Connect with us

Tech

Europe’s data protection supervisors warn over plans to ‘narrow’ privacy rights | Computer Weekly

Published

on

Europe’s data protection supervisors warn over plans to ‘narrow’ privacy rights | Computer Weekly


Europe’s data protection supervisors have warned that proposals by the European Commission to reform privacy law by narrowing the definition of personal data could erode privacy rights for EU citizens.

The regulators said in a joint response with the European Data Protection Board,  that the proposed changes raise “significant concerns” and could adversely affect the level of protection for individuals’ personal data.

The warning comes as the European Commission presses ahead with proposals to reform a raft of EU data protection laws through a “Digital Omnibus” regulation which it says will simplify compliance for businesses and will boost EU competitiveness.

The European Data Protection Board, and national European Data Protection Supervisors warned in a joint opinion that some of the proposed measures could damage privacy rights of individuals, create legal uncertainty and make data protection law more difficult to apply.

The contested proposals include changes to the definition of personal data that would weaken privacy rights by allowing organisations to treat personal data as non-personal data if they processed it in a way that did not identify individuals.

Proposals ‘go beyond’ European law

Although the proposals had been welcomed by many data protection practitioners as a way to simplify compliance with data protection and privacy regulations, the regulators have sounded a warning bell.

They “strongly urge” legislators not to adopt the proposed changes to personal data, arguing that they “go far beyond a targeted or technical amendment” and go far beyond EU case law by “significantly narrowing the concept of personal data”.

The regulators also raise concerns about proposals that could water down individual’s rights not to be subject to automatic decision-making by AI or software through a proposed “exhaustive list” of cases where automatic decision making would be allowed.

Another proposal that would allow the European Commission new powers to determine whether pseudonymized data should no longer be classed as personal data, has also sparked calls for clarification.

The regulators warn that proposals to restrict the right of people to make subject access requests to people motivated by ‘data protection’ concerns is not compatible with EU law.

If implemented, this proposal is likely to exclude access requests made by journalists, academics or policy makers, for non-data protection purposes, such as journalistic or academic research.

They also call for the Commission to fine-tune proposals that would allow organisations to use special categories of data – including data on political opinions, religious beliefs, trade union membership, health and sexual orientation – when they are used in “incidental” and “residual” way to train our use AI systems.              

Reporting data breaches simplified

The EDPB and the data protection supervisors support many of the EU’s proposals, including plans to make reporting data breaches less painful for companies.

The European Commission proposes raising the threshold of risk before companies need to make a notification and extending the deadline to file a notification from 72 to 96 hours.

“This change is not expected to substantially affect the level of protection for data subjects but would significantly reduce the administrative burden for controllers, given that they would only have to notify data breaches that are likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects,” they said.

Another proposal to offer alternative ways for people to consent to cookies to avoid “consent fatigue” and a “proliferation of cookie banners,” for example by consenting to cookies once on a particular computer, have also been welcomed.

However the regulators remain concerned about the proposed changes to the definition of personal data.

The European Data Protection Supervisor, Wojciech Wiewiórowski said, “These changes are not in line with the Court’s case law and would significantly narrow the concept of personal data.”

Anu Talus, chair of the European Data Protection Board, said any changes to EU Data protection law must bring legal certainty while maintaining a high level of protection of individual rights and freedoms.

“We strongly urge the co-legislators not to adopt the proposed changes to the definition of personal data. These changes are not in line with the Court’s case law and would significantly narrow the concept of personal data,” she added.

Isabelle Roccia, managing director for Europe for IAPP, a professional association with 90,000 members, said that privacy and data protection professionals were in favour of the EU’s proposals.

“The Commission proposal to narrow the scope of personal data definition was welcomed by many practitioners as a sign of pragmatism in the interpretation of the GDPR. If adopted, it would have consequential impact in easing many friction points across contractual obligations and data transfer rules among others,” she said.

“With this joint opinion, EDPS and EDPB are signaling that they want to preserve the conservative and data-subject-first approach they have established in the past decade,” she added.

She said that business leaders would also welcome legal certainty around the legal basis for when developers can use “legitimate interest” to process personal data to train AI models.

Commission proposals benefit US big tech 

The campaign group, noyb, said that the “Digital Omnibus” proposed sweeping changes to the GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive that were disguised as simplification measures.

The group claims that the changes would not help EU businesses that have to complete “useless” paperwork to comply with data protection laws, but would mainly be useful to big US tech companies.

Max Schrems, privacy lawyer and honorary chair of noyb, said, “the independent authorities have called out key changes for what they are: neither ‘technical change’ nor ‘simplification’, but limitations of the right to data protection for EU residents”.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

I’ve Been Waiting Months for This Gorgeous Laptop to Drop in Price. It Finally Happened

Published

on

I’ve Been Waiting Months for This Gorgeous Laptop to Drop in Price. It Finally Happened


After a long time of resisting significant price drops, the Asus Zenbook S 16 has finally dropped down to $1,000, which is $500 off its retail price.

It’s normal for laptops to dip in price toward the end of their lifespan, close to when an update comes out. But the Asus Zenbook S 16 has held on. To be fair, it’s an extremely high-end Windows laptop, one of the prettiest to come out last year. It’s sleek, portable, and has a striking design. It even gets fantastic battery life, on par with a MacBook. Speaking of MacBooks, this Zenbook is the laptop I saw tech journalists traveling with more than anything else. Given how much tech they review, that’s quite an endorsement.

But the S 16 has always been hard for me to recommend when the cheapest model available was $1,500. I was always on the lookout for a more significant price cut, but it never dropped more than a couple hundred bucks. And even though it always came with 24 GB of RAM and a terabyte of storage, the price was a hard pill to swallow. Well, the day has finally come. It’s now down to $1,000 over at Best Buy as part of the store’s Presidents’ Day sale. That’s an incredible price for this much laptop.

Photograph: Christopher Null

Asus

Zenbook S 16 (UM5606)

The previously mentioned memory and storage still apply here, along with the 2880 x 1800 OLED display with a 120-Hz refresh rate. This laptop basically has every high-end feature you could imagine, but one of my favorite aspects is the ports. Despite the thin profile, the S 16 keeps all the legacy ports you might want, including HDMI, USB-A, and even a full-size SD card slot.

There is also a smaller, 14-inch model, but its discount is not as strong as the 16-inch model. It comes in at $1,300 right now, which is still a solid price for this configuration.

I should say that Asus has an update in the works for 2026 with the latest Intel chips, but it’s only coming to the 14-inch model. I won’t lie: Based on my testing, these CPUs will make a significant difference in performance—especially on the graphics front. But I have a feeling Asus will be selling this device for an even higher price for much longer, especially with the recent development around memory shortage.

While the Zenbook S 16 is certainly the best deal at Best Buy for its Presidents’ Day sale, I would also recommend the Asus Zephyrus G14, which is also $500 off. This configuration comes with a powerful RTX 5070 Ti graphics card and is one of our favorite gaming laptops.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

‘Uncanny Valley’: ICE’s Secret Expansion Plans, Palantir Workers’ Ethical Concerns, and AI Assistants

Published

on

‘Uncanny Valley’: ICE’s Secret Expansion Plans, Palantir Workers’ Ethical Concerns, and AI Assistants


Brian Barrett: They’ve got 80 billion or so to spend 75 billion of that I think they have to spend in the next four years. So yeah, they’re going to keep expanding. And when you think of how much of an impact 3000 agents officers had in Minneapolis alone, that’s like an eighth of the, they can repeat some version of that in a lot of different spots.

Leah Feiger: And I’ve been fielding, honestly, shout out to the many local reporters around the country who’ve been contacting me in the last day or so, just to ask questions about the locations that we named that are near them or in their states or cities. And the thing to me that keeps coming up is that in addition to new buildings, they’re getting put into preexisting government buildings, preexisting leases, or that that appears to be the plan. And then we’ve also found that a bunch of these ICE offices are being located near plans for giant immigration detention warehouses, and we’re looking at offices being set up, say 20 minutes, an hour and 20 minutes away for these. Yeah. So we’re looking at different, the triangulation of this around you have to have your lawyers, your agents, have a place to get their orders and put their computers and do in some ways very mundane things that are required of an operation like this one.

Brian Barrett: Well, Leah, that’s a good point. I think when people hear ICE offices or when I do just instinctively, I think of ICE as guys with guns and masks and all that, but that’s not exactly what we’re saying here. Do you mind talking through what these offices seem to be queued up to be used for and by whom? Because ICE is not just the masked guys with bad tattoos.

Leah Feiger: Yes, absolutely. So what we reported in this story as well was some of the specific parts of ICE that actually reached out to GSA and asked them to expedite the process of getting new leases, et cetera, included in that, for example, where representatives from Ola, Ola is ICE’s office of the principal legal advisor. So that’s the lawyers, those are the ICE lawyers that are working with the courts and arguing back or deportation orders saying yes, no, et cetera, signing the documents, putting everything in front of judges. This is a really important part of this entire operation that we’re not talking about a ton. There’s a lot of focus on the DOJ. There’s a lot of focus. There was an excellent article this week in Politico talking about all of these federal judges that are really, really upset that DHS and ICE are ignoring their requests for immigrants to not be detained anymore.

The missing level of that is the lawyers that are part of this that are representing ICE to the US government here, and that’s ola. So they’ve reached out to GSA extensively as we report to get these leasing locations, specifically with the OLA legal request. I just want to get across how big this is. How massive is this ICE repeatedly outlined its expansion to cities around the us And this one piece of memorandum that we got from Ola stated that ICE will be expanding its legal operations into Birmingham, Alabama, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers, Jacksonville, and Tampa, Des Moines, Iowa, Boise, Idaho, Louisville, Kentucky, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, grand Rapids, Michigan, St. Louis, Missouri, rally, North Carolina, long Island, New York, Columbus, Ohio, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Charleston and Columbia, South Carolina, Nashville, Tennessee, Richmond, Virginia, Spokane, Washington and Cord Delaine, Idaho and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. We have other locations as well throughout the rest of the article, but those are the requests from OLA.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Waymo Asks the DC Public to Pressure Their City Officials

Published

on

Waymo Asks the DC Public to Pressure Their City Officials


Waymo needs some help, according to an email message the self-driving developer sent to residents of Washington, DC, on Thursday.

For more than a year, Waymo has been pushing city officials to pass new regulations allowing its robotaxis to operate in the district. So far, self-driving cars can test in the city with humans behind the wheel, but cannot operate in driver-free mode. The Alphabet subsidiary—and its lobbyists—have asked local lawmakers, including Mayor Muriel Bower and members of the city council, to create new rules allowing the tech to go truly driverless on its public roads. The company has previously said it will begin offering driverless rides in DC this year.

But Waymo’s efforts to sway officials have stalled, so the company is now asking residents to apply some pressure. “We are nearly ready to provide public Waymo rides to everyone in DC,” says an email sent to those who have signed up for Waymo’s DC service. “However, despite significant support, District leadership has not yet provided the necessary approvals for us to launch.”

The email directs recipients to contact DC officials via a form letter that says, in part: “Over the past year, I have observed Waymo vehicles operating throughout our local areas, and I am thrilled about the potential advantages this service could provide, including enhanced accessibility and a decline in traffic-related incidents.” The communication urges DC residents to edit the letter to “use your own words,” because personalized messages “have a higher impact.” Only DC residents or those with DC addresses can participate, Waymo says.

In a written statement, Waymo spokesperson Ethan Teicher says, “We’ll be ready to serve Washingtonians this year, and urge the Mayor, the District Department of Transportation, and the City Council to act.” The company says that 1,500 people contacted district leaders through its email in the first 90 minutes after it was sent.

Generally, self-driving vehicle developers have only launched service in places where regulations clearly outline how the tech might hit the roads. Other US cities with Waymo service, including ones in California, Florida, and Texas, already had those rules in place before the company entered their markets. But as Waymo’s ambitions have grown larger, it has begun to target large blue-state cities where autonomous vehicle tech doesn’t yet have a “driver’s license.” Earlier this month, the company said it would begin testing in Boston, where city lawmakers pushed last year for an ordinance that would ban self-driving taxis from operating without a human behind the wheel. Waymo has said that it needs Massachusetts lawmakers to “legalize fully autonomous vehicles” before it can launch service in Boston.

Eventually, self-driving-vehicle developers hope that the US Congress will pass a law allowing the broader testing and operation of their tech across the US. On Tuesday, a House committee advanced a bill that would direct the federal government to create safety standards for autonomous vehicles, and prevent states from passing their own laws prohibiting the sale or use of the tech, or from requiring companies to submit information on crashes.

Waymo’s new DC pressure campaign echoes the ones launched by transportation disrupters, including ride-hailing giant Uber and bike- and scooter-share company Bird, nearly a decade ago. Like self-driving tech developers, those companies wanted to launch their new services in places where the rules didn’t align with their business ambitions. Ultimately, Uber and Lyft generally succeeded in getting laws passed in US statehouses allowing their services to operate on public roads—and preventing cities from creating their own laws.

Today, Waymo operates in six US metro areas—Atlanta, Austin, Los Angeles, Miami, Phoenix, and the San Francisco Bay Area—and plans to launch in more than 10 this year. Three other companies, including Nuro and Amazon-owned Zoox, have permits to test self-driving tech in Washington, DC.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending