After director Quentin Tarantino slammed Paul Dano as “the weak sister” in his recent podcast rant, calling him “weak sauce” and “the limpest d–k in the world”, a wave of support from Hollywood poured in this week defending the actor’s talent and character. 

Tarantino, while ranking his favourite films of the 21st century, placed There Will Be Blood at No. 5. 

Despite praising the film overall, he didn’t hold back in criticising Dano’s performance, saying the movie “needs” a stronger foil than Dano in his view.

But many disagree strongly. On X, comedian and filmmaker Ben Stiller wrote simply, “Paul Dano is f-ing brilliant.”

Simu Liu, known for starring in Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, added, “idk man i think paul dano is an incredible actor.”

Support also came from behind the camera: Matt Reeves, director of The Batman, praised Dano on X as “an incredible actor, and an incredible person.” 

Meanwhile, screenwriter Mattson Tomlin encouraged anyone skeptical to check out Dano’s work in Wildlife, calling him “a terrific actor” and “an astonishing director who exudes control and tremendous empathy.”

Dano’s body of work includes standout performances in films like Little Miss Sunshine, 12 Years a Slave, The Fabelmans, and his recent turn as the Riddler in The Batman. 

Despite Tarantino’s harsh critique, the breadth of voices coming to Dano’s defense this week suggests many believe his reputation and range speak louder than any one negative comment.

NEW YORK: The transformative effects of artificial intelligence dominated discussions at the Reuters NEXT conference in New York, with panellists concentrating on how it may upend work – and job growth – sidestepping concerns about an AI bubble.

Artificial intelligence represents the biggest technological upheaval to the world economy since the rise of the internet a quarter-century ago. It has brought trillions of dollars of investment and dizzying stock-market gains, but also a shortage of memory chips, regulatory scrutiny, and rising anxiety about job displacement.

The numbers are eye-popping. In the first half of 2025, AI-related capital expenditures contributed more to GDP growth than the consumer, according to JP Morgan Asset Management. Investment advisory Bespoke Investment Group recently estimated about one-third of the rise in global market cap since the introduction of AI assistant ChatGPT comes from 28 AI-related companies.

Corporate executives at Reuters NEXT largely focused on how AI would transform work, though some talked about the threat to jobs. “All (of our customers) are focused on slowing headcount growth,” said May Habib, CEO and co-founder of AI startup Writer. “This has happened just in the last few weeks. You close a customer, you get on the phone with the CEO to kick off the project, and it’s like, ‘Great, how soon can I whack 30% of my team?’”

Fears of job upheaval

The fears about job displacement brought on by the AI boom are backed by a US Federal Reserve report noting data and surveys that say artificial intelligence is already replacing entry-level positions and causing companies to trim hiring plans. An August Reuters/Ipsos poll showed 71% were concerned AI will be “putting too many people out of work permanently.”

Striking a more optimistic tone that became one theme of the Reuters NEXT conference, economist Joseph Lavorgna, counsellor to the US Treasury secretary, said the focus should be on how the technology could enhance labour rather than replace it. “AI is an incredible tool that I think is complementary to the existing workforce,” he said. “We need policies that are going to encourage businesses to invest, and AI is a complement to it.”

Nevertheless, employment data is hard to ignore. Recent college graduates have seen a sharp rise in unemployment, with a current jobless rate of 9.5% for those between 20 and 24 with a bachelor’s degree, according to the US Labour Department, compared with the nation’s 4.4% rate.

Joe Depa, EY chief innovation officer, likened the changes to previous tech upheavals like the development of the internet, but “the difference this time is that the disruption is faster.” Depa said “adaptability is the new job security,” with his biggest worry around the middle management class.

Tracey Franklin, Moderna’s chief people and digital technology officer, said what has changed is how companies are starting to evaluate employment needs in tandem with technological needs, rather than separately.

“We’re pooling teams together and really looking at, what is their IT portfolio, what is their human capital strategy, how do we pull that together to meet their business objectives. So we’re having these integrated conversations we didn’t have before,” she said.

Scepticism and worry

The Reuters/Ipsos poll also showed 61% worried about increased electricity consumption from data centres, which is only set to grow. Jeff Schultz, senior vice president of portfolio strategy at Cisco Systems, noted the infrastructure to run AI and the chips needed already consume a lot of power, and that network traffic needed for agentic AI is much higher and steadier than sporadic demand from AI chatbots.

But backlash is growing to the energy-hogging data centre clusters that have contributed to rising utility prices. It is evident in places like Virginia and Pennsylvania, even among supporters of President Donald Trump, who has championed AI development and is considering ways to restrict state-level regulations.

There was notable trepidation among speakers at Reuters NEXT from the media and creative industries, due to concern that AI-generated content could replace the creative work of writers or actors.

“When it comes to talent, there is a lot of controversy whether it’s acting, whether it’s music, et cetera, and that’s where I think we really need to be very aggressive in protecting creative talent and making sure that they are not replaced,” said longtime media executive Shari Redstone.

Sarah Jessica Parker, the longtime star of TV series “Sex and the City,” said she thinks people still value the tactile human experience – citing the unpredictability and spontaneity of performance.

“We’re still – the majority of us – relying on the human exchange,” Parker told Reuters editor-in-chief Alessandra Galloni. “Even on film, even though I know there’s so much now that you can fix and make prettier or tighter or better, there’s still this human element when we talk about the movies we love … I’m not sure that AI will be able to replicate that live nerve.”

Rachel Zegler went viral once again after she shared a funny update from her Spotify Wrapped.

The Hunger Games actress said her listening age was 67, which surprised many fans and turned into a lighthearted moment across social media.

Rachel explained that her playlists were filled with classic singers, old film music and slow emotional songs.

However, these choices pushed her listening age far above her real age and created a wave of jokes online.

Fans called the Snow White actress a sweet old soul and said she got the most adorable music taste.

Meanwhile many said that she was the only young star who could proudly sound like a grandmother through her playlist.

People on X and TikTok reacted with playful memes and comments, with many saying that she listened to better music than most people her age.

Others shared their own listening ages and joined the trend that started after her post.

Zegler often spoke about her love for music from past decades. She said these songs helped her feel inspired in her acting work and allowed her to connect with emotions in a deeper way.

Furthermore, the 23-year-old actress’ followers shared this was not a shock because she always loved classic voices and memorable melodies.

Her update continued to gain attention as more Wrapped posts appeared online. Many viewers felt her honesty added a warm and fun moment to the season.

By sharing her result, the actress opened a bigger conversation about why people return to older songs for comfort.

Rachel Zegler’s simple post became one of the most charming viral stories of the week.