Connect with us

Business

ECC for phasing out govt guarantee for Skill Bond | The Express Tribune

Published

on

ECC for phasing out govt guarantee for Skill Bond | The Express Tribune



ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan’s economic managers have stressed that government guarantee should be phased out to ensure that the Pakistan Skill Impact Bond become self-sustaining and move towards a public-private partnership model.

The matter was taken up in a recent meeting of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) while considering a Rs1 billion government guarantee for floating the Pakistan Skill Impact Bond.

During discussion, the committee said that a proposed steering committee should monitor the overall process of issuing the bond. Once the bond was floated, it could be listed, since there was already a provision for that.

The Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training briefed the meeting that the National Vocational and Technical Training Commission (NAVTTC), established in 2006, was mandated to spearhead the technical and vocational training programme by providing necessary support to the federating units for producing a market-driven workforce. The aim was not only to meet the industrial and self-employment needs but also export the trained manpower to the region and beyond. The Skill Impact Bond is a strategic solution designed to attract private capital for the Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) sector, easing the financial burden on the government. It is expected to contribute significantly to national development by creating a skilled workforce that enhances productivity, reduces unemployment and promotes inclusive and sustainable economic growth.

Considering the fast-changing technological landscape and the need to spur economic growth, the Federal Education and Professional Training Division told the ECC that it was imperative that NAVTTC mobilise additional resources to produce quality human resources by employing global best practices in cooperation with development actors, thereby reducing dependence on public funding.

Countries such as the UK, India, Vietnam and Turkey have also floated Skill Impact Bonds. For instance, India has attracted more than $600 million in foreign investment through these bonds in the education and public health sectors.

The division emphasised that the Skill Impact Bond marked a significant shift from the traditional funding models, transitioning from supply-driven training to demand-driven requirements and from input-based to outcome-based approaches. Risk investors will provide initial capital and receive returns based on the achievement of pre-determined, measurable social outcomes.

The division further said that in the pilot phase NAVTTC, with the assistance of a bank (risk investor), planned to issue the Skill Impact Bond worth Rs1 billion, backed by the government guarantee. Following evaluation on September 4, 2024, The Bank of Punjab was selected as the risk investor, subject to the ECC’s approval.

It was highlighted that the apex committee of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) had already approved the sovereign guarantee in its meeting held on February 7, 2024. The proposal for introducing the bond for sustainable skill development and vocational training was also endorsed by the Finance Division. A summary was submitted to the ECC on December 18, 2024, but the committee deferred its decision and directed the Ministry of Federal Education to develop a comprehensive business plan covering all aspects, including the syndication strategy, cash flow and commercial market elements. In compliance, a robust business plan was prepared along with a financial model.



Source link

Business

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews

Published

on

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews



Food delivery giant Just Eat, funeral firm Dignity and motor platform Autotrader are among five firms under investigation by the UK’s competition watchdog as part of its crackdown on fake and misleading online reviews.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had launched probes against the companies – also including customer review and feedback firm Feefo and Pasta Evangelists – to see whether consumer laws have been broken.

Since April last year, companies have been banned from certain tactics around online reviews under law, such as fake posts, paid-for reviews that are not clearly marked as incentivised, as well as for hiding negative feedback.

Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: “Fake reviews strike at the heart of consumer trust – with many of us worrying about misleading content when looking at reviews online.

“With household budgets under pressure, people need to know they’re getting genuine information – not reviews or star ratings that have been manipulated to push them towards the wrong choice.

“We’ve given businesses the time to get things right. Now we’re deploying our new powers to tackle some of the most harmful practices head on.”

The CMA said it was looking into whether Just Eat’s ratings system had inflated some restaurant and grocer star ratings, giving a misleading picture of quality.

For Autotrader and Feefo, the CMA is investigating whether a number of one-star reviews – moderated by Feefo, which handles reviews for the new and used car site – were hidden on the platform and did not count towards the star ratings.

Dignity is under investigation by the CMA into whether it asked staff to write positive reviews about the firm’s crematoria services.

And artisan fresh pasta chain Pasta Evangelists is being probed over allegations it offered customers discounts for leaving five-star reviews on delivery apps without this being disclosed.

If the CMA finds the firms have broken the law, it can order them to change their practices and fine them up to 10% of their annual global sales.

An Autotrader spokesperson said: “We endeavour always to operate as a responsible and compliant business and will co-operate fully with the CMA’s investigation.”

It comes after the CMA recently secured commitments from Google and Amazon to beef up their systems to identify and remove fake reviews.

Amazon last June agreed to put in place “robust processes” to quickly detect and remove fake reviews alongside sanctions for rogue sellers and businesses after an investigation by the CMA to curb the customer hazard.

The tech giant said it would sanction businesses that boost their star ratings via bogus reviews or catalogue abuse, including bans from selling on the website, while users could also be banned for posting fake reviews.

Consumer group Which? welcomed the investigations and said the CMA must “get tough” on firms found to be breaking the law with reviews.

Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: “Investigations are a welcome first step, but enforcement will be key – the regulator must be prepared to get tough, use its powers and issue serious fines if these companies aren’t playing by the rules.”

The CMA said it swept more than 100 review publishers as part of the clampdown and sent advisory letters to 54 firms to improve their compliance with the law, with 90% having made changes in response and 75% telling the watchdog they better understood the rules.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply

Published

on

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply



Anthony Albanese says nation’s supply remains “secure” amid reports of panic buying and shortages.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial

Published

on

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial



A woman has been awarded $6m in a verdict that could have implications for hundreds of other cases in the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending