Connect with us

Business

Trump claims California’s $20 fast-food minimum wage hurts businesses. The truth is a lot more complicated

Published

on

Trump claims California’s  fast-food minimum wage hurts businesses. The truth is a lot more complicated


U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at the McDonald’s Impact Summit at the Westin Hotel in Washington, D.C., U.S., Nov. 17, 2025.

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

President Donald Trump on Monday said that California Gov. Gavin Newsom is “laying siege on the minimum wage.”

Trump’s comments at the McDonald’s Impact Summit likely referred to California’s higher hourly pay floor for fast-food workers, which took effect a year and a half ago. However, data so far indicate the policy hasn’t been the danger Trump described.

Research shows that the state’s fast-food worker turnover is down. Widespread closures haven’t occurred, and restaurant chains are still opening locations in California.

To be sure, the increased wages have put more pressure on restaurant chains and operators at a time when other costs are climbing and diners are eating out less frequently. Plus, consumers are paying more for their burgers, chicken tenders and fries as a result of the new pay floor.

But after a protracted fight over whether higher pay for workers would harm restaurants, critics’ worst fears have not come to pass.

Fast-food workers in California at chains with more than 60 national locations started earning $20 an hour in April 2024, 25% more than the state’s broader minimum wage of $16 an hour. The sectoral pay floor is part of larger law passed in California that also establishes a council that will recommend proposed industry standards to state agencies and carries the authority to raise the hourly minimum wage annually.

Fast-food workers’ big break only came after a compromise between the restaurant industry and unions that ended months of fighting between the two parties. The Service Employees International Union championed the legislation, saying it would improve workers’ lives and help with industry turnover. Quick-service restaurants argued that they were being unfairly targeted and the wage hike would burden their businesses.

“I firmly believe that everyone should be entitled to a fair wage. The issue that I and my colleagues in this industry have is that we, as an industry, were targeted,” said Kerri Harper-Howie, who runs WEH Organization and its 25 McDonald’s locations in Los Angeles County with her sister, Nicole Harper-Rawlins.. “If someone works at Macy’s and they’re making minimum wage, or they work at CVS … They also should deserve that increase in wages.”

California hasn’t supported a wider minimum-wage increase. Last November, just months after the fast-food pay floor went into effect, voters in the state struck down a ballot measure that would have raised the statewide minimum wage to $18 an hour. It reportedly was the first time in nearly three decades that voters shot down a statewide minimum wage hike on any state ballot.

For now, other states have yet to follow California’s lead, as the nation monitors the effects of the law and the restaurant industry continues to lobby against it.

A scramble for franchisees

A McDonald’s worker prepares to deliver an order at a McDonald’s restaurant on May 8, 2024 in San Francisco, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

Broadly, the restaurant industry struggles with razor-thin profit margins. Labor is typically the biggest cost, and operators often aim to keep it roughly 30% of their overall costs. The higher minimum wage has been yet another challenge for operators, on top of commodity inflation and weakness in consumer spending.

“What we can say without a doubt is that it’s really tough to operate any restaurant, any concept, any size, in California right now,” said Sean Kennedy, executive vice president of public affairs for the National Restaurant Association, a major trade group that opposed the wage hike.

For 17 months after the higher minimum wage went into effect, Harper-Howie’s WEH Organization saw its same-store sales decline. The trend finally reversed in October, as McDonald’s rounded the one-year anniversary of an E. coli outbreak that sent company-wide sales plunging by double-digits overnight. The burger chain more broadly has seen its U.S. performance struggle, although it reported same-store sales growth in the third quarter.

“For a long period of time, we were just bleeding money,” said Harper-Howie, who formed the California Alliance of Family Owned Businesses with fellow McDonald’s franchisees to push back against the California legislation.

Harper-Howie estimates that her restaurants passed along price increases of less than 10% to customers. Raising prices further would be difficult amid a pullback in dining across the restaurant industry, particularly from low-income consumers. Plus, she said other minimum-wage workers who frequent McDonald’s didn’t receive the same pay hike, which made the food “unaffordable for many.”

Harshraj Ghai, who operates more than 200 Burger King, Taco Bell and Popeyes locations across California and Oregon, has similarly raised menu prices by roughly 10% to 12% at California locations. That wasn’t enough to offset the wage increases, Ghai said.

To further mitigate the higher costs, Ghai has worked to cut labor hours by testing artificial intelligence to take drive-thru orders, using pre-cooked bacon for breakfast and adding automatic batter mixers.

“The cost and maintenance of of these technologies starts to become a little bit better than it would to pay somebody to actually do it,” he said.

The wage hike was just one more rapidly increasing cost for franchisees to wrangle. For example, Harper-Howie said WEH’s insurance costs have soared, on top of rising prices for beef and other key ingredients.

The Los Angeles wildfires put more pressure on Harper-Howie’s business. One of her locations was temporarily closed, but the bigger blow came from the shrinking traffic as fires raged across the county, displacing many residents and scaring off tourists.

Trump’s hardline immigration stance has been another issue.

“Our employees are predominantly Latino, and they’re terrified,” Harper-Howie said. “That’s all of our hourly workers, our general managers, our shift managers, our department managers, and supervisors — and it’s our customers.”

Harper-Howie said that she hasn’t had to close any restaurants yet, crediting WEH’s decades in the McDonald’s system after her parents joined the franchise in the 1980’s.

But that isn’t the case for Ghai, who has had to shutter some unprofitable locations permanently. He said that he’s shuttered roughly 10 California locations over the last year and half, and he anticipates shuttering another 12 over the next year or two. While closures are a typical part of a large-scale restaurant business, those closures are much steeper than normal for Ghai, he said.

For comparison, Ghai operates only Taco Bell restaurants in Oregon, but those locations are “significantly more profitable” than those in California, he said. He hasn’t had to close any of his Oregon Taco Bells, but he has closed at least three in California. Taco Bell broadly has outperformed the broader fast-food industry over the last year, helped by its value perception and strong brand equity.

Meanwhile, Kennedy said some franchisors are choosing to refranchise their California restaurants, collecting franchising fees in place of the headaches of operating the locations themselves.

Despite higher labor costs, California is still a desirable market for fast-food chains. The state added nearly 2,300 fast-food restaurants from the first quarter of 2024 to the first quarter of 2025, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That increase represents a 5% jump, faster than the rest of the country’s growth of 2% and outpacing California’s increase of 2% in the year-ago period, based on analysis by the California Fast Food Workers Union.

A lifeline for workers

An employee hands items to a customer at the drive-thru of a Jack in the Box restaurant in Los Angeles, California, US, on Monday, April 1, 2024.

Eric Thayer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

While the mandated pay hike brings another challenge for restaurant operators, workers see it as a win, even if it means fewer scheduled hours.

For Zane Marte, 28, the pay bump meant that he could offer more support to his family and buy some of his own groceries, rather than leaning on his parents.

Marte worked for Jack in the Box in the San Jose area for seven years. When he started, he earned $12 an hour. Over time, his pay crept up, lifted by raises and eventually a promotion to a management position. Still, until the $20 fast-food wage went into effect, his hourly pay was still several dollars below the new pay floor.

His experience aligns with research from the University of California Berkeley’s Center on Wage and Employment Dynamics. Researchers Michael Reich and Denis Sosinskiy found that the average pre-policy wage for fast-food workers in California was $17.13 an hour, suggesting that the average hourly pay hike after the $20 minimum took effect was about 17%.

A separate report from the University of Kentucky published in April found that hiring for fast-food jobs fell after the new pay floor was implemented. However, turnover shrank as the higher wages encouraged workers to stick around. That decline in turnover offset a slowdown in hiring for fast-food workers in California, according to the report.

Historically, turnover has been a major problem for the fast-food industry. Hiring and training new workers is expensive and time consuming for operators.

For his part, Marte left Jack in the Box months after receiving the raise after he said he grew “fed up” with his manager. He has since left California and found employment using his college degree.

Before the higher minimum wage went into effect, one concern from operators and trade groups was that other restaurants not included in the policy would have to raise their own wages to stay competitive — which critics said could be particularly hard for small businesses. But that fear largely doesn’t seem to have been realized.

The Berkeley study did not find any evidence of a spillover into the wages of workers at full-service restaurants chains such as Denny’s, Applebee’s, Buffalo Wild Wings, Red Robin and Outback Steakhouse.

And more broadly, the researchers from the University of Kentucky did not find evidence that other non-food, low-wage employers raised their pay. The slowdown in fast-food hiring meant that other employers didn’t have to worry much about their workers leaving for those jobs.

Research from the Shift Project, a partnership between Harvard and the University of California San Francisco, found that the wage hike did not result in employers cutting scheduled hours or lead to understaffing in the immediate aftermath of the policy.

Anecdotally, however, some fast-food restaurants have cut back their hours.

For example, Julia Gonzalez, 21, lives in Los Angeles and works at Pizza Hut and Yoshinoya, a Japanese fast-food chain with roughly 100 locations in California. She told CNBC that she’s been scheduled for fewer hours, but the increased wages still mean that she’s able to save more money. (Gonzalez is affiliated with the California Fast Food Workers Union, which was a proponent of the industry’s higher minimum wage.)

Harper-Howie also told CNBC that her restaurants cut the number of overall labor hours because of slumping sales, as higher menu prices scared away diners.

Meanwhile, the number of fast-food job losses caused by the policy is still hotly debated.

Analysis of BLS data by the Employment Policies Institute, which opposes minimum wage hikes, found that roughly 16,000 fast-food jobs in California have been eliminated since Newsom signed the law in September 2024. However, Reich and Sosinskiy reported no related job losses using employment data that was adjusted to remove seasonal fluctuations, citing California’s more temperate climate than the rest of the country.

For his part, Newsom, widely believed to be a frontrunner for the 2028 presidential election, still includes it in lists of his policy wins as California governor.

“After raising the minimum wage for workers, California now has 750,500 fast food jobs — the MOST in state history! California’s fast food industry continues to boom every single month with workers finally receiving the wages they deserve,” he wrote in a post on X in August last year.



Source link

Business

New data series: Real GDP growth data calculation methodology overhauled to improve accuracy – here’s what changes – The Times of India

Published

on

New data series: Real GDP growth data calculation methodology overhauled to improve accuracy – here’s what changes – The Times of India


Real GDP in India is calculated by adjusting nominal growth figures for inflation through the use of price indices. (AI image)

India is set to release its first set of GDP or Gross Domestic Product data on the basis of a new series that may also address recent criticism from economists. The government is revamping the methodology used to estimate real GDP growth under a new national accounts series scheduled to be released this week. The revised framework will incorporate more detailed price deflation techniques to respond to concerns raised by economists.Real GDP in India is calculated by adjusting nominal growth figures for inflation through the use of price indices. Critics have argued that the existing approach is outdated because it depends largely on the wholesale price index rather than the more widely followed consumer price index.In November, the International Monetary Fund highlighted shortcomings in India’s national accounts system. It pointed to the continued use of the 2011–12 base year, heavy dependence on wholesale price data and extensive reliance on single-deflation techniques. The IMF assigned the methodology a “C” rating.

New GDP data series: What changes

“We will now use about 500–600 items from the new CPI and the old WPI series, compared with about 180 earlier, to deflate the output and improve accuracy of the data,” Saurabh Garg, secretary in the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, said in an interview according to a Reuters report.He noted that this approach will remain in place until a revised WPI series is introduced, which is expected in the near term.Under the earlier system, periods marked by subdued nominal GDP expansion and low wholesale inflation often resulted in inconsistencies, as they tended to produce comparatively higher real growth estimates.As per the current data series, India’s economy, which is one of the fastest-expanding among major global economies, is projected to grow by 7.4% in 2025–26. This is compared with an estimated 6.5% growth in 2024–25.Nominal GDP, which measures economic output at prevailing market prices, is expected to increase by 8.0% during the current financial year.A revised GDP series with 2022–23 as the base year will be released on February 27, along with updated historical data covering the previous four years.These modifications form part of a wider overhaul of India’s statistical framework, following the introduction of a new retail inflation series earlier this month. Updates to the wholesale price index and industrial production data are also in progress.A key element of the revised framework is the adoption of double deflation, which adjusts both output prices and input costs separately to derive real value added.Garg said the changes are expected to enhance data precision, especially in the manufacturing sector, where differences between input and output price movements had previously raised concerns about distortions under the single-deflation approach.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Many worlds of AI: For investors, the implications are significant – The Times of India

Published

on

Many worlds of AI: For investors, the implications are significant – The Times of India


The story of AI in business is not one of universal acceleration. (AI image)

Two stories from the past few weeks capture something essential about where we are with AI.The first concerns Salesforce, the enterprise software giant that aggressively embraced AI for customer service. CEO Marc Benioff proudly announced that AI deployment had allowed the company to cut support staff from 9,000 to roughly 5,000. Then reality intervened. Reports from late 2025 indicate that the company is now withdrawing from AI due to widespread failure. The AI agents confidently gave wrong answers, dropped instructions when given more than eight steps, and lost focus when users asked unexpected questions. Customers complained that AI support took longer than the simple old search function. Salesforce is now retreating to rigid, rule-based scripting–essentially admitting they were, in their own words, “more confident” than the technology warranted.The second story is a zeitgeist shift. Over the past couple of months, the conversation around AI and coding has transformed completely. People who were skeptical six months ago–senior developers who actually write code for a living–are now saying the age of human beings writing code is ending. Not in some distant future, but imminently. Entire features are being shipped by AI with minimal human intervention. The productivity gains are no longer incremental; they’re structural.How can both be true? How can AI fail comprehensively in customer service–seemingly straightforward–while revolutionising software development, which appears far more complex?The answer is that we’ve been thinking about AI wrong. We treat it as a single phenomenon that will sweep through the economy at roughly the same pace. However, AI in business is not a single story. It’s many parallel stories, moving at wildly different speeds. And the distinction has almost nothing to do with how intelligent the AI is.I’ve written about this tension before. A year ago, I argued that “the fact that a revolution is real doesn’t mean that every business claiming to be part of it will succeed.” More recently, I observed that “the gap between what AI demos well in controlled environments and what it actually delivers when confronting the messy real world remains enormous.” I now think there’s a more precise way to understand this gap. It’s not random. It’s structural.Consider what makes coding fertile ground for AI. Code is formally structured and machine-verifiable–it runs and passes tests, or it doesn’t. The feedback loop is immediate. When AI makes a mistake, a developer (or another AI agent) notices, fixes it, and moves on. Errors are private and reversible. Now consider customer service. Customers don’t speak in data schemas. Emotion, sarcasm, and cultural context matter enormously. One wrong answer can escalate to social media outrage or regulatory complaints. The failures are public and often irreversible.The difference isn’t intelligence. It’s what I’d call error economics. AI thrives where mistakes are cheap, private, and correctable. It struggles where mistakes are expensive, public, and permanent.We received a clear illustration of executive disconnect just a few days ago. During Bajaj Finance’s Q3 call, CEO Rajeev Jain announced that AI had listened to 2 crore calls and generated 100,000 new customer offers. “We’ll be able to listen to 100 million calls next year,” he said proudly. The response on social media was predictable hilarity. As the entire country, except apparently Mr Jain knows, Bajaj Finance’s incessant spam calls are the butt of countless jokes. Here was a CEO using sophisticated technology to optimize something customers actively despise. Machine learning works perfectly; the learning about customers is absent.For investors, the implications are significant. When you hear “AI” attached to a business function, ask: what happens when it’s wrong? If the answer involves customers, regulators, or reputations, progress will be slower than vendor PPTs claim. If the answer is “someone notices and fixes it,” that’s a different world entirely.The story of AI in business is not one of universal acceleration. It’s one of the selective escape velocities. Coding has left the atmosphere and gone into orbit. Customer service is still fighting gravity. Most other functions lie somewhere in between–mistakenly assumed to be closer to the rocket than they really are. The many worlds of AI are not converging. They’re diverging. And that divergence will determine which investments succeed and which disappoint.(Dhirendra Kumar is Founder and CEO of Value Research)



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gold slips from three-week high on profit-booking, firm dollar – SUCH TV

Published

on

Gold slips from three-week high on profit-booking, firm dollar – SUCH TV



Gold prices fell on Tuesday as investors booked profits after bullion rose more than 2% in the previous session, while pressure from a stronger dollar also weighed on the yellow metal.

Spot gold fell 0.8% to $5,189.99 per ounce, snapping a four-session winning streak and dropping from a more than three-week high hit earlier in the day.

Bullion gained 2.5% in the previous session.

US gold futures for April delivery were down 0.3% at $5,210.40.

“Obviously, we had a meaningful rally (in gold) yesterday.

We have a little bit of a digestion here, and I think it’s noteworthy that we don’t see the panic that we saw on Wall Street extend into the Asian market,“ Ilya Spivak, head of global macro at Tastylive, added that a firmer dollar and profit-booking by investors were responsible for bullion’s drop.

Asian stock markets stuttered in early trade on Tuesday as a selloff on Wall Street overnight rattled investors, with sentiment hurt by heightened uncertainty over US President Donald Trump’s tariff policy and rising US-Iran tensions.

The dollar edged up, making greenback-priced bullion more expensive for holders of other currencies.

US President Donald Trump on Monday warned countries against backing away from trade deals negotiated recently with the US after the Supreme Court struck down his emergency tariffs, saying that if they did, he would hit them with much higher duties under different trade laws.

Elsewhere, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller said he was open to leaving interest rates on hold at the March meeting if the upcoming February jobs data indicated the labour market had “pivoted to a more solid footing” after a weak 2025.

Markets currently expect three 25-basis-point rate cuts this year, according to CME’s FedWatch Tool.

Spot silver fell 1% to $87.38 per ounce, after hitting a more than two-week high on Monday.

Spot platinum lost 0.7% to $2,139.25 per ounce, while palladium gained 0.3% to $1,748.12.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending