Connect with us

Business

‘If System Was Unfair…’: Deepinder Goyal Defends Gig Economy After Workers’ Strike

Published

on

‘If System Was Unfair…’: Deepinder Goyal Defends Gig Economy After Workers’ Strike


Last Updated:

Deepinder Goyal said the record deliveries were completed without any additional incentives for delivery partners

Deepinder Goyal said the gig economy has emerged as one of India’s largest organised job creation engines.

Delivery platform founder Deepinder Goyal defended India’s gig economy, arguing that a system that is fundamentally unfair would not be able to attract and retain large numbers of workers, after delivery partners’ unions held a nationwide strike on December 31.

Deepinder Goyal said that Zomato and its quick-commerce arm Blinkit clocked their highest-ever number of deliveries on New Year’s Eve, despite calls for work stoppages by sections of gig workers.

“One thought for everyone: if a system were fundamentally unfair, it would not consistently attract and retain so many people who choose to work within it,” Deepinder Goyal said in a post on X (formerly Twitter), cautioning against what he described as “narratives pushed by vested interests”.

Record Deliveries Despite Strike, Deepinder Goyal Says 

Deepinder Goyal said that more than 4.5 lakh delivery partners across Zomato and Blinkit delivered over 75 lakh orders to more than 63 lakh customers in a single day- an all-time high for the platforms.

Deepinder Goyal said the record deliveries were completed without any additional incentives for delivery partners, adding that while New Year’s Eve typically sees higher incentives than normal days, this year was no different from previous New Year’s periods.

“Over 4.5 lakh delivery partners showed up for work,” he said, calling their participation significant and not negligible.

‘10-Minute Promise Not About Speeding’

In a follow-up post, Deepinder Goyal addressed concerns around Blinkit’s 10-minute delivery promise, pushing back against criticism that such timelines encourage unsafe driving.

“Our 10-minute delivery promise is enabled by the density of stores around your homes. It’s not enabled by asking delivery partners to drive fast,” he said.

Deepinder Goyal said delivery partners do not even see the promised delivery time on their apps.

“Delivery partners don’t even have a timer on their app to indicate what was the original time promised to the customer,” he added.

Explaining the process, he said orders are typically picked and packed within about 2.5 minutes, after which riders travel an average distance of under two kilometres in about eight minutes, translating to an average speed of around 15 kmph.

‘Hard To Imagine The Complexity’

Deepinder Goyal acknowledged public concern around safety, saying the criticism stems from a lack of understanding of how the system works.

“I understand why everybody thinks 10 minutes must be risking lives, because it is indeed hard to imagine the sheer complexity of the system design which enables quick deliveries,” he wrote.

He also urged sceptics to speak directly to delivery partners.

“If you’ve ever wanted to know why millions of Indians voluntarily take up platform work and sometimes even prefer it to regular jobs, just ask any rider partner when you get your next food or grocery order,” he said, adding, “You will be humbled by how rational and honest they will be with you.”

‘No System Is Perfect’

While defending the gig economy, Deepinder Goyal said platforms remain open to improvement.

“No system is perfect, and we are all for making it better than today,” he said, adding that the sector is “far from what it is being portrayed on social media by people who don’t understand how our system works and why”.

“If I were outside the system, I would also believe that gig workers are being exploited, but that’s not true,” he added.

Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.

Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trendsstock updatestax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.
News business ‘If System Was Unfair…’: Deepinder Goyal Defends Gig Economy After Workers’ Strike
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Netflix grants Warner Bros. Discovery 7-day waiver to reopen deal talks with Paramount Skydance

Published

on

Netflix grants Warner Bros. Discovery 7-day waiver to reopen deal talks with Paramount Skydance


Warner Bros. Discovery on Tuesday said it will reopen deal talks with Paramount Skydance under a seven-day waiver from Netflix to explore “deficiencies” in Paramount’s offer to buy the entirety of WBD.

The legacy media company has a pending transaction with Netflix for its streaming and studio businesses. Paramount launched a hostile tender offer straight to WBD shareholders at $30 per share after losing out to Netflix in a bidding war.

“Netflix has provided WBD a limited waiver under the terms of WBD’s merger agreement with Netflix, permitting WBD to engage in discussions with Paramount Skydance (“PSKY”) (NASDAQ: PSKY) for a seven-day period ending on February 23, 2026 to seek clarity for WBD stockholders and provide PSKY the ability to make its best and final offer,” Warner Bros. Discovery said in a release.

“During this period, WBD will engage with PSKY to discuss the deficiencies that remain unresolved and clarify certain terms of PSKY’s proposed merger agreement,” it said.

Paramount leadership has repeatedly said its $30 per share, all-cash offer is not its “best and final.” Last week the company sweetened its offer with additional “enhancements,” but stopped short of raising the per-share value.

Warner Bros. Discovery said Tuesday that a senior Paramount representative informed a WBD board member that it would pay $31 per share if deal talks were to reopen.

Tune in at 4:30pm ET as Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos joins CNBC TV. Watch in real time on CNBC+ or the CNBC Pro stream.

After the limited waiver period, Netflix will retain its matching rights provided by the merger agreement, WBD said.

“Throughout the entire process, our sole focus has been on maximizing value and certainty for WBD shareholders,” said WBD CEO David Zaslav in a statement. “Every step of the way, we have provided PSKY with clear direction on the deficiencies in their offers and opportunities to address them. We are engaging with PSKY now to determine whether they can deliver an actionable, binding proposal that provides superior value and certainty for WBD shareholders through their best and final offer.”

WBD also on Tuesday announced a special meeting of shareholders will be held on March 20 and said its board continues to unanimously recommend the Netflix deal over Paramount’s offer.

Netflix said in a statement the shareholder meeting date marked an “important milestone for our transaction with WBD.”

“While we are confident that our transaction provides superior value and certainty, we recognize the ongoing distraction for WBD stockholders and the broader entertainment industry caused by PSKY’s antics,” Netflix said. “Accordingly, we granted WBD a narrow seven-day waiver of certain obligations under our merger agreement to allow them to engage with PSKY to fully and finally resolve this matter.”

Shares of Warner Bros. Discovery were up about 3.5% Tuesday. Shares of Paramount were up about 6%.

Raising regulatory concerns

Either proposed purchase of Warner Bros. Discovery assets comes with regulatory questions.

Media industry insiders and lawmakers have questioned whether Netflix’s proposed deal would win approval as it would bring together two of the top streaming services and could result in higher prices for consumers.

Netflix leadership has repeatedly said the company believes it would win regulatory approval for the deal because it would preserve jobs in a challenged media landscape rife with layoffs.

Paramount has sounded the alarm to WBD shareholders, however, and argues its offer is not only better but would more easily garner government support.

On the flipside, Paramount’s offer has raised questions of foreign funding and antitrust considerations in bringing together two large portfolios of pay TV channels and two major film studios.

Paramount’s deal is financed in part by sovereign wealth funds of Saudi Arabia; Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; and Qatar. Paramount has said those entities have agreed to forgo any governance rights.

In its statement on Tuesday, Netflix called out the foreign funding, which it said it expects to come under scrutiny from international regulators, including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Netflix said it also expects European authorities “to scrutinize the Middle Eastern investors in PSKY’s consortium and to be skeptical of claims that they are purely passive investors.”

Given Europe’s track record of antitrust enforcement, it’s possible regulatory battles for either deal would be won or lost in that market. Of course, the question still looms of how President Donald Trump will view either transaction. Trump recently said he hadn’t been involved in the process so far and didn’t plan to be, though he has reportedly met with executives from each camp.

Netflix’s statement on Tuesday “unsurprisingly points to a number of arguments Netflix believes it has in its favor,” according to an analyst note from Raymond James on Tuesday, “including better prospects for approval, a clearer national security picture, and financial security.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

NPS Active vs Auto Choice: What Works In Volatile Markets?

Published

on

NPS Active vs Auto Choice: What Works In Volatile Markets?


Last Updated:

NPS lets Indians aged 18-70 invest in bonds, government securities, or equity, with active or auto asset allocation and pension benefits at age 60.

Choosing between control and convenience: NPS Active vs Auto Choice during market volatility.

Choosing between control and convenience: NPS Active vs Auto Choice during market volatility.

The National Pension Scheme (NPS) is a government-backed retirement scheme, allowing salaried professionals to save for after-job life.

NPS provides people with the option of investing in corporate bonds, government securities or equity. If you are an Indian citizen between the age of 18 to 70 years, you can invest in NPS. Under this scheme, you can contribute regularly during your working age. After this, at the age of 60, you can withdraw a part of the accumulated money and can get regular pension income from the remaining amount.

NPS gives two options to the subscriber to invest in the scheme, auto and active. An auto choice is an option in which the subscribers give the fund manager the freedom to invest their money wherever they want, whereas, in active choice, the subscriber tells assets his money is to be invested.

What is an active choice in NPS?

This option is available to NPS members who want to select their own asset blend. Subscribers can select the ratio in which their money will be spread across different asset classes under this choice. In other words, you have a say in the assets you own. Even within this option, there are restrictions because a maximum of 75% can be allocated to stocks. This maximum was increased a few years ago from 50%.

What is an auto choice in NPS?

There are three funds in NPS for auto allocation (NPS auto choice option). There is a Default Moderate Life Cycle Fund. In this, the maximum equity investment can be up to 50 per cent. The second is the Conservative Life Cycle Fund, which allows only up to 25% investment in equities. The third is the Aggressive Life Cycle Fund in which you can invest up to 75% in equity.

If you want to choose the active choice, consider three things before doing so. First, are they able to do the right capital allocation by valuing different asset classes? Secondly, if the subscriber has investments elsewhere and NPS is only a part of his overall portfolio, can they go for active choice? Thirdly, if there is a need to change the NPS portfolio in future, you will do so. If you consider yourself true on these three conditions, then you should choose the active choice option to invest in NPS.

Which Is Better Choice?

At a time of market volatility, when performance has remained muted for the past six months to a year, there are concerns about overexposure to equities among a section of subscribers.

“In volatile phases, this design (auto option) can be a big advantage. There is no temptation to time the market. There is no last-minute panic exit. The portfolio quietly adjusts on its own,” Ajay Kumar Yadav, CFP CM, Group CEO& CIO , Wise FinServ added.

On the other hand, Active Choice offers greater flexibility. Yadav explained that it allows investors to decide how much to allocate to equity, corporate bonds, and government securities within prescribed limits. According to him, this option suits investors who understand markets and are comfortable managing asset allocation decisions.

“For example, when interest rates soften, increasing exposure to government securities may enhance returns. After sharp equity corrections, staying invested or even raising equity allocation can strengthen long-term compounding,” he said.

Shantanu Awasthi, Co-founder and CEO of Mavenark Wealth, said Auto Choice operates within a predefined asset allocation structure managed under a single AMC framework. “Auto Choice confines investors to a predefined asset allocation structure managed within a single AMC,” he said, adding that the model offers simplicity and built-in discipline but limits flexibility.

According to Awasthi, Auto is essentially a structured, convenience-led approach where investors outsource both asset allocation and fund selection. While this reduces decision fatigue, it restricts customization and tactical shifts during changing market cycles.

CA Niresh Maheshwari, Director at Wealth Wisdom India Pvt. Ltd., said the bigger risk during volatility lies in investor reaction rather than price swings. “When markets turn volatile, the real risk isn’t the fluctuation, it’s how investors react to it,” he said.

Maheshwari explained that Active Choice may suit investors who understand asset allocation and are comfortable maintaining higher equity exposure, even as they age. “Active Choice are suitable to those who understand markets and asset allocation, want higher equity exposure even as they age, and are comfortable monitoring their portfolio,” he said. However, he warned that discipline is critical — “Without it, flexibility becomes overreaction.”

For investors who prefer a hands-off approach, Maheshwari said Auto Choice may offer more comfort. “Auto Choice works for those who prefer a set-and-forget approach and don’t want to manage risk themselves,” he said. The life-cycle model automatically reduces equity exposure with age, limiting the need for tactical decisions during market swings.

“For long-term retirement investing, behaviour and consistency matter far more than trying to time the market,” Maheshwari added.

Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.

Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.

Check JEE Mains Result 2026 Link Here

Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Air India and Lufthansa Group sign MoU to expand India-Europe flight network

Published

on

Air India and Lufthansa Group sign MoU to expand India-Europe flight network


India-Europe Flight Network: Air India and the Lufthansa Group recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to form a joint business partnership. The agreement establishes a framework for cooperation between Air India, its subsidiaries such as Air India Express, and Lufthansa Group carriers, including Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines, ITA Airways, Lufthansa, and SWISS.

Through this partnership, the two companies aim to enhance flight connections and travel experiences between India and Europe on a single ticket. The move follows the recent completion of the India-European Union Free Trade Agreement. The airlines plan to collaborate on route planning, flight schedules, and marketing to make travel more convenient. They also intend to coordinate frequent flyer programs and IT systems.

Carsten Spohr, Chairman and CEO of the Lufthansa Group, said the agreement marks a new phase in aviation between the two regions. He stated, “Together with Air India, we will strengthen our access to the aviation market with the highest growth rates worldwide.”

Add Zee News as a Preferred Source


Air India, in a statement, said it is expanding its fleet and services following its privatisation in 2022. The airline views this cooperation as a way to support growing trade and travel ties. Campbell Wilson, CEO and Managing Director of Air India, noted that the framework allows both companies to explore closer cooperation on multiple levels. He said, “This would unlock greater value for our common customers and respective shareholders, and we look forward to progressing these initiatives together with the Lufthansa Group.”

The two airline groups already collaborate through the Star Alliance and existing codeshare agreements. Currently, they operate 145 routes connecting 15 cities in India with 29 cities in Europe. The new agreement will initially focus on traffic between India and the Lufthansa Group’s home markets of Germany, Austria, Belgium, Italy, and Switzerland, with plans to expand to the rest of Europe and the Indian subcontinent later.

Economic data shows that the EU is India’s largest trading partner for goods, with bilateral trade exceeding 120 billion euros in 2024. Together, India and the European Union represent nearly 25 percent of global Gross Domestic Product. The airlines believe that improved aviation links will further strengthen these economic relations. Final details of the partnership, including specific routes, will be announced after the companies obtain the necessary regulatory and anti-trust approvals. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending