The other goal of the Button is rapid response time. Unlike the Humane Ai pin, which got lots of criticism for taking a painfully long time to reply to queries, the Button is designed to be nearly instantaneous. In a demo via Zoom call, I watched Nolet ask the Button for a recommendation for the best sandwich shops in my neighborhood. While the Button didn’t choose my idea of the best sandwich place around, it did at least answer all the questions within a second. It can also be immediately interrupted by pressing the button, which is a great feature for people like me who cannot tell a chatbot to shut up fast enough.

Nolet is unapologetic about the very clear Apple ethos you might be able to suss out in the design.

“The Humane pin felt a little geeky to wear, right?” Nolet says. “But the iPod shuffle? Really cool. That’s where the idea started, and then we just put all of our Apple-esque expertise into it and tried to refine it into something that we thought would actually be useful.”

Nearly all their product images and videos show the Button being used as a wearable, but Nolet insists the device can also be kept in a pocket, bag, or car glove box as well.

“My cofounder says we can’t tell people it looks cool; they have to decide,” Nolet says. “Our intention is to build something that is kind of fashionable, but it’s up to you guys to tell us if it’s cool.”

Though Apple has long been a leader in technological coolness, it has struggled in the virtual reality space, specifically with its too expensive, too heavy Vision Pro and that devices complicated rollout. Apple is not alone on that front. Meta is actively rejiggering support for its VR efforts. Nolet posits that part of the reason for that instability is that VR has required building hardware and the software ecosystems to support it at the same time.

“There was no software innovation that we were anchored to as an industry, so I think it’s quite a hard pitch,” Nolet says. “It’s much, much easier to stand on the shoulders of giants.”

Anthropic “has not satisfied the stringent requirements” to temporarily lose the supply-chain-risk designation imposed by the Pentagon, a US appeals court in Washington, DC, ruled on Wednesday. The decision is at odds with one issued last month by a lower court judge in San Francisco, and it wasn’t immediately clear how the conflicting preliminary judgments would be resolved.

The government sanctioned Anthropic under two different supply-chain laws with similar effects, and the San Francisco and Washington, DC, courts are each ruling on only one of them. Anthropic has said it is the first US company to be designated under the two laws, which are typically used to punish foreign businesses that pose a risk to national security.

“Granting a stay would force the United States military to prolong its dealings with an unwanted vendor of critical AI services in the middle of a significant ongoing military conflict,” the three-judge appellate panel wrote on Wednesday in what they described as an unprecedented case. The panel said that while Anthropic may suffer financial harm from the ongoing designation, they did not want to risk “a substantial judicial imposition on military operations” or “lightly override” the military’s judgments on national security.

The San Francisco judge had found that the Department of Defense likely acted in bad faith against Anthropic, driven by frustration over the AI company’s proposed limits on how its technology could be used and its public criticism of those restrictions. The judge ordered the supply-chain risk label removed last week, and the Trump administration complied by restoring access to Anthropic AI tools inside the Pentagon and throughout the rest of the federal government.

Anthropic spokesperson Danielle Cohen says the company is grateful the Washington, DC, court “recognized these issues need to be resolved quickly” and remains confident “the courts will ultimately agree that these supply chain designations were unlawful.”

The Department of Defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but acting attorney general Todd Blanche posted a statement on X. “Today’s DC Circuit stay allowing the government to designate Anthropic as a supply-chain risk is a resounding victory for military readiness,” he wrote.
“Our position has been clear from the start—our military needs full access to Anthropic’s models if its technology is integrated into our sensitive systems.

Military authority and operational control belong to the Commander-in-Chief and Department of War, not a tech company.”

The cases are testing how much power the executive branch has over the conduct of tech companies. The battle between Anthropic and the Trump administration is also playing out as the Pentagon deploys AI in its war against Iran. The company has argued it is being illegally punished for insisting that its AI tool Claude lacks the accuracy needed for certain sensitive operations such as carrying out deadly drone strikes without human supervision.

Several experts in government contracting and corporate rights have told WIRED that Anthropic has a strong case against the government, but the courts sometimes refuse to overrule the White House on matters related to national security. Some AI researchers have said the Pentagon’s actions against Anthropic “chills professional debate” about the performance of AI systems.

Anthropic has claimed in court that it lost business because of the designation, which government lawyers contend bars the Pentagon and its contractors from using the company’s Claude AI as part of military projects. And as long as Trump remains in power, Anthropic may not be able to regain the significant foothold it held in the federal government.

Final decisions in the company’s two lawsuits could be months away. The Washington court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on May 19.

The parties have revealed minimal details so far about how exactly the Department of Defense has used Claude or how much progress it has made in transitioning staff to other AI tools from Google DeepMind, OpenAI, or others. The military, which under President Trump calls itself the Department of War, has said it has taken steps to ensure Anthropic can’t purposely try to sabotage its AI tools during the transition.

Update 4/8/26 7:27 EDT: This story has been updated to include a statement form acting attorney general Todd Blanche.

As the world held its breath on Tuesday night, news of a ceasefire and the potential reopening of the Strait of Hormuz brought a collective sigh of relief. But with shipments stalled in the strait for over a month, the disruption to global shipping will not resolve immediately.

“Traffic through Hormuz dropped by about 95 percent [during this conflict]. As a result, prices surged, and not just for crude oil but also for refined products like jet fuel, diesel, and gas oil,” says Carsten Ladekjær, CEO at Glander International Bunkering, which specializes in supplying fuel and lubricants to the global shipping industry.

The impact has been uneven across regions. Countries heavily dependent on Middle Eastern energy—particularly in Asia—have been most affected. India sources around 55 percent of its energy imports from the region, China about 50 percent, Japan 93 percent, South Korea 67 percent, and Singapore 70 percent, according to Ladekjær.

While the ceasefire signals a possible reopening, key details remain unclear. “Even with a ceasefire, reopening won’t be immediate,” Ladekjær says. “There’s a backlog, with ships waiting to leave, and likely a controlled process for who gets out first. Iran still appears to be managing that.”

Energy markets reacted quickly. Brent crude fell to around $94 from $110 earlier in the week—a drop of roughly 15 percent.

“Refined products like diesel and jet fuel have dropped even more, because markets are forward-looking—they price in expectations,” says Arne Lohmann Rasmussen, chief analyst and head of research at Global Risk Management. “But we’re still well above prewar levels, which were around $60 to $70.”

A System Under Backlog

Around 1,000 ships remain in the Gulf, including hundreds of tankers awaiting passage.

As of this writing, more than 800 cargo ships and tankers are stuck inside the Persian Gulf, with over 1,000 additional vessels waiting on both sides of the Strait of Hormuz.

Under normal conditions, roughly 150 vessels pass through the strait daily. Experts say clearing the backlog will take time, as ships must be sequenced through, refueled, and repositioned.

“That’s a logistical nightmare. We don’t yet know what the current capacity will be, especially from a security standpoint,” says Lohmann Rasmussen. “It’s not something that can be solved overnight. There are logistical issues, security issues, and even communication challenges.”

Though the market has already seen a correction, that doesn’t mean prices at the pump or in storage will drop immediately.