Entertainment
Taylor Swift details how Travis Kelce hilariously got confused
Taylor Swift just revealed that Travis Kelce once Hugh Grant’s wife for Greta Gerwig.
The 14-time Grammy winner recalled the hilarious moment that happened at the Eras Tour, when her fiancé thought the Heretic actor’s wife was actually the Barbie director.
During her appearance on Late Night with Seth Meyers, Taylor remembered Hugh attending the second Eras Tour in London, where he met Travis.
The Kansas City Chiefs player met Grant’s wife, Anna Eberstein, too, whom he thought was the Lady Bird director and then proceeded to congratulate Anna on his favorite Greta film, Barbie.
Travis even made an “I’m just Ken” joke while pointing at Taylor and didn’t know until after the show that he was usually speaking with Hugh’s very confused wife.
After the tent party, Kelce told Swift he had such a great time and met all these celebrities, including Grant.
Travis then explained to Taylor that Greta and Hugh were dancing really closely all night and “had all these inside jokes,” which led him to believe they might be making a movie together. “They kind of seem like they’re like soulmates,” the Blank Space crooner recalled the NFL star telling her.
Meanwhile, Travis told Taylor he had a great time dancing with a family and the Lover crooner then saw a bunch of videos of her now-fiancé dancing with Greta, so Taylor told Travis it looks like she did enjoy the joke. “Oh, that’s not Greta,” Travis told Taylor.
Taylor then figured out the Travis had confused Anna for Greta though Seth Meyers said, “The good thing is he recognized true love. He saw soulmates, and he knew you were soulmates.”
Taylor Swift wants her groom to be equally involved in the wedding planning.
A 2012 interview of the pop sensation with Cosmopolitan magazine is resurfacing after her engagement to the NFL star Travis Kelce.
In that interview, Swift talked about what she had envisioned regarding her future wedding and the involvement she demanded from her partner for their big day.
She told the outlet, “I want to build a life with someone that’s based on their dreams as well as my dreams.”
The Beautiful Eyes hitmaker added, “I don’t want it to just be like, ‘So, I have a scrapbook. In it, I put all the fabric swatches of the wedding dress I’m going to wear. I also have a tuxedo I picked out of a catalog that you’ll wear.’ I don’t want him to wonder if it even matters if he’s there.”
For those unaware, Swift is engaged to her long-time boyfriend, Kelce. They dated each other for two years and finally announced their engagement on August 26, 2025 in a joint Instagram post.
An insider also opened up to Radar Online regarding the 14-time Grammy winner’s wedding plans.
“Taylor doesn’t want to make their wedding all about her. This is Travis’ day, too, and she wants to share the special occasion with him and their friends and family and make it about all of them. This is a joint venture,” the source stated.
A wedding planner will be hired but “Taylor and Travis have an idea of what they want the ceremony and reception to be like,” noted the insider.
“Taylor wants it to be stress-free and fun,” the source said.
An ex-cop sheds light on the only way Prince Harry has to get back his taxpayer funded security.
The ex-cop in question is the former head of the UK’s Counter Terrorism unit, Neil Basu.
He spoke to The Telegraph when delivering this verdict and said, “The fact is this. If the Metropolitan Police had been asked to protect the Duke of Sussex by either the head of state—whether it was the Queen at the time or the future King—we would protect that person.”
And “there is nothing whatsoever that would have led us to say, ‘No, I’m sorry, sir, or ma’am, we’re not doing that’,” he admitted.
In terms of what it would take to get that security though, the ex-cop admitted, “I’ve been asked many times, I think the reality is the Duke of Sussex and the head of state, his father, would probably need to come to some arrangement between them. I think that reconciliation would be the key to this problem.”
Still, “what I will say, is the head of state, both the queen, when she was alive, and the king today constitutionally would not want to interfere in the decision-making of either the government or the police. And I’ve happened to have known them both and I know that they would abide by that.”
“It’s quite brutal for principals [royals] when the decision, the discretion, is ‘well, that wouldn’t have any impact at all so we’ll just let you protect yourself’.”
“And that’s where they’ve left him but I think they did it because they didn’t think he would leave. I think they thought if he wasn’t protected he wouldn’t leave the country,” he added before signing off.
McArthurGlen Troyes celebrates 30 years with expansion and green goals
High-performance supercapacitor made from upcycled water bottles
Western Michigan won the men’s hockey natty! Now what?
-
Tech1 week agoSound Machines Can Be a Game-Changer For Light Sleepers—Here Are Our Tested Picks
-
Tech1 week agoTiny explosions and soft materials make onscreen braille more robust
-
Tech1 week agoSimulation tool improves accuracy and speed of electric grid modeling
-
Tech1 week agoForget Panning. Blink’s Arc Can Merge Two Security Cameras for a 180-Degree View
-
Fashion1 week agoGoldsmiths upsizes at Merry Hill mall
-
Fashion1 week agoMaje’s Elina Kousourna: “We need to succeed in instilling pride among our teams in selling at full price”
-
Business1 week agoNike posts surprise sales growth but turnaround work is far from over
-
Tech1 week agoAmazon Prime Big Deal Days Is Next Week, but We Already Found 40 Early Deals