Connect with us

Sports

Why don’t all teams use the unstoppable tush push? Do Eagles have a ‘secret ingredient’?

Published

on

Why don’t all teams use the unstoppable tush push? Do Eagles have a ‘secret ingredient’?


THE ATLANTA FALCONS, protecting a 7-3 lead, faced a fourth-and-1 at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers‘ 47 with 9:03 left in the first half of their Week 1 matchup.

For the Philadelphia Eagles, the playcall would have been automatic: the tush push. And the result would have been nearly automatic: a first down. They’ve converted the play 96.6% of the time in fourth-and-1 scenarios since 2022. It has become so unstoppable that nearly two-thirds of NFL teams voted to ban it.

But Falcons coach Raheem Morris is no fan of the tush push, questioning its legality and wanting it banned. So instead, he called for a handoff to star running back Bijan Robinson, who was stopped for no gain. The Bucs scored on the ensuing possession en route to a 23-20 NFC South victory.

“There’s just no other play in our game where you can absolutely get behind somebody and push them,” Morris said. “I never really understood it, why that was legal. So, I’ve definitely been one of those guys voting against that.”

Morris is not alone in his skepticism. Only nine teams have run the play 10 or more times since 2022. Four teams — the New Orleans Saints, Washington Commanders, Carolina Panthers and Miami Dolphins — have never attempted one.

Even the Indianapolis Colts under Shane Steichen, who was at the forefront of implementing the play when he was with the Eagles, have attempted push plays just three times since he was hired in Indianapolis in 2023. None of those attempts produced a first down.

The play is as simple as it is effective. At a basic level for the Eagles, it involves quarterback Jalen Hurts taking the snap and diving forward behind a powerful offensive line while being pushed from behind by teammates lined up in the offensive backfield.

The Eagles have attempted it 116 times since 2022, including six times in Sunday’s victory over the Kansas City Chiefs. That tied for the most attempts by the Eagles in a single game. And it was juxtaposed against the Chiefs’ failure on a critical third-quarter fourth-and-1 play in which running back Kareem Hunt was stuffed after a handoff.

The NFL is often described as the ultimate copycat league, so why don’t more teams try to duplicate the Eagles’ signature play? The league average success rate for a fourth-and-1 non-tush play is 67.0% since 2022, while the league average for a tush push is 84.8%. And the Eagles’ rate is nearly 12 points higher, but the teams opposed to the play have a variety of objections, including avoiding injury risk to quarterbacks or not having personnel ideally suited to running the play. Meanwhile, the Eagles keep pushing along, and it’s not sitting well with some teams, including Chiefs coach Andy Reid, who accused Eagles linemen of false starts.

“We’ve tried it at other places, and it’s not the same replication that it is in Philly,” said Saints coach Kellen Moore, who was the Eagles’ offensive coordinator this past season. “They’re the ones that are doing it, and all of us have tried to replicate it in some way. And, usually, at the end of the day, it’s their play.”

The Eagles’ dominance hasn’t been well received by everyone. The Green Bay Packers proposed banning the play, but that proposal narrowly failed during contentious league meetings in May. There are still many vocal proponents of banning it, with the measure falling just two votes short of passage. But, for now, the only thing standing between the Eagles and more successful tush push plays are NFL defenses. And those defenses have yet to devise reliable ways to stop them.

“There’s some secret ingredient that they got going on over there compared to everybody else,” Colts defensive tackle DeForest Buckner said.


STEICHEN REMEMBERS VIVIDLY the revelatory moment when he discovered the tush push might become a go-to tactic.

He was Philadelphia’s playcaller on Oct. 9, 2022, when the Eagles included the current version of the play in their game plan for the first time (they had used a variant of it sparingly in 2021). It was originally intended to be one of several short-yardage plays in their offensive catalogue.

With 8:06 remaining in the first quarter of that day’s game against the Arizona Cardinals, the Eagles faced a first-and-goal from the Cardinals’ 1-yard line. It was an ideal scenario to roll out their newest play. Worst case, the Eagles would have additional chances to convert if the experiment failed.

Ultimately, those fears were unfounded.

Hurts, behind a surge from his offensive line — and with tight end Dallas Goedert pulling Hurts from the front and running back Kenneth Gainwell pushing him from behind — barreled across the goal line for the first points of the game.

“We hit the first one, and I’m like, ‘All right, that was pretty nice, let’s do it again,'” Steichen said. “And, so, we did it again. I don’t even know how many times we ran it in that one game.”

All told, the Eagles attempted the play six times in the victory over Arizona. They converted first downs on five of those attempts.

That was the day everything changed.

The play became the singular focus of the Eagles’ short-yardage offense. The offensive coaching staff routinely held weekly 90-minute meetings about short-yardage situations before employing the tush push, Steichen said. But the instant success of the push play reduced those meetings to about 10 minutes.

“We’d look at each other and say, ‘So, are we good?'” Steichen said. “If there wasn’t anything else, we’d just say, ‘All right, we’re done.'”

The staff began adding layers to the play, like drawing up alternative plays they could run out of the tush push formation. Eventually they added a second pusher in the backfield after initially drawing up the play with just one. But mostly, coaches were inclined to not fix something that wasn’t broken.

Since 2022, other teams have had ample opportunity to duplicate the play. But only the Bills have used it with any regularity, converting 51 out of 57 attempts — with any down and distance — for an 89.5% success rate. The Chicago Bears (16 attempts) are the next closest team.

Are the Eagles just smarter? More talented? Tougher? It’s much more nuanced than that.

Not surprisingly, the offensive line plays the most fundamental role in a successful tush push. Without a powerful unit capable of creating significant upfront push, the play isn’t even viable. And yet, four of the top five teams in run block win rate from 2024 never attempted a push play this past season. The fifth, the Baltimore Ravens, tried it just five times.

So, having a formidable line does not automatically make a team a good candidate to run this play. You have to have the right personnel with the right skill sets. The ability of the interior offensive linemen to create significant push and get lower than the defensive linemen in the scrum is key. Now-retired Eagles center Jason Kelce was particularly good at this.

“You’ve just got to have the perfect technique,” Tennessee Titans center Lloyd Cushenberry III said.


BUT THERE ARE other factors to consider, even for teams with top offensive lines.

Take Washington, for example. The Commanders were third in the NFL this past season in rushing yards per game and ranked second in collective run block win rate. But their slender rookie quarterback, Jayden Daniels (6-foot-4, 210 pounds), is not as powerfully built as Hurts, who is a compact 6-1 and 223 pounds and famously squats nearly 600 pounds.

“I’m assuming they don’t want me to do it,” Daniels said of the Commanders’ aversion to the play. “I guess that’s the reason why. If I need to do it, I’ll do it.”

Therein lies another component of this equation: It is Hurts’ lower-body strength and overall power combined with the Eagles’ skilled offensive line that makes it all come together.

In Jacksonville, new Jaguars coach Liam Coen said he has included the tush push in the playbook in part because of 6-6, 220-pound quarterback Trevor Lawrence. But Coen admits to never considering it in his previous role as Tampa Bay Buccaneers offensive coordinator with smaller quarterback Baker Mayfield (6-1, 215).

“We didn’t do a ton of [quarterback] sneaks because Baker was not the biggest, even though he’d probably bust my chops for saying that,” Coen said. “But he can get them, too, though. It’ll be a part of the [Jaguars’] scheme.”

To that end, Seattle Seahawks coach Mike Macdonald said he might consider using the tush push with rookie quarterback Jalen Milroe, who showed himself to be a powerful runner at Alabama. The Seahawks successfully executed one in the preseason with Milroe under center and could deploy it again.

“You’ve seen him,” Macdonald said. “He’s a strong person.”

Instead, the Seahawks ran one with tight end AJ Barner on Sunday against the Steelers, and they converted.

There’s a final variable to consider, and it’s also related to the quarterback: instincts.

Hurts has developed such a knack for finding the openings in that split second after the snap on push plays that it has made him difficult to stop. In that 2022 game when the Eagles attempted the tush push for the first time, the hole Hurts attempted to push through never materialized. But he ably slid slightly to his left and found an alternative path to the end zone.

“The quarterback has to have a tremendous feel for it,” Steichen said.

Some have that, some don’t.

Los Angeles Rams coach Sean McVay makes no pretense about which category his quarterback, Matthew Stafford, falls into.

“We always joke, he’s a terrible sneaker,” McVay said. He added, “You won’t be seeing much tush push from the L.A. Rams.”


THERE ARE SOME in NFL circles who are opposed to the tush push on principle because of the pushing element. Many of those individuals participated in those heated debates earlier in the year.

But there are coaches who choose not to run the play based on mere philosophy. For them, there are other ways to gain a single yard in a short-yardage scenario.

“We don’t live in that world,” Kansas City Chiefs offensive coordinator Matt Nagy said. “Schematically, we feel we have our own ways of getting to that quarterback sneak, even if it’s not that play.”

The Chiefs have in recent years employed tight ends on standard quarterback sneaks, using pre-snap shifts to move them under center. Three-time MVP Patrick Mahomes had a right patellar (kneecap) dislocation on a sneak in 2019 and missed two games, which likely influenced the team’s philosophy. The Chiefs’ short-yardage approach has been relatively successful as they ranked 16th this past season in converting third and fourth downs with a yard or less to go for a first down (71.7%).

Dallas Cowboys coach Brian Schottenheimer has a similar view.

“We have different ways of what I would say attacking the A-gaps and things like that,” he said. “And we have some plays that we feel like we’ve perfected that are different than that.”

Another obstacle, some say, is the inability to safely replicate the play in practice. Even Steichen admitted calling the tush push as often as the Eagles did is what helped them perfect it — not practice. Some coaches are understandably reluctant to call a play they haven’t adequately rehearsed.

“We’re obviously not going to create a bunch of scrums on the practice field with our own defense and risk injuries,” New England Patriots offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels said.

The Eagles are proof that the best way to improve at running the play is to run it more often. But you can only afford to do so if it’s actually working.

“It’s about them doing it over and over and over again,” Steichen said. “They’re getting the reps on the field on game day, and that’s their practice — doing it.”

A final philosophical objection might be one of the most obvious: Not every team wants to subject its quarterback to potential punishment. It’s a different question from whether the quarterback is actually good at running the tush push. Hurts inevitably gets hit on the play, even though it hasn’t resulted in an injury for the reigning Super Bowl MVP.

Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray‘s position on the concept is simple: Count me out. And he told former Arizona coach Kliff Kingsbury as much.

Murray recalled running a quarterback sneak early in his career against the Falcons. He converted the first down, he said, but defenders were in the pile “f—ing with my fingers and messing with me and stuff. I told Kliff … ‘Yo, I’m not doing that s— again.’ But I would do it if we needed to do it. I would definitely do it.”

Minnesota Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores said “exposing the quarterback” to injury is, in his estimation, the biggest reason more teams don’t run the tush push.

“It’s a violent play, I would say,” he said. “There’s certainly a lot of contact on that particular play.”

Colts center Tanor Bortolini was recently discussing the idea of a tush push with quarterback Daniel Jones, formerly of the New York Giants. Jones’ position was unambiguous.

“In New York, he said they ran it one time and he got smoked by a linebacker,” Bortolini said. “He was like, ‘I never want to run that again.’ And I was like, ‘You know what? That makes sense.’

“You really hate to put your quarterback in a spot where he can just get drilled like that.”


THERE REMAINS SIGNIFICANT opposition to the tush push. During the May league meeting, 22 teams voted for the Packers’ proposal to ban it (passage required 24 votes). That means roughly two out of three owners were convinced the play is worth eliminating.

League officials posited that it’s a dangerous play and should be removed from the game.

“I think we owe it to our players,” Green Bay Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst said. “It’s not about success, it’s about safety here.”

play

1:23

Schefter: ‘Eagles have mastered the tush push’

Adam Schefter explains how the Eagles have mastered the tush push, leaving defenses and officials unsure how to manage it.

There was also criticism in the Eagles’ game Sunday, with Fox analyst Tom Brady and Reid suggesting Eagles offensive linemen were getting off the line of scrimmage before the snap but weren’t penalized.

“If guys are moving early, then you’ve got to call that,” Reid said. “[The league] will go back and look at that and see what their evaluation is of it. It could be different than mine. I felt like the guys [were] moving, and that’s why I was griping about it on the sideline with the officials.

“But sometimes people see things differently. I’ll be curious to see what the response is.”

Eagles coach Nick Sirianni said of the Chiefs, “I would argue that they were in the neutral zone a lot and taking every inch that they had.” Still, the questions might create renewed scrutiny of the play.

But, for now, the play is perfectly legal and is available to every team. And yet, there is minimal momentum toward wider usage.

In Week 1 of this season, just two teams ran a tush push of any sort. To no surprise, it was the same teams that have long been doing it successfully: the Eagles and the Bills (two attempts each).

It’s just the latest evidence of what has been clear all along: The rest of the league still hasn’t cracked this code, and the Eagles, in particular, stand alone.

“I can’t hate that they mastered it,” Titans defensive tackle Sebastian Joseph-Day said. “Shout[out] to their coach, shout[out] to their players. They just got it down. They got it down to the T.”

Contributing: Todd Archer, Sarah Barshop, Turron Davenport, Rob Demovsky, Mike DiRocco, Brady Henderson, John Keim, Marc Raimondi, Mike Reiss, Kevin Seifert, Nate Taylor, Katherine Terrell and Josh Weinfuss.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Transfer rumors, news: Arsenal join Man City in race for Newcastle defender

Published

on

Transfer rumors, news: Arsenal join Man City in race for Newcastle defender


Arsenal are ready to join Manchester City in the race to land Newcastle right back Tino Livramento, while Tottenham defender and captain Cristian Romero is likely to leave at the end of the season. Join us for the latest transfer news and rumors from around the globe.

Transfers home page | Men’s winter grades | Women’s grades

TRENDING RUMORS

Arsenal are considering an offer to sign Newcastle right back Tino Livramento this summer, reports The Daily Telegraph. Livramento, 23, has a contract until 2028, but it’s claimed that talks over a possible extension have been shelved. Newcastle want the England international to stay, but Arsenal are keen, while Manchester City have also been linked with a move at a cost of around £60 million.

– There is a serious possibility that Tottenham defender and captain Cristian Romero could leave in the coming months, according to Fabrizio Romano. A number of top clubs have reportedly been calling about a transfer, as uncertainty continues over his long-term future at Spurs with the club in the midst of a relegation battle. The Argentina World Cup winner has a contract until 2029, so his exit could raise some significant funds.

– Arsenal have held initial talks with RB Leipzig over a possible deal for defender Castello Lukeba, claims L’Equipe. The report suggests that the Gunners are one of several teams looking at the France center back, with Bayern Munich also in the picture. The 23-year-old has a contract with Leipzig until 2029, while the Bundesliga club values his transfer at around €60 million.

Juventus and AC Milan have joined a number of MLS clubs in the race to sign Barcelona striker Robert Lewandowski, reports Calciomercato. The 37-year-old is set to become a free agent in the summer, with his contract entering the final few months, and has scored 115 goals and assisted 23 times for the Blaugrana in 181 appearances since joining from Bayern Munich. However, with no sign of a renewal in sight, teams are circling tp land him as a free agent.

– Bayern Munich are keen to keep hold of forward Michael Olise this summer amid reports linking the France international with a transfer to Liverpool, according to Fabrizio Romano. The Bundesliga giants are looking to downplay talk of an exit and while Liverpool are likely to push for a winger, Olise may not be available. The 24-year-old joined Bayern in 2024 and has 15 goals and 26 assists across all competitions this season.

EXPERT TAKE

play

2:06

Olley: Tudor’s position will be reviewed after Liverpool vs. Tottenham

James Olley examines Igor Tudor’s future at Tottenham after their 5-2 defeat to Atletico Madrid in the Champions League.

OTHER RUMORS

– Manchester United are stepping up interest in West Ham midfielder Mateus Fernandes but his transfer will cost around £60 million. (Ekrem Konur)

Joshua Zirkzee is eyeing a possible exit from United in the summer transfer window, with clubs in Serie A interested. (Sun)

– Liverpool have added Real Madrid defender Dean Huijsen to their shortlist, having missed out on signing him last summer when he was at Bournemouth (Ekrem Konur)

– West Ham want to make their loan move for Chelsea defender Axel Disasi permanent in the summer, if they stay in the Premier League. (Daily Mail)

– VfB Stuttgart youngster Finn Jeltsch is attracting transfer interest from Arsenal, Liverpool, and Bayern Munich. (TEAMtalk)

– Arsenal are preparing offers for Bayern’s Leon Goretzka and Dortmund’s Julian Brandt, with the midfield pair set to become free agents at the end of the season. (TEAMtalk)

– Tottenham are still keen on signing left back Andy Robertson as a free agent if he leaves Liverpool, having missed out on landing him in January (Football Insider).

– Juventus want to sign Marcos Senesi as a free agent from Bournemouth this summer (Gazzetta dello Sport)

– Napoli are set to enter talks with Scott McTominay‘s agent over a new contract (Gazzetta dello Sport)



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

PSG are Champions League faves, and win vs. Chelsea shows why

Published

on

PSG are Champions League faves, and win vs. Chelsea shows why


PARIS — Like it or not, Paris Saint-Germain are still the team to beat in the Champions League. Why? The reigning champions can reach levels that the rest can only dream of, and PSG simply blew Chelsea away when they slipped through the gears.

This has been a season of inconsistency and ups-and-downs for PSG, but the side that won the Champions League in such devastating form last season has apparently been lying in wait at Parc des Princes, ready to reawaken. And that moment came as this round-of-16 first-leg tie approached its final fifteen minutes in Paris.

Chelsea had fought back twice to make it 2-2 on the night and the Premier League side threatened to turn the game on its head and take the lead ahead of next Tuesday’s second-leg at Stamford Bridge. But then it happened.

A mistake by goalkeeper Filip Jorgensen — surprisingly selected ahead of first-choice Robert Sánchez — gifted the ball to Khvicha Kvaratskhelia and it ended up with Vitinha, who lofted the ball over Jorgensen to make it 3-2. For Chelsea, it marked their third error leading to goal in the Champions League this season — only on-the-verge-of-relegation Tottenham has more among Premier League teams with six.

From that point onwards, PSG — and especially substitute Kvaratskhelia — were unstoppable. They were ruthless, and a game that was drifting towards a draw — or even a Chelsea win — ended with PSG claiming a 5-2 victory.


Predicting 2026 Champions League winner based on past winners
Ranked: 10 worst Premier League teams, relative to spending
Havertz haunts ex-club, giving Arsenal time to prove they’re Europe’s best


Now, PSG are overwhelming favourites to comfortably reach the quarterfinals. Last season, a similar spark propelled PSG to Champions League glory. In January 2025, PSG fell 2-0 behind at home to Manchester City, who scored twice shortly after the start of the second-half, and the French side were heading out of the competition in the League Phase. But by the end of that game, PSG had won 4-2 and it transformed their season. They never looked back.

Chelsea certainly didn’t help themselves. PSG scored five goals from an expected goals of just 0.87 — that +4.13 goal-above-expected is the second highest in a Champions League knockout match in 15 years. The error that allowed PSG to score the go-ahead goal was a big culprit.

But in the end, Chelsea were the victims of another PSG surge, and it was the home side’s breathless performance in the final 15 minutes that will send put the rest of Europe on notice.

“The last 15-20 minutes were crazy, but that’s on me,” Chelsea coach Liam Rosenior said. “We need to better when setbacks happen, be calm and collected, and that didn’t happen.

“It’s a painful one because we were in the tie for 75 minutes. We have shot ourselves in the foot, made the tie very difficult now and the fifth goal is the painful one.”

PSG simply have incredible attacking talent and it all clicked against Chelsea, starting with Bradley Barcola and Ousmane Dembélé‘s first-half goals — Dembele’s counter-attack goal was a stunning example of the pace PSG possess.

Chelsea were able to expose PSG’s defensive frailties, equalising twice through Malo Gusto and Enzo Fernández, but Enrique’s forwards are so potent that they are able to make up for the lapses at the back that have affected the team all season.

Will those issues cost them a back-to-back Champions League title? That’s the risk, especially after the inexplicable decision to offload Gianluigi Donnarumma to City in the summer following the signing of Lucas Chevalier.

Chevalier has had a difficult first season in Paris and he was on the bench again, overlooked in favour of the inconsistent Matvey Safonov, who should have saved Gusto’s goal.

Perhaps PSG can ride it out all the way to another final simply because they have so much firepower upfront, but they will have to repeat the form that overran Chelsea to ensure that their defensive problems don’t prove to be their downfall.

If Kvaratskhelia can continue to play as he did in the final 15 minutes, PSG will be too strong for every other team left in the competition.

The Georgia winger made it 4-2 with a powerful curling shot from 20 yards on 86 minutes and then put the game seemingly beyond Chelsea’s reach with another, deep into stoppage time.

But even before he started scoring, the former Napoli player destroyed Chelsea’s right flank and it was clear that he was burning with determination to make a point to Enrique for starting him on the bench in the first place.

When Kvaratskhelia hit PSG’s fifth, the Chelsea players slumped to the ground like a boxer that had taken too many blows.

“I think we showed today we are capable of everything,” Kvaratskhelia said. “We just have to continue like this. We conceded two goals and we can see the mistakes we made, but we are happy with a three goal victory. We are still PSG.”

Chelsea still have 90 minutes to turn the tie around next week, but they will know that PSG are more likely to pick them off on the counter-attack whenever they attempt to find the three goals needed to wipe out their deficit.

This was a brutal lesson for Chelsea. They looked like a team that could compete for 70 minutes, but then they encountered the European champions at the top of their game.

That PSG were able to just turn it on and dismantle a Premier League side as strong as Chelsea — a team that was able to beat PSG in the FIFA Club World Cup final last summer — underlined the power and quality that Enrique has at his disposal.

Yes, it has been difficult season for PSG, but they have shown their best again and nobody can live with them like this.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Big Ten asks NCAA to pause tampering inquiries, revamp rules

Published

on

Big Ten asks NCAA to pause tampering inquiries, revamp rules


The Big Ten sent a letter to the NCAA this week asking the organization to put a halt to “investigations and infractions proceedings” related to tampering, according to a copy of the letter obtained by ESPN.

The letter states that the “current framework” for tampering rules “cannot be credibly or equitably enforced,” pointing out the rules for tampering were designed before a modern era that includes paying athletes and essentially unlimited transfers.

“These rules were not designed for a world in which student-athletes are compensated market participants making annual decisions with significant economic consequences,” the letter reads. “The collision between the old rules and new reality is producing outcomes that harm the population that the rules were designed to protect.”

The letter comes in the wake of a flurry of recent tampering headlines. That included the NCAA seeking to impose significant penalties against tampering offenders. The case of linebacker Luke Ferrelli, who transferred to Ole Miss after enrolling at Clemson, has also put the issue in the forefront.

The prevalence of tampering in the current landscape is so great that numerous officials told ESPN’s Max Olson that it’s essentially a competitive disadvantage to not tamper.

“If you’re not doing that, you’re so far behind in the game,” an SEC general manager told Olson.

The Big Ten’s letter lays out why the current rules are antiquated for the modern space, suggests a pause that “does not create a window of impunity” and lays out a vision for building “a framework suited to the world as it actually exists.”

The Big Ten letter states: “We are committed to engaging in an expeditious process to develop a modern framework for contact rules that addresses the varied challenges and opportunities of the current collegiate landscape.”

The letter shows portal numbers from this year (the first football season with just one portal period) that have not appeared publicly. That includes 1,000 football players who entered the portal on Jan. 2 and took campus visits the same weekend. More than 300 had signed with a new school by the end of the weekend. Some signed as quickly as 90 minutes into the portal opening, and others had a “do not contact” designation that essentially couldn’t exist without some type of fact finding to determine a new destination.

“These timelines reflect the reality of player movement and raise serious questions about whether the current regulatory structure can realistically accommodate the pace at which the modern transfer market operates,” the letter says.

The letter says the current framework “conflates” genuine predatory recruiting — in which a school targets a player under contract — with a far more common scenario in which a student-athlete already exploring options engages in conversations as part of a rational, market-driven evaluation.

“The world is materially different than in 2018 when the Division I membership adopted the existing contact rules and penalty structure,” the letter reads. “The House v. NCAA settlement transformed college athletics into an environment where student-athletes are compensated directly by institutions.”

The letter also notes that only 15 Level II or above tampering cases have been fully adjudicated by the NCAA in five years, including just three involving FBS football, one involving men’s basketball and zero involving women’s basketball.

The NCAA says its enforcement team processed around 90 impermissible contact cases last year, including major infractions by Oklahoma State’s women’s tennis program and UCLA’s cross country and track programs.

The Big Ten argues the dearth of tampering cases in a time when thousands of athletes are transferring every year proves that “consistent, equitable enforcement is no longer achievable” under current NCAA rules.

The letter also mentions legal scrutiny that has arisen.

“Continued enforcement of the current rules risks having the courts strike down the rules entirely,” the letter reads.

The letter argues the NCAA must change: “The system of college sports is under tremendous stress, both internally and externally. Systems adapt or they break.”

It lays out that the Big Ten would want an enforcement approach that would be “timely and meaningful, but able to be meted out fairly with penalties that are commensurate with the circumstances.”

The letter concludes by saying: “The Big Ten is committed to quickly engaging in a deliberative process drawing on athletics administrators, compliance professionals, coaches, legal counsel, and other stakeholders from across the membership and will work to produce a comprehensive proposal. We believe this collaborative, membership-driven approach is the best path to a durable solution and need the NCAA’s support in this effort.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending