Connect with us

Business

US Top Court Blocks Trump’s Tariff Orders: Does It Mean Zero Duties For Indian Goods?

Published

on

US Top Court Blocks Trump’s Tariff Orders: Does It Mean Zero Duties For Indian Goods?


Last Updated:

The verdict does not overturn all of Trump’s tariff actions as duties imposed on steel and aluminium under separate legal provisions remain intact.

US President Donald Trump and PM Modi | File Image

US President Donald Trump and PM Modi | File Image

The US Supreme Court has struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariff regime, ruling that the measures were imposed without legal backing.

In a 6-3 ruling, the court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorise the president to unilaterally impose broad, across-the-board tariffs.

The 1977 law allows the executive to regulate certain international economic transactions during a declared national emergency, but does not extend to blanket tariff actions, the court said.

Chief Justice John Roberts, who authored the majority opinion, said Congress has delegated tariff-setting powers only in limited and clearly defined circumstances.

He was joined by the court’s three liberal justices and conservative justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett. Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

Also Read: US To Refund Billions? What Next After Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump Tariffs

What The Ruling Means For India

The verdict does not overturn all of Trump’s tariff actions. Duties imposed on steel and aluminium under separate legal provisions remain intact. However, it invalidates two major categories of tariffs introduced using IEEPA.

These include the so-called “reciprocal” tariffs, which carried a baseline rate of 10 per cent for most countries, and a separate 25 per cent levy imposed on select imports from Canada, China and Mexico over fentanyl-related concerns.

India had been subject to the reciprocal tariffs, with a 26 per cent rate announced on Trump’s “Liberation Day” in April 2025, later revised to 25 per cent.

With the court ruling, these IEEPA-based tariffs no longer apply, effectively bringing reciprocal tariffs on most Indian exports down to zero for now.

Separately, India had also faced a 25 per cent “penalty” tariff linked to its imports of Russian oil, a measure the US had said was tied to the Ukraine war.

That levy was removed earlier this month after New Delhi and Washington reached a trade understanding. As a result, both the penal tariff and the reciprocal tariff on Indian goods now stand withdrawn.

Under the trade framework discussed earlier, the reciprocal tariff was expected to be reduced to 18 per cent, but the court’s decision renders that rate moot for the time being.

Tariffs That Still Apply

Despite the relief, US tariffs on Indian goods do not disappear entirely.

Duties on steel and aluminium exports, imposed under different statutory authority, continue to apply.

For other products, tariffs revert to pre-IEEPA levels, which are generally lower under the standard US tariff schedule, though sector-specific levies remain.

The ruling does not prevent Trump, or a future administration, from imposing tariffs using other laws.

However, such actions would face stricter procedural limits and could require congressional involvement.

US officials have indicated that alternative legal routes could still be explored to retain elements of the tariff framework.

For India, the decision comes at a critical juncture. Ongoing trade talks with Washington had been overshadowed by tariff uncertainty, particularly for exporters in textiles, pharmaceuticals and engineering goods.

Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.

Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trends, stock updates, tax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.
News business economy US Top Court Blocks Trump’s Tariff Orders: Does It Mean Zero Duties For Indian Goods?
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Business

New norms for NH & bridge works: Longer timelines, realistic deadlines – The Times of India

Published

on

New norms for NH & bridge works: Longer timelines, realistic deadlines – The Times of India


New Delhi: In a major change in policy, govt has increased the time allowed for construction of 6-10 km-long bridges across rivers such as Ganga and Brahmaputra to six years and for 2.5-6 km-long bridges on Mahanadi and Godavari to five years. The timelines have been revised from the current 24-30 months.Similarly, the construction period has been fixed at two years for national highway projects costing up to Rs 500 crore, 30 months for Rs 500-1,500 crore projects, and three years for works costing over Rs 1,500 crore.The change in the ‘normative construction period’ has been made after a gap of 13 years, learning from past experience of how the average time taken for completion of NH projects has been over four years against the standard timeline of 2.5-3 years. The revised timeline for construction will be applicable for all NH projects to be bid out from May 6.In a circular, the road transport ministry said present guidelines — issued in 2013 — are derived from a legacy linear model that does not explicitly account for voluminous earthwork, leading to unrealistic construction period and resulting in additional cost and risk.“Therefore, a need was felt to revise the existing guidelines based on scientific analysis, understanding of completed projects, and prescribe a realistic construction period for civil works at DPR and bid invitation stage,” the ministry said. It added that the new norm will improve predictability in completion of projects, reduce disputes, enhance value and quality of NHs, for realistic and bankable bids, better quality outcomes and improved investor confidence.An additional six months time has been provisioned in the new norms for critical projects which involve multiple flyovers, tunnels or elevated structures. Similarly, an addition of 12 months has been provisioned for projects that involve cutting and slope stabilisation in hilly states.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon in annual letter cites risks in geopolitics, AI and private markets

Published

on

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon in annual letter cites risks in geopolitics, AI and private markets


JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is calling for a broad recommitment to American ideals as his bank navigates geopolitical uncertainty, a teetering economy and the revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence.

Dimon in his annual letter to shareholders, published Monday, noted the country’s 250th anniversary as “the perfect time to rededicate ourselves to the values that made this great nation of ours — freedom, liberty and opportunity.”

“The challenges we all face are significant. The list is long but at the top are the terrible ongoing war and violence in Ukraine, the current war in Iran and the broader hostilities in the Middle East, terrorist activity and growing geopolitical tensions, importantly with China,” Dimon said. “Even in troubled times, we have confidence that America will do what it has always done — look to the values that have defined our singular nation and sustained our leadership of the free world.”

Dimon, the longtime leader of the world’s largest bank by market cap, is among the most outspoken of U.S. corporate leaders. His annual letter offers not only a matter of record for his firm’s performance, but also sweeping perspectives on the global state of affairs.

In Monday’s letter, Dimon noted headwinds including global conflicts, persistent inflation, private market upheaval and what he called “poor bank regulations.”

Dimon said that while regulations like those put in place after the 2008 financial crisis “accomplished some good things … they also created a fragmented, slow-moving system with expensive, overlapping and excessive rules and regulations — some of which made the financial system weaker and reduced productive lending.”

He specifically cited negative consequences of capital and liquidity requirements, the current construction of the Federal Reserve’s stress test and a “badly handled” process at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Dimon also said JPMorgan’s reaction to revised proposals for Basel 3 Endgame and a global systemically important bank, or GSIB, surcharge — issued by U.S. regulators last month — were “mixed.”

“While it was good to see that the recent proposals for the Basel 3 Endgame (B3E) and GSIB attempted to reduce the increase in required capital from the 2023 proposals, there are still some aspects that are frankly nonsensical,” Dimon said.

The CEO said with the aggregate proposed surcharges of about 5%, the bank would need to hold “as much as 50% more capital across the vast majority of loans to U.S. consumers and businesses when compared with a large non-GSIB bank for the same set of loans.”

“Frankly, it’s not right, and it’s un-American,” he said.

On trade and geopolitics

Dimon identified geopolitical tensions as the primary risk facing his bank, namely the wars in Ukraine and Iran and their impacts on commodities and global markets — deeming war “the realm of uncertainty.”

“The outcome of current geopolitical events may very well be the defining factor in how the future global economic order unfolds,” he said. “Then again, it may not.”

He also cited a “realignment of economic relations in the world” brought on by U.S. trade policy. U.S. President Donald Trump has made tariffs a signature policy of his second term in office, introducing higher duties on dozens of trade partners and import categories.

“The trade battles are clearly not over, and it should be expected that many nations are analyzing how and with whom they should create trade arrangements,” Dimon said. “While some of this is necessary for national security and resiliency, which are paramount, it is hard to figure out what the long-term effects will be.”

On private markets

Dimon also spoke to recent upheaval in the private markets, as fears around loans made to software firms spur massive redemption requests at private credit funds.

“By and large, private credit does not tend to have great transparency or rigorous valuation ‘marks’ of their loans — this increases the chance that people will sell if they think the environment will get worse — even if actual realized losses barely change,” Dimon said.

The executive added that actual losses are already higher than they should be relative to the environment.

“However this plays out, it should be expected that at some point insurance regulators will insist on more rigorous ratings or markdowns, which will likely lead to demands for more capital,” he said.

On AI

Dimon reiterated Monday that the pace of AI adoption is unlike any technology that came before it. He said while its implementation will be “transformational,” it remains to be seen how the AI revolution will unfold.

“Overall, the investment in AI is not a speculative bubble; rather, it will deliver significant benefits. However, at this time, we cannot predict the ultimate winners and losers in AI- related industries,” Dimon said.

“We will not put our heads in the sand. We will deploy AI, as we deploy all technology, to do a better job for our customers (and employees),” he wrote.

JPMorgan has been at the forefront of Wall Street firms introducing AI at every level of its business. Last year, JPMorgan Chief Analytics Officer Derek Waldron gave CNBC an early demonstration into how it’s using agentic AI to speed up work and improve results for customers and shareholders.

In February, Dimon said AI was reshaping JPMorgan’s workforce and that the bank had “huge redeployment plans” for employees.

“We have focused on some of the ‘known and predictable’ and some of the ‘known unknown’ events,” he said. “But huge technological shifts like AI always have second- and third-order effects as well that can deeply impact society. … We should be monitoring for this kind of transformation, too.”

— CNBC’s Leslie Picker and Ritika Shah contributed to this report.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Gold price rises up Rs1,100 per tola in Pakistan – SUCH TV

Published

on

Gold price rises up Rs1,100 per tola in Pakistan – SUCH TV



The prices of gold increased in the local market on Monday, with 24-karat gold per tola rising by Rs1,100 to settle at Rs491,462 compared to Rs490,362 on the previous trading day, according to rates issued by the All Pakistan Sarafa Gems and Jewellers Association.

Similarly, the price of 10 grams of 24-karat gold increased by Rs943 to Rs421,349 from Rs420,406, whereas 10 grams of 22-karat gold went up by Rs864 to Rs386,250 against Rs385,386.

In the international market, the price of gold increased by $11 to $4,687 per ounce from $4,676.

Meanwhile, the price of silver per tola decreased by Rs 50 to Rs 7,744 from Rs 7,794, while the price of 10 grams of silver declined by Rs 43 to Rs 6,639 from Rs 6,682.

The price of silver in the international market also decreased by $0.50 to $72.60 per ounce from $73.10.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending