Connect with us

Business

Tandridge District Council launches cost-of-living support fund

Published

on

Tandridge District Council launches cost-of-living support fund


Low income households in a part of Surrey can now apply for new support funding.

Residents with low incomes in the Tandridge District Council catchment area can request a grant to help with living costs from 10:00 GMT on Monday.

Eligible households without children can apply for £125 while those with children can request £225.

The council said applications would be processed on a first come, first served basis and would close once all the money has been allocated.

Applicants must be aged 16 or over, live in the Tandridge district and be in financial difficulty and struggling to meet the cost of essential items, the council said.

Those who apply for other grants, such as Surrey County Council’s e-voucher household support fund, are still able to receive the funding from Tandridge.

Unlike the county council’s e-voucher scheme, Tandridge said it would deposit cash into people’s bank accounts to give them greater flexibility over how the money was used.

Tandridge is paying for its new scheme with £150,000 of its budget. The Surrey County Council fund is paid for by the Department for Work and Pensions.

The county council’s scheme, which runs each month, would previously pass the money to local councils to issue to residents.

Now, residents must apply to the county council directly. This funding scheme also opens on Monday.

The leader of the Tandridge District Council, Catherine Sayer, said: “Residents can apply to both Tandridge District Council’s winter support scheme and Surrey County Council’s essential e-voucher scheme, as they are run separately.

“Our support is provided as a cash deposit into a bank account rather than a supermarket e-voucher, giving residents more flexibility in how they use the money.

“The payment levels were set to allow us to support as many residents as possible within a total funding pot of £150,000.”

Through the county council’s scheme, a household without children can apply for a £200 supermarket voucher, while those with children are eligible for a £300 voucher.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Trump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors

Published

on

Trump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors


Danielle KayeBusiness reporter

Houston Chronicle via Getty Images A for sale sign is seen in front of a house.Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

A for sale sign is seen in front of a house in a Spring Branch neighborhood in Houston, Monday, Oct. 27, 2025.

US President Donald Trump has said he will move to ban big corporate investors from buying single-family homes, in a bid to make housing more affordable for Americans.

In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump said he would ask Congress to “codify” the plan and would discuss it further at the Davos World Economic Forum later this month.

The pledge bolstered an idea that has been circulating for years among housing advocates and lawmakers, in response to Wall Street’s increased role in America’s residential housing market. But some analysts question the extent to which a ban would affect prices.

Shares of Blackstone, one of the largest private equity buyers, fell more than 5% on Wednesday.

“That American Dream is increasingly out of reach for far too many people, especially younger Americans,” Trump said on social media, referring to home ownership.

“People live in homes, not corporations.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the details of a possible ban, including whether it would require congressional approval.

Trump’s comments on Wednesday come as his administration faces growing public pessimism about his handling of the economy. He has in recent weeks sought to allay voter anxiety about the cost of living in the US, with home affordability high on the list of Americans’ concerns.

Sam Garin, a spokesperson for an advocacy group that has raised alarm about the effect of private equity ownership on renters, said her group welcomed Trump’s move.

“We eagerly await the details of what this policy will actually entail,” said Garin, of the Private Equity Stakeholder Project, adding: “But we urge policymakers not to stop there.”

Since the 2008 financial crisis led to a wave of foreclosures, Wall Street investors such as Blackstone and other private equity firms have bought tens of thousands of homes to rent out, becoming major landlords, especially in certain markets.

Their role has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers in both political parties, who have blamed the firms for helping to push up the cost of renting and buying.

On Wednesday, Ohio Republican Senator Bernie Moreno, said he would introduce legislation to codify Trump’s proposal.

Shares of property firms fell on Wednesday after Trump’s comments. Builders FirstSource, a building products supplier, dropped more than 5%, while Invitation Homes, which owns single-family homes, fell 6%.

But some housing industry analysts questioned whether a ban would make much of a dent in home prices, given the relatively small role of institutional investors in the overall market.

Laurie Goodman, a fellow at the Urban Institute, said the impact of a ban would depend in part on how “large” investors are defined.

Blackstone has said that institutions own 0.5% of all single-family homes in the US.

Goodman said that her research found that institutional investors, when defined as those that own at least 1,000 units in three or more locations, own about 4% of the single-family market.

That number, she added, has held steady over the past few years, as purchases have slowed amid high interest rates and high home prices.

Goodman said a proposal for a ban raised other questions, such as how existing properties owned by institutional investors would be handled.

She said instead of an outright ban, “institutional investors should be required to provide more for their tenants”.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

US will control Venezuela oil sales ‘indefinitely’, official says

Published

on

US will control Venezuela oil sales ‘indefinitely’, official says


The US will control sales of sanctioned Venezuelan oil “indefinitely” as it prepares to roll back restrictions on the country’s crude in global markets, the White House said.

Officials said sales were expected to start with 30 million to 50 million barrels of oil and the revenue would be controlled by the US government in order to maintain leverage over the Venezuelan government.

“We’re going to let the oil flow,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said at a conference with oil and gas executives in Miami.

It’s not clear what portion of the revenues from the sale – which analysts expect to raise about $2.8bn (£2.1bn) – would be shared with Venezuela.

“We need to have that leverage and control of those oil sales to drive the changes that simply must happen in Venezuela,” Wright said, while adding that some of the money would then “flow back into Venezuela”.

White House officials said on Wednesday that they had already taken steps to start marketing the oil and the administration was working with key banks and commodity firms to execute the sales.

The comments offered more insight into plans US President Donald Trump announced on social media on Tuesday.

He said that Venezuela would be “turning over” up to 50 million barrels of oil to the US, and it would be sold at its market price.

The money is set to be deposited into US controlled accounts, which Trump said he as president would control and use to benefit the people of Venezuela and the US.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the aim was to disburse the money “in a way that benefits the Venezuelan people – not corruption, not the regime – so we have a lot of leverage to move on the stabilisation front”.

Analysts said the impact of the change in policy would depend on details, like the pace of the sales.

Venezuela has some of the world’s largest proven oil reserves, but disinvestment, mismanagement and decades of US sanctions have left it with output of only about a million barrels per day – less than 1% of global production.

That supply, which provided critical resources to the Venezuelan government, in recent years has been going primarily to China.

But that too has been disrupted in recent months after the US ramped up strikes and a blockade of Venezuelan tankers as part of its pressure campaign against Maduro.

On Wednesday, Beijing’s foreign minister condemned the US seizure of Maduro and US plans to exert control over Venezuela’s oil resources.

Trump is due to meet with oil executives at the White House on Friday.

Analysts said that in the short term, US oil firm Chevron and US oil refineries, which are set up to process the kind of “heavy” crude that is characteristic of Venezuela’s output, are well placed to benefit from increased flow of oil from Venezuela.

Such a shift could put pressure on Mexico and Canada, which produce similar crude and are currently the main sellers to US refineries.

Oil prices, which are already relatively low amid steady supply and muted demand expectations, slipped further over the last week on the prospect that Venezuela might have increased access to the global market.

But analysts have warned that meaningful expansion of the country’s output will take years and billions of dollars in investment, which firms may be hesitant to undertake, given less risky opportunities in the US and in other countries such as Guyana.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

IndiGo disruptions: CCI seeks details from airline, DGCA; probe on dominant position under way – The Times of India

Published

on

IndiGo disruptions: CCI seeks details from airline, DGCA; probe on dominant position under way – The Times of India


The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has sought information from IndiGo and aviation regulator DGCA to assess whether the country’s largest airline indulged in unfair business practices following widespread flight cancellations last month, PTI reported citing sources.In early December, IndiGo, which commands over 63% share of the domestic aviation market, faced major operational disruptions that led to the cancellation of thousands of flights before services stabilised. In response, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) curtailed the airline’s winter schedule by 10%.Sources said the anti-trust regulator has sent a set of queries to IndiGo as part of its preliminary examination of the airline’s conduct. The CCI has also sought information from the DGCA, including data on airfares, to gain a broader understanding of market conditions before deciding its next course of action.The Competition Commission is currently assessing whether there is prima facie evidence that IndiGo violated competition norms by abusing its dominant position in the market. As part of its process, the watchdog first undertakes an initial assessment before ordering a detailed investigation by its Director General (DG), if required.On December 18, the CCI said it had taken cognisance of information filed against IndiGo in connection with the recent flight disruptions across multiple routes. “Based on the initial assessment, the Commission has decided to proceed further in the matter in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002,” it said in a release.A day later, CCI Chairperson Ravneet Kaur told PTI that the regulator had decided to examine the matter further based on the information available. “We have information which has come to us, and based on that information, the matter was placed before the commission. The commission has taken a view that in the initial assessment, it looks like we can go into further detail,” she said.The DGCA has already completed its probe into the operational disruptions, while the CCI continues to evaluate whether IndiGo’s conduct warrants a full-fledged investigation under competition law.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending