Politics
Air Canada flight attendants continue strike despite order to return, airline delays restart

- Air Canada delays resuming operations to Monday evening.
- Flight attendants stay on strike past deadline to return to duties.
- Government ordered binding arbitration to break contract impasse.
Air Canada flight attendants remained on strike on Sunday, past the deadline set by a government-backed labour board’s order to return to work, causing the country’s largest airline to delay restarting operations.
The Canadian Union of Public Employees said in a statement that members would remain on strike and invited Air Canada back to the table to “negotiate a fair deal,” calling the order to end its strike unconstitutional. The airline announced that it would delay its plans to restart operations from Sunday until Monday evening.
On Saturday, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal government moved to end the strike by more than 10,000 flight attendants by asking the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order binding arbitration. The CIRB issued the order, which Air Canada had sought, and unionised flight attendants opposed.
The Canada Labour Code gives the government the power to ask the CIRB to impose binding arbitration in the interest of protecting the economy.
The government’s options to end the strike now include asking courts to enforce the order to return to work and seeking an expedited hearing. The minority government could also try to pass legislation that would need the support of political rivals and approval in both houses of parliament, which is on break until September 15.
The government did not respond to requests for comment.
“The federal government has entrusted a board to administer these rules in the Canadian Labor Code, and if you defy them, you are transgressing and essentially violating the law,” said Rafael Gomez, a professor of employment relations at the University of Toronto.
The government, under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, intervened last year to head off rail and dock strikes that threatened to cripple the economy, but it is unusual for a union to defy a CIRB order.
Flights grounded, passengers stranded
Air Canada flight attendants walked off the job on Saturday for the first time since 1985, after months of negotiations over a new contract.
Air Canada had said it planned to resume flights on Sunday evening, following the expected end of the strike that caused the suspension of around 700 daily flights on Saturday, stranding more than 100,000 passengers.
The union called a decision by the CIRB chair, Maryse Tremblay, to not recuse herself from handling the case a “staggering conflict of interest,” since she had worked as a senior counsel for Air Canada in the past. According to Tremblay’s LinkedIn profile, she served as Air Canada’s counsel from 1998 to 2004.
The CIRB did not respond to a request for comment.
Other unions joined the flight attendants’ picket line in solidarity in Toronto on Sunday.
“They are in support here today because they are seeing our rights being eroded,” said Natasha Stea, an Air Canada flight attendant and local union president.
Air Canada had started cancelling flights on Thursday in anticipation of the stoppage.
Travellers at Toronto Pearson International Airport said they were confused about whether their flights would resume or Air Canada would make alternative arrangements.
“We are kind of left to figure it out for ourselves and fend for ourselves with no recourse or options provided by Air Canada at this time,” said Elizabeth Fourney of Vancouver.
The most contentious issue has been the union’s demand for compensation for time spent on the ground between flights and when helping passengers board. Attendants are largely paid only when their plane is moving.
CUPE had pushed for a negotiated solution, saying binding arbitration would take pressure off the airline.
Air Canada said on Sunday that the CIRB had ordered the terms of the collective agreement between the union and the airline that expired on March 31 be extended until a new agreement can be reached.
Politics
US VP Vance tells Pakistani intermediaries Trump open to ceasefire: source

US Vice President JD Vance communicated with intermediaries from Pakistan about the Iran conflict as recently as Tuesday, a person briefed on the matter told Reuters, a sign of his expanding role in efforts to broker an end to the conflict.
At President Donald Trump’s direction, Vance signalled privately that Trump was open to a ceasefire as long as certain US demands were met, the source told Reuters on Wednesday.
Vance also delivered what the source described as a “stern message” that Trump was impatient, warning there would be growing pressure on Iranian infrastructure unless Tehran agreed to a deal.
Pakistan has been acting as an intermediary between the United States and Iran, the source said.
The more than a month-long war between the US, Israel and Iran began on February 28 and has plunged the Middle East into turmoil.
Soon after the initial strikes, Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz — a key shipping route — and launched retaliatory attacks on Israel and US bases across the region.
The development comes at a time when Pakistan has stepped up its diplomatic push to help end the US-Israel war on Iran.
In this regard, Pakistan hosted key regional ministers — from Saudi Arabia, Turkiye, and Egypt — and relayed messages between Washington and Tehran.
On Tuesday, Pakistan and China also jointly urged the US, Israel, and Iran to stop the strikes and initiate “peace talks as soon as possible”.
The call came following a high-level meeting between Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing.
The meeting’s five-point initiative for peace in the region included the call for an immediate end to hostilities, an urgent start to peace talks, security of non-military targets and shipping lanes, and the primacy of the United Nations Charter.
Vance has taken a greater role in trying to negotiate an end to the war, now in its fifth week. Widely viewed as a potential successor to Trump in the 2028 presidential election, Vance has taken a cautious approach on the conflict, reflecting his long-held skepticism of prolonged US military involvement overseas.
The source said the team that Trump has said are involved in negotiations — Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner — remain involved.
Trump has warned the US would attack Iranian infrastructure, but has delayed launching such attacks on Iran’s power grid until April 6 in hopes of reaching a deal with Tehran.
Politics
Supreme Court justices skeptical of Trump order to restrict birthright citizenship

- Trump first president to attend Supreme Court arguments.
- Babies born in the US are recognised as American citizens.
- Trump’s policy targets children of certain immigrants.
With President Donald Trump present, US Supreme Court justices signalled scepticism on Wednesday toward the legality of his directive to restrict birthright citizenship in the US, part of his hardline immigration approach that would upend the long-held understanding of a key constitutional provision.
In his historic visit to the top US judicial body, Trump, wearing a red tie and dark suit, sat in the front row of the public gallery of the ornate courtroom after arriving by motorcade from the White House. The Republican president then left midway through the proceedings not long after the Justice Department lawyer arguing for his administration completed his presentation.
Most of the nine justices, conservatives and liberals alike, grilled the lawyer with questions about the legal validity of Trump’s executive order and its practical implications. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority.
The justices heard more than two hours of arguments in the administration’s appeal of a lower court’s decision that blocked his directive. Trump’s order had instructed US agencies not to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither parent is an American citizen or legal permanent resident, also called a “green card” holder.
Trump became the first sitting president to attend a Supreme Court oral argument, according to Clare Cushman, the Supreme Court Historical Society’s resident historian. Joined by White House Counsel David Warrington, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Trump was at the courthouse for a bit more than an hour and a half.
‘Priceless and profound gift’
US Solicitor General D John Sauer, representing the administration, told the justices that most nations do not grant automatic birthright citizenship.
“It demeans the priceless and profound gift of American citizenship,” Sauer said. “It operates as a powerful pull factor for illegal immigration and rewards illegal aliens who not only violate the immigration laws but also jump in front of those who follow the rules.”
The United States is among 33 countries with automatic birthright citizenship policies, according to the Pew Research Centre. Trump wrote on social media after the arguments that the United States is “STUPID” for having birthright citizenship.
The lower court found that Trump’s directive violated citizenship language in the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment as well as a federal law codifying birthright citizenship rights, acting in a class-action lawsuit by parents and children whose citizenship is threatened by the directive.
The 14th Amendment has long been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship for babies born in the United States, with only narrow exceptions such as the children of foreign diplomats or members of an enemy occupying force.
The provision at issue, known as the Citizenship Clause, states: “All persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
The administration has asserted that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means that being born in the United States is not enough for citizenship, and excludes the babies of immigrants who are in the country illegally or whose presence is lawful but temporary, such as university students or those on work visas.

Conservative Chief Justice John Roberts told Sauer that his arguments limiting who qualifies for citizenship at birth seemed “quirky.”
Noting that historically the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excluded the children of ambassadors or enemies during a hostile invasion, Roberts said Sauer is trying to expand those examples to everyone in the US illegally.
“I’m not quite sure how you can get to that big group from such tiny and sort of idiosyncratic examples,” Roberts said.
Roberts also challenged Sauer to provide evidence for the administration’s stated concern over “birth tourism,” by which foreigners travel to the United States to give birth and secure citizenship for their children.
“Do you have any information about how common that is or how significant a problem it is?” Roberts asked.
“No one knows for sure,” Sauer replied, while citing media reports of birth tourism companies abroad.
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 in the aftermath of the Civil War of 1861-1865 that ended slavery in the United States, and overturned a notorious 1857 Supreme Court decision that had declared that people of African descent could never be US citizens.
Liberal Justice Elena Kagan said the administration’s interpretation of the 14th Amendment is not supported by the provision’s text.
“You’re using some pretty obscure sources to get to this concept,” Kagan told Sauer.
American Civil Liberties Union attorney Cecillia Wang, arguing for the challengers, told the justices Trump’s order was unlawful.
“Ask any American what our citizenship rule is and they will tell you, ‘Everyone born here is a citizen, alike,'” Wang said. “That rule was enshrined in the 14th Amendment to put it out of the reach of any government official to destroy.”
Politics
Tehran residents on edge after month of war

For Tehran resident Fatemeh, the highlight of her day in a city beset by deadly daily US-Israeli strikes in the now month-long war is to make the short journey to her local cafe.
“When I make it to a cafe table, even for a few minutes, I can almost believe the world hasn’t ended,” said the 27-year-old dental assistant.
“It feels like stepping out of this damn war and into an ordinary day, or at least imagining a world that isn’t filled with the constant fear of losing your life, or where you stay alive but lose a loved one or everything you have,” she told AFP.
If a lull in the bombing allows a better night’s sleep, Fatemeh said she will put on make-up and dress up to make her visit to the cafe extra special.
“And then I go back home, back to the reality of living through war, with all its darkness and weight,” she said.
Residents of Tehran who spoke to AFP’s team covering the war in Paris painted a picture of a city that is still clinging to some routine, with cafes and restaurants open, no shortages reported in supermarkets or petrol stations, and people trying to keep up some vestige of a social life.
But they know that life is anything but normal with the US and Israel maintaining a relentless pace of bombardment on the capital since the war started on February 28 with the martyrdom of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and other top officials.
There are security checkpoints on what were peaceful streets, the internet has been blocked or drastically slowed for everything except domestic services, and windows are taped up to prevent them shattering in case of attack.
As well as fear of being killed or losing a loved one in an attack, people are gripped by anxiety over the future, over what kind of country they will live in and how they will make ends meet amid a collapsing economy.
The people who agreed to share messages with AFP gave only their first names for fear of the consequences were they to be identified by authorities.
‘Only thing left’
“These days, I mostly stay at home and only go out if I absolutely have to. The only thing left from my life routine before the war that helps me keep my spirit up is cooking,” said Shahrzad, 39.
But she added: “Sometimes I find myself crying in the middle of it. I miss ordinary days… A life where I didn’t have to constantly think about explosions, death, or losing my loved ones.
“I try to stay strong for my daughter… But when I think about the future, I can’t form any clear picture in my mind that I can hold on to with hope.”

People in Tehran have, over the last week, been trying to make the best they can out of the main traditional Persian holiday of Nowruz, a festival that normally sees people leave the city or celebrate at home with family.
“There is no famine, everything is available. Cafes are open, and we still go out to cafes,” said Shayan, 40, a photographer. “There is gasoline, water and electricity.”
“But there is a sense of helplessness in all of us. We don’t know what to do, and there’s really nothing we can do.
“There was no real Nowruz atmosphere at all, but we tried to force ourselves,” he said.
While shops and restaurants are open until 9pm, “many people don’t go out after the afternoon”, he added.
‘I miss a peaceful night’s sleep’
Elnaz, 32, a Tehran-based painter, said when attacks did relent and she had time to think, she remembered how much she missed “living a simple life”.
“We miss the simplest things, going out at night, or just being able to go to another part of the city.
“I miss something as ordinary as shopping somewhere other than the small grocery store or bakery on my street.
“I miss reading in a cafe, going to the park… all those very, very simple things.”
She added: “And more than anything, I miss a peaceful night’s sleep.”
Elnaz said that on some nights the attacks are so intense it feels like “all of Tehran is shaking”.
“Everything goes back to one state — survival. Thinking only about staying alive with all the people I love. My friends, my family, and the people of my city, who look kinder than ever in this difficult time,” she said.
Kaveh, 38, a visual artist, said a piece of a missile struck about 50 metres from his house a few days ago.
“I brought it home with me. I want to make something out of it when I get the chance,” he said, recalling that dust was falling from the sky and several windows were shattered immediately.
He described how, at night in some areas, groups of people who back the clerical system drive around, honking and gathering, “while just a few streets away, there are checkpoints where cars and phones of normal people are being searched”.
“If you have something to do in the city, you’ll likely pass through multiple checkpoints in a single day — each run by different groups. Cars are searched, phones are checked, and months of accumulated frustration are taken out on people at these checkpoints.
“These are just parts of our daily reality under these circumstances,” he said.
The morose atmosphere, residents say, has been compounded by unseasonably rainy weather that contrasts with the spring sunshine people are used to enjoying at Nowruz.
Portraits of children killed in attacks are displayed in squares, while giant flags of the Islamic Republic cover buildings that have been reduced to ruins.
“In the end, for many people, the most important concern is the future of Iran and its people, and what might actually improve the situation,” said Kaveh.
-
Politics1 week agoAfghanistan announces release of detained US citizen
-
Tech1 week agoCan a Home Appliance Fix the Problem of Soft-Plastic Waste?
-
Sports1 week agoBroadcast industry CEO says consolidation is ‘essential’ to compete for NFL soaring media rights prices
-
Entertainment1 week agoUN warns migratory freshwater fish numbers are spiralling
-
Business1 week agoProperty Play: Home flippers see smallest profits since the Great Recession, real estate data firm says
-
Business1 week agoGold prices soar in Pakistan – SUCH TV
-
Fashion1 week agoICE cotton slips on weaker crude, profit booking
-
Business1 week agoMore women are entering wealth management, but few are in advisory roles, study finds
