Connect with us

Entertainment

New Delhi urges UN body not to restrict imports of animals by Ambani zoo

Published

on

New Delhi urges UN body not to restrict imports of animals by Ambani zoo


India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Anant Ambani, son of Indian billionaire Mukesh Ambani, pose for a photograph after the inauguration of Vantara animal rescue and rehabilitation centre in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India, March 4, 2025. — Reuters

NEW DELHI: India has urged a UN wildlife trade body not to curb its imports of endangered species, saying it has tightened oversight amid growing allegations of irregular animal shipments to a large private zoo run by Asia’s richest family.

Vantara, a 3,500-acre zoo in Gujarat state run by the philanthropic arm of a conglomerate led by billionaire Mukesh Ambani and his family, has faced allegations of improper imports of certain animals, triggering higher scrutiny from authorities in Germany and the European Union, Reuters has reported.

Indian investigators tasked by the country’s Supreme Court to examine the allegations by non-profit and wildlife groups cleared the sanctuary of any wrongdoing in September, and Vantara has said it complies with all regulations.

Anant Ambani, son of Mukesh Ambani, gestures during an event in Mumbai, India, July 12, 2024 — Reuters
Anant Ambani, son of Mukesh Ambani, gestures during an event in Mumbai, India, July 12, 2024 — Reuters

However, after visiting the facility in September, the Secretariat of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites) issued a report last week asking India to review its procedures.

The report cited discrepancies between exporter and importer trade data and flagged insufficient checks on the origin of some animals.

In a submission to Cites dated November 10, India said any restrictive or punitive measure at this stage would lack legal foundation and risk unsettling the Cites framework, calling the measure “premature and disproportionate”.

The wildlife body’s request “would constitute a de facto suspension or moratorium on lawful” imports, the government said.

The Indian submission, posted on the Cites website ahead of its convention meeting this month, is first being reported by Reuters. It signals new wrangling over Vantara’s imports.

‘Exceptionally high standards’

Cites is a global treaty that regulates trade in endangered plants and animals, or products derived from them, with the aim of ensuring their survival.

While Cites acknowledged last week that Vantara operates facilities of “exceptionally high standards,” it recommended that India halt new import permits for endangered species until safeguards are tightened.

The body warned that without stricter checks, animals sourced from the wild could be misrepresented as captive-bred.

A satellite image shows the Vantara wildlife centre, run by the philanthropic arm of tycoon Mukesh Ambanis Reliance Industries, in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India, May 3, 2025. — Reuters
A satellite image shows the Vantara wildlife centre, run by the philanthropic arm of tycoon Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries, in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India, May 3, 2025. — Reuters

India countered that it “has strengthened inspection and reporting mechanisms for all recognised zoos and rescue facilities” including Vantara. The government also instructed the Central Zoo Authority to ensure enhanced due diligence for all future acquisitions.

Cites and Vantara did not respond to a Reuters request for comment on the Indian government’s submission on Wednesday.

Vantara — home to 2,000 species

Vantara says it is home to some 2,000 species. That includes imported exotic species from South Africa, Venezuela, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, including snakes, tortoises, tigers, cheetahs, giraffes and chimpanzees.

The shipments were recorded with a declared value of $9 million, which Vantara has said reflected freight and insurance charges, not any payments for wildlife.

The Cites report last week noted that “a number of animals come from established commercial breeding facilities, which would normally sell the animals they breed”.

India has mounted a defence, saying in response that the SC panel’s findings showed imports were carried out in compliance with regulations.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

President Zardari assents 27th Constitutional Amendment to law after parliament’s approval

Published

on

President Zardari assents 27th Constitutional Amendment to law after parliament’s approval


President Asif Ali Zardari signs a bill in this undated picture. — President House
  • President gives assent to bill on PM’s advice.
  • Assent given to bill after nod from both houses.
  • Senate greenlights bill after changes by NA. 

ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari on Thursday gave assent to the much-debated 27th Constitutional Amendment after approval from the Parliament.

With the president’s signature, the amendment has now officially become part of the Constitution.

“The Constitution (Twenty-Seventh Amendment) Bill, 2025 is assented to, as advised by the Prime Minister [Shehbaz Sharif], at Para-5 of the Summary,” read a notification issued by the President’s House. 

The development came moments after the Senate approved the amendment bill following changes approved by the National Assembly a day earlier, amid noisy protests by the opposition.

Federal Minister for Law Azam Nazeer Tarar presented the constitutional amendment bill today, with the tweaks to the draft earlier approved by the upper house. The amendment bill received 64 votes (two-thirds majority in the 96-member House) in favour and four against.

Senate Chairman Yousuf Raza Gilani announced the result, saying: “So the motion is carried by the votes of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the Senate, and consequently, the bill stands passed.”

The much-touted bill was initially presented in the upper house of parliament on Monday and got a nod on the same day. It was then referred to the NA, which approved it with some amendments. Therefore, the legislation was again presented in the Senate today to approve the latest changes.

New tweaks

A day earlier, the National Assembly passed the amendment bill that seeks to change the judicial structure and military command, with 234 votes in favour and four against amid the opposition’s walkout. It included eight amendments — not part of the Senate-approved previous version — aimed at clarifying the chief justice’s position.

The amended bill fine-tunes the structure of the newly established Federal Constitutional Court (FCC), clarifies the titles and ranking of the country’s top judges, and drops several clauses from the Senate-approved draft that had sought to alter oath-related provisions for various constitutional offices.

One of the most significant updates relates to Clause 2, which modifies Article 6(2A) of the Constitution — the article concerning high treason. The National Assembly’s version adds the term “Federal Constitutional Court” after “the”, thereby explicitly including the new court within the ambit of Article 6. The earlier Senate draft had not mentioned the court by name.

The lower house also introduced a fresh Clause 2A to amend Article 10(4), which deals with preventive detention. This revision adds the words “Supreme Court” within the explanatory portion of that article.

Meanwhile, the National Assembly deleted several provisions that had appeared in the Senate’s version. Clauses 4, 19, 51, and 55 — which collectively proposed to modify the wording of oaths administered to a range of constitutional officeholders — were removed from the final text.

Clause 4 had aimed to revise Article 42, under which the president takes the oath of office before the Chief Justice of Pakistan, by substituting the phrase “Chief Justice of Pakistan” with “Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court.”

Likewise, Clause 19 proposed changes to Article 168, which regulates the appointment and oath of the Auditor General of Pakistan. It would have added the term “Supreme Court” before “Chief Justice of Pakistan,” thereby slightly altering the formal oath text.

Clause 51 mirrored this approach for Article 214, which requires the Chief Election Commissioner to take the oath before the Chief Justice. The Senate draft suggested replacing this with “Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court.”

Similarly, Clause 55 sought to amend Article 255(2), which applies in cases where an oath cannot be administered before the designated official. At present, the Chief Justice of Pakistan can nominate another person; the Senate version proposed transferring this authority to the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court.

All of these oath-related proposals were ultimately omitted by the National Assembly.

Another key modification came in Clause 23, which amends Article 176 to include a proviso specifying that, “notwithstanding anything contained in the Constitution, the incumbent Chief Justice shall continue to be known as the Chief Justice of Pakistan during his term in office.”

A further addition was made under Clause 56, which now defines the “Chief Justice of Pakistan” as “the senior among the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,” thereby establishing a formal hierarchy between the two judicial heads.

The multi-clause amendment bill required a two-thirds majority in the 336-member House. The ruling coalition easily secured the required votes, with the PML-N holding 125 seats, the PPP 74, the MQM-P 22, the PML-Q four, the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party four, and one seat each held by the PML-Z, the Balochistan Awami Party, and the National Peoples Party.

However, four members from the JUI-F, once a close ally of the ruling PML-N, were the only lawmakers to register their votes against the amendments.





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

'Disgraced' Andrew shows clear signs of distress about leaving Royal Lodge

Published

on

'Disgraced' Andrew shows clear signs of distress about leaving Royal Lodge



A royal expert reveals how former prince Andrew is feeling after he was ordered to vacate his royal residence, the Royal Lodge.



Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Hilaria Baldwin goes unfiltered about 26-year age gap with Alec Baldwin

Published

on

Hilaria Baldwin goes unfiltered about 26-year age gap with Alec Baldwin


Hilaria Baldwin gets real about 26-year age gap with Alec Baldwin

Hilaria Baldwin admits to sometimes needing therapy over her 26-year age gap with husband Alec Baldwin.

The multi-hyphenate, 41, made the admission during a recent guest appearance on the Uncut and Uncensored with Caroline Stanbury podcast.

“I don’t believe that age is just a number, at least in our situation,” Hilaria admitted. “I think that there’s certain things where I have to look at him and say he has 26 more years of experience. And sometimes that’s a flex, and sometimes that means that we need to do a little therapy.”

Hilaria, who appeared on Dancing with the Stars season 34, added that she’s learned not to care about outside opinions, especially given that she’s entered her 40s. “You can’t please everybody,” she said.

“By your 40s, you know what you want, and that confidence is really sexy and comforting.”

She also shared that maturity has brought more peace and self-assurance. “The ups and downs and insecurities we have when we’re younger fade away. That’s a gift that comes with age.”

Hilaria and Alec, who married in 2012, share seven children, including daughters Carmen, 12, María, 4, and Ilaria, 2, and sons Rafael, 10, Leonardo, 9, Romeo, 7, and Eduardo, 5.

The Rust star is also father to Ireland Baldwin, 30, from his marriage to Kim Basinger.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending