Connect with us

Business

Spreadex eliminated its ‘only competitor’ with Sporting Index deal, CMA says

Published

on

Spreadex eliminated its ‘only competitor’ with Sporting Index deal, CMA says



A UK watchdog has found gambling firm Spreadex’s takeover of rival spread betting firm Sporting Index created a monopoly in the market by eliminating its “only competitor”.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said Spreadex must sell Sporting Index following a fresh review of the deal.

A spokesman for Spreadex said it disagreed with the “entirely disproportionate” decision regarding its acquisition of a “failing firm”.

The CMA found that having a monopoly in the market could lead to a worse experience for users, a more limited range of products, and higher prices for consumers.

The acquisition, which took place in 2023, reduces the number of specialist betting firms from two to one, the regulator said.

Richard Feasey, chairman of the independent panel reviewing the merger, said: “We found that the merger substantially lessens competition by removing Spreadex’s only competitor in the sports spread betting market in the UK.

“We also found that the only effective remedy would be for Spreadex to sell Sporting Index to restore competition in the supply of licensed online sports spread betting in the UK.

“Doing so would mean customers in the UK have greater choice between two independent businesses, rather than one.”

Sports spread betting involves betting on a range of outcomes for a sports event, rather than fixed-odds bets which involve a standard “win or lose” scenario.

The closer a bet is to an outcome, the more money a consumer can win. But it also means it is possible for consumers to lose more than their initial stake.

The CMA launched a fresh investigation into the deal after Spreadex appealed its decision to the Competition Appeal Tribunal in March.

A panel had found last year that the deal harmed competition in the market and that a sale should take place.

Following Friday’s final report, Spreadex can now assure the regulator that it will sell Sporting Index, or the CMA could order the sale to a buyer that it approves of.

A spokesman for Spreadex said it was “extremely disappointed” in the CMA’s decision.

It said: “We have co-operated and engaged positively with the CMA throughout what has now been a 20-month review period into an immaterial transaction involving a failing firm serving a very small number of customers in a tiny sub-section of the UK sports betting market.”

Spreadex said it recognised the “importance of the CMA’s role in protecting and promoting competition in the UK economy” but that it believed the review was “wholly disproportionate to the benefits it is purported to provide either the UK economy or consumers”.

“Sporting Index’s customers have greatly benefited from Spreadex’s infrastructure, resources, improved services, and increased oversight since the acquisition,” it said.

“Spreadex strongly disagrees with this entirely disproportionate decision and are reviewing all available options.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Iran war worries fail to dampen business sentiment in Japan

Published

on

Iran war worries fail to dampen business sentiment in Japan



Business sentiment among major Japanese manufacturers rose from 16 to 17 in March, according to the Bank of Japan’s quarterly survey released on Wednesday.

The improvement in the so-called diffusion index in the closely watched “tankan” report, recorded for the fourth quarter straight, comes even as worries grow about Japan’s economic growth and oil supplies because of the US-Israeli war on Iran.

The survey is an indicator of companies foreseeing good conditions minus those feeling pessimistic.

The index for large non-manufacturers, such as the service sector, stood unchanged from the last tankan at 36.

Japan’s inflation has so far remained relatively moderate, but worries are growing about prices at the gas stands and other products. Investors and consumers alike are filled with uncertainty about how much longer the war may last and what US president Donald Trump might say next. Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 has gyrated wildly in recent weeks.

Analysts say the Bank of Japan may start to raise interest rates because of concerns about inflation, given the soaring energy costs and declining yen, two elements that greatly affect living costs for the average Japanese consumer.

Historically, Japan has benefited from a weak yen because of its giant exports, exemplified in autos and electronics. A weak yen raises the value of exports’ earnings when converted into yen.

But in recent years, a weak yen is working as a negative, as resource-poor Japan imports much of its energy, as well as other key products such as food and manufacturing components.

The US dollar has been soaring against the yen lately.

Japan’s central bank had a negative interest rate policy for years to fight deflation until it normalised policy in 2024. It kept the rate unchanged at 0.75 per cent in March. The next Bank of Japan monetary policy board meeting is set for April 27 and 28.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Iran war: Asia stocks jump after Trump suggests conflict could end in weeks

Published

on

Iran war: Asia stocks jump after Trump suggests conflict could end in weeks



The price of Brent crude oil to be delivered in May rose by a record 64% in March as the conflict disrupted energy supplies.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Household energy bill drop ‘short-lived respite’ amid fears of July hike

Published

on

Household energy bill drop ‘short-lived respite’ amid fears of July hike



Household energy prices are falling by 7% from Wednesday in a “short-lived respite” for households already braced for a predicted 18% hike from July.

Ofgem’s price cap has dropped from £1,758 to £1,641 – a reduction of £117 or around £10 a month for the average household using both electricity and gas.

This is an 11% fall year on year, but still £600 more than bills were in the winter of 2020 to 2021.

The reduction is lower than the average £150 cut to bills pledged by the Chancellor in November, when she moved 75% of the cost of the renewables obligation from household bills onto general taxation and scrapped the energy company obligation (Eco) scheme.

And it comes amid increasing concern about the amount energy bills could rise by from July as a result of the Middle East conflict, with latest predictions from Cornwall Insight suggesting this could be 18% or £288 a year – to almost £900 above pre-crisis levels.

In the meantime, consumer groups have urged households to send in meter readings to ensure their energy usage is billed at the lowest possible rate, and investigate fixed rate deals if they remain on their firm’s standard variable rate.

A spokesman for Energy UK, which represents firms, said: “Suppliers are required to set direct debits as accurately as possible based on the best and most current information available.

“So – as well as factors like current balance, payment record and previous energy usage – this will also include the latest projection of energy costs over the coming months.

“Suppliers regularly review direct debt levels so any current assessment for price cap customers would likely take into account that bills look set to go up again in July. Customers on fixed deals however will not see any increase until their current deal comes to an end.”

Simon Francis, coordinator of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition, said: “The fall in bills from April 1 offers brief relief for households, but the respite will be short-lived.

“Given the ongoing profits made by the energy industry, households deserve more than a temporary reprieve before prices rise again.

“For the millions of households already in energy debt to their suppliers, this is a real concern and risks pushing more people into crisis.

“The Government must use the window between now and July to act. That means targeted support for those hit first and hardest, including households off the gas grid and those on heat networks, faster action on energy debt, and preparations to bring costs down if prices deteriorate further.”

National Energy Action chief executive Adam Scorer said: “Any price drop is good news, but everyone knows that it will be overtaken by events.

“It is likely to be a false dawn. And the people who know that the best are those already struggling to afford their energy bills and know the real cost of an energy crisis.

“Unfortunately, today’s good news is hugely overshadowed by the fear and dread of what may be to come.”

Which? energy editor Emily Seymour said: “April’s energy price cap fall will bring much needed relief for households. What you save will vary depending on how much you use.

“Despite this drop, many households are already concerned about the next price cap announcement in May, which will set rates from July and is currently predicted to rise by £288, or 18%, per year for the average household.

“It’s important to remember this isn’t confirmed yet, so don’t feel pressured into making quick decisions.

“If you’re currently paying variable rates, it’s worth checking the market to see what fixed deals are available. Fixing could offer protection against future increases, but only if the price is right.

“Options have reduced in the last few weeks, but some energy companies are still offering fixes with prices around those of the January-March price cap.

“If you’re worried about paying your energy bills, contact your supplier as soon as possible. Energy companies are obliged to help if you’re struggling to pay and won’t disconnect you for missing a payment. Request a review or break in payments, and access any available hardship funds.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending