Business
Fraud victims are being failed by justice system, warn charities
Dan WhitworthStockton-on-Tees
BBCVictims of fraud are being failed by the criminal justice system, charities are warning, as new analysis suggests only a fraction of reports result in a prosecution.
There were 1.2 million recorded cases of fraud in England and Wales in the 12 months to June, data from the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau shows.
But in the same time frame fewer than 13,000 cases were prosecuted, Ministry of Justice figures show.
Wayne Stevens, the national lead for fraud at charity Victim Support, said: “Our experience is that victims get a pretty poor deal from the criminal justice system as a whole.” The Home Office said it would publish “an ambitious fraud strategy in the New Year.”
Joan Holdaway, 85, shared her experience as part of the BBC’s Scam Safe Week from 22 to 28 November.
She had £1,000 stolen after being bombarded with phonecalls from fraudsters using photos of celebrities to promote their investment scam online.
“It was very upsetting,” said Ms Holdaway. “All I kept thinking about was how I was going to eke out the money that I’d still got. Then I kept thinking ‘I’m not going to get this back, I know I’m not.'”
She contacted the UK’s national reporting centre for fraud and cybercrime, Action Fraud, which put her in touch with Cleveland Police. Officers referred her to the Victim Care and Advice Service which helped her to be reimbursed by her bank under fraud rules introduced just over a year ago.
Known as the mandatory reimbursement requirement it obliges banks to refund most victims of push payment fraud – when victims are tricked and manipulated into transferring money to criminals themselves.
No one has been prosecuted in Ms Holdaway’s case and she told the BBC the emotional and mental impact had been tremendous.
“It’s made me very, very suspicious. You just cannot sleep properly and it’s just on your mind all the time. All I was doing was avoiding ever speaking to anyone again.
“I don’t think you ever get over it really… I think it stays with you… and you wonder anybody that you don’t know, are they who they say they are? It’s really dreadful.”
Mr Stevens said Victim Support was concerned people were not taken seriously when they report fraud to the bank or police.
“If the fraud has an international dimension the fraud often isn’t investigated,” he said.
“Until recently victims often didn’t get reimbursed the money that was lost to criminals.”
He said Victim Support was calling for improved campaigns to raise public awareness about the real risks of fraud. It also called for greater cooperation between banks and social media companies where fraud can take place.
UK Finance, which represents the banking industry, said: “Protecting customers is a top priority and banks invest billions in advanced systems to help detect and stop fraud happening in the first place.”
The Home Office said in a statement fraud was “a serious and damaging crime that can affect anyone, at any time, and we are determined to bring those responsible to justice”.
A spokesperson added: “In the new year we will publish an ambitious Fraud Strategy, which will reduce fraud, target offenders and protect victims.”
One charity in Stockton-on-Tees is on the front line in the fight against fraud offering help, support and advice for thousands of victims every year.
Dave Mead helps run the Victim Care and Advice Service, VCAS.
“A big, big chunk of our work and some of our most challenging work is fraud,” he said. “The figures are eye-watering. We’re contacting between 500 to 800 victims of fraud every month.
“The vast majority of victims don’t report fraud [and] we find some. But we’ve got to get into the communities through elderly groups, faith groups, youth groups.
“We’ve got to raise the conversation.”
Vicky Beaumont is an advice and support worker for VCAS.
“To be honest, even though I help people and speak to people day in day out, it’s still hard to see them [victims] relive that emotion.
“[But] it’s so rewarding, it’s such a good job to do to be able to support people like that and get great results for them. I would do this all day everyday.”
BBC’s Scam Safe Week content across BBC TV, Radio, iPlayer, Sounds and Online from 22 to 28 November 2025
Business
Why Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders might opt for Paramount’s offer — and why they might not
Ted Sarandos, CEO of Netflix and David Zaslav, CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery.
Mario Anzuoni | Mike Blake | Reuters
Hours before Warner Bros. Discovery agreed to sell its studio and streaming assets to Netflix, Ted Sarandos, the co-CEO of Netflix, called WBD CEO David Zaslav to inform him Netflix wouldn’t be bidding any higher.
WBD shareholders now have a chance to call Sarandos’ bluff.
WBD shareholders have until Jan. 8 to tender their shares to Paramount for $30 in cash, though that deadline may be artificial. Paramount can extend it all the way to WBD’s annual meeting, which hasn’t been set yet but this year took place June 2.
If Paramount acquires 51% of outstanding WBD shares, it would control the company, even though the WBD board already agreed to sell the company’s studio and streaming assets to Netflix. Both Netflix and Paramount can use the coming days and weeks to speak with WBD shareholders to gauge whether they’d like to take Paramount’s offer or stick with the board’s recommendation to sell to Netflix.
To tender or not to tender, that is the question. There are sound arguments for both sides. The decision also presents a game theory element for shareholders who may simply want a bidding war rather than caring about the right buyer.
To tender
There are two overarching reasons why a shareholder might tender their holdings to Paramount.
The first is if the investor believes Paramount’s $30-per-share, all-cash offer for the entirety of WBD is more valuable than Netflix’s $27.75-per-share bid for just the Warner Bros. film studio and HBO Max streaming business. The second is a belief that tendering shares is the best way to force a bidding war between Netflix and Paramount.
A shareholder could decide Paramount’s current offer is better than Netflix’s if they think it has a higher likelihood of regulatory approval or if they believe Discovery Global — the portfolio of linear cable networks including CNN, TNT, Discovery, HGTV and TBS that’s set to be spun out — will have minimal value as a publicly traded company.
Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison told CNBC earlier this month he values Discovery Global at $1 per share, given his prediction on the likely multiple (2 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) at which it will trade based on current valuations for similar linear cable networks. If WBD doesn’t agree to sell the entire company to Paramount, it plans to split Discovery Global out as its own publicly traded entity in mid-2026.
Paramount’s argument is that $30 per share is already greater than Netflix’s $27.75-per-share offer plus $1 for Discovery Global.
David Ellison, CEO of Paramount Skydance, exits following an interview at the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., December 8, 2025.
Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters
Paramount’s bid is also all cash, while Netflix’s bid includes 16% equity with a so-called “collar,” which means shareholders won’t know exactly how much Netflix stock they’ll actually receive until the deal closes.
As for regulatory approval, Paramount has played up arguments that a combined Netflix and HBO Max streaming business would be anticompetitive. Netflix has more than 300 million global paying customers. The idea of the largest streamer buying HBO Max has already raised concerns with politicians, including President Donald Trump, who said there may be a “market share” issue with a Netflix deal.
While Paramount would combine Paramount+ with HBO Max, Paramount+ has about 80 million subscribers, presenting less of a risk to competition.
The second, more nuanced argument to tender is to maximize upside even if the assets ultimately go to Netflix.
Ellison has already made it known Paramount’s $30-per-share offer isn’t best and final. Tendering could cause Netflix to come back with a higher offer, which may then prompt Paramount to raise its bid as well.
GAMCO Investors chairman and CEO Mario Gabelli told CNBC earlier this month “the notion of Company A and Company B having a bidding war — that’s what we like as part of the free market system.”
He added last week that while he was previously leaning toward tendering his shares to Paramount, “the most important part is to keep it in play.”
Not to tender
Other shareholders may believe, in contrast, that not tendering is the best way of jumpstarting a bidding war. If Paramount sees that it’s not getting traction with shareholders as the annual meeting gets closer, it may raise its bid to get more shareholders on board.
There are additional reasons not to tender. Shareholders may want the Netflix and Discovery Global equity portion of the Netflix proposal.
In a WBD filing last week, the company said a mystery “Company C” proposed to acquire Discovery Global and its 20% stake in WBD’s streaming and studios business for $25 billion in cash. That bid was rejected by the WBD board as “not actionable.”
Still, the mystery bid suggests there may be an interested buyer in all of Discovery Global if it gets spun out, which could result in far more than $1 per share, according to Rich Greenfield, an analyst at LightShed Partners. That’s a good reason not to tender, he said, because it makes the Netflix offer much more valuable than Paramount’s bid.
Ensuring WBD splits Discovery Global is also the safe play for shareholders in case regulators block a Paramount-WBD merger, Greenfield said. Since the Paramount deal is for all of WBD, including CNN, Ellison’s bid — which includes roughly $24 billion from Middle Eastern sovereign funds — may run into regulatory and political hurdles, Greenfield noted.
“You want the split to happen,” Greenfield said in an interview. “If the Paramount deal doesn’t get regulatory approval, now you’ve prevented the split from happening. You’re stuck in 2027 with declining cable networks, and you haven’t spun them off. Does the U.S. really want a company funded by more Middle Eastern money than money from the Ellisons owning CNN?”
‘Where’s Poppa?’
WBD’s board has argued part its reasoning for rejecting Paramount’s $30-per-share bid was its concern with financing, noting more funding comes from Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds than the Ellison family, which has committed about $12 billion.
Paramount altered the terms of its deal Monday to help address funding concerns. Oracle founder Larry Ellison, the father of David and one of the world’s five wealthiest people, agreed to provide “an irrevocable personal guarantee of $40.4 billion of the equity financing for the offer and any damages claims against Paramount,” should the existing financing fall through, Paramount said in a statement.
Paramount also said Monday it will publish records confirming the Ellison family trust “owns approximately 1.16 billion shares of Oracle common stock and that all material liabilities of the Ellison family trust are publicly disclosed.” Paramount has said the family trust will backstop the financing. WBD’s board had previously argued the trust is an “opaque entity,” preferring a direct commitment from the Ellisons.
Notably, even with the Monday announcement, the Ellisons haven’t increased their personal equity investment, which still stands at $12 billion. Internally, some WBD executives have cited the 1970 Carl Reiner movie “Where’s Poppa?” when speaking about the bid, according to a person familiar with the matter. WBD has pushed for the Ellisons to commit more personal money to the deal.
Still, a WBD shareholder may not care where the funding is coming from as long as it’s there. The three SWFs involved in the deal are the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund (PIF), Abu Dhabi’s L’imad Holding Company and the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA). The PIF and QIA, in particular, are known institutions that have contributed billions of dollars to other U.S.-based deals.
Last Updated:
The 8th Pay Commission is expected to come into force from January 1, 2026, following the conclusion of the 7th Pay Commission on December 31
A new income tax return (ITR) form is likely to be introduced in January 2026.
With just days left for the curtain to fall on 2025, the arrival of the new year will bring more than fresh calendars and resolutions. From January 1, 2026, a host of policy and regulatory changes are set to kick in, directly impacting farmers, salaried employees, young people and the wider public. Banking rules, social media regulations, fuel prices and government schemes are all in line for an overhaul.
While every new year ushers in tweaks to existing rules, 2026 is expected to see several big-ticket changes. The government’s renewed push on data protection and social media oversight, along with revisions in banking norms, is likely to alter how people transact, spend and access services.
Banking rules set for overhaul
One of the key changes will be in how credit scores are updated. Credit bureaus will now be required to refresh customer data every week instead of once every 15 days, making credit histories more dynamic and responsive.
Several major banks, including SBI, PNB and HDFC, have already reduced loan interest rates, a move that is expected to benefit borrowers in the new year. Revised fixed deposit (FD) interest rates will also come into effect from January 2026.
Banks have further tightened norms related to UPI and digital payments, along with stricter enforcement of PAN-Aadhaar linking. From January 1, PAN-Aadhaar linkage will be mandatory to access most banking and government services; failure to comply could lead to denial of services.
SIM verification rules have also been made more stringent, particularly for messaging platforms such as WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal, in a bid to curb fraud and misuse.
Social media and traffic curbs in focus
The Centre is considering stricter social media regulations for children below 16 years, on the lines of measures introduced in countries such as Australia and Malaysia. Discussions are underway on age-based restrictions and parental controls.
On the mobility front, several cities are preparing to impose fresh curbs on diesel and petrol commercial vehicles to combat rising pollution levels. In parts of Delhi and Noida, plans are being discussed to restrict deliveries using petrol-powered vehicles.
Relief for government employees
The 8th Pay Commission is expected to come into force from January 1, 2026, following the conclusion of the 7th Pay Commission on December 31. This is likely to bring a revision in pay structures for central and state government employees.
In addition, dearness allowance (DA) is set to rise from January 2026, providing a salary boost amid persistent inflation. Some states, including Haryana, are also expected to review and raise minimum wages for part-time and daily-wage workers.
Key changes for farmers
In states such as Uttar Pradesh, farmers are being issued unique IDs that will be mandatory to receive installments under the PM-Kisan scheme. Without the ID, beneficiaries may not receive the credited amounts.
Under the PM Kisan Crop Insurance Scheme, farmers will now be eligible for compensation if crops are damaged by wild animals. However, losses must be reported within 72 hours to claim insurance benefits.
What it means for the general public
A new income tax return (ITR) form is likely to be introduced in January, pre-filled with details of banking transactions and expenditure, simplifying compliance but increasing scrutiny.
Prices of LPG and commercial gas cylinders will be revised from January 1, while aviation turbine fuel (ATF) prices will also be updated the same day, changes that could have a ripple effect on household budgets and airfares.
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.
December 22, 2025, 20:42 IST
Read More
Business
Gold Crosses Rs 1.45 Lakh Per 10 Grams, Silver Tops Rs 2 Lakh Per Kg — What’s Driving The Record Rally?
New Delhi: Gold prices surged to a fresh lifetime high on Monday as expectations of interest rate cuts by the U.S. Federal Reserve strengthened investor demand for safe-haven assets.
Spot gold jumped nearly 2 percent to around USD 4,426 per ounce, which translates to roughly Rs 1.38–Rs 1.45 lakh per 10 grams in Indian terms. This marks one of the highest global-equivalent gold prices ever seen for Indian buyers, reflecting strong international demand and currency impact.
Silver also climbed to a new record. Spot silver touched USD 69.44 per ounce, equivalent to approximately Rs 1.95–Rs 2.05 lakh per kilogram in Indian measurement, driven by investment demand and tight supply conditions.
The rally in precious metals has been fueled by growing confidence that the U.S. central bank will begin easing monetary policy in the coming months. Lower interest rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-interest-bearing assets like gold and silver, boosting their appeal.
Gold prices have now risen nearly 70 percent over the past year, marking their strongest annual performance in decades. Analysts point to a mix of factors supporting the rally, including persistent global inflation risks, geopolitical tensions, and steady central bank buying.
Other precious metals also traded higher, with platinum hitting multi-year highs and palladium moving closer to levels last seen nearly three years ago, indicating broad strength across the metals complex.
For Indian consumers, the surge translates into costlier jewellery purchases, while investors holding gold and silver continue to benefit from strong price momentum and their role as a hedge against inflation and global uncertainty.
Right wing urges boycott of iconic Brazilian flip-flops
Mold Is the Enemy. A Good Dehumidifier Is the Solution
Lions fan involved in altercation with Steelers star denies using derogatory language toward player
-
Business1 week agoStudying Abroad Is Costly, But Not Impossible: Experts On Smarter Financial Planning
-
Business1 week agoKSE-100 index gains 876 points amid cut in policy rate | The Express Tribune
-
Fashion5 days agoIndonesia’s thrift surge fuels waste and textile industry woes
-
Business5 days agoBP names new boss as current CEO leaves after less than two years
-
Sports1 week agoJets defensive lineman rips NFL officials after ejection vs Jaguars
-
Tech1 week agoFor the First Time, AI Analyzes Language as Well as a Human Expert
-
Tech5 days agoT-Mobile Business Internet and Phone Deals
-
Entertainment1 week agoPrince Harry, Meghan Markle’s 2025 Christmas card: A shift in strategy