Politics
Zelensky, European leaders head to US for talks on peace deal terms

- Trump says Nato and Crimea “off the table” for Ukraine.
- Ukraine fears pressure to accept Russian land demands.
- No ceasefire breakthrough after Trump-Putin summit.
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said reclaiming Crimea or entering Nato were off the table for Ukraine, as President Volodymyr Zelensky arrived in Washington for Monday talks aimed at ending the war with Russia.
Zelensky, who has repeatedly rejected territorial concessions, will meet Trump in Washington on Monday, accompanied by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and other leaders.
The meeting comes on the heels of a summit between Trump and Russia’s Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, which failed to yield a ceasefire breakthrough but produced promises from both leaders to provide “robust security guarantees” to Ukraine.
Zelensky was not invited to the Alaska meeting, after which Trump pivoted to the long-held Russian position that a ceasefire was not needed before a final peace deal.
“President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,” Trump posted on his social media platform. “Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!”
Trump and Zelensky are expected to meet one-on-one before being joined by a cohort of European leaders on Monday, according to the White House schedule.
Along with von der Leyen, Nato chief Mark Rutte and the leaders of Britain, Finland, France, Germany and Italy will be present.
It will be the first time Zelensky visits Washington since a bust-up with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February when the two men berated the Ukrainian leader for being “ungrateful.”
On Sunday night, after arriving in Washington, Zelensky said: “We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably.”
Security guarantees
Since the Oval Office row in February, Trump has grown more critical of Putin and shown some signs of frustration as Russia repeatedly stalled on peace talks.

But Washington has not placed extra sanctions on Moscow and the lavish welcome offered to Putin in Alaska on his first visit to the West since he invaded Ukraine in 2022 was seen as a diplomatic coup for Russia.
Speaking in Brussels on the eve of his visit to the United States, Zelensky said he was keen to hear more about what Putin and Trump discussed in Alaska.
He also hailed Washington’s offer of security guarantees to Ukraine as “historic.”
Trump said he spoke to Putin about the possibility of a Nato-style collective defense guarantee for Ukraine.
The promise would be outside of the framework of the Western military alliance that Ukraine wants to join and which is seen as an existential threat by Russia.
French President Emmanuel Macron said European leaders would ask Trump “to what extent” Washington is ready to contribute to security guarantees for Ukraine.
Discussion on land
Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff said Moscow had made “some concessions” regarding five Ukrainian regions that Russia fully or partially controls, and said that “there is an important discussion with regard to Donetsk and what would happen there.

“That discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday,” he said, without giving details.
Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 following a sham referendum and did the same in 2022 for four Ukrainian regions — Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia — even though its forces have not fully captured them.
A source briefed on a phone call between Trump and European leaders on Saturday told AFP that the US leader was “inclined to support” a Russian demand to be given territory it has not yet captured in the Donbas, an area that includes the Donetsk and Lugansk regions and which has seen the deadliest battles of the war.
In exchange, the source cited Trump as saying, Moscow would agree to “freeze” the front line in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Russian forces hold swathes of territory but not the regional capitals.
Russia has until now insisted that Ukraine pull its forces out of all four regions as a precondition to any deal.
‘Capitulation’
There is concern in Europe that Washington could pressure Ukraine to accept Russia’s terms.

“For peace to prevail, pressure must be applied to the aggressor, not the victim of aggression,” Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said Sunday.
Macron said: “There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.”
Zelensky has repeatedly pushed back against ceding territory, but said he is ready to discuss the issue in the context of a trilateral summit with Trump and Putin.
Trump has raised the possibility of such a meeting, but Russia has played down the prospect.
Moscow’s forces have been advancing gradually but steadily in Ukraine, particularly in the Donetsk region.
Russian attacks on Kharkiv killed three people and wounded dozens more, Ukrainian authorities said Monday, while a separate overnight attack on the Sumy region near the border wounded two others.
Politics
Rift emerges within top Afghan Taliban leadership

Four years into their rule in Afghanistan, the Afghan Taliban regime has reportedly been rocked by internal rifts, with key leaders pitted against each other.
The Taliban declared the war in Afghanistan was over after they took control of the presidential palace in Kabul on August 15, 2021, and the United States withdrew its forces from the war-ravaged country.
However, rifts have emerged within the Afghan Taliban ranks, with Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada warning that internal disagreements could bring them all down.
The BBC, citing an audio leak it obtained, reported that Akhundzada had voiced his concerns over division within the Taliban ranks.
In the leaked clip, purportedly from one of his speeches at a religious seminary in Kandahar in January 2025, Akhundzada can be heard warning that “the emirate will collapse and end” as a result of the ongoing divisions.
The publication, citing insiders, stated that the Afghan Taliban have been divided into two distinct groups: the Kandahar group and another based in the capital Kabul.
The Kandahar group remains loyal to Akhundzada, who is operating from his base in Kandahar, where leaders loyal to him control every aspect of the Afghan society.
The group includes Afghanistan Prime Minister Mohammad Hassan Akhund, Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani and Higher Education Minister Neda Mohammad Nadim.
The group is working towards the Taliban supreme leader’s vision of a strict Emirate that is isolated from the modern world.
The second group, comprising powerful Taliban members, is largely based in Kabul and advocates for engagement with the outside and allows girls and women access to education.
Afghanistan Deputy Prime Minister Abdul Ghani Baradar, Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani, and Defence Minister Mohammad Yaqood Mujahid make up the Kabul group.
The BBC, citing a Taliban insider, described the situation as “the Kandahar house versus Kabul”.
According to the publication, the conflict between the two groups became evident in September last year, following the Taliban supreme leader’s directive to suspend internet and mobile phone services.
However, the services were restored three days later without any explanation given by the Afghan Taliban regime.
Citing Taliban insiders, BBC reported that the Kabul group went against Akhundzada’s orders and restored the services, an act described as “nothing short of a rebellion”.
The publication stated that the group restored the services as the move directly threatened officials’ privileges and financial resources.
Meanwhile, the Taliban supreme leader reportedly moved key departments to Kandahar — including distribution of weapons, which had been previously managed by Haqqani and Yaqoob, who are members of the Kabul group.
The group has recently struggled to secure meetings with Akhundzada, with Kabul-based ministers reportedly told to travel to Kandahar only if they receive an official invitation, the report said.
The situation appears contained as of early 2026, though underlying tensions persist.
Afghan Taliban regime spokespersons have downplayed the disagreement as a mere difference of opinion; however, the ideological rift continues through public statements.
Politics
Pro-Iran protests held in Indian-occupied Ladakh

Pro-Iran protesters carried posters of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and chanted slogans in the Indian-occupied Ladakh region, as Iran’s leadership tries to quell domestic unrest.
The rally was held under the banner of the Imam Khomeini Memorial Trust, according to a report by The Times of India.
Several processions set off from different parts of Kargil, with large crowds carrying banners of Khamenei and chanting slogans in his support.
The processions converged at the Old Taxi Stand in Kargil, where the main gathering was held, drawing thousands of men and women from across the district, the publication reported.
Protesters raised slogans against the United States and Israel, targeting US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Tehran is seeking to deter US President Donald Trump’s repeated threats to intervene on behalf of anti-government protesters.
Some experts and regional diplomats warn that military intervention could backfire by smothering protests in Iran, fueling an intensified crackdown on those who participated and triggering retaliatory Iranian missile attacks on US bases in the Middle East.
The US is withdrawing some personnel from bases in the Middle East, a US official said on Wednesday, after a senior Iranian official said Tehran had warned neighbours it would hit American bases if Washington strikes.
However, Trump said late Wednesday that killings in Iran’s protests were subsiding and he believed there was no plan for large-scale executions of protesters.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi had also said there was “no plan” by Iran to hang people, when asked about the anti-government protests.
“There is no plan for hanging at all,” the foreign minister told Fox News in an interview on the “Special Report with Bret Baier” show. “Hanging is out of the question,” he said.
Politics
Turkish foreign minister says talks held on defence pact with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia

- Turkish FM stresses need for broader regional cooperation, trust.
- Says issues could be resolved if nations “be sure of each other”.
- Bloomberg reports Ankara in advanced talks to join defence pact.
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said on Thursday that talks have been held on a possible defence pact with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, but no agreement has been signed.
Responding at a press conference in Istanbul to a question about whether there might be such an alliance, Fidan pointed to what he said was a need for broader regional cooperation and trust, and added that regional issues could be resolved if relevant countries would “be sure of each other”.
His comments follow a Bloomberg report last week that said Ankara was at an “advanced stage of discussions” to join the Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (SMDA) between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.
The publication, citing people familiar with the matter, reported that the talks were likely to conclude with a deal.
The SMDA between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia treats an attack on either nation as an act of aggression against both. It was signed on September 17, 2025, during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s visit to Saudi Arabia.
The Bloomberg report stated that Turkiye was mulling joining the pact amid concerns over the reliability of the United States, and its increasingly overlapping interests with those of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in South Asia.
Pakistan and Turkiye maintain decades-long defence ties, under which Ankara is building corvette warships for the Pakistan Navy.
Turkiye has also upgraded numerous F-16 fighter jets of the Pakistan Air Force, and also shares its drone technology with Islamabad.
Pakistani officials credit the country’s military success against India in the May 2025 conflict to strengthened defence agreements.
On Wednesday, PM Shehbaz said Pakistan was engaged in discussions with multiple countries on defence agreements, including the sale of its fighter jets.
“After Pakistan won the war last year, the demand for Pakistani fighter jets has increased […] many countries are actively engaged with us to acquire the jets,” the premier said while addressing a meeting of the federal cabinet.
Prior to that, Minister for Defence Production Raza Hayat Haraj told the BBC that Islamabad was in talks with several countries over potential agreements to sell JF-17 Thunder fighter jets.
Pakistan and India went to war in May last year after India launched an unprovoked attack on Pakistan following the attack on tourists in the Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK).
New Delhi maintains that the terrorists who killed 26 tourists in IIOJK’s Pahalgam were Pakistanis — an accusation that Islamabad has denied and has also asked India to partake in a neutral investigation.
Pakistan, during the 87-hour conflict, downed its six fighter jets, including three Rafale, and dozens of drones.
The war between the two nuclear-armed nations ended on May 10 with a ceasefire agreement brokered by the United States.
-
Politics1 week agoUK says provided assistance in US-led tanker seizure
-
Entertainment1 week agoDoes new US food pyramid put too much steak on your plate?
-
Entertainment1 week agoWhy did Nick Reiner’s lawyer Alan Jackson withdraw from case?
-
Business1 week agoTrump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors
-
Sports5 days agoClock is ticking for Frank at Spurs, with dwindling evidence he deserves extra time
-
Sports1 week agoPGA of America CEO steps down after one year to take care of mother and mother-in-law
-
Business1 week agoBulls dominate as KSE-100 breaks past 186,000 mark – SUCH TV
-
Sports6 days ago
Commanders go young, promote David Blough to be offensive coordinator
