Tech
Keep Tabs on Your Pets and Kids With the Best Indoor Security Cameras
Compare Indoor Cameras
Best MicroSD Cards
Photograph: Amazon
Many security cameras support local storage, enabling you to record videos on the camera or a linked hub. A few hubs have built-in storage, and some provide slots for hard drives, but most rely on microSD cards. Here are some details on what to look for (and a few recommendations).
The microSD card you choose should have fast read and write speeds so that you can record high-quality video and play it back without delay. We recommend going for Class 10 microSD cards rated as U1 or U3. You can dive deeper into what that means in our SD card explainer. Before buying, check the card type, format, and maximum supported card size for your security camera. Consider how many hours of video each card capacity can store. For example, you might get a couple of days of HD video on a 32-GB card. If you want to record continuously, you likely want a higher-capacity card.
I recommend formatting the card as soon as you insert it into the camera. You will usually be prompted to do this, but if not, there is generally an option in the settings. Just remember, formatting will wipe anything on the microSD card, so back up the contents first.
Some security camera manufacturers offer their own branded microSD cards. They work just fine in my experience, but for maximum reliability, here are my favorites. Always remember to check the specs. Even different sizes of cards in the same range often have different capabilities.
Other Indoor Cameras to Consider
There are a lot of security cameras out there. Here are others I tried that didn’t earn a top spot.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Wyze Cam Pan V4 for $60: The V3 was our pick for the best panning camera, and the V4 offers several improvements, including an upgrade to 4K footage and a built-in spotlight. The smart design allows it to spin 360 degrees and tilt 180 degrees to take in a whole room. I like the option to set waypoints in the app to have it cycle through, the privacy mode, the automatic motion tracking, and the ability to record locally on a microSD card (up to 512 GB). On the downside, you must subscribe for features like AI detection and rich notifications, starting from $3 a month ($20 a year) for a single camera, though that only gets you 14 days of video storage. The frame rate also drops to 15 (from 20) at night, and I found moving subjects, combined with the camera panning, resulted in blurry footage. While we are testing Wyze cameras again after the firm beefed up its security policies, the past security breaches may still give you pause if you’re considering its cameras for inside your home.
Aqara Camera G100 for $35: This affordable camera comes from Aqara’s rapidly expanding stable of smart home gadgetry, and offers an impressive set of specs for the money (2K video, 140-degree field of view, AI detection, IP65 rating, spotlight for color night vision, two-way audio, and microSD card slot for local storage). On paper, it’s very similar to our top pick, but I found connectivity a little flaky (it needs a strong Wi-Fi signal) and the AI detection frequently identified my cat as a person. It’s still a bit of a bargain and makes sense for folks who have already invested in Aqara gear. It also boasts wide smart home compatibility, including Apple HomeKit, which is a real rarity at this price.
TP-Link Tapo HybridCam 360 C216 for $30: With a cute design that can sit on a table or shelf or be mounted the other way up, this camera has an IP65 rating, so it can also work outdoors, though it needs to be plugged in via the 6.6-foot USB-C cable. The video is sharp at up to 2K and 30 fps, and the C216 allows 360-degree pan and 152-degree tilt. It can track subjects and patrol the room, and there’s local video storage via microSD card. People detection is good, and it can recognize a baby crying (my cat can also trigger this). An excellent pan/tilt camera at a very competitive price, the only thing keeping this from a recommendation above is TP-Link’s slightly superior C225, but if your budget is limited and the C225 isn’t on sale, this is a great second choice.
Lorex 2K Dual-Lens Indoor Pan-Tilt Camera for $80: There’s a lot to like about this dual-lens camera, with one fixed-view camera and a pan-and-tilt lens on top to track subjects and cover a 360-degree area. It offers crisp 2K video with HDR, smart motion detection for people and pets, and local storage on a microSD card up to 256 GB (32 GB included). There’s also two-way audio with a call button on the camera, capable of calling the app on your phone. The tracking was sometimes a bit unreliable, and tapping on notifications did not always load the clip, but it mostly worked well. Lorex was owned by Dahua (banned by the US government) until a Taiwanese firm, Skywatch, reportedly bought it in 2023.
Eufy Indoor Cam E220 for $32: This is a solid alternative to TP-Link’s Tapo Pan Camera above. Eufy’s E220 also offers up to 2K footage with a 125-degree field of view, but pans to cover 360 degrees horizontally and tilts through 95 degrees vertically. It has person and pet detection, can automatically track movement, offers local or cloud storage, and supports Google Home and Amazon Alexa. The weakness is the limited frame rate (15 fps), which can result in choppy footage.
Ezviz C6 for $100: A cute design, crisp and clear video, and onboard AI and storage make this a compelling prospect. I like that the 2FA allows fingerprint unlock, it has a privacy mode, and it gives you the option to have gestures trigger a call. But the C6 struggled in mixed lighting, repeatedly identified my cat as a human intruder, and needs to be positioned low for the best view. I also tested the Ezviz C6N ($30), which had problems with subjects appearing blurry, and the Ezviz CP1 Pro (£20) and Ezviz SD7 (£130), which seem to be available only in the UK. The SD7 is a 7-inch portable screen with a battery inside that offers a dedicated view of your Ezviz cameras (up to 30), allowing you to play back video and control them where applicable, but that’s all it does, so I am slightly puzzled about why you would buy it over a smart display that can also do other stuff.
Photograph: Simon Hill
Psync Camera Genie S for $28: Easily the most interesting security camera I have tested, the unusual Psync Camera Genie S has a funky, blocky design that folds open to reveal a 2K camera and four LED lights. It records in a vertical format like TikTok, can pan 350 degrees and tilt 135 degrees, and has smart motion tracking. It supports two-way audio and has 32 or 64 GB of storage inside. In keeping with the AI trend, it is GPT-enabled, so if you spring for a ViewSay subscription ($1/month during Beta, then $7/month), it uploads frames of each video to a secure server and uses a visual language model to describe them for your notifications. This can have unintentionally hilarious results. Instead of getting a generic alert, it might say, “A man is opening a door, and a cat is behind him,” or, “A person is standing in a dark room, holding a baby, and looking at the camera.” Those are both real notifications I got, though the latter was actually my daughter holding a cat toy. ViewSay can also label objects in the room, but for most folks, it seems like a pointless gimmick, and it definitely needs to work on the accuracy to make it useful. The feed is quick to load, but I found the footage a bit blurry in low light (the maximum frame rate is 20), and the vertical orientation limits your field of view.
Wiz Indoor Security Camera for $17: As a 1080p camera with a relatively narrow 120-degree field of view, the debut Wiz security camera is a hard sell. Parent company Signify owns Philips Hue, but Wiz is cheaper, and if you own any of its smart lights, you can use the camera to trigger them. It also works with the company’s SpaceSense technology to use Wi-Fi and your Wiz lights to detect motion. It supports two-way audio, sound detection, and night vision. You can insert a microSD card for local recording, but you need a subscription ($4/month) for activity zones, cloud storage, and manual recording. There is a privacy mode, but it lacks a shutter. It’s a reliable camera, but only worth considering for folks with Wiz lights. It comes with a USB cable, but no power adapter.
TP-Link Tapo C210 for $20: If you want the ability to pan around the room, TP-Link’s Tapo C210 is another affordable indoor security camera with versatility. Like its sibling, our budget pick above, this camera supports up to 2K video, two-way audio, and local recordings via microSD cards up to 256 GB. But it has the same disappointing frame rate (15 frames per second), which can result in jerky video clips—more of a problem with a panning camera. There’s also some lag on the two-way audio, and the camera does not return to its starting position after tracking a subject, which can leave it facing the wrong way.
Eve Cam for $165: This is a solid HomeKit security camera for Apple households. The video quality is reasonably good, the night vision works well, motion alerts are reliable, and it can generally distinguish pets from people. The magnetic base is quite handy, and it is easy to automate this camera through Apple’s Home app so that it turns on when you leave the house or triggers lights when it senses motion. But it is relatively expensive, and it only works with Apple devices. An iCloud storage plan (starting from $1 per month for one camera) and a HomePod or Apple TV to act as a HomeKit hub are essential.
Panasonic Home Hawk Window for $120: This camera sticks to the inside of a window, so you can keep an eye on the outside of your house without mounting anything—a huge plus if you’re renting. The image quality is surprisingly clear, it has a decent 150-degree wide-angle view, and you can set it to just detect people to avoid notifications for every car that drives past or bird that pops up. But it’s pricey, there’s no 2FA, and there’s no cloud storage, so you’ll need a microSD card to view anything outside of a livestream.
Blink Mini for $30: Compact, versatile, and cheap, the Blink Mini offers good-quality video, two-way audio, accurate motion detection, activity zones, and integration with Alexa. The 1080p footage is clear, even in low light, but bright areas can appear blown out. There is two-way audio, but it often lags and distorts. If you don’t want a subscription (from $3 per month), you can add a Sync Module 2 ($50) and record to a USB flash drive (sold separately). It worked reliably in my testing, but it detects any motion (it can’t distinguish between pets and people). You can also get the Blink Mini Pan-Tilt Camera for $40, which is a regular Blink Mini camera with a pan-and-tilt mount, so you can pan through 360 degrees and tilt through 135 degrees.
Ezviz C1C for $20 and C6CN for $60: Ezviz’s cameras are as affordable as Wyze’s. The app has a really nice grid view, so you can easily watch a live feed of all your cameras, but there’s a small delay when detecting motion—I set up the C6CN panning camera in my living room, and it didn’t start recording until I made it from the door to the other side of the room. It always detected motion accurately, but the delay might be an issue if you’re dealing with an intruder.
TP-Link Kasa Spot for $20: I tried the Spot and the Spot Pan Tilt ($22), and both are impressive and inexpensive offerings from TP-Link. They have a wide field of view and decent motion detection that alerts you instantly. These cameras lacked two-factor authentication when I tested them, but the company has since added the feature to the Kasa app.
Don’t Buy These
Photograph: Simon Hill
I didn’t like every camera I tested. These are the ones to avoid.
Ring Indoor Cam: Ring is reintroducing a policy to enable local law enforcement to request footage directly from Ring users, making its camera tough to recommend. We stopped recommending Ring a few years ago due to this policy (among other reasons), but began testing and recommending Ring hardware after it changed its tune. If you’re already in the ecosystem, you may still fancy the Ring Indoor Cam (2nd Gen). It records crisp 1080p footage at 24 frames per second, has optional color night vision, and has a privacy shutter you can swivel around. You get motion alerts, pre-roll captures a few seconds before each event, two-way audio is decent, and the Ring Indoor Cam has a built-in siren. But the feature-packed app can be slow to load the live feed, and the best features, like person alerts and rich notifications, require a Ring Protect Plan ($5 per month for one camera or $10 per month for all your cameras and doorbells). Ring recently introduced a new version of this camera that ups the resolution to 2K and brings a few other improvements, but we haven’t tested it yet.
Chamberlain myQ Smart Indoor Security Camera: While we love the MyQ Garage Opener, the firm’s foray into security cameras was not as successful. We had issues getting the camera up and running, the MyQ app was slow and buggy, and a subscription starting from $8 per month is required if you want to record video (there’s no local option). The 1080p resolution is OK, but the night vision is weak, and there are several better options above.
Nooie 360 Cam 2: We liked the original Nooie 360 Cam. This version sports a similar design, allowing for almost 360-degree rotation and 94-degree tilt, and bumps the video resolution up to 2K. It takes microSD cards (up to 128 GB), and cloud plans start from $3 per month for 14-day event recording. Unfortunately, alerts are not reliable (sometimes they didn’t come through to my phone). The Nooie app is buggy, and it often takes a frustratingly long time to load the video feed. Any motion triggers a recording (there’s no person or pet detection), and you can set the camera to track a subject or pan and tilt manually, but annoyingly, it doesn’t return to a default position. There is 2FA, but it’s optional.
SwitchBot Indoor Camera and Pan/Tilt Cam: These cameras are affordable and offer clear video, but both struggled with exposure in mixed lighting. The app is a little flaky and crashed on me when I tried to play back video from an inserted microSD card, and there’s no 2FA. If you enable motion tracking, the pan cam also has the unfortunate habit of staying in the last position it tracked movement.
Wyze Cam V3: The V3 has been discontinued, but you can still find it on Amazon. While it offers good-quality video and works well on the whole, the free service makes this far less of a bargain than it used to be. It does boast local or cloud recordings, 2FA, and a choice of smart-home integrations. But this is one of the cameras that had a major security flaw that Wyze failed to fix for several years.
Tech
Do Lightsaber Blades Have Mass?
When you think of Star Wars, you think of lightsabers. Right? What could be better, from a movie-making standpoint, than a futuristic sword that lets you create awesome fencing duels like in old-time Errol Flynn swashbucklers. (So much better than watching Stormtroopers fire their blasters into walls and ceilings and anything else except their targets.)
Lightsabers come in a cosmic rainbow of hues (color-coded blue or green for good guys, red for bad) and a variety of shapes. There’s even a double-bladed version in Phantom Menace. (I don’t want to start a nerd fight—yet—but the best lightsaber battle in the canon has to be the “Duel of the Fates” in that movie, thanks to the skills and scariness of Darth Maul actor Ray Park.)
So … exactly what are lightsabers? Of course, they aren’t real, so nobody really knows how they work. Even the characters in the movies seem a little confused about it. In Phantom Menace, Anakin calls it a “laser sword.” Yeah, he was a kid, but both Din Djarin (the Mandalorian) and Luke Skywalker also refer to it as a laser sword—though I suspect Luke was being sarcastic.
Anyway, that’s just wrong: It can’t be a laser. For starters, lasers beams are invisible from the side, so you wouldn’t see a thing unless you staged the duels in a disco with fog machines to scatter the beams. Second, the beams go on forever; they don’t have an end. Third, laser beams can’t clank together like swords—they’d just pass through each other when you try to parry.
But what is it then? We can greatly narrow the possibilities by asking if the blade has mass. If it’s some kind of light (as you’d think from the name “lightsaber”), then the answer is no—light, or electromagnetic radiation, has no mass. If we can determine that it has mass, then it’s not light.
This is a question we can answer, by analyzing how lightsabers move when you wave them around. In other words, it’s time for some physics!
Mass and Motion
Don’t confuse mass and weight. Mass is a measure of how much “stuff” like protons, neutrons, and electrons are in an object, and weight is the amount of gravitational force acting on an object. Here we want to see what impact the mass of a lightsaber would have on its motion. But let’s start with something simpler.
Instead of a lightsaber, say we have a “lightball” made of the same buzzy substance. Since it’s symmetrical, we can describe its motion without worrying about rotation. If we want to move this ball back and forth, we call on Newton’s second law of motion. This says the acceleration (a) of an object depends on its mass (m) and the amount of force (F) applied to it.
Tech
How a cloud-native architecture handles persistent storage | Computer Weekly
Cloud-native, or containerised, applications are now mainstream. As many as 82% of enterprises now have Kubernetes in production, according to the Cloud Native Computing Forum (CNCF). That is up from 66% in 2023. And a full 98% of organisations have at least some cloud-native applications, the industry body says.
But moving applications to cloud-native environments does not just mean creating new code. It also means adapting infrastructure. Compute, networking and data storage all need to work with container environments. By no means can all systems do this out of the box, especially when it comes to on-premise hardware.
At the same time, enterprise IT architects need to consider the requirements of legacy applications and virtual machines (VMs) that are not being updated. And enterprises will want to make the most efficient use of their storage hardware, regardless of their application environments.
Moving to containers means adapting a technology that was not designed for persistent storage to handle business-critical data.
Stateless states
Containerised applications started out as stateless, or ephemeral. The designers never intended containers to hold persistent data. They expected that microservices or containerised applications would use no non-volatile storage and discard the contents of memory, and even their settings, once they had completed their tasks.
Instead, containerised applications rely on an external data store, usually a database or cache.
There are advantages to this approach. These include simpler deployment, easier scaling, fault tolerance and recovery, and application portability. But most business applications, if not the majority, need persistent data.
“Most business applications require storage. In reality, unless you’re converting Fahrenheit to Celsius and back, you’re storing something somewhere,” says Dan Ciruli, vice-president and general manager for cloud native at Nutanix.
And the need to work with persistent data is all the more important, as enterprises look to containers as an alternative to conventional virtual machines.
But this means rethinking the way applications work. And it requires IT architects to update their storage systems to support modernised, cloud-native applications. This can be directly, where array manufacturers support containers, or through a control plane such as Nutanix or Everpure’s Portworx.
Almost inevitably, changes are being driven by AI, as enterprises look to support its data-heavy workloads in modern, cloud-native environments. But there are other drivers, too, including a trend to move virtualised applications to containers and the need for cost controls.
“Kubernetes might be over a decade old, but it’s continuing to evolve as AI transforms the way we handle data. Already, Kubernetes has moved beyond the days when it was built only for ephemeral, stateless applications,” says Michael Cade, global field chief technology officer at Veeam Software.
“Today, stateful applications such as databases, machine learning pipelines and streaming systems are now being treated as first-class citizens [in containerised environments] and have been given the specialised tools they need to thrive.”
Storage connections
Connecting storage to Kubernetes, though, relies on support from both application developers and hardware suppliers.
The main way to connect storage to container environments is through the container storage interface (CSI). CSI needs to be supported directly by the storage provider, be that the hardware manufacturer, a cloud service, or a software-defined storage (SDS) supplier.
As the CNCF’s Kubernetes page notes: “CSI was developed as a standard for exposing arbitrary block and file storage systems to containerised workloads on container orchestration systems like Kubernetes.” CSI allows third-party storage providers to write, and deploy, plug-ins for storage without changing the core Kubernetes code.
SDS technologies, for their part, also use CSI drivers, but run on commodity hardware rather than dedicated storage arrays, as well as hyper-converged infrastructure. It also includes open source options, such as OpenEBS, Longhorn and Ceph.
“Every environment needs a storage back end, with a CSI driver that connects it to Kubernetes. It’s up to the storage provider to provide the CSI driver,” says Nigel Poulton, an author and independent expert in Kubernetes and containers.
“Most CSI drivers create at least one StorageClass that maps to a tier of storage and its capabilities. For example, a CSI driver might create a StorageClass called ‘fast-replicated’ that maps to high-speed flash storage automatically replication to a remote location. Any application using this class automatically gets that tier and set of capabilities,” he adds.
This level of abstraction is highly useful for application developers, as they no longer have to worry about the physical capabilities of the storage system. That is handled by the CSI drivers.
“The CSI drivers enable us to give access to storage from the containerised application, but [for firms to] still administer the storage the way they do the storage that’s running under their VMs,” says Nutanix’s Ciruli. “And that’s a big advantage.” He also sees customers installing Kubernetes on bare metal clusters.
This also maintains separation between the Kubernetes workloads and the underlying storage hardware. On paper at least, enterprises can move their containerised applications to a different platform or supplier, or new storage hardware, without rewriting code and with minimal disruption.
In practice, large-scale moves of Kubernetes applications between platforms are still relatively rare. Enterprises tend to develop applications to run on Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), Microsoft Azure, or local hardware, depending on their business requirements.
Application portability, supported by CSI, is a useful insurance, even if there are enough differences between platforms to suggest caution.
“We really don’t need to become an expert in how EBS [Elastic Block Store] works versus Azure disk, or local SSD [solid-state drives] and how that works,” says Greg Muscarella, general manager for Portworx at Everpure. “If you have to manage those things, it becomes somewhat complex. Companies tend to focus on a single cloud environment.”
Few organisations, he suggests, have code where they could “push a button and move it to a different cloud”, not least because of differences between storage architectures from both hardware suppliers and cloud providers. However, enterprises are moving more applications to cloud-native environments. And this increasingly includes databases and applications that previously ran in conventional virtual machines.
New platforms
One of the most significant trends in application modernisation is to move both virtual machines and database-driven applications to containers. Cost, avoiding supplier lock-in and the need to consolidate on fewer platforms are all drivers.
“The line between ‘containerised’ and ‘virtualised’ is blurring,” suggests Veeam’s Cade. “For a long time, containers and VMs were seen as two separate siloes. But as stateful applications have developed, and since VMs are essentially a typical stateful workload, we’re seeing a significant rise in businesses running them directly within Kubernetes using platforms such as Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization.”
Poulton agrees. He sees more organisations moving virtualised workloads to containers, via tools such as KubeVirt. But, although organisations are porting over virtualised applications, and databases, IT architects need to be sure that all the application’s requirements are met by the storage layer.
“Databases have much more demanding requirements, including ordered startup, replication, automated failover and backup,” he cautions. “The two biggest changes are ensuring a CSI driver exists for the storage system and potentially deploying an operator.”
A Kubernetes operator provides details about a database’s specific requirements, and sometimes storage, too. Operator support is essential to allow databases to deliver enterprise workloads over Kubernetes. Again, the operator supports the modern application goal of separating the code from the storage array or cloud storage service.
Percona, for example, provides operators for MySQL, PostgreSQL and MongoDB, as well as Everest. “The operators are basically the game changers,” says Kate Obiidykhata, the company’s general manager for cloud native. “They encode the human DBA knowledge into the software, and you have all those most important resilience components, backup, failover, replication and upgrades automated.”
Operators, she adds, help enterprises to adopt hybrid architectures or multicloud strategies, allowing data portability without the need to rewrite applications. But workloads that operate on VMs will not automatically run on containers, she says. Firms will need to plan, and test, their deployments with care.
“There are specific playbooks that you should apply and methodologies that are obviously different from the classic database setup on VMs,” says Obiidykhata. “But it’s all doable, and many companies are now running those databases on Kubernetes. They just have a different playbook to mitigate those issues.”
Firms also need to factor in how they run their ported applications in production. Development, understandably, attracts much of the attention. But how systems run from “day two” onwards is critical. This includes storage provisioning and tiering, as well as backup, recovery and security.
The CSI drivers take care of much of the hard work, but enterprises are likely to look to invest in new hardware, or even storage from suppliers focused on cloud-native environments, to ease the migration to containers.
“This is usually by deploying new storage architectures, either via new storage products from existing vendors, but increasingly by engaging with new vendors,” says Poulton. Enterprises, he adds, might still be running older hardware systems, but they are unlikely to use them for Kubernetes.
Tech
The Asus Zenbook 16 Delivers Great Performance in an Otherwise Mediocre Laptop
So, what’s not to like? Well, early compatibility problems slowed the initial uptake of Snapdragon X, and the CPU’s integrated graphics performance turned out to be pretty terrible. And to date, powerful onboard AI features just haven’t proven important, as most AI workloads are still being done in the cloud. With the second-generation X2, Qualcomm set out to deliver on the original promise of faster performance.
But what exactly does “faster” mean? As with most claims in the PC computing space, it’s all about the benchmarks. On the Zenbook A16, the tests I ran indeed showcased exemplary performance from the X2 Elite Extreme, in some of the most widely used benchmarking tools, namely Geekbench 6 and Cinebench 2024. (I don’t have enough competitive Cinebench 2026 results to make wide comparisons yet on that benchmark.)
The performance boost on Geekbench is particularly striking, with the A16 scoring 50 to 100 percent faster than competing systems from AMD and Intel. It’s even faster than the Apple MacBook M4 Pro, the last Mac for which I have comparable benchmark scores. However, that Mac did beat the Asus on the Cinebench benchmark, but not by much, and the Asus now stands solidly in second place in my testing archive.
Graphics performance is much better than in previous generations of Snapdragon X chips, with frame rates quadrupling on average, depending on the test. That’s a dramatic and much-needed improvement for the CPU, and while no one will accuse the A16 of being a gaming rig, it does at least make for a workable experience with less taxing games and graphics-heavy workloads.
Beige Belies Performance
Photograph: Chris Null
I’m happy enough with how the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme performs to sign off on its performance claims, but there’s a lot more to the Zenbook A16 than its CPU.
Under the hood, the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme X2E94100 CPU is complemented by 48 GB of RAM and a 1-TB SSD. The 16-inch touchscreen offers a solid resolution of 2880 x 1800 pixels, and it’s incredibly bright. A weight of 2.9 pounds is impressive (if not unheard of) for the 16-inch category, and at 0.65 inches (at its thickest), it has a svelte, quite portable carrying experience. Asus’s Ceraluminum technology (now with added magnesium) is used in the machine’s lid, base, and keyboard frame. That helps keep it thin and light, though when adjusted or touched, the screen shimmied more than I expected.
-
Tech7 days agoA Brain Implant for Depression Is About to Be Tested in Humans
-
Tech1 week agoAlmost 90% of women leave tech industry within 10 years | Computer Weekly
-
Business7 days ago‘I had £20,000 stolen and had to fight a 13-month fraud reporting rule to get it back’
-
Business1 week agoPakistan’s oil market is fuelling the crisis | The Express Tribune
-
Sports6 days agoPro wrestling star Steph De Lander reveals how colleague’s advice helped lead her to title triumph at ACW
-
Entertainment7 days agoMelania Trump says ABC should ‘take a stand’ on late-night host Kimmel
-
Tech6 days agoThis Ambitious Laptop Doesn’t Leave Much Room for Your Hands
-
Entertainment7 days agoNorway joins Type 26 Frigate Programme to boost NATO naval power





