Connect with us

Politics

UK councillor vindicated over false Palestine-related allegations

Published

on

UK councillor vindicated over false Palestine-related allegations


This collage shows Independent Councillor Noor Jahan Begum (left) and Labour Councillor Tanweer Khan. — Reporter
This collage shows Independent Councillor Noor Jahan Begum (left) and Labour Councillor Tanweer Khan. — Reporter

LONDON: A local authority with a large South Asian population has found that Independent Councillor Noor Jahan Begum breached the Councillor Code of Conduct after making a series of unfounded and serious allegations against Labour Councillor Tanweer Khan — using the issue of Palestine for local political gain.

The Redbridge Council Standards Committee’s ruling follows a detailed independent investigation and a formal public hearing. The Committee concluded that Councillor Begum misled the investigation, lied during the process, and colluded with her niece, who had submitted a separate complaint against Councillor Khan. Both women failed to disclose their family relationship, despite living at the same address.

Councillor Khan had alleged that on April 10, 2025, Councillor Begum distributed misleading leaflets against him in a local ward; that she behaved in a stalking manner outside the Ilford Islamic Centre on 18 April 2025; and that she engaged in misconduct while responding to this complaint, supporting her relative’s complaint on the same matter. The leaflets falsely alleged that Khan, as Chair of the Council’s Pension Fund Committee, was not supporting the “divestment” campaign relating to the Local Government Pension Scheme. They implied that he was pro-Israel, pro-Zionism, and anti-Palestine.

Councillor Begum denied all allegations. However, the Council found that on April 10 she was in her ward distributing leaflets and speaking to residents, and that she had made claims — including that Councillor Khan had behaved in a misogynistic manner — that were not supported by evidence. Regarding the allegation that she distributed leaflets outside the Ilford Islamic Centre in order to harass Khan, the Sub-committee made no findings, citing a lack of evidence that harassment had occurred.

The Sub-committee concluded that Councillor Begum made statements and allegations that were inconsistent with incontrovertible evidence. It agreed with the Investigator that she had deliberately minimised her involvement with the Redbridge Palestine Solidarity Campaign; falsely claimed she was not leafleting; downplayed her relationship with a member of the public by stating she only knew her from demonstrations, despite them being related; claimed Councillor Khan approached by car when CCTV showed he was on foot; denied delivering leaflets despite photographic evidence; and altered her statements during the investigation.

The Sub-committee found that in all these instances, Councillor Begum was acting in her official capacity. She used the title of councillor when making her complaint, her conduct related to her role as a councillor when making allegations against another councillor, and she participated as an elected member in a formal process concerning alleged breaches of the Code of Conduct.

The Council found that although the language used in the leaflets about Khan was extremely harsh, it fell within the bounds of freedom of speech. However, Councillor Begum’s dishonesty and her failure to act with integrity when making and supporting a complaint did breach the Code in relation to respect—because she made untrue claims capable of causing both personal and professional harm—and disrepute, as her dishonest behaviour brought her role and the London Borough of Redbridge into disrepute. Her actions eroded public trust by involving a closely related witness whose relationship with her was concealed.

Without offering her a right of appeal, the Committee recommended that Councillor Begum be removed from all committees for six months, attend training arranged by the Monitoring Officer within six weeks, and that the Monitoring Officer consider any further necessary action.

The investigation also raised concerns about the misuse of sensitive international issues to inflame local politics. Throughout the dispute, Councillor Begum portrayed Councillor Khan as aligned with pro-Israel positions, despite his long-standing, publicly documented support for Palestinian rights.

Speaking after the decision, Councillor Khan said: “The Committee’s ruling highlights how such claims can be weaponised to cause reputational and personal harm. My record on Palestinian rights is clear and a matter of public record. What my family and I have endured over these months has been deeply distressing, but I am grateful that the truth has now been established. I have supported the cause of Palestine all my life and I will always stand by the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination. I was hounded and defamed.”

He added that Councillor Begum had publicly demanded that Redbridge Council divest from companies such as Amazon, yet “records show that her own by-election campaign was financially supported by Capumen, a recruitment company that lists Amazon as a major client. This raises serious issues of political and moral hypocrisy.”

Councillor Begum said in a statement: “The Council did not follow due process. They failed to correctly investigate my complaint against Mr Khan and have publicly censured me for making a retaliatory complaint. I strongly disagree and will be making a complaint to the Local Govt Ombudsman.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Pakistan’s JF-17 draws strong visitor interest at Dubai Airshow 2025

Published

on

Pakistan’s JF-17 draws strong visitor interest at Dubai Airshow 2025


Military aircraft perform precision manoeuvres at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter
Military aircraft perform precision manoeuvres at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter

DUBAI: The Dubai Airshow 2025 opened at Al Maktoum International Airport on Monday, bringing together global aviation leaders, defence officials and industry experts for one of the region’s largest aerospace events.

Aircraft from Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates were parked side by side in the static display area, drawing attention from visitors who noted the close proximity of the two fleets.

Pakistans JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter jet is parked in static display area at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter
Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter jet is parked in static display area at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter

The arrangement was seen as a symbolic reflection of strong ties between the UAE and Pakistan in defence and aviation cooperation.

The skies above the airshow were dominated by colourful aerobatic displays as military and commercial jets performed precision manoeuvres throughout the opening day.

Military aircraft perform precision manoeuvres at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter
Military aircraft perform precision manoeuvres at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter

Crowds gathered around the runway and viewing stands as teams showcased high-speed turns, formations and signature stunts.

Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder remained a major attraction. The multirole fighter impressed aviation enthusiasts with its agility during the aerobatic segment and later drew large groups of visitors at the static display.

Visitors take photo with Pakistans JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter jet at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter
Visitors take photo with Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter jet at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter

Many attendees stopped to take photos of the aircraft and ask technical questions from the Pakistan Air Force officials present.

Pakistani pilots also became a highlight, with participants lining up for pictures and selfies following their performance. Visitors praised the professionalism and display routine of the PAF team, calling it “one of the best crowd-pullers” of the day.

Visitors take photo with Pakistans JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter jet at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter
Visitors take photo with Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter jet at Dubai Airshow 2025, Al Maktoum International Airport. — Reporter

The five-day airshow will continue to feature defence announcements, aircraft showcases and daily demos from international manufacturers and air forces.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Bangladesh demands India extradite convicted ex-PM Hasina

Published

on

Bangladesh demands India extradite convicted ex-PM Hasina


Bangladeshs then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina along with Indias Prime Minister Narendra Modi pose for a picture during her ceremonial reception at the Forecourt of Indias Rashtrapati Bhavan Presidential Palace in New Delhi, India, June 22, 2024. — Reuters
Bangladesh’s then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina along with India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi pose for a picture during her ceremonial reception at the Forecourt of India’s Rashtrapati Bhavan Presidential Palace in New Delhi, India, June 22, 2024. — Reuters
  • Former interior minister also faces extradition.
  • India notes verdict, avoids extradition response.
  • Muhammad Yunus calls verdict a historic milestone.

DHAKA: Bangladesh on Monday demanded India extradite ousted former prime minister Sheikh Hasina, hours after she was sentenced to hang for crimes against humanity.

Hasina’s autocratic rule was backed by New Delhi, and the 78-year-old fled to India after her ouster in a mass uprising in August 2024, fraying relations between the two neighbours.

She has been in hiding ever since.

On Monday a court in Dhaka sentenced Hasina as well as former interior minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal to death in absentia, after being found guilty of crimes against humanity over a deadly crackdown against last year’s student-led uprising.

The former minister’s whereabouts are not known, but Bangladesh says he is also in India.

“We urge the government of India to immediately extradite the two convicts to the Bangladeshi authorities,” Dhaka’s foreign ministry said in a statement, saying it was “an obligatory responsibility for India”.

Bangladesh warned that “granting asylum to these convicts… would be extremely unfriendly and an affront to justice.”

India’s foreign ministry said that it had “noted the verdict” of Hasina.

“India remains committed to the best interests of the people of Bangladesh, including in peace, democracy, inclusion and stability,” the ministry said in a statement that does not directly address the issue of potential extradition.

Hasina’s 15-year tenure saw widespread human rights abuses, including the mass detention and extrajudicial killings of her political opponents.

Bangladesh last year said it would request an Interpol red notice for Hasina, but there was no record on the global police body alert law enforcement list.

Bangladesh’s interim leader Muhammad Yunus welcomed the verdict.

“The awarding of death sentences to Sheikh Hasina and Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal in the crimes against humanity case is a historic verdict,” the Nobel Peace Prize winner said in a statement.

He called for calm and warned against any “attempt to violate public order”, urging “everyone to refrain from any indisciplined acts”.

Hasina’s son and adviser, Sajeeb Wazed, told Reuters on the eve of the verdict that they would not appeal unless a democratically elected government took office with the Awami League’s participation.

During the trial, prosecutors told the court that they had uncovered evidence of her direct command to use lethal force to suppress a student-led uprising in July and August 2024.

According to a United Nations report, up to 1,400 people may have been killed during the protests between July 15 and August 5, 2024, with thousands more injured — most of them by gunfire from security forces

Hasina was represented by a state-appointed defence counsel who told the court that the charges against her were baseless and pleaded for her acquittal.

Ahead of the verdict, Hasina dismissed the accusations and the fairness of the Tribunal proceedings, asserting a guilty verdict was “a foregone conclusion.”

Bangladesh has been tense ahead of the verdict, with at least 30 crude bomb explosions and 26 vehicles torched across the country over the past few days. There have been no casualties, however.

‘Politically motivated’

Hasina, 78, who has remained in India since she was overthrown in August 2024, challenged the legitimacy of the Tribunal in an email interview with Reuters last month.

“These proceedings are a politically motivated charade,” she said. “They have been brought by kangaroo courts, with guilty verdicts a foregone conclusion. They are presided over by an unelected government which consists of my political opponents.”

She also said she was denied adequate notice of the hearings and any meaningful opportunity to mount a defence, adding that she was not personally involved in the use of lethal force or other alleged crimes.

The Muslim-majority South Asian country of 170 million people has been governed by an interim administration headed by Nobel Peace laureate Muhammad Yunus since Hasina fled. Although the country has been largely peaceful since, political stability is yet to return.

In the Reuters interview, Hasina warned of growing anger among supporters of the Awami League and said that millions of party loyalists would boycott the parliamentary elections in February.

On Monday, security remained tight across Dhaka and other major cities, with paramilitary forces deployed around key government buildings and the tribunal complex.

Authorities said they were prepared for any trouble after the verdict.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

UK threatens visa bans ahead of asylum overhaul

Published

on

UK threatens visa bans ahead of asylum overhaul


Despite an increase in asylum claims being submitted, the number of initial positive decisions the UK authorities have granted fell from 2023 to 2024.— Reuters
Despite an increase in asylum claims being submitted, the number of initial positive decisions the UK authorities have granted fell from 2023 to 2024.— Reuters

The UK government on Monday threatened visa bans on three African countries unless they accept the returns of irregular migrants, as the interior minister was set to announce sweeping changes to the asylum system.

Britain said it would stop granting visas to nationals from Angola, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of Congo unless the countries accepted the returns of “their criminals and illegal immigrants”, the interior ministry said in a statement.

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood was expected later on Monday to announce the government has touted as the “most sweeping reforms to tackle illegal migration in modern times”.

Immigration has become a bitterly divisive issue in Britain in recent years, fuelling support for the hard-right Reform UK party.

Mahmood’s hardline rhetoric and measures is aimed at curbing asylum seekers crossing the Channel from France to Britain on small boats— but they are widely seen as an attempt to claw back public support from Reform, which has surged past the governing Labour Party in popularity polls.

Echoing US President Donald Trump’s travel bans, the Home Office said the “three countries face penalties for their unacceptably low cooperation and obstructive returns processes”.

Home Office minister Alex Norris told Sky News the countries had “one month to get this in order”.

The government also said it would consider similar measures against other countries.

These include an “emergency brake” on visas for people from countries with high rates of asylum claims, who travel to the UK by legal routes.

Despite an increase in asylum claims being submitted, the number of initial positive decisions the UK authorities have granted fell from 2023 to 2024, according to the latest government figures.

Thousands of visas have been granted under humanitarian schemes for Ukrainians, Afghans and Hong Kong residents in recent years.

Other planned measures, modelled on Denmark’s strict asylum system, will include ending automatic benefits for asylum seekers and drastically reducing protections for refugees.

One of the most contentious proposals — which has been condemned by charities as well as Labour lawmakers — will see the length of refugee status cut from five years to 30 months.

Refugees will have their protection “regularly reviewed” and will be forced to return to their home countries once those are deemed safe.

They will also need to wait for 20 years, instead of the current five, before they can apply for permanent residency.

“We should be welcoming and integrating and not creating this situation of kind of perpetual limbo and alienation, which doesn’t help the refugees and it doesn’t help society,” Labour MP Tony Vaughan told the BBC’s Today programme.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending