Connect with us

Tech

EE, Three claim UK’s best mobile internet performance in 2025 | Computer Weekly

Published

on

EE, Three claim UK’s best mobile internet performance in 2025 | Computer Weekly


Industry analysis from nPerf of the UK’s mobile market arena in 2025 has revealed “intense” competition at the top tier, with the best internet performance delivered not just by market leader EE but also rival provider Three.

The nPerf Speed Test analysed the overall quality of the connection experienced by UK mobile users across all four quarters of 2025, considering several criteria, namely download speed, upload speed, latency, browsing performance and streaming quality. Measurements were based on 57,299 tests conducted via the nPerf application on both Android and iOS devices.

Download speeds above 25 Mbps were classified as excellent, and a latency of 0-30 ms was considered excellent, enabling activities such as 4K video streaming and real-time interaction, while 31-100 ms enabled optimal internet performance with minimal delay. Browsing performance was seen as a measure of how quickly and efficiently internet pages were loaded and navigated. A browsing score between 75% and 100% meant near-instant page loading.

A score between 75% and 100% indicates smooth streaming in terms of the quality benchmark. Scores between 50% and 75% were seen as adequate for YouTube streaming. Below 50% resulted in compromised video quality.

Overall, EE and Three were found to have tied for leadership with both operators delivering download speeds exceeding 110 Mbps, supporting what were described as “comprehensive” user experiences.

Both EE and Three Users were seen as benefiting from high-quality mobile experiences, particularly for streaming, gaming and real-time communications.

EE’s performance was rated as having “comprehensive strengths” and demonstrating “strong performances” across all metrics. The BT-owned operator had an overall score of 86,470 nPoints in the study, complementing download speeds of 110.44 Mbps with upload speeds of 15.77 Mbps. EE rated scores of 69.65% for browsing and 76.51% as regards video streaming, delivering “fluid content viewing” for users.

For its part, Three was said to have a “solid top position” additionally guaranteeing “high-quality” video calls and “efficient” content sharing. The operator achieved the best latency in the sector (35.31 ms), perfect for online gaming and real-time communications. Three’s overall rating was 84,993 nPoints, with download speeds reach 110.72 Mbps and upload speeds of 16.50 Mbps, but also with the best latency in the sector (35.31 ms). Leading in upload performance, the operator could guarantee high-quality video calls and efficient content sharing.

In competitive positioning, Vodafone ranked third with 74,892 nPoints and delivered 74.56 Mbps in download speed. The operator was said to have demonstrate solid video streaming performance at 74.35%.

The fourth UK mobile operator, O2, was said to have experienced a “focused” performance in 2025, totalling 66,557 nPoints and displaying “efficient” latency of 37.56 ms, suitable for what were called “responsive” online experiences.

Looking specifically at the mobile internet experience of the UK’s 5G networks, Three subscribers enjoyed the best 5G internet in 2025 with both fastest download and upload speeds. Both O2 and Three offered the best 5G connections with the lowest latency. EE, Three and Vodafone tied for best 5G web browsing performances while Three and Vodafone were seen as delivering the leading 5G streaming performances.

Commenting on the results, Sébastien de Rosbo, CEO of nPerf, said: “The UK mobile market demonstrates strong competition at the top, with both leaders delivering comprehensive performance and user experiences that benefit from high-speed connectivity across all key indicators.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

How to Watch the Lyrids Meteor Shower at Its Peak

Published

on

How to Watch the Lyrids Meteor Shower at Its Peak


In mid-April, astronomy enthusiasts will be able to enjoy one of the classic celestial spectacles. The meteor shower known as the Lyrids will illuminate the sky, especially in the northern hemisphere, and anyone will be able to see it with the naked eye, weather permitting—if they know where to look.

The Lyrids began to appear as early as April 14, but their activity peaks between the night of April 21 and the early morning of April 22, according to NASA. During those hours, the shower will show 15 to 20 meteors per hour under dark skies.

The shower gets its name because the meteors appear to emerge from the constellation Lyra. Locating the radiant is simple if you use an astronomical mapping app: Just find Vega, the fifth brightest star in the sky, surpassed only by Sirius, Canopus, Alpha Centauri A, and Arcturus. Once you locate it, look around it; the luminous traces of the Lyrids will seem to be projected from that point due to a perspective effect. Keep in mind that it takes 20 to 30 minutes for the human eye to adjust to darkness.

The moon will be in early crescent phase during the peak, so its light will interfere very little. With a dark sky, meteors should stand out easily. The shower is usually visible from 10 pm to dawn, although early morning offers the best conditions. It is best to stay away from light pollution and, if possible, to observe from high ground. An outing to the mountains works well.

Each meteor shower has a different origin. In April, Earth crosses the cloud of fragments left by comet C/1861 G1 (Thatcher) in its orbit around the sun. This comet, discovered in 1861, takes about 415 years to complete its journey. The grains of ice and rock that it released centuries ago enter the atmosphere at high speed and produce the flashes we know as the Lyrids.

After the Lyrids, the calendar still holds several spectacles for those who follow the night sky. The Eta Aquarids will arrive in May with debris from Halley’s Comet. The Perseids will appear in August, the Orionids will return in October, and the year will close with the Leonids in November and the Geminids in December. The latter is considered the most intense and reliable shower on the calendar.

This story originally appeared on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

A Humanoid Robot Set a Half-Marathon Record in China

Published

on

A Humanoid Robot Set a Half-Marathon Record in China


Over the weekend in China, a humanoid robot shattered world half-marathon record—the human record—by seven minutes.

The star performer was a robot developed by the Chinese company Honor (the smartphone maker), which finished the 13.1-mile race in 50 minutes, 26 seconds. The human record, set by Ugandan Olympic medalist Jacob Kiplimo, is 57 minutes, 20 seconds. The result marks an impressive milestone especially considering that, just a year earlier, the fastest robot at this half-marathon event took two and a half hours to complete the same distance.

But Honor’s robot was not the only participant. The event consisted of more than 100 humanoid robots from 76 institutions across China. The robots lined up alongside 12,000 human runners in Beijing’s E-Town, albeit on separate courses to avoid accidents. The contrast in performance between humans and robots was more than evident.

Run, Robot, Run

A humanoid robot is designed to mimic the structure and movement of the human body, with legs, arms, and sensors that allow it to interact with its environment. In this case, the winning robot incorporated features inspired by elite runners: long legs (almost a meter), advanced balance systems, and a liquid cooling mechanism, similar to that of smartphones, to prevent overheating during the race.

In addition, many of the participating robots operated autonomously, meaning without direct human control. Thanks to artificial intelligence algorithms, they could adjust their pace, maintain balance, and adapt to the terrain in real time. Notably, the Honor robot that achieved the 50-minute mark operated autonomously. The Chinese manufacturer presented another robot, operated by remote control, that ran the same stretch in even less time: 48 minutes, 19 seconds.

As expected, there were some accidents in the race. Some robots fell down, others veered off the path, and several needed technical assistance along the way. While the physical performance of humanoid robots has advanced rapidly, their reliability is still developing. Of course, the laughter and jeers are no longer as frequent as they used to be, replaced by applause and exclamations of surprise.

The winning robot, “Blitz,” from smartphone manufacturer Honor was on display at the awards ceremony after the Beijing E-Town Robot Half Marathon.

Photograph: Lintao Zhang/Getty Images

Robot Superiority

Just like the robots that went viral for their impressive martial arts display a few weeks ago, this long-distance race is part of a broader strategy by China to show off its leadership in the development of advanced robots.

You don’t need to be a robotics expert to see that this achievement demonstrates that machines can outperform humans at specific physical tasks under controlled conditions. (It’s hard to imagine that the winning robot could achieve the same result, for example, if it started to rain during the race.) But humans still have a few tricks up their sleeve: Running in a straight line is very different from performing complex real-world activities, such as manipulating delicate objects or interacting socially.

However, it’s understandable that the image of a robot crossing the finish line in record time, ahead of human athletes, raises several questions. Is this the beginning of a new era in which machines redefine physical limits?

One could argue that a car is a machine, and those have always been faster than humans. But a humanoid robot is designed to mimic humans. It’s more alarming to see one beat humanity at its own game—even if so many of them are still tripping over themselves.

This story originally appeared in WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.





Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

War Memes Are Turning Conflict Into Content

Published

on

War Memes Are Turning Conflict Into Content


As ceasefire announcements between the US and Iran—and separately between Israel and Lebanon—dominated headlines over the past two weeks, they also prompted a look back at how war spread online: through memes.

There were jokes about conscription. Captions about getting drafted, but at least with a Bluetooth device. The song “Bazooka” went viral, with users lip-syncing to: “Rest in peace my granny, she got hit by a bazooka.” Military filters followed. So did posts about Americans wanting to be sent to Dubai “to save all the IG models.”

Across the Gulf, the tone was different but the instinct was the same. Memes joked that Iran was replying to Israel faster than the person you’re thinking about. Delivery drivers were shown “dodging missiles.” “Eid fits” became hazmat suits and tactical vests.

Dark humor is one of the oldest responses to fear, a way of reclaiming control, however briefly, over events that offer none. Variations of that idea appear across psychology and philosophy, including Freud’s relief theory, which frames humor as a release of tension.

But social media changes the scale and speed of that instinct.

A joke once shared within a small community can become a global template in minutes. Algorithms do not reward depth or accuracy; they reward engagement. The memes that travel fastest are usually stripped of context, easy to recognize and simple to remix.

Middle East scholar and media analyst Adel Iskandar traces political satire back centuries, from banned satirical papyri in ancient Egypt to cartoons during revolutions and gallows humor in modern wars. “Where there is hardship, there is satire,” he says. “Where there is loss of hope, there is hope in comedy.”

That tradition still exists online. But today it is fused with recommendation systems designed to keep attention moving.

Memes Spread Faster Than Facts

The word “meme” was coined by Richard Dawkins in his 1976 book The Selfish Gene, where he described how ideas replicate like genes. On today’s internet, replication follows platform logic.

Fitness means generality. A meme does not need to be accurate. It needs to feel familiar. It needs the right format, paired with trending audio and the right emotional shorthand.

“A meme is like a virus,” Iskandar says. “If it doesn’t travel, it’ll die.”

The most visible response online is not always the truest one. It is often just the easiest to spread. And once context disappears, one crisis can start to resemble any other.

Geography shapes humor too, and adds another level of tension. “If you live far away from the threat, you’re capable of producing content that ridicules it with an element of safety,” says Iskandar. “Whereas if you happen to be within close proximity, it is more of a fatalism.”

That divide matters. For some users, war exists mainly as mediated spectacle: clips, edits, graphics, headlines, and reaction posts. For others, it is sirens, uncertainty, disrupted flights, rising prices, and messages checking who is safe.

The same meme can function as entertainment in one country and emotional survival in another. Take the American experience of violence, which Sut Jhally, professor of communication at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, says “is very mediated.”

What much of the Western world has consumed instead is what cultural critic George Gerbner called “happy violence”: spectacular, consequence-free, and detached from the aftermath.

Jhally argues that the September 11 attacks remain the defining modern American experience of war-adjacent political violence. Much else has been cinematic: distant invasions, blockbuster destruction, video-game logic, apocalypse franchises.

The teenager from the Midwest joking about being drafted is drawing from zombie films and superhero apocalypses. “There is almost no discussion about what an actual Third World War would look like,” he says. “People do not have a perception of what that really looks like.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending