Fashion
Calida Group moves to strengthen its Board of Directors
Published
December 11, 2025
The Calida Group is strengthening its Board of Directors. This move aims to broaden the Board’s expertise in retail and the textile industry and to reinforce the Group’s strategic direction. The focus is on increasing efficiency in product development and brand communications for Calida and Aubade.
With this in mind, the Board of Directors intends to propose to the shareholders of the Swiss lingerie company at the Annual General Meeting on April 15, 2026 the election of Caroline Forster and Nicole Loeb as additional members.
Caroline Forster is an experienced leader and, since 2008, has served as co-CEO of the St. Gallen-based Forster Group, which operates globally. The family-owned company, with around 850 employees, produces embroidery for haute couture, prêt-à-porter, interiors, and lingerie, as well as technical textiles. She brings many years of leadership experience in both operational and strategic roles and has held various board and industry positions since 2007. She was also a member of the Executive Committee of economiesuisse until the end of 2024.
Nicole Loeb is an experienced entrepreneur and a prominent leader in Swiss retail. Since 2005, as delegate of the Board of Directors of Loeb Holding and chair of the Board of Directors of Loeb AG, she has shaped the strategic development of the long-established, independent Swiss retail company headquartered in Bern. She holds a degree in textile business management and is also active in key industry and business organisations, including as a board member of the Swiss Retail Federation and on the regional economic advisory board of the Swiss National Bank.
“I am delighted that, with Caroline Forster and Nicole Loeb, we can propose two renowned and successful entrepreneurs and leaders for election to the Board of Directors. Thanks to their proven experience in the textile industry and retail, they will provide valuable impetus for the strategic development of the Calida Group. I am convinced that, drawing on insights from their own family businesses, they will help shape our Group’s future strategic direction in a lasting way,” said Felix Sulzberger, chairman of the Board of Directors.
This article is an automatic translation.
Click here to read the original article.
Copyright © 2025 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.
Fashion
CAI seeks scrapping of India’s 11% cotton duty to protect industry
The Cotton Association of India (CAI) said the industry is passing through one of its worst phases, with high domestic cotton prices preventing Indian mills from benefitting from free trade agreements (FTAs) with partner countries.
India’s cotton trade body has urged the government to permanently remove the 11 per cent import duty on raw cotton, warning that high MSP, low productivity and elevated domestic prices are eroding mill competitiveness and hurting exports.
CAI said duty restoration after December 2025 could worsen unemployment, bad debts and industry stress.
High MSP, low domestic productivity and elevated input costs have made Indian cotton significantly more expensive than global prices. As a result, mills are unable to compete with international suppliers, while spinners and fabric manufacturers face continuous margin pressure. The 11 per cent duty, introduced during COVID-19, has outlived its purpose and is now distorting the market, the CAI said in a press release.
CAI warned that the industry’s distress has also begun affecting cotton traders and ginners, with delayed payments and rising bad debts across the value chain. The association noted that the only sustainable solution is to ensure the availability of competitively priced raw cotton, which requires urgent duty removal.
The press release further stated that India’s textile exports are suffering due to global recessionary conditions and uncertainty in Europe. CAI said that if raw cotton imports become costlier after December 2025, unemployment, loan defaults and financial stress across mills could intensify.
The association also linked duty removal to policy goals, noting that the Textile Ministry’s target of achieving $100 billion in textile and apparel exports by 2030 will only be feasible if mills receive raw material at competitive rates. It added that India historically had zero import duty on cotton with no adverse impact on farmers.
CAI cited abnormal seasonal rains this year, which damaged cotton quality and forced mills to depend more heavily on imports. If the duty is not removed permanently, the association cautioned that buyers may shift to rival manufacturing hubs such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, Pakistan and other markets—leading to a long-term loss of India’s global market share.
CAI president Vinay N Kotak urged the government to intervene immediately, stating that permanent removal of the 11 per cent duty is critical for the survival of the entire cotton and textile value chain. The association concluded that only with competitive raw cotton can India fully utilise FTAs, attract global orders and strengthen its position in the textile supply chain.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KUL)
Fashion
Australian apparel makers slash inventory to 5-year low: Report
Sales fell from $460,175 to $253,268 quarter on quarter (QoQ) as the sector navigated challenging consumer conditions, yet the aggressive destocking strategy delivered substantial margin improvement.
Lead times also improved significantly, falling to 18 days from 33 days in Q2, close to the prior-year benchmark of 17 days and slightly above the national manufacturing average of 16 days. The shift signals a return to operational normality after prolonged disruptions, Unleashed said in a press release.
Australian clothing and fashion manufacturers cut inventory by 64.7 per cent in Q3 2025 to the lowest level since 2019, while boosting margins by 8.19 per cent despite weaker sales, as per data from Unleashed.
Lead times improved and firms shifted from pandemic stockpiling to leaner, data-driven operations.
Executives said recovery signs are emerging.
The destocking move aligns with a broader manufacturing trend across Australia, where firms have shifted away from pandemic-era buffer building in favour of lean inventory strategies to protect profitability and liquidity. Nationally, small and micro manufacturers increased quarterly sales by 9 per cent to $625,400 while expanding profit margins by 3.2 per cent.
“In spite of cautious consumer spending, spiking energy prices and high labour costs, Australian small and micro manufacturers have been adapting and thriving,” said Jarrod Adam, head of production and distribution at Unleashed. “Manufacturers have found pockets of demand and capitalised on them. The real story is operational awareness; firms have focused on growing revenue and expanding profitability without tying up capital in excess stock. That’s a fundamental shift in mindset from the pandemic era of buffer building.”
The report also compared performance across the UK and New Zealand, concluding that Australian operations are leading on efficiency. Average stock on hand across industries fell to $311,200 in Q3 from $462,735 in Q2. Purchasing of raw materials also declined sharply, down 34.9 per cent to $339,371, reinforcing the shift towards disciplined, data-driven inventory control.
“The sheer velocity of the Q3 pivot is remarkable,” added Adam. “Lead times down 36 per cent, stock down 33 per cent, purchasing down 35 per cent, yet margins up nearly 4 percentage points. This is what disciplined inventory management looks like when manufacturers have real time data and the confidence to act on it.”
“It’s been a tough eighteen months, particularly for retailers, but we’re now seeing a modest recovery in market demand for the first time, which is hugely encouraging,” said Tim Deane, owner at Norsewear, a New Zealand clothing manufacturer that markets across Australia and New Zealand. “We need a sector-wide strategy to lower energy costs and better implement the use of technology to improve productivity.”
The report is based on data from over 1,000 Australian small and mid-sized manufacturers using Unleashed across categories including clothing and fashion.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (SG)
Fashion
Industry experts explore the opportunities and pitfalls of e-commerce exports at ‘Welcome on Board’
Published
December 11, 2025
“Testing the market digitally” has almost become a cliché. Where brands once opted for a selection of retailers or even a first store, digital is now seen as a gateway to international markets. But while online activity can be managed from the domestic market, turning it into a profit centre means sidestepping a few pitfalls. This was highlighted by Mathieu Grodner, president of Simone Pérèle, who shared his experience, alongside experts Rémy Daguillard of Stellae and Basile Ricordel of Global-e, at the Welcome on Board event, organised by the various federations and professional committees for economic development both in the fashion sector and dedicated to exports.
For the head of the premium lingerie brand, digital provided a complementary solution to its international brick-and-mortar presence. “We approached digital with our own platform,” said the grandson of the brand’s founder. “The question was how to develop our digital business in a way that was profitable, efficient, and compelling for our end customer. We were fortunate to have existing logistics flows in place to deliver a high-quality service to our customers wherever they are. We started with our core markets, the US and Australia, before expanding into other regions. You have to be able to adapt to different geographical areas and, increasingly, to the international context.”
Practically speaking, the brand had to deploy tools to clearly identify where its customers are located and offer an appropriate response in terms of language, currency, payment methods, taxes, customs duties, and even local logistical complexities.
“The complexity lies in removing all the barriers to purchase that may exist on the website,” said Rémy Daguillard, Stellae’s president for France, a logistics specialist for premium and luxury brands. “The aim is to ensure that the end consumer, whom you may have across the world, can enjoy the same customer experience as if your brand were domestic or local.”
“I would add that the question is not necessarily to sell everywhere in the world. Obviously that’s possible. Rather, can you do it and be profitable?” added Basile Ricordel, commercial director at Global-e, who recalls observing the digital expansion of the American brand Surface to Air. “E-commerce was seen as an El Dorado. But products were being shipped and customs duties and taxes were miscalculated. There was the issue of packaging, the choice of transport provider, or even the failure to take returns into account… In the end, costs can quickly stack up.”
Beware of hidden costs
The specialists emphasise that this accumulation rapidly erodes margins- and can even tip the business into the red. They therefore urge brands to scrutinise customs duties and taxes to avoid paying them several times over, and to right-size packaging to the actual dimensions of products, thereby reducing costs. They also recommend creating a returns collection point in certain markets to consolidate weekly or monthly returns and thus lower unit transport costs.
While e-commerce is a window into global markets, they nevertheless recommend a step-by-step approach to deployment. At Global-e, the company leverages its data to target potential markets in line with each brand’s needs. “We have insights into best practices, consumer habits, and macroeconomic trends, with the aim of improving conversion,” said Basile Ricordel. “In fact, given the international context, the US market is perhaps more complicated at the moment. Hence the idea of redirecting that investment budget towards other markets, such as Japan right now. But the idea is to focus on five to ten countries that warrant investment and work to generate margin.”
For his part, Rémy Daguillard also urges brands to avoid endless laundry lists and to take local and geopolitical realities into account. “Obviously, e-commerce in Russia right now is going to be tricky. But there are areas that aren’t closed and that require understanding. Mexico, for example, is a dynamic market for luxury goods, but it has specific features to take into account, with hidden costs.” The executive recounts the misadventure of customers who have to slip an extra note to couriers to be able to collect their parcels. “You can devise your best model; these things happen, and France doesn’t have the same norms as Mexico, Brazil, or Australia.”
“You can’t be adventurous on all fronts,” confirmed Mathieu Grodner, who pointed out that digital represents 20% of his business today. “You can’t be the best in every territory, and we’ve learned that the hard way. But we’re striving to be increasingly homogeneous worldwide, because today you can no longer claim to be an international brand if you have too much disparity, whether in your prices or in your offering.”

This prioritisation appears to be a key point, particularly in a geopolitical context that has been especially unstable in recent years, with the episode over US customs duties a notable flashpoint. The abolition of the de minimis exemption, which since 2016 had allowed brands to send parcels to the US without paying duties or taxes on products valued at under $800, has significantly disrupted export strategies for the US market.
“The question of the American market has indeed been top of mind for all our clients, who have been trying to adapt as best they can since August 29 to taxes and customs duties, particularly with the abolition of the de minimis rule. Since we developed a model that allows customs duties to be paid on the transfer price, this has reduced the impact,” said Rémy Daguillard.
“Throughout the debate on tariffs, brands were worried about how they would be affected,” agreed Basile Ricordel. “Questions are being asked about products made in Europe, but some brands also have products made in China. Brands are wondering whether they should hold local stock. And that raises questions such as appointing a fiscal representative… all while seeking the best option to avoid eroding profitability in the US.”
Opportunities therefore remain in the US, as in other markets, but the unstable economic and geopolitical context is prompting brands to take greater precautions when rolling out their digital business into new markets.
This article is an automatic translation.
Click here to read the original article.
Copyright © 2025 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.
-
Business1 week agoCredit Card Spends Ease In October As Point‑Of‑Sale Transactions Grow 22%
-
Politics5 days ago17 found dead in migrant vessel off Crete: coastguard
-
Uncategorized1 week ago
[CinePlex360] Your site has updated to WordPres
-
Sports6 days agoAustralia take control of second Ashes Test | The Express Tribune
-
Tech1 week agoNew control system teaches soft robots the art of staying safe
-
Business1 week agoAsian stocks today: Markets trade mixed ahead of US economic data; HSI nears 1% loss; Nikkei adds over 800 points – The Times of India
-
Fashion1 week agoBangladesh’s economic outlook cautiously optimistic: Govt
-
Fashion3 days agoGermany’s LuxExperience appoints Francis Belin as new CEO of Mytheresa
