• UNSC votes to re-impose sanctions on Iran over nuclear programme.
• Sanctions will be renewed and take effect on September 28.
• European powers’s action undermines IAEA engagement: Tehran.

TEHRAN: Iran’s top security body has said that action by Britain, France and Germany to reimpose UN sanctions will “effectively suspend” its cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog.

“Despite the foreign ministry’s cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the presentation of plans to resolve the issue, the actions of European countries will effectively suspend the path of cooperation with the agency,” the Supreme National Security Council said in a televised statement.

The announcement comes after the Security Council voted on Friday to reimpose frozen UN sanctions after the European governments activated the “snapback” mechanism in a decade-old nuclear agreement, accusing Iran of non-compliance.

The vote means that the sanctions, which were suspended in return for curbs on Iran’s nuclear activities set out in the 2015 deal, will take renewed effect on September 28 unless Iran can persuade the council to relent in the next week.

Tehran said the action by the European powers undermined months of engagement with the IAEA aimed at resuming monitoring and ensuring compliance with international rules.

Earlier this month, Iran and the IAEA reached an agreement in Cairo that would have allowed inspections of Iranian nuclear sites to resume.

Iran had suspended them after Israel and the United States attacked its nuclear facilities in June.

Western governments have long accused Iran of seeking a nuclear weapons capability, an ambition Tehran denies. Tehran has also criticised the IAEA for failing to condemn the Israeli and US strikes.

The European governments have said they will not delay the re-imposition of UN sanctions unless Iran resumes full cooperation with the IAEA and reopens nuclear talks with the US, which have been suspended since June.

• US is seeking to regain control of base used after 9/11.
• Trump confirmed talks with Afghanistan are underway.
• Kabul urges engagement without US military presence.

US President Trump on Saturday threatened Afghanistan if it does not give back control of the Bagram air base to the United States.

“If Afghanistan doesn’t give Bagram Airbase back to those that built it, the United States of America, BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

Trump said on Thursday that the United States had sought to regain control of the base used by American forces following the attacks of September 11, 2001. He told reporters on Friday that he was speaking with Afghanistan about it.

The withdrawal of American forces in 2021 led to a takeover of the base by the Taliban movement.

Afghan officials have expressed opposition to a revived US presence.

“Afghanistan and the United States need to engage with one another … without the United States maintaining any military presence in any part of Afghanistan,” Zakir Jalal, an Afghan foreign ministry official, said in a post on X on Thursday.

• White House says policy protects US jobs, limits national-security risks.
• India, source of 71% of approved H-1B petitions, faces major disruption.
• Homeland Security, State Dept to deny entry sans extra payment proof.

US President Donald Trump on Friday issued a new executive order tightening rules for the H-1B visa programme, a move that threatens India’s IT industry and other sectors heavily reliant on skilled foreign workers.

India is the largest beneficiary of the H-1B programme, which allows US companies to hire skilled foreign workers. Industry analysts said the new restrictions could slow hiring, raise costs, and disrupt projects in the IT and technology sectors, potentially affecting thousands of Indian professionals currently working in the United States.

Under the new order, applications for H-1B visas will only be considered valid if the sponsoring company pays an additional $100,000 per application. The restriction takes effect on September 21, 2025, and will initially remain in place for 12 months. 

The Department of Homeland Security and the State Department have been instructed to block entry to any candidate whose application is not accompanied by this payment and to tighten oversight to prevent the misuse of B visas for unauthorised employment entry.

The White House justified this move by stating that certain companies, particularly in the IT sector, have been misusing the H-1B programme, replacing American workers with cheaper foreign labour. 

This, it argues, has not only suppressed wages but also created national security risks. According to the administration, the policy shift aims to give American students and graduates better job opportunities and to ensure that companies hire only the most skilled and high-value foreign professionals.

Official figures show that in fiscal year 2024, a total of 219,659 H-1B visas were issued worldwide, with India accounting for the overwhelming majority. 

According to USCIS data, 71% of approved H-1B petitions were for Indian nationals, while China ranked second at 11.7%. The remaining eight countries combined made up a far smaller share. 

The top 10 countries and their respective numbers were:

1. India — 283,397 (71.0%)

2. China — 46,680 (11.7%)

3. Philippines — 5,248 (1.3%)

4. Canada — 4,222 (1.1%)

5. South Korea — 3,983 (1.0%)

6. Mexico — 3,333 (<1%)

7. Taiwan — 3,099 (<1%)

8. Pakistan — 3,052 (<1%)

9. Brazil — 2,638 (<1%)

10. Nigeria — 2,273 (<1%)

These figures, drawn directly from the official USCIS annual report Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers, FY 2024, clearly show that India stands to be the most severely impacted by this executive order.

The same report reveals that 64% of approved H-1B cases are concentrated in the computer/software sector, followed by engineering/architecture at 10%, education at 6%, administrative specialisations at 5%, and healthcare at 4%. 

This indicates that while the tech industry will bear the brunt of the new policy, education, engineering, and healthcare sectors will also feel its ripple effects.

Dallas-based immigration attorney Naeem Sukhia explains that the executive order applies to all H-1B holders, but its impact will vary by sector. 

While the order was technically applicable to all specialty occupations, he said, the heaviest pressure would fall on IT and technology companies, which the government believes have been the primary abusers of the programme. 

Sukhia noted that critical healthcare roles such as nursing and medical positions may qualify for national interest exemptions to prevent staff shortages in hospitals, but sponsors will need to provide strong evidence to secure such exemptions.

Regarding Pakistan, Sukhia states that most Pakistani professionals on H-1B visas also come from the computer, software, and engineering fields, with a smaller yet significant presence in healthcare, education, and administrative roles. 

The new $100,000 fee and stricter vetting will also affect Pakistani IT professionals and the companies that sponsor them. Engineering and education roles may also face increased barriers, though hospitals and medical systems could potentially secure exemptions by proving local workforce shortages, which could limit the impact on healthcare.

Sukhia emphasised that this policy was primarily a challenge for countries like India and China, which together accounted for more than 80% of all H-1B petitions. 

India, as the world’s largest supplier of IT professionals, is directly in the crosshairs. 

He said the executive order would deliver a major blow to India’s tech industry, and its timing was especially striking given that Modi and Trump publicly displayed a close relationship on social media. 

“This shows that while political optics may suggest warmth, the reality of economic and immigration policy is moving in an entirely different direction,” Sukhia remarked.

For Pakistan, the impact will be far smaller than for India, but sponsorship for professionals in IT, engineering, and education will become more expensive and difficult. 

Only Pakistani professionals who can clearly demonstrate that they are highly skilled and essential are likely to succeed. 

Hospitals and healthcare systems, however, may provide some relief for Pakistani doctors and nurses if they can secure national interest exemptions, allowing them to continue filling critical roles in the US healthcare sector.