Connect with us

Sports

Sources: Big Ten closes in on $2 billion capital deal

Published

on

Sources: Big Ten closes in on  billion capital deal


The Big Ten is closing in on voting on a capital agreement that will infuse league schools with more than $2 billion, industry sources told ESPN.

There’s been momentum within recent days for the deal to push forward, and the structure of the complicated agreement is coming together. A vote is expected in the near future, per sources.

The framework calls for the formation of a new entity, Big Ten Enterprises, which would hold all leaguewide media rights and sponsorship contracts.

Shares of ownership in Big Ten Enterprises would fall to the league’s 18 schools, the conference office and the capital group — an investment fund that’s tied to the University of California pension system. Yahoo Sports first reported the involvement of the UC investment fund.

The pension fund is not a private equity firm, and the UC fund valuation proved to be higher than other competing bids. This has been attractive to the Big Ten and its schools, according to sources.

A source familiar with the deal said there’s been momentum in recent days, but the league is still working with leadership to make a final decision.

The exact equity amounts per school in Big Ten Enterprises is still being negotiated. There is expected to be a small gap in equity percentage between the biggest brands and others, however it is likely to be less than a percentage point.

ESPN reported last week that a tiered structure is expected in the initial allocation of the $2 billion-plus in capital, with larger brands receiving more money. Each school, however, would receive a payout in at least the nine-figure range, sources said.

The deal would call for an extension of the league’s Grant of Rights through 2046, providing long-term stability and making further expansion and any chance league schools leave for the formation of a so-called “Super League” unlikely.

Traditional conference functions are expected to remain with the conference. Any decision-making within Big Ten Enterprises would be controlled by the conference. The UC pension fund would receive a 10% stake in Big Ten Enterprises and hold typical minority investor rights but no direct control.

The money infusion is acutely needed at a number of Big Ten schools that are struggling with debt service on new construction, rising operational expenses and providing additional scholarships and direct revenue ($20.5 million this year and expected to rise annually) to athletes.

The Big Ten has argued that the deal would alleviate financial strain and help middle- and lower-tier Big Ten schools compete in football against the SEC.

ESPN first reported last week that the league was in detailed conversations about the deal.

Big Ten Enterprises would be tasked with not just handling the league’s valuable media rights (the current seven-year, $7 billion package runs through 2030) but trying to maximize sponsorship and advertising deals leaguewide such as jersey patches or on-field logos.

“Think of it this way — the conference is not selling a piece of the conference,” a league source told ESPN last week. “Traditional conference functions would remain 100 percent with the conference office — scheduling, officiating and championships. The new entity being created would focus on business development, and it would include an outside investor with a small financial stake.”

The deal has not been without detractors, with both Michigan and Ohio State — the league’s two wealthiest athletic programs — expressing skepticism initially, per sources. Each school has been hit with significant lobbying not just from the league office but also other conference members to come to an agreement.

Politicians in a number of states have also voiced opposition, including United States Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) who stated Thursday, “You’re going to let someone take and monetize what is really a public resource? …That’s a real problem.”

Cantwell followed up Friday by sending a letter to each Big Ten president warning that any deal involving private equity could invite review, including impacting the schools’ tax-exempt status.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Athletes Unlimited Softball League: Expansion and allocation draft

Published

on

Athletes Unlimited Softball League: Expansion and allocation draft


After wrapping up its inaugural season, the Athletes Unlimited Softball League is expanding from its original four teams to six. That expansion kicks off on Dec. 1, with an expansion draft for players already in the AUSL, followed by an allocation draft for new players.

The two new expansion teams — Cascade and Oklahoma City Spark — will pick from a pool of unprotected players from the other four teams. Each team will select five players to start. After that, there may be up to three additional rounds, and original teams can add a player to their protected lists before each round. Any unselected players will go back to their original teams.

The allocation draft will follow and will feature all six teams selecting players not currently on an AUSL roster.

The draft will be broadcast on ESPNU (7 p.m. ET) and on the AUSL streaming hub. Check out the picks and some highlights below.


Expansion draft picks

No. 1: Spark — Utility Maya Brady

No. 2: Cascade — Pitcher Sam Landry

No. 3: Cascade — Pitcher Carley Hoover

No. 4: Spark — Utility Sydney McKinney

No. 5: Spark — Sydney Romero

No. 6: Cascade — OF Sierra Sacco

No. 7: Cascade — P Payton Gottshall

No. 8: Spark — 3B Jessi Warren

No. 9: Spark — P Alana Vawter

No. 10: Cascade — OF Korbe Otis

No. 11: Cascade — INF Tori Vidales

No. 12: Spark — Utility Bubba Nickles-Camarena

No. 13: Spark — INF Delanie Wisz


Allocation draft picks

Round 1

No. 1: Cascade — P Kelly Maxwell

No. 2: Spark — C Kinzie Hansen

No. 3: Talons — OF Jayda Coleman

No. 4: Bandits — P Kat Sandercock

No. 5: Blaze — INF Alyssa Brito

No. 6: Volts — P Ally Carda

Round 2

No. 7: Spark — P Maddie Penta

No. 8: Cascade — C Mia Davidson

No. 9: Talons — OF Jadelyn Allchin

No. 10: Bandits — INF Jocelyn Alo

No. 11: Blaze — INF Jenna Laird

No. 12: Volts — P Alyssa Denham

Round 3

No. 13. Cascade — INF Sis Bates

No. 14. Spark — P Jailyn Ford

No. 15. Talons — INF Rachel Becker

No. 16. Bandits — OF Jessica Clements

No. 17. Blaze — P Jala Wright

No. 18. Volts — OF Rylie Boone

Round 4

No. 19. Spark — INF Billie Andrews

No. 20. Cascade — INF Paige Sinicki

No. 21. Talons — INF Maddie Moore

No. 22. Bandits — INF Sami Williams

No. 23. Blaze — Utility Valerie Cagle

No. 24. Volts — P Aliyah Binford

Round 5

No. 25. Cascade — Utility Ali Newland

No. 26. Spark — INF Sydney Sherrill

No. 27. Talons — OF Aliyah Andrews

No. 28. Bandits — P Emiley Kennedy

No. 29. Blaze — Pass

Round 6

No. 30. Spark — C Haley Lee

No. 31. Cascade — OF Kendra Falby

No. 32. Talons — Pass

No. 33. Bandits — Pass

Round 7

No. 34. Spark — Pass

No. 35. Cascade — Pass

Teams will fill their remaining roster spots at the AUSL College Draft this spring.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

The Commanders are coming up empty on this season’s ‘luck dashboard’

Published

on



After benefiting from good fortune in 2024, Washington is among the NFL’s unluckiest teams in 2025, according to metrics compiled by an NFL data scientist.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

How Nick Saban and ESPN tried to help Lane Kiffin coach two teams at once

Published

on



Kiffin wanted to stay at Mississippi through the College Football Playoff even after taking the job at LSU. That only made sense on television.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending