp. and United Parcel Service Inc., who handle documentation and tariff payments, CBP would direct refunds to the registered importer – the courier service rather than the goods’ owner.This arrangement could generate complications between the actual importers and courier services, creating another obstacle for businesses seeking reimbursement.

Tariff collections: Trump admin may not let go easily

Trump has valued the tariff income, declaring it has restored national wealth. He and his supporters have suggested various uses for these funds, including reducing national debt, supporting struggling agricultural sectors, and potentially distributing payment cheques to US citizens.This suggests the Trump administration will be reluctant to release these funds if the tariffs are invalidated, and they are likely to swiftly implement new levies using alternative legal frameworks should this occur. The Supreme Court is scheduled to review arguments in November regarding this matter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Top 10 Richest Indian Professional Managers In 2025

Published

on

Top 10 Richest Indian Professional Managers In 2025


Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trendsstock updatestax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

House-buying reform plan aims to cut costs and time

Published

on

House-buying reform plan aims to cut costs and time


Charlotte EdwardsBusiness reporter, BBC News

Getty Images Young couple sat in a living room surrounded by cardboard boxesGetty Images

Plans for a major reform of the house-buying system, which aim to cut costs, reduce delays and halve failed sales, have been unveiled by the government.

Under the new proposals, sellers and estate agents will be legally required to provide key information about a property up front, and the option of binding contracts could stop either party walking away late in the process.

The government estimates the overhaul could save first-time buyers an average of £710 and shave four weeks off the time it takes to complete a typical property deal.

But sellers at the end of a chain may face increased initial costs of £310 and, while broadly welcoming the move, housing experts say more detail is needed.

Previous attempts at mandating sellers to offer key information – through home information packs – were scrapped owing to complaints that it discouraged or delayed sellers in putting homes on the market.

The broader issue of housing affordability remains a block for many potential property purchasers, especially first-time buyers.

And many home buyers would not benefit from the estimated savings, as the calculations include the average cost of failed transactions that some might not experience.

Collapsing chains

There has long been frustration in England and Wales over the length and jeopardy of the house-buying process for buyers and sellers, such as slow paperwork, ‘gazumping’ — when successful buyers are outbid at the last minute — and broken chains.

Typically in England it takes about six months.

The 12-week consultation on these plans draws on other jurisdictions, including the Scottish system where there is more upfront information and earlier binding contracts making the process quicker.

This will include being up front about the condition of the home, any leasehold costs, and details of property chains.

The government says this transparency will reduce the risk of deals collapsing late in the process and improve confidence among buyers, particularly those purchasing a home for the first time.

It says those in the middle of a chain could also potentially gain a net saving of £400 as a result of the increased costs from selling being outweighed by lower buying expenses, as well as more competition in the sector.

Housing minister Miatta Fahnbulleh told BBC Breakfast the plans to get sellers to arrange the house survey means buyers would get all the information “upfront”.

“You know what you’re getting, you don’t have this thing that every time, for example, there is a new buyer because the transaction failed and you need to do another survey,” she said.

“In Scotland, where they do this, you see that it drives down the number of failed transactions.”

Housing is a devolved issue but the department said it wanted views from across the UK, and the coverage of the proposals would depend on how the measures were finalised.

Contracts and fines

The proposals suggest a “long-term” option of binding contracts is intended to halve the number of failed transactions, which currently cost the UK economy an estimated £1.5bn a year.

Anyone who breaks the contract could face fines, but no firm details are yet provided on how this would work, and what would be considered as justified reasons to leave the contract.

Surveys suggest about a third of buyers had experienced gazumping in the last 10 years.

The reforms also aim to boost professional standards across the housing sector.

A new mandatory Code of Practice for estate agents and conveyancers is being proposed, along with the introduction of side-by-side performance data to help buyers choose trusted professionals based on expertise and track record.

The government said further details the changes would be published in the new year, forming part of its broader housing strategy, which includes a pledge to build 1.5 million new homes.

Conservative shadow housing minister Paul Holmes said: “Whilst we welcome steps to digitise and speed up the process, this risks reinventing the last Labour government’s failed Home Information Packs – which reduced the number of homes put on sale, and duplicated costs across buyers and sellers.”

Housing expert Kirstie Allsopp, the presenter of Channel 4’s Location, Location, Location, told the BBC’s Today programme she was “really glad the government has grasped this nettle”.

She said it was important to focus on both the buying and selling sides, “because things fall through because buyers walk away just as much as sellers walk away, and I think that was a worrying element”.

But Babek Ismayil, chief executive of homebuying platform OneDome, said genuine integration of the process rather than more paperwork at the start was required.

“There’s a risk of unintended consequences: requiring sellers and agents to gather more upfront information could delay properties coming onto the market,” he said.

“In a market where boosting supply is critical, any added friction must be carefully managed to avoid slowing things down.”

The announcement comes as the Conservatives propose changes to its tax policy for first home buyers at the party’s conference in Manchester.

The party plans to “reward work” by giving young people a £5,000 tax rebate towards their first home when they get their first full time job, if the return to government.

Shadow chancellor Mel Stride announced proposals for a “first-job bonus” that would divert National Insurance payments into a long-term savings account.

The party say it will be funded by cuts to public spending worth £47bn over five years in areas such as welfare, the civil service and the foreign aid budget.

Thin, red banner promoting the Politics Essential newsletter with text saying, “Top political analysis in your inbox every day”. There is also an image of the Houses of Parliament.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending