Business
Government borrowing hits highest August level for five years
Charlotte EdwardsBusiness reporter
Getty ImagesUK government borrowing in August hit the highest level for the month in five years, latest figures show, adding to the pressure on the chancellor ahead of the Budget.
Borrowing – the difference between public spending and tax income – was £18bn in August, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said, which was higher than analysts had expected.
Despite tax and National Insurance receipts increasing, they were outstripped by higher spending on public services, benefits and debt interest, the UK statistics body said.
One analyst said Rachel Reeves faced “tough choices” in the Budget to meet her tax and spending rules, with speculation building that taxes will rise.
The latest borrowing figure for August is the highest for the month since the height of the Covid pandemic, when government spending was ramped up to support the economy.
Borrowing over the first five months of the financial year has now reached £83.8bn, which is £16.2bn higher than the same period last year.
It is also above the prediction of £72.4bn that the government’s official forecaster, the Office for Budget Responsibility, had made in March.
Paul Dales, chief UK economist at Capital Economics, said the latest figures, “highlight the deteriorating nature of the public finances even though the economy hasn’t been terribly weak”.
He added that this would contribute to the chancellor having to find money in November’s Budget, “mostly through higher taxes”.
Nabil Taleb, an economist at PwC UK, said Reeves now faced “tough choices, and the test will be whether she can make them palatable to voters and markets”.

The expectation is Reeves will need to raise extra money or cut spending to meet her self-imposed rules for government finances.
Reeves has two main rules, which she has said are “non-negotiable”:
- Not to borrow to fund day-to-day public spending by the end of this parliament
- To get government debt falling as a share of national income by the end of this parliament in 2029/30.
There has been a wide range of forecasts for how much money Reeves might raise in the Budget to meet her rules.
One factor that will influence this is the latest growth forecast from the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Small changes to the forecaster’s outlook can make a big difference to its projections for tax income over the years ahead.
The cost to the government through its U-turns on benefit cuts – which had aimed to save billions of pounds – will also be a factor, as will the interest rates on government borrowing.
Mr Dales at Capital Economics said the chancellor would have “to raise £28bn, mostly through higher taxes, if she wants to keep her buffer against her rule of £10bn”.
Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said the latest figures suggested “the chancellor will need to raise taxes by more than the £20bn we had previously estimated”.
“We still expect the chancellor to fill the fiscal hole with a smorgasbord of stealth and sin tax increases, along with some smaller spending cuts.”
On the financial markets, the value of the pound fell 0.5% against the dollar to $1.349, while government bond yields – which indicate government borrowing costs – rose on Friday.
The latest ONS figures showed interest payments on government debt rose by £1.9bn to £8.4bn, partly due to inflation pushing up costs.
Welfare spending increased by £1.1bn to £27.3bn, largely driven by inflation-linked benefit rises and higher state pension payments.
James Murray, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said the government had “a plan to bring down borrowing because taxpayer money should be spent on the country’s priorities, not on debt interest”.
“Our focus is on economic stability, fiscal responsibility, ripping up needless red tape, tearing out waste from our public services, driving forward reforms, and putting more money in working people’s pockets,” he added.
But shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride, wrote on X: “Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves are too weak and distracted to take the action needed to reduce the deficit.
“The chancellor has lost control of the public finances, and Labour’s weakness means much needed welfare reforms have been abandoned.”
Warm weather boosts stores
Separate data from the ONS showed that good weather brought a boost to the High Street in August.
Retail sales rose by 0.5% during the month, slightly higher than analysts had expected, with butchers, bakers, clothing stores and online shopping all reporting growth.
The figures come despite warnings from some retailers in recent days of cost pressures and price rises.
However, the monthly shop sales data from the ONS can be volatile.
Over the three months to August sales declined by 0.1%, the ONS said, compared with the three months to May.
“Overall, August caps off a better-than-expected summer, particularly for non-food retailers, with sales of seasonal lines boosted by the hottest summer temperatures on record,” said Jacqueline Windsor, head of retail at PwC.
“However, overall sales volumes remain below pre-pandemic levels, so the high street is far from being out of the woods.”
Alice Cowley, managing director in Accenture’s retail practice, said retailers were “facing fresh headwinds as we head into the autumn”.
She said factors such as uncertainty over possible Budget measures, and ongoing energy and labour cost pressures, would continue to put profit margins “under greater strain”.
Business
Household energy bill drop ‘short-lived respite’ amid fears of July hike
Household energy prices are falling by 7% from Wednesday in a “short-lived respite” for households already braced for a predicted 18% hike from July.
Ofgem’s price cap has dropped from £1,758 to £1,641 – a reduction of £117 or around £10 a month for the average household using both electricity and gas.
This is an 11% fall year on year, but still £600 more than bills were in the winter of 2020 to 2021.
The reduction is lower than the average £150 cut to bills pledged by the Chancellor in November, when she moved 75% of the cost of the renewables obligation from household bills onto general taxation and scrapped the energy company obligation (Eco) scheme.
And it comes amid increasing concern about the amount energy bills could rise by from July as a result of the Middle East conflict, with latest predictions from Cornwall Insight suggesting this could be 18% or £288 a year – to almost £900 above pre-crisis levels.
In the meantime, consumer groups have urged households to send in meter readings to ensure their energy usage is billed at the lowest possible rate, and investigate fixed rate deals if they remain on their firm’s standard variable rate.
A spokesman for Energy UK, which represents firms, said: “Suppliers are required to set direct debits as accurately as possible based on the best and most current information available.
“So – as well as factors like current balance, payment record and previous energy usage – this will also include the latest projection of energy costs over the coming months.
“Suppliers regularly review direct debt levels so any current assessment for price cap customers would likely take into account that bills look set to go up again in July. Customers on fixed deals however will not see any increase until their current deal comes to an end.”
Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, said: “The fall in bills from April 1 offers brief relief for households, but the respite will be short-lived.
“Given the ongoing profits made by the energy industry, households deserve more than a temporary reprieve before prices rise again.
“For the millions of households already in energy debt to their suppliers, this is a real concern and risks pushing more people into crisis.
“The Government must use the window between now and July to act. That means targeted support for those hit first and hardest, including households off the gas grid and those on heat networks, faster action on energy debt, and preparations to bring costs down if prices deteriorate further.”
National Energy Action chief executive Adam Scorer said: “Any price drop is good news, but everyone knows that it will be overtaken by events.
“It is likely to be a false dawn. And the people who know that the best are those already struggling to afford their energy bills and know the real cost of an energy crisis.
“Unfortunately, today’s good news is hugely overshadowed by the fear and dread of what may be to come.”
Which? energy editor Emily Seymour said: “April’s energy price cap fall will bring much needed relief for households. What you save will vary depending on how much you use.
“Despite this drop, many households are already concerned about the next price cap announcement in May, which will set rates from July and is currently predicted to rise by £288, or 18%, per year for the average household.
“It’s important to remember this isn’t confirmed yet, so don’t feel pressured into making quick decisions.
“If you’re currently paying variable rates, it’s worth checking the market to see what fixed deals are available. Fixing could offer protection against future increases, but only if the price is right.
“Options have reduced in the last few weeks, but some energy companies are still offering fixes with prices around those of the January-March price cap.
“If you’re worried about paying your energy bills, contact your supplier as soon as possible. Energy companies are obliged to help if you’re struggling to pay and won’t disconnect you for missing a payment. Request a review or break in payments, and access any available hardship funds.”
Business
Nike shares fall 9% on weak outlook, expected 20% sales decline in China
A Nike logo is displayed at a Nike store in Austin, Texas, Feb. 5, 2026.
Brandon Bell | Getty Images
Shares of Nike fell in extended trading Tuesday after the retailer warned sales will fall for the rest of the calendar year, led by an expected 20% decline in its key China market during the current quarter.
Chief Financial Officer Matt Friend said during the company’s earnings call that Nike expects sales for its current fiscal fourth quarter to drop between 2% and 4%, compared with Wall Street estimates of a 1.9% increase, according to LSEG.
For the duration of the calendar year, Friend said, the company expects sales to fall by a low single-digit percentage, led by growth in North America and offset by declines in China. That outlook wasn’t comparable to estimates.
Nike beat expectations across the business on both the top and bottom lines for its fiscal third quarter, but its guidance left investors with more questions about how long its turnaround will take. Friend also cautioned that Nike’s guidance was based off of where the global economic picture stands today — and it could change given recent geopolitical volatility.
“We also recognize that the environment around us has become increasingly dynamic, and we could experience unplanned volatility due to the disruption in the Middle East, rising oil prices and other factors that could impact either input costs or consumer behavior,” said Friend. “We are focused on what we can control.”
Shares fell more than 8% in extended trading.
Here’s how the world’s largest sneaker company did for its fiscal third quarter, compared with estimates from analysts polled by LSEG:
- Earnings per share: 35 cents vs. 28 cents expected
- Revenue: $11.28 billion vs. $11.24 billion expected
The company’s reported net income for the three-month period that ended Feb. 28 was $520 million, or 35 cents per share. That’s a 35% decline from $794 million, or 54 cents per share, a year earlier. That plunge came as Nike’s gross profit margin slid 1.3 percentage points to 40.2%, “primarily due to higher tariffs in North America,” the company said.
Sales were flat at $11.28 billion, compared to $11.27 billion last year.
While Nike beat expectations on the top and bottom lines, it posted a mixed picture regionally. Nike’s largest market of North America continued to show steady growth, as revenue climbed 3% to $5.03 billion, but that was just shy of Wall Street’s expectations of $5.04 billion, according to StreetAccount.
Meanwhile, Nike’s Greater China market continued to shrink, with revenue down 7% to $1.62 billion during the quarter. Still, that total beat analyst estimates of $1.50 billion, according to StreetAccount.
Nike is continuing to work through a colossal turnaround under CEO Elliott Hill. About a year and a half into his tenure, Hill has made strides in repairing parts of the business, but has been clear that it’ll take time for the entire company to improve given the retailer’s scale and complexity.
He reiterated that expectation on Tuesday, saying in a news release that “the pace of progress is different across the portfolio.”
“The areas we prioritized first continue to drive momentum,” Hill said. “The work is not finished, but the direction is clear, our teams are moving with focus and urgency, and our foundation is getting even stronger to build the future of NIKE.”
Friend said Nike’s turnaround efforts “will continue to impact results over the balance of the calendar year.”
Nike’s recovery was already coming at a tough time as a global trade war dented its efforts to improve profitability and drive sales from inflation-weary shoppers. But now the athletic company will have to contend with a new war in the Middle East that’s already led to rising gas prices and is expected to send consumer prices even higher, which could push shoppers to cut back on nice-to-haves like new clothes and shoes to save money elsewhere.
“We continue to be encouraged by the momentum in North America. We’ve got a strong order book for summer,” Friend said. “We’re seeing positive signs and sell through. We’re not seeing a consumer reaction to what’s going on in the Middle East at this point in time, in North America.”
Hill has focused in part on revitalizing Nike’s business with wholesale partners as opposed to direct sales on its website and in stores. Wholesale revenue climbed 5% to $6.5 billion.
Meanwhile, direct sales slid 4% to $4.5 billion.
Business
Tech giant Oracle makes ‘significant’ job cuts
It is thought that thousands of people may have lost their jobs at Oracle, one of the world’s largest tech companies.
Source link
-
Politics1 week agoAfghanistan announces release of detained US citizen
-
Sports1 week agoBroadcast industry CEO says consolidation is ‘essential’ to compete for NFL soaring media rights prices
-
Tech1 week agoCan a Home Appliance Fix the Problem of Soft-Plastic Waste?
-
Entertainment1 week agoUN warns migratory freshwater fish numbers are spiralling
-
Business1 week agoProperty Play: Home flippers see smallest profits since the Great Recession, real estate data firm says
-
Business1 week agoGold prices soar in Pakistan – SUCH TV
-
Fashion1 week agoICE cotton slips on weaker crude, profit booking
-
Business1 week agoMore women are entering wealth management, but few are in advisory roles, study finds

