Connect with us

Politics

How the IPC global hunger monitor determines famine

Published

on

How the IPC global hunger monitor determines famine


Palestinians wait to receive food from a charity kitchen, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, August 21, 2025. — Reuters
Palestinians wait to receive food from a charity kitchen, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, August 21, 2025. — Reuters 

A global hunger monitor determined on Friday that famine is taking place in Gaza, nearly two years after Israel launched a military campaign in the tiny Palestinian territory in response to the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023.

Here is an explanation of what the monitor is, how it assesses a hunger crisis, when it identifies famine and how it collects data.

Who is confirming famine?

The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) is an independent body funded by Western countries and widely recognised as the main global system for measuring the severity of hunger crises.

It was set up to sound the alarm so that famine and mass starvation could be prevented and to help organisations respond.

The IPC is overseen by 19 major humanitarian organisations and regional bodies. It typically partners with national governments to analyse data.

How is famine determined?

The IPC system charts acute food insecurity on a five-phase scale. Its most extreme warning is Phase 5, which has two levels, catastrophe and famine.

If the IPC or one of its partners finds that at least one area is in famine, a famine review committee, led by up to six experts, is activated.

For an area to be classified as in famine, at least 20% of people must be suffering extreme food shortages, with one in three children acutely malnourished and two people out of every 10,000 dying daily from starvation or malnutrition and disease.

The IPC says it does not formally declare famine, but provides analysis for governments and others to do so.

Even if a region has not yet been classified as in famine, the IPC can determine that households there are suffering famine conditions, which it describes as starvation, destitution and death.

The IPC relies on the UN World Food Programme and other relief organisations and government agencies to provide data.

Its preferred method for assessing acute malnutrition levels is to measure children’s weight and height, or if conditions do not allow that, to measure the circumference of children’s upper arms.

What are the precedents?

This is the fifth time in the past 14 years that a famine has been determined by the IPC, and the first time it has confirmed famine outside Africa.

The IPC previously concluded that there was famine in areas of Somalia in 2011, South Sudan in 2017 and 2020, and Sudan in 2024.

Some have criticised the IPC for being too slow to respond to serious humanitarian catastrophes. In Gaza, it has struggled to access data and Israel has contested its findings.

While a famine classification does not trigger any formal response, it can focus global attention.

Of the people affected, some 280,000 are in a northern region covering Gaza City, which the IPC said was in famine. The rest are in Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis — central and southern areas that the IPC projected would be in famine by the end of next month.

The IPC said the analysis released on Friday only covered people living in the Gaza City, Deir al-Balah and Khan Younis areas.

It was unable to classify North Gaza governorate due to access restrictions and a lack of data and it excluded any remaining population in the southern Rafah region.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Trump takes a dig at Macron, saying wife treats him ‘badly’

Published

on

Trump takes a dig at Macron, saying wife treats him ‘badly’


US President Donald Trump shakes hands with French President Emmanuel Macron at the White House in Washington, DC, US, February 24, 2025. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with French President Emmanuel Macron at the White House in Washington, DC, US, February 24, 2025. — Reuters

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump made fun of the French president and his wife during a private lunch Wednesday, as he lambasted Nato allies for not joining the war against Iran that has roiled the Middle East.

“We didn’t need them, but I asked anyway,” Trump told a private lunch in a video posted briefly on the White House YouTube channel before access was blocked.

“I call up France, Macron — whose wife treats him extremely badly. Still recovering from the right to the jaw,” Trump said.

He was referring to a May 2025 news video that appeared to show Brigitte Macron shoving the French president’s face on a trip to Vietnam, which Macron later rejected as part of a disinformation campaign.

“And I said, ‘Emmanuel, we’d love to have some help in the Gulf even though we’re setting records on knocking out bad people and knocking out ballistic missiles. We’d love to have some help. If you could, could you please send ships immediately,'” Trump continued.

He then mimics a French accent to give Macron’s alleged answer: “‘No no no, we cannot do that, Donald. We can do that after the war is won,'” he said.

“I said, ‘No no, I don’t need after the war is won Emmanuel,'” Trump said.

“So I learned about Nato — Nato won’t be there if we ever have the big one, you know what I mean by the big one,” Trump said, without elaborating.

He also branded Nato a “paper tiger,” the latest salvo by Trump and his top officials against the transatlantic alliance since he returned to the White House last year.

On Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States “is going to have to reexamine” its relationship with Nato once the war against Iran has concluded.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Former Iran foreign minister seriously wounded in US-Israeli strike

Published

on

Former Iran foreign minister seriously wounded in US-Israeli strike



Former Iranian foreign minister Kamal Kharazi was seriously wounded in a strike that also claimed the life of his wife, Iranian media reported.

Still an adviser to the government, Kharazi had given an interview to CNN a few weeks ago.

According to the newspapers Shargh, Etemad and Ham Mihan, his home in Tehran was targeted on Wednesday in a US-Israeli strike.

He was badly injured and hospitalised following the attack, the outlets said.

Kharazi had served as foreign minister from 1997 to 2005 under reformist ex-president Mohammad Khatami.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Takeaways from Trump’s speech on Iran

Published

on

Takeaways from Trump’s speech on Iran


President Donald Trump pauses as he finishes speaking about the Iran war from the Cross Hall of the White House on Wednesday, April 1, 2026, in Washington. — Reuters
President Donald Trump pauses as he finishes speaking about the Iran war from the Cross Hall of the White House on Wednesday, April 1, 2026, in Washington. — Reuters

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump staunchly defended his handling of the month-old US-Israeli war on Iran in a prime-time address on Wednesday, saying the US military was nearing completion of its mission while also reinforcing his threats to bomb the Islamic Republic back to the Stone Age.

He delivered his 19-minute speech against a backdrop of high global oil prices and his own low approval ratings.

Here are some key takeaways:

Looking for an exit – but not quite yet

Trump, facing a war-wary American public and sliding poll numbers, said the US had destroyed Iran’s navy and air force, crippled its ballistic missile and nuclear program and would continue to hit them “extremely hard” over the next two to three weeks.

Journalists at the White House listen as US President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation about the Iran war, in Washington, DC, US, April 1, 2026. — Reuters
Journalists at the White House listen as US President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation about the Iran war, in Washington, DC, US, April 1, 2026. — Reuters

But beyond that, even while saying the US military was on track to complete its objectives “very fast,” he stopped short of offering a firm timeline for an end to hostilities.

And he suggested the war could escalate if Iranian leaders did not capitulate to US terms during negotiations, with strikes on Iran’s energy and oil infrastructure possible.

Trump’s use of his speech to reiterate threats and send mixed messages may do little to calm jittery financial markets and ease the concerns of an American public that has shown little support for the country’s biggest military operation since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

The often conflicting signals that Trump has issued throughout the course of the conflict have only added to confusion, with the president one moment calling for a diplomatic settlement and in the next threatening to rain further destruction on Iran amid a continuing US military buildup in the region.

The Strait of Hormuz

Trump’s comments on Wednesday were not clear about whether US military operations could end even before Iran reopened the Strait of Hormuz, the vital waterway on which it has a chokehold that has created the worst global energy shock in history.

A map showing the Strait of Hormuz is seen in this illustration taken March 23, 2026. — Reuters
A map showing the Strait of Hormuz is seen in this illustration taken March 23, 2026. — Reuters

He instead repeated his calls for countries that rely on Gulf oil to “take the lead” and assume the burden of reopening the waterway, not the US, which he said does not need energy supplies from the region.

Western allies, however, have resisted joining a war that he and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu started without consulting them.

In his speech, however, Trump stopped short of saying, as he has in recent media interviews, that he is considering withdrawing from Nato over what he sees as its failure to support the US in the Iran conflict.

The risk, analysts say, is that Iran would essentially be left with significant leverage over the strait, the passageway for a fifth of the world’s oil and natural gas shipments.

Washington’s Gulf allies may also resent a hasty US exit, given that they could be left with a wounded, hostile neighbor.

Mission accomplished?

Trump touted the US military’s successes in the conflict but questions remain about whether he has truly achieved the main goal he laid out at the start of the war: Closing off Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon.

Protesters attend an anti-US and anti-Israeli rally, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 26, 2026. — Reuters
Protesters attend an anti-US and anti-Israeli rally, amid the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 26, 2026. — Reuters

More than a month later, Iran still has a stockpile of highly enriched uranium that could be processed to bomb grade, but it is believed to be mostly buried underground by US-Israeli bombing in June.

Trump, in a sudden reversal from his demands that Iran turn over the enriched uranium, told Reuters earlier on Wednesday that he no longer cared about the material because it was “so far underground” and US satellites could keep an eye on the area. Iran has always denied seeking a nuclear bomb.

While threatening new air strikes if Iran tries to move the stockpile, he made no mention of sending special forces on a risky mission to seize it, which US officials have said is among the options under consideration. However, any deployment of ground troops would likely anger most Americans.

Despite Trump’s claims of having destroyed Iran’s conventional military capabilities, it has demonstrated that its remaining missiles and drones can still be used to target Israel as well as US Gulf allies and American military installations housed on their land.

And Trump’s earlier calls for the overthrow of Iran’s theocratic rulers have gone unfulfilled. US-Israeli air strikes martyred many of the top leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, but they have been replaced by even more hard-line successors, including Khamenei’s son. US intelligence has deemed the Iranian government largely intact.

Domestic politics

Trump’s speech, his first prime-time address since the war started on February 28, was originally seen as being aimed at easing Americans’ concerns about the interventionist tendencies of a president who campaigned for his second term on a promise to keep the US out of “stupid” military interventions.

Journalists at the White House listen as US President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation about the Iran war, in Washington, DC, US, April 1, 2026. — Reuters
Journalists at the White House listen as US President Donald Trump delivers an address to the nation about the Iran war, in Washington, DC, US, April 1, 2026. — Reuters

But Trump, whose advisers have pressed him to show the public that he considers kitchen-table issues a priority, gave only a nod to Americans’ anxieties and appeared to dismiss their economic pain as temporary and sure to ease once the war is over.

“Many Americans have been concerned to see the recent rise in gasoline prices here at home,” he said. “This short-term increase has been entirely the result of the Iranian regime launching deranged terror attacks against commercial oil tankers of neighboring countries that have nothing to do with the conflict.”

While Trump’s MAGA movement has mostly stood with him, his grip on his political base could weaken if the economic impact, including high gas prices, persists with his Republican Party scrambling to keep control of Congress in November’s midterm elections.

Trump’s overall approval rating has fallen to 36%, the lowest since his return to the White House, a Reuters/Ipsos poll completed on Monday found.

After his TV appearance, stocks fell, the dollar strengthened and oil rose as Trump stopped short of providing a clear outline for when the war would end.

The market reaction reflects a basic problem with Trump’s dissonant messaging: He wants to reassure Americans that the war will be over soon, while at the same time threatening Iran with new attacks and suggesting he may leave without opening the Strait of Hormuz.

Flat performance?

Wednesday’s address offered Trump precious prime-time viewership and a chance to reset with voters. He made a dramatic entrance, walking through double doors in the White House residence to approach the podium.

A customer watches U.S. President Donald Trump address the nation on the Iran crisis from the White House in Washington, DC, on screen at Brooklyn Diner in Times Square, New York, US, April 1, 2026. — Reuters
A customer watches U.S. President Donald Trump address the nation on the Iran crisis from the White House in Washington, DC, on screen at Brooklyn Diner in Times Square, New York, US, April 1, 2026. — Reuters

But for the next 19 minutes, he spoke in a mostly subdued tone in a dimly lit room, sticking to well-worn talking points instead of clarifying his reasons for taking the US to war.

It was a far cry from the usual public appearances of the former reality TV star who was in front of probably his biggest audience since ‘State of the Union’ address.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending