Entertainment
William Shatner and Neil deGrasse Tyson: When stars collide
Not long ago in Seattle, an astronomical event of sorts happened: Two superstars collided. William Shatner, of “Star Trek” fame, and Neil deGrasse Tyson, America’s favorite astrophysicist, took to the stage to explore the nature of exploration. Think of it as sort of Martin & Lewis, but with more quantum mechanics.
“It’s a bromance,” said Tyson. “I think what Bill Shatner and I have together should be the textbook definition of the bromance.”
“If we have a bromance,” said Shatner, “I’d be very privileged.”
The two grew close last year on an upscale cruise to Antarctica, where they ended up being the after-dinner entertainment. “The organizer said, ‘Why don’t we put the two of you on this mini-stage that they have on the ship, and we just chew the fat?'” said Tyson. “And then the organizer said, ‘Why don’t you guys take this on the road?'”
Their first port of call? Seattle, where they debuted a wide-ranging, sometimes meandering, but always intriguing stage show they’re calling “The Universe Is Absurd!”
CBS News
When Shatner asked his partner for a sound bite, deGrasse Tyson solicited a suggestion from the audience: “Pick anything out of the universe. Go. Anything. Doesn’t matter.”
“Pluto!” yelled one enthusiastic audience member.
DeGrasse Tyson obliged: “More than half of Pluto is made of ice, so that, if it were where Earth is right now, heat from the Sun would evaporate that ice and it would grow a tail. And that is no kind of behavior for a planet!” Mic drop. “That’s a sound bite!”
For deGrasse Tyson, director of New York City’s Hayden Planetarium, and an authority on just about everything we know about the universe, it’s a chance to get inside the insatiably curious mind of the 94-year-old Shatner. “What kind of magic potion is he drinking?” deGrasse Tyson laughed. “By the way, you can do the math, he’s been alive for three billion seconds, okay? I did the math, you don’t have to. So when Bill Shatner speaks, it’s coming from a place way deeper than any of the rest of us can possibly match.”
And for Shatner, who never formally studied astrophysics, it’s a chance to make up for what he sees as lost time. “I feel bad about it, because that knowledge of what constitutes the construction of nature, we know so little, but the little we know is so awesome, it’s so spellbinding,” he said. “The fact that I wasn’t conscious of how spellbinding it is as a youth, I could have been much more educated about it.”
CBS News
Four years ago, Shatner became the oldest person ever to go into space, and he’s been globetrotting ever since.
Shatner asked deGrasse Tyson, “Do you still scratch your head in awe?”
“Every night I look up,” he replied.
So, is this the dynamic between the two – Shatner with questions, deGrasse Tyson with answers? “Unfortunately, that’s the way it is,” Shatner replied.
“No, but he’s got wisdom and life experience that I value, and I respect,” deGrasse Tyson added. “So, I’m here to grab some of that.”
As for Shatner’s take on deGrasse Tyson, “He has access, both because of his mentality, and the books and the studies, so he’s into modern-day mysticism, which is the study of the stars and how it works and what goes on.”
“You call that modern-day mysticism?” deGrasse Tyson asked.
“Because you don’t know for sure that what you’re saying is absolutely truth until more experimentation.”
“That’s the frontier. We’re scratching our heads.”
“Exactly,” said Shatner. “So, he is an explorer. He is an explorer. He is on that verge. He teaches that. And it is mystical in every sense of the word.”
I asked, “This is where I think you are politely and respectfully in disagreement, because Dr. deGrasse Tyson will say something like, ‘We know what the speed of light is and what the fastest things can move is.’ And you say, ‘Well, we’ll see about that!'”
“Yeah, we’ve had that argument,” said Shatner.
DeGrasse Tyson seems just fine not knowing everything – for example, what was going on before the Big Bang, and the profound idea of somethingness coming from nothingness. “We don’t know. Next question!” he said. “No, as a scientist, you need to be comfortable in the presence of a question that does not yet have an answer.”
Of course, the ultimate question, the one we really don’t know definitively, is where we go when we die, something that Shatner, as he loses friends and colleagues, finds himself considering more often. “You know, I vary between the fear of death, my fear,” he said. But, “I have so much love around me. I have a wife, and children, and grandchildren. I even have two great-grandchildren. And I have two great dogs. I’ve had dogs all my life, all my adult life. And so, all my life is fertile, is vibrant. And I don’t want to leave it. And that’s the sadness. I don’t want to go.”
“Are you curious, though, about what you will find out?” I asked.
“Not enough to die!” he laughed.
“Even your curiosity has a limit?”
“Right. It stops right there!”
So, William Shatner’s famous curiosity bumps up against the edge of his universe. And as the show wrapped up in Seattle, Shatner closed things out with one of his unique spoken-word songs, accompanied by trumpeter Keyon Harrold.
Do not grow old
no matter how long you live.
Do not forget pain
but somehow learn to forgive.
The universe, it turns out, might be a bit absurd, but what an interesting ride!
WEB EXCLUSIVE: Watch an extended interview with William Shatner and Neil deGrasse Tyson (Video)
For more info:
Story produced by Anthony Laudato. Editor: Karen Brenner.
Entertainment
The imperium of ego
From its inception, the American presidency has bound immense destructive capacity to the temperament of a single individual. It is an office that fuses authority with impulse by placing a military juggernaut in the hands of an individual.
Alice Roosevelt distilled this dynamic with biting precision. She quipped that her father (President Roosevelt) wished “to be the corpse at every funeral, the bride at every wedding and the baby at every christening”. Beneath the wit lay the indictment of an untethered ego.
Today, that strain of vanity has been eclipsed by Donald Trump. Ego is no longer a trait; it is doctrine. It has converted statecraft into spectacle, where personal whims masquerade as reality and contradiction is insubordination. What emerges is not just volatility but a corrosive force that destabilises the very architecture of international order.
This pathology is not confined to one geography. In South Asia, Narendra Modi’s initiation of the failed Operation Sindhoor reflected the same instinct that conjured crises to manifest power. Between nuclear rivals, such theatrics are reckless. They place millions within the blast radius of a narcissist’s need to appear unassailable.
Traversing further, clinical insight offers clarity. Mary Trump is a psychologist and Donald Trump’s niece. She describes a “monstrous ego” having reduced the Oval Office to an arena of impulse and domination. She describes the cabinet not as an ensemble of peers but as a congregation of “weaker, more craven and just as desperate” enablers. Loyalty is measured by the willingness to echo.
Governance, inevitably, mutates into spectacle. Its logic is laid bare in self-inscribed tokens of power like Trump’s commemorative gold coins and his signatures emblazoning future currency notes. Contagious, it results in loyalists curating the same iconography. Kash Patel’s personalised sneakers with his and the FBI initials to Pete Hegseth’s conspicuous tattoos; governance morphs into an orbit of narcissism.
The most dangerous manifestation of this dogma is what psychologists term narcissistic injury. It is when reality refuses to submit. In ordinary individuals, the damage is contained. In a president, it detonates outward. Slights are magnified and setbacks personalised. Decision-making degrades into reflex. Actions are calibrated to preserve ego and become increasingly indifferent to consequences.
The purge within the Pentagon is the clearest expression of this pathology – a punitive action to cauterise wounded pride. In such moments, governance ceases to be an instrument of statecraft and becomes an apparatus of psychological self-preservation. Senior commanders are not removed for failure but for resisting one.
Downed aircraft, missing crew members and an adversary unwilling to conform vindicate professional reluctance. The prospect of captured personnel threatens to transform a setback into a spectacle. In such a moment, restraint becomes impossible.
Escalation is no longer a choice but a compulsion, a violent necessity to overwrite failure with force. What follows is not a strategy but an ever more dangerous raising of the stakes to salvage pride. This is the true logic of an egocracy.
In such conditions, truth inevitably becomes malleable. It is distorted, diluted or outrightly discarded. The pattern is not new. The claims of WMDs that initiated the 2003 Iraq invasion were totally fabricated. The tragic reality that saw over a million perish was a stark testament to what happens when deception is weaponised in the service of self-justification.
This paradigm is starkly visible again in the narratives enabling the Gaza genocide and the strikes on Iran. Curated intelligence reports and ever-shifting justifications make a mockery of established facts. Reality is no longer a constraint; it is an inconvenience to be managed.
In ‘The Second Coming’, Yeats captured the birth of disorder: “What rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?” In his vision, the disintegration of order did not herald a new one but the emergence of something unrestrained and primal. The destruction wrought by narcissism is far more insidious. It does not emerge from chaos; it engineers it. Conflict and disorder become an assertion of the self.
History offers a harsher mirror. Roman Emperor Caligula governed through spectacle and fear. He was known for his cruelty in prolonging his victims’ sufferings. Through their entire ordeal, he had these words of Roman tragedian Lucius Accius on his lips – oderint dum metuant – let them hate, so long as they fear me. It captures the essence of power stripped of legitimacy and sustained only through dread.
In the modern era, such a mindset carries unprecedented stakes. The fusion of personal volatility with nuclear capability renders miscalculation existential. John Kennedy warned about such a world enforced by America’s war machine. He called it “peace of the grave or security of the slave” – subjugation or annihilation.
This is the calamitous binary that we see invoked from Gaza to Iran. The world remains riveted with Iran. Gaza, with its ongoing sufferings, has become a sidelined tragedy. In one case, resistance commands attention; in the other, endurance slips from view.
The chilling distillation is that prudence has been subsumed by an unbounded ego. It simply cannot retreat, concede and most dangerously, it cannot stop. This is the ultimate manifestation of the Imperium of Ego.
The writer explores the forces which shape power, belief and society. He can be reached at: [email protected]
Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed in this piece are the writer’s own and don’t necessarily reflect Geo.tv’s editorial policy.
Originally published in The News
Entertainment
Anna Faris talks about being insecure about ‘Scary Movie’ role
Anna Faris has opened up about the anxiety that plagued her during the making of the original Scary Movie films, admitting she spent much of the time hiding and hoping nobody would notice her, convinced she was about to lose the job.
“I remember being just so scared that I was gonna get fired because I had no body of work behind me. I didn’t even have an agent,” the actress and comedian, 49, tells PEOPLE.
Scary Movie, released in 2000, was her first major film role, and she says she was “so quiet and so intimidated in those first two movies”, spending her time on set hanging back rather than engaging with her castmates.
Things started to shift by the third instalment in 2003.
“For me, it felt like I got to pay more attention. I did get to involve myself more. I did feel comfortable making small talk and having banter and doing what normal people do as opposed to just hiding in the corner, hoping that no one will notice me,” she says.
More than two decades later, Faris is back as Cindy Campbell in Scary Movie 6, and the experience of returning could not feel more different.
When she got the call, she was “shocked and immediately thrilled.”
“I couldn’t believe that there was a world where I would be feeling so good about doing Scary Movie, not just good, but great,” she says.
The reunion has also given her the chance to do something she had never properly done before, thank the Wayans brothers for taking a chance on her all those years ago.
Marlon, Shawn and Keenen Ivory Wayans wrote, created and produced the original films.
“It’s a little healing in the sense that we got to be back together again. That is, for me, a personal celebration because I got to thank them. I’d never thanked them properly,” she says.
“It felt like the Wayans brothers were casting me. This time, I got to thank them and feel like I wasn’t gonna get fired.”
Entertainment
‘Harry Potter’ movie star Bonnie Wright expecting second baby
Bonnie Wright, the actress famously known for playing Ginny Weasley in the Harry Potter film franchise, has revealed she is expecting her second baby.
The 35-year-old star shared the happy news with her followers on Sunday, 5 April, through a heartwarming post on Instagram.
Wright, who appeared in all eight movies of the wizarding series, confirmed that her “second little earthling” will be joining the family this autumn.
The announcement was with two sweet photos of the mother sitting on a couch with her two-year-old son, Elio Ocean Wright Lococo.
In the snaps, Wright is seen displaying her baby bump, with one particularly touching shot showing her looking down at her son while he faces her stomach.
She captioned the post, “Two babies on my lap, our second little earthling joining us this autumn,” shortly after teasing a “very special” update on her Instagram Stories with a waterside selfie.
Support from the Harry Potter family came quickly, with co-star Evanna Lynch, who played Luna Lovegood, among the first to offer her congratulations in the comments.
Wright and her husband, Andrew Lococo, originally met in 2020 and tied the knot in March 2022.
Their first child, Elio, was born in September 2023.
-
Sports1 week agoUSMNT handed reality check by Doku, Belgium ahead of World Cup
-
Sports1 week ago2026 NCAA men’s hockey tournament: Schedule, results
-
Uncategorized4 days ago
[CinePlex360] Please moderate: “Trump signals p
-
Uncategorized7 days ago
[CinePlex360] Please moderate: “Further tariff
-
Entertainment3 days agoJoe Jonas shares candid glimpse into parenthood with Sophie Turner
-
Tech2 days agoOur Favorite iPad Is $50 Off
-
Entertainment1 week agoThe Avett Brothers’ bassist explains why he wrote a book about John Quincy Adams
-
Sports1 week agoMan City show why they are worthy WSL title winners as tired United wilt

