Connect with us

Business

Labour MPs warn Reeves’s business rates U-turn for pubs doesn’t go far enough

Published

on

Labour MPs warn Reeves’s business rates U-turn for pubs doesn’t go far enough


Rachel Reeves is facing backlash from Labour MPs, pub landlords and business owners over the “wholly inadequate” 15 per cent cut in business rates bills.

The support, which the Treasury has said is worth £1,650 for the average pub next year, came after warnings that a decision in the chancellor’s Budget to end the rate relief brought in during the Covid pandemic would lead to mass closures and job losses.

The anger prompted a national campaign of pubs led by TV presenter Jeremy Clarkson, barring Labour MPs from their premises.

The Independent first revealed that the government would U-turn on the plan to end the relief earlier this month, and the Treasury finally confirmed pubs and music venues would get 15 per cent off their business rates bills from April as part of a major support package.

However, other hospitality businesses such as hotels, restaurants and cafes will not receive additional support despite their own concerns over soaring tax bills.

The Independent has seen a letter from 50 Labour MPs, organised by Labour Knowsley MP Anneliese Midgley, a member of the culture select committee, warning that the change is not enough.

The letter, also signed by former minister Justin Madders, and leading Labour MPs Stella Creasy, Dan Carden, Sharon Hodgson, Alex Sobel, Kerry McCarthy and others, warns that music venues are still under threat.

They said: “The UK Music industry is one of our most important cultural and economic assets, delivering world-renowned artists, venues, festivals, studios and generating significant international soft power. In 2024, it contributed £8 billion to the economy.

“Many of us have been contacted by constituents in recent months who use and run these critical music spaces, explaining that they will be severely impacted by the 2026 business rates revaluation, scheduled to take effect on 1 April 2026.

“According to the Music Venue Trust, 84 grassroots music venues in England face rateable value increases of between 45 per cent and 275 per cent from 2025/26 to 2026/27. These increases do not represent marginal adjustments but existential threats.”

Announcing the support in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Treasury minister Dan Tomlinson said the property tax bills for pubs and music venues in England will be reduced by 15 per cent in 2026/27 and then be “frozen in real terms” for the next two years.

But responding to the announcement, Ms Creasy urged ministers to revisit the exclusion of cafes, soft plays and community centres from its plans, claiming it could lead to their closure.

She said: “I’m sure he does not want to be the minister responsible for sending toddlers into pubs, because the other places that their parents might take them during the day have closed down. That would not be in anybody’s interest.”

The Treasury’s intervention comes after an intensifying backlash from industry bosses and MPs over impending tax increases.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ budget saw her barred by pub landlords (PA)

However, industry bodies UKHospitality and the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) had warned that pub business rates bills in England would still increase by an average of 15 per cent, or £1,400, in April without intervention.

They said this would have led to an average rise of 76 per cent, or £7,000, by the 2028/29 financial year.

And not all landlords were convinced. Dom Jacobs, founder and managing director of the Ardent Pub Group in London, said: “Rachel Reeves’ latest U-turn may be welcome, but it is wholly inadequate.

“Hospitality continues to shoulder an excessive tax burden, and this half-measure does nothing to change that.

“Instead of backing a sector capable of delivering real growth and jobs, the government has once again missed the mark, a failure that will inevitably push many brilliant publicans out of business.”

Matthew Todd, landlord of The Wonston Arms near Winchester, Hampshire, said: “I don’t see how it’s going to save the venues that are going to close – it’s actually a very small amount that’s being talked about. It’s woefully not enough, I’m afraid.”

Andy Lennox, who runs The Old Thatch in Wimborne, Dorset, said the rates relief was a “discount on a bill rise” and did not go far enough.

He said, “This is a bill that we can’t afford to pay anyway. It’s been discounted down, but it’s still going up. And essentially, we have always argued that there needs to be meaningful tax reform in line with Europe, so VAT cut to 13%.

“So ultimately, whilst it is welcomed that the government is listening, we don’t think it goes far enough.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Vets to be legally required to publish price lists and cap prescription fees

Published

on

Vets to be legally required to publish price lists and cap prescription fees



Vets will be legally bound to prescription fee caps and publishing price lists among new measures which will start coming into force later this year, the competition watchdog has announced.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said its final reforms for the sector will help pet owners better navigate the vet services market.

Other legally binding measures will include a price comparison website and mandatory branding by the large groups to boost competition and drive down prices.

The CMA said pet owners using a vet practice that is part of a larger chain can expect to see changes before Christmas, including standard price lists.

The measures follow the CMA finding that fees have risen at almost twice the rate of inflation, with pet owners not being given enough information about their vet and the prices of treatments.

Martin Coleman, chairman of the independent Inquiry Group, said: “This is the most extensive review of veterinary services in a generation, and today’s reforms will make a real difference to the millions of pet owners who want the best for their pets but struggle to find the practice, treatment and price that meets their needs.

“Too often, people are left in the dark about who owns their practice, treatment options and prices – even when facing bills running into thousands of pounds.

“Our measures mean it will be made clear to pet owners which practices are part of large groups, which are charging higher prices, and for the first time, vet businesses will be held to account by an independent regulator.

“Our changes put pet owners at the centre but also help vets by enhancing trust in the profession and protecting clinical judgment from undue commercial pressure – and that is important to ensure our pets continue to get the best care.”

The CMA said practices must publish a comprehensive price list for standard services, including consultations, common procedures, diagnostics, written prescriptions and cremation options under its new rules.

Prescriptions – for which “many” practices charge £30 or more for each – are to be capped at £21 for the first medicine and £12.50 for any additional medicines.

Practices must also provide a written estimate in advance for any treatment expected to cost £500 or more, including aftercare costs, as well as an itemised bill.

Emergency care will be the only exception for written estimates.

Prices and information about who owns the surgery are to be made available to pet owners through the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS) ‘Find a Vet’ service, which will share the data with third-party comparison sites.

Vet businesses must make it clear whether they are part of a group or an independent business, with details of group ownership to be displayed on signs at the surgery and online.

British Veterinary Association president Rob Williams said: “The majority of the CMA’s measures focus on increasing transparency and information, which will help pet owners make more informed choices and support competition, which is a really positive step.”

He added: “Delivering highly skilled veterinary medicine is costly and whilst we recognise prices have risen sharply in recent years this is due to a number of factors, including the higher costs all businesses are experiencing – and vet practices are not immune.

“Plus, thanks to advances in diagnostics and medical technology over the last 20 years, vets can now do much more to manage disease and injury in animals, whereas in the past the only option available may have been to euthanase.

“Owners today also have a greater expectation of their vet, with many expecting human quality healthcare for their pets and whilst this is possible to deliver, it comes at a cost.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gold price prediction today: Pressure on gold prices to continue on March 24, 2026 amid US-Iran war? Check outlook – The Times of India

Published

on

Gold price prediction today: Pressure on gold prices to continue on March 24, 2026 amid US-Iran war? Check outlook – The Times of India



Gold price prediction today: Gold prices are likely to remain range-bound in the near future, says Praveen Singh, Head Currencies and Commodities, Mirae Asset ShareKhan



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Estée Lauder is in talks to merge with Puig amid ongoing turnaround plan

Published

on

Estée Lauder is in talks to merge with Puig amid ongoing turnaround plan


An Estée Lauder pop-up store is seen inside a Daimaru store on Nanjing Road in Shanghai, China, Aug. 6, 2021.

Costfoto | Future Publishing | Getty Images

Estée Lauder Companies said Monday that it is in talks with Spanish beauty group Puig to potentially merge the two companies.

“No final decision has been made, and no agreement has been reached,” Estée Lauder said in a statement.

Shares of the U.S. beauty company were down nearly 8% following the news, which was first reported by the Financial Times. Puig’s stock rose roughly 3%.

Puig owns major beauty brands including Charlotte Tilbury, Jean Paul Gaultier and Rabanne. The companies did not disclose any financial details of the potential deal.

Estée Lauder has been struggling amid ongoing headwinds from tariffs and its restructuring as it enacts its “Beauty Reimagined” turnaround plan to revitalize the business. In its second-quarter earnings report last month, the beauty retailer said it’s expecting a $100 million hit to its full-year profitability due to tariff impacts.

Estée Lauder’s stock has dropped roughly 25% this year.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending