Connect with us

Business

Leasehold reforms risk deterring investors to the UK, industry groups warn

Published

on

Leasehold reforms risk deterring investors to the UK, industry groups warn



Government plans to cap ground rents at £250 a year could have major ramifications on the pensions and investment industry and “weaken the appeal” of the UK, according to warnings.

The changes are expected to affect companies and funds with assets linked to ground rent income.

Millions of leaseholders and future homeowners are set to benefit from charges being reduced and the ability to switch to commonhold, according to the Government.

But groups representing property investors have warned that retrospective changes to current property rules could have unintended consequences.

A spokeswoman for the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said it “supports proportionate leasehold reform” but raised concerns about the knock-on effect for pension funds.

“We are deeply concerned that retrospective changes to existing property rights set a troubling precedent and undermine confidence in contract certainty,” the organisation said.

“It is likely to raise the risk premium that investors attach to the UK and could weaken its appeal as a destination for global capital and the domestic market.

“We will continue to discuss this with members and Government.”

Danny Pinder, director of policy for the British Property Federation, said it supports the move to address “rapidly escalating ground rents” but warned that the cap will “interfere with investments made by pension funds and institutional investors over many years and undermine the Government’s pursuit of investment in this country”.

He stressed that compensation should be given to those that have “invested in good faith” and who “continue to fund everyone’s pensions”.

Investment manager M&G warned of a £230 million one-off hit as a consequence of the reforms.

The company said it has £722 million of ground rent assets through a shareholder fund, and that the financial hit will come from a write-down on the value of these assets, should the reforms go ahead in their current form

Bosses argued that the changes were “disproportionate” and would “negatively impact savers and companies that have chosen to invest in UK assets”.

It is understood that some of the UK’s biggest insurance groups are also speaking to the Government about the impact of the reforms, while investors might seek compensation over possible losses.

There is not expected to be a significant impact on major Britain’s housebuilders, with the competition watchdog leading a crackdown since 2019 on mis-selling of leasehold homes on contract terms that break consumer law, with probes involving major housing developers and freehold owners.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews

Published

on

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews



Food delivery giant Just Eat, funeral firm Dignity and motor platform Autotrader are among five firms under investigation by the UK’s competition watchdog as part of its crackdown on fake and misleading online reviews.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had launched probes against the companies – also including customer review and feedback firm Feefo and Pasta Evangelists – to see whether consumer laws have been broken.

Since April last year, companies have been banned from certain tactics around online reviews under law, such as fake posts, paid-for reviews that are not clearly marked as incentivised, as well as for hiding negative feedback.

Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: “Fake reviews strike at the heart of consumer trust – with many of us worrying about misleading content when looking at reviews online.

“With household budgets under pressure, people need to know they’re getting genuine information – not reviews or star ratings that have been manipulated to push them towards the wrong choice.

“We’ve given businesses the time to get things right. Now we’re deploying our new powers to tackle some of the most harmful practices head on.”

The CMA said it was looking into whether Just Eat’s ratings system had inflated some restaurant and grocer star ratings, giving a misleading picture of quality.

For Autotrader and Feefo, the CMA is investigating whether a number of one-star reviews – moderated by Feefo, which handles reviews for the new and used car site – were hidden on the platform and did not count towards the star ratings.

Dignity is under investigation by the CMA into whether it asked staff to write positive reviews about the firm’s crematoria services.

And artisan fresh pasta chain Pasta Evangelists is being probed over allegations it offered customers discounts for leaving five-star reviews on delivery apps without this being disclosed.

If the CMA finds the firms have broken the law, it can order them to change their practices and fine them up to 10% of their annual global sales.

An Autotrader spokesperson said: “We endeavour always to operate as a responsible and compliant business and will co-operate fully with the CMA’s investigation.”

It comes after the CMA recently secured commitments from Google and Amazon to beef up their systems to identify and remove fake reviews.

Amazon last June agreed to put in place “robust processes” to quickly detect and remove fake reviews alongside sanctions for rogue sellers and businesses after an investigation by the CMA to curb the customer hazard.

The tech giant said it would sanction businesses that boost their star ratings via bogus reviews or catalogue abuse, including bans from selling on the website, while users could also be banned for posting fake reviews.

Consumer group Which? welcomed the investigations and said the CMA must “get tough” on firms found to be breaking the law with reviews.

Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: “Investigations are a welcome first step, but enforcement will be key – the regulator must be prepared to get tough, use its powers and issue serious fines if these companies aren’t playing by the rules.”

The CMA said it swept more than 100 review publishers as part of the clampdown and sent advisory letters to 54 firms to improve their compliance with the law, with 90% having made changes in response and 75% telling the watchdog they better understood the rules.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply

Published

on

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply



Anthony Albanese says nation’s supply remains “secure” amid reports of panic buying and shortages.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial

Published

on

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial



A woman has been awarded $6m in a verdict that could have implications for hundreds of other cases in the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending