Connect with us

Politics

Somalia calls Israeli FM visit to Somaliland an ‘incursion’

Published

on

Somalia calls Israeli FM visit to Somaliland an ‘incursion’


Somalis hold an image depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a demonstration after Israels recognition of self-declared Somaliland as an independent and sovereign state, in Hodan district of Mogadishu, Somalia, December 28, 2025. — Reuters
Somalis hold an image depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a demonstration after Israel’s recognition of self-declared Somaliland as an independent and sovereign state, in Hodan district of Mogadishu, Somalia, December 28, 2025. — Reuters
  • Somalia says reserves right to take diplomatic, legal measures.
  • Somaliland president praises Israel’s “courageous” decision.
  • Israeli minister says recognising Somaliland “moral thing to do”.

The Israeli foreign minister arrived in the “Somaliland” region of the Federal Republic of Somalia on Tuesday in a high-profile visit, condemned by Somalia as an “unauthorised incursion”, after Israel recognised the breakaway region in the Horn of Africa.

Israel announced last month it was officially recognising Somaliland, a first for the self-proclaimed republic since it declared independence from Somalia in 1991.

Somaliland enjoys a strategic position on the Gulf of Aden and has its own currency, passport and army, but has struggled to win international recognition, amid fears of provoking Somalia and encouraging other separatist movements in Africa.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, whose delegation was welcomed at the airport by senior government officials, said recognising Somaliland had been “the moral thing to do”.

Somaliland President Abdirahman Abdullahi Mohamed praised Israel’s “courageous” decision, and said it would open up economic and development opportunities.

“It promotes the strategic interest partnership of the two countries,” he said in a joint press conference.

Somalia reacted furiously to news of the visit, labelling it an “illegal” and “unauthorised incursion”.

In a statement, Somalia’s foreign ministry said it “reserves the right to take all appropriate diplomatic and legal measures… to safeguard its sovereignty, national unity, and territorial integrity”.

A special meeting of the African Union Peace and Security Council on Tuesday condemned “in the strongest terms” the recognition by Israel and called for its “immediate revocation”.

The Arab League said in a statement that “any official or quasi-official dealings” with officials in Somaliland treated as separate from Somalia was a “flagrant violation of Somalia’s unity and sovereignty”.

The move would “undermine regional peace and security and exacerbate political tensions in Somalia, the Red Sea, the Gulf of Aden and the Horn of Africa”, the League added.

Following Israel’s recognition, Al-Shabaab, which has fought the Somali government for around two decades, said they would fight any attempt by Israel to use Somaliland as a base.

‘Threat’ to stability

Analysts say the deal with Somaliland could provide Israel with better access to the Red Sea, enabling it to hit Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Somaliland’s location alongside one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes has made it a key partner for foreign countries.

Israel’s recognition was supported by the United States, but criticised by Egypt, Turkey, the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council and the Saudi-based Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. The European Union insisted Somalia´s sovereignty should be respected.

Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud called the Israeli decision a “threat” to stability in the already volatile Horn of Africa.

In an interview with Al Jazeera, he said Somaliland had accepted three conditions from Israel: the resettlement of Palestinians, the establishment of a military base on the Gulf of Aden, and joining the Abraham Accords to normalise ties with Israel.

Somaliland’s foreign ministry denied the first two conditions.

The region has experienced greater stability than the rest of insurgency-hit Somalia.

It was briefly a recognised state in June 1960 when it gained independence from Britain, but voluntarily united with Italian-administered Somalia days later.

Somaliland´s leaders say that union was never formally ratified and became void when the Somali state effectively collapsed in 1991.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

US seizes Russia-flagged oil tanker chased to North Atlantic

Published

on

US seizes Russia-flagged oil tanker chased to North Atlantic


A handout image of the ship Marinera (Ex-Bella 1) seen in the distance, released on January 7, 2026. — Reuters
A handout image of the ship Marinera (Ex-Bella 1) seen in the distance, released on January 7, 2026. — Reuters 
  • US says it seizes vessel despite ship being escorted by Russian navy.
  • Vessel thwarted earlier attempt to board it near Venezuela.
  • Russia’s Transport Ministry slams seizure of oil tanker. 

WASHINGTON: The United States on Wednesday seized a Russian-flagged oil tanker in the North Atlantic after pursuing it from off the coast of Venezuela, in an operation condemned by Moscow.

Washington says the tanker is part of a so-called shadow fleet that carries oil for countries such as Venezuela, Russia and Iran in violation of US sanctions, and seized it despite the ship being escorted by the Russian navy.

The vessel had thwarted an earlier attempt to board it last month near Venezuela, where a US raid on Saturday toppled the country’s authoritarian president, Nicolas Maduro.

“The vessel was seized in the North Atlantic pursuant to a warrant issued by a US federal court,” US European Command, which oversees American forces in the region, said in a statement on X.

After the operation, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth posted that the US blockade on Venezuelan oil was in full effect “anywhere in the world.”

Russia’s Transport Ministry slammed the seizure, saying “freedom of navigation applies in waters on the high seas, and no state has the right to use force against vessels duly registered under the jurisdiction of other states.”

The US military also announced a second sanctioned tanker ship had been seized in the Caribbean Sea.

Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem posted on X that both vessels “were either last docked in Venezuela or en route to it,” and included a video of US forces roping down from a helicopter onto an unidentified ship and proceeding toward the bridge with weapons ready.

US to control oil sales ‘indefinitely’ 

Last weekend, US special forces snatched Maduro and his wife from Caracas and flew them to New York to face trial on drug charges.

Since then, President Donald Trump has said that the United States will “run” Venezuela and US companies will control its critical oil industry.

In Caracas, after several days of shuttered shops and intermittent public transport, the capital’s streets were again busy Wednesday with pedestrians, street vendors, cars and motorbikes.

The North Atlantic operation came despite Russia reportedly sending a submarine and other naval assets to escort the empty tanker and saying the vessel was sailing under the Russian flag.

The vessel, formerly known as the Bella-1, in recent weeks switched its registration to Russia, changed its name to the Marinera and the tanker’s crew reportedly painted a Russian flag on the tanker.

It had been en route to Venezuela before it evaded the US blockade, and has been under US sanctions since 2024 over alleged ties to Iran and Hezbollah.

Trump said Tuesday that Venezuela said 30-50 million barrels of “high?quality, sanctioned” Venezuelan crude will be shipped to US ports, with the revenue — perhaps more than $2 billion at current market prices — placed under his personal control.

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright added Wednesday that Washington will control sales of Venezuelan oil “indefinitely.”

It was not clear whether Venezuela’s new ruler — interim president Delcy Rodriguez — had agreed to hand over the oil, how the plan would work, or what its legal basis would be.

Rodriguez – a long-time member of Maduro’s inner circle as vice president and energy minister – has vowed cooperation with the United States amid fears that Trump could pursue wider regime change.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

UAE civil law reform ends guardian control at 18

Published

on

UAE civil law reform ends guardian control at 18


UAE flag flies over a boat at Dubai Marina, Dubai, United Arab Emirates May 22, 2015. — Reuters
UAE flag flies over a boat at Dubai Marina, Dubai, United Arab Emirates May 22, 2015. — Reuters

DUBAI: The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has introduced a new civil law setting 18 as the legal age of adulthood, a move experts say will significantly expand the rights and responsibilities of young people and bring the country in line with international practice.

Previously, adulthood in the UAE was defined as 21 lunar years, which is roughly equivalent to 20 under the Gregorian calendar. The reform, introduced through amendments to the Civil Transactions Law, grants full legal and financial independence from the age of 18.

Under the new rules, young adults can manage their personal finances without the approval of a legal guardian. They can enter contracts, obtain bank loans, buy and sell property, and register and run businesses independently. Minors aged 15 will also be able to apply for judicial permission to manage their assets, a step aimed at supporting early business activity.

The government said the change will standardise the age of majority across UAE legislation, including labour and juvenile laws, improving legal clarity and consistency.

For many Pakistanis living and working in the UAE, including students, young professionals, and entrepreneurs, the reform is expected to make it easier to access banking services, employment and business opportunities. The UAE already allows people to work, drive, marry and be tried in criminal courts as adults from the age of 18, and the new law formally aligns civil responsibilities with those rights.

The move reflects the UAE’s wider efforts to encourage youth participation in economic growth and entrepreneurship.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

IPI condemns Israel’s move to expand powers to shut foreign media

Published

on

IPI condemns Israel’s move to expand powers to shut foreign media


The camera that belonged to Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah who was killed on October 13 by what a Reuters investigation has found was an Israeli tank crew, is displayed during a press conference by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, in Beirut, Lebanon, December 7, 2023. — Reuters
The camera that belonged to Reuters journalist Issam Abdallah who was killed on October 13 by what a Reuters investigation has found was an Israeli tank crew, is displayed during a press conference by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, in Beirut, Lebanon, December 7, 2023. — Reuters

The IPI global network has criticised the Israeli government for maintaining its ban on unrestricted media access to Gaza, saying it was disappointed.

“IPI is deeply disappointed in the Israeli government’s decision to extend and expand a temporary order giving authorities unilateral power to close foreign media outlets deemed to be threats to national security,” it said in a statement.

The government had told the Supreme Court in a submission late Sunday that the ban should remain in place, citing security risks in the Gaza Strip.

Since the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, the government has barred foreign journalists from independently entering the devastated territory.

Instead, Israel has allowed only a limited number of reporters to enter Gaza on a case-by-case basis, embedded with its military inside the blockaded Palestinian territory.

Last month, the court set January 4 as a final deadline for the government to present a plan for allowing media access to Gaza.

In its submission, the government maintained that the ban should remain in place.

“This is for security reasons, based on the position of the defence establishment, which maintains that a security risk associated with such entry still exists,” the government submission said.

The government also said that the search for the remains of the last hostage held in Gaza was ongoing, suggesting that allowing journalists in at this stage could hinder the operation.

Meanwhile, the Foreign Press Association (FPA) also condemned the decision.

“The Foreign Press Association expresses its profound disappointment with the Israeli government´s latest response to our appeal for full and free access to the Gaza Strip,” the association said on Tuesday.

“Instead of presenting a plan for allowing journalists into Gaza independently and letting us work alongside our brave Palestinian colleagues, the government has decided once again to lock us out” despite the ceasefire in the territory, it added.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending