Connect with us

Tech

How to Hide Google’s AI Overviews From Your Search Results

Published

on

How to Hide Google’s AI Overviews From Your Search Results


Going online in 2026 means subjecting yourself to a relentless bombardment of generative AI tools. How about a few AI agents to get you started? Do you want to use this chatbot sidebar? Would you like every search query to be answered with an AI summary? While there’s no off switch to avoid this smorgasbord of AI tools entirely, there is one keyboard trick you can use to dodge Google’s AI Overviews for a brief respite.

If you don’t want to see an AI-generated summarization of webpage links when you use Google Search, you can type “–ai” at the end of your query. It’s an option WIRED readers highlighted under a recent article about scams found in Google’s AI Overviews. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed using this nifty addendum over the past week, and I wish Google offered a permanent toggle with similar zapping capabilities.

“People find Search more helpful with AI Overviews, and they’re coming back to search more as a result,” a Google spokesperson tells WIRED. “We offer a ‘web’ filter to see links only, but people only use it for a tiny fraction of searches.” The spokesperson compared AI Overviews to other features baked into the search results, like knowledge panels, that can’t be removed.

If you want to try this out, you can put any combination of letters or numbers attached to an en dash, like “–1” or “–z,” at the end of your Google search, and it works just the same, as reported by PCMag. It prevents AI Overviews from appearing completely. The en dash function in Google is designed to remove whatever topic you attach to it from the search results. The removal of AI Overviews seems incidental, and it’s unclear how long this trick will stick around. After typing in a result, you can also tap on the “Web” tab—sometimes hidden under “More”—right below the search bar to see site links.

In my tests, the –ai trick appears to be limited to search queries in computer browsers. When I tried it in the Safari and Chrome apps on iOS, Google’s AI-generated “web guide” still popped up prominently in the results. However, Google does offer a Classic Search button on the right side of these results. After clicking that button, the results will reload and show you a mix of website links and short-form videos. The exception seems to be on Android—at least on a Google Pixel phone we tested with, using “–ai” removed AI Overviews.

It’s a nice change from the current default when I’m using my laptop, and I’ll likely continue typing “–ai” at the end of every search until it becomes muscle memory, just like I add “Reddit” all the time to my queries. Even so, I feel nostalgic for the minimalist Google I grew up with and the utter simplicity of those top 10 blue links.

If you’re looking to switch search engines to a service without any generative AI, DuckDuckGo and Brave are two solid options worth considering. Both search engines allow users to toggle AI summaries on and off in the settings. You don’t need to change browsers to use a different search engine, as Google lets you swap the default search engine in Chrome’s settings menu.

When Google launched AI Overviews in 2024, it was a major turning point for the search engine. But AI Overviews was widely mocked on social media for incorrect answers, like an infamous result that suggested baking pizza with glue. It didn’t stop Google, though, as the company has continued to lean further into AI tools since the initial release of AI Overviews and has kept iterating on the user experience.

While Google claims the accuracy of these results has improved over time, generative AI tools still sometimes insert inaccuracies when summarizing information. So, it’s always worth clicking through and double-checking anything you read in an AI Overview. All the more reason, I think, to cut out the middlebot completely and visit those dang websites directly.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

These Cheap Noise-Cancelling Sony Headphones Are Even Cheaper Right Now

Published

on

These Cheap Noise-Cancelling Sony Headphones Are Even Cheaper Right Now


We’ve tested oodles of noise-canceling headphones and the Sony WH-CH720N might have an unfortunate name, but they’re the best budget-friendly pair we’ve tried. They usually offer good value when selling for the full $178 MSRP, but right now they’ve fallen to $95 shipped on Amazon and $100 on Best Buy.

These headphones are well-built and well-designed, with great active noise cancellation and robust sound. They don’t fold up and they don’t come with a case, but you can get a case as a separate purchase if that’s a deal-breaker for you.

These are lightweight, with adaptive sound that can adjust itself to suit your environment. Moreover, if you want a pair of over-hear wireless headphones with active noise cancellation, it’s very difficult to get that in a package this affordable. Tack on the long-lasting 35-hour battery, and paying under $100 becomes a no-brainer if you’re in the market and on a tight budget. We haven’t seen them drop this low in price before.

We’re nowhere near a shopping event like Amazon Prime Day or Black Friday, but this is just one of several headphone deals we’ve spotted recently. Check those stories out if you’re on the hunt for wireless gaming earbuds or open earbuds.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The Best Phones With an Actual Headphone Jack

Published

on

The Best Phones With an Actual Headphone Jack


If a headphone jack is a must-have on your next phone, Motorola’s Moto G Stylus 5G 2025 strikes the best balance of performance, aesthetics, features, and price. Not only does it have the jack, but it also stores a stylus inside, an embarrassment for any other company that cited space-saving reasons to nix the port. The gorgeous blue vegan leather finish on the back truly makes this phone stand out, putting the Blue Man Group to shame. The performance, powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset, is nice and smooth, and you get a 120-Hz 6.7-inch OLED screen to boot. It’s slim, despite the 5,000-mAh battery, which lasts a full day and then some with average use. And the 50-megapixel main camera is reliable day or night as long as you keep still when tapping the shutter button.

Motorola goes above and beyond, stuffing this phone with twice the amount of typical storage at 256 GB; there’s also a microSD card slot to expand space, wireless charging, and an IP68 rating, so it will survive an accidental drop in the pool. For the first time, Motorola’s also offering two Android OS upgrades on its Moto G phones, meaning you can hold onto it a little longer before it won’t get new features. (You’ll still get 3 years of security updates.) Just remember that mobile phones are heavily discounted during big sale events, so I recommend waiting for a sale.

Motorola has already started launching its 2026 slate of Moto G devices, but the Moto G Stylus 2026 seems to be last on the list. Expect its arrival in the next month or two, which means you may want to wait for the latest and greatest.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Password Managers Share a Hidden Weakness

Published

on

Password Managers Share a Hidden Weakness


An FBI informant helped run the Incognito dark web market and allegedly approved the sale of fentanyl-laced pills, including those from a dealer linked to a confirmed death, WIRED reported this week. Meanwhile, Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Customs and Border Protection officers sparked a Department of Justice probe. Documents say that CBP officers in the US Virgin Islands were still friendly with Epstein years after his 2008 conviction, illustrating the infamous sex offender’s tactics for cultivating allies.

WIRED published a guide detailing experts’ tips and preferred tools for surveillance-resistant organizing and collaboration. In opsec fails, comments and other metadata left on a PDF detailing Homeland Security’s proposal to build “mega” detention and processing centers reveal the DHS personnel involved in the plan’s creation. And the Department of Homeland Security is making moves to combine its face and fingerprint technologies into a centralized, searchable database across all its agencies.

Fears about possible drug cartel drone activity over Texas sparked a recent airspace shutdown in New Mexico and El Paso, Texas, but the episode ultimately underscored the challenges of safely deploying anti-drone weapons near cities. A database left accessible to anyone online contained billions of records, including passwords and Social Security numbers. The situation is far from unique, but it underscores ongoing potential identity-theft risk since it appeared that some of the data has not yet been exploited by criminals.

If you’re looking to make $10,000, the Fulu Foundation—a nonprofit that pays out bounties for removing user-hostile features—is on the hunt for a way to use Ring cameras while preventing them from sending data to Amazon. And the Mexican city of Guadalupe, which will host portions of the 2026 World Cup, will deploy four new robot dogs to help provide security during matches at BBVA Stadium.

But wait, there’s more! Each week, we round up the security and privacy news we didn’t cover in depth ourselves. Click the headlines to read the full stories. And stay safe out there.

We at WIRED have recommended password managers for years. They are, arguably, the only practical and convenient system for creating and implementing unique, sufficiently strong passwords across every online account in your life. But the risk—at least when using cloud-based password managers that back up your credentials and make them accessible across devices—is that the password manager company itself becomes a point of vulnerability. If one of these companies is breached or suffers a data leak, those flaws could expose an untold number of secret credentials.

Password manager companies have responded to those fears with promises of “zero knowledge” systems in which they claim credentials are encrypted so that even they can’t access them in an unencrypted state. But a new study from security researchers at ETH Zurich and USI Lugano shows how frequently those claims are showing cracks—or failing altogether if a malicious insider or hacker is sufficiently skilled at exploiting cryptographic flaws.

The researchers specifically analyzed password managers from Bitwarden, Dashlane, and LastPass—though they warn their findings likely apply to others, too—and found that they could often gain access to users’ credentials. In some cases, they could access users’ entire “vault” of passwords or even gain the ability to write to those vaults at will. The cryptographic vulnerabilities they found varied between password managers and existed only when certain features were enabled, such as the key escrow systems that allow the backup and recovery of passwords. But they also say many of the flaws they found were relatively simple and show the lack of scrutiny around password managers’ “zero knowledge” claims. Read the full research paper here.

Virtually no part of American society, it increasingly seems, has escaped mention in the newly released emails of the late convicted pedophile and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein—including the cybersecurity and technology community represented at the Defcon hacker conference. Defcon this week officially banned three people whose ties to Epstein had come to light in the Justice Department’s incomplete and highly redacted release of documents related to Epstein: cybersecurity entrepreneur Vincent Iozzo—who had already been removed from review board on the website of Black Hat, Defcon’s more corporate sister conference—as well as former MIT Media Lab director Joichi Ito and tech investor Pablos Holman. (A spokesperson for Iozzo said the ban was “performative” and not based on any “wrongdoing,” in a statement to TechCrunch, while Holman and Ito didn’t respond to its requests for comment.) All three men had extensive interactions with Epstein, including long after he was exposed as a sex offender and trafficker both in court and in extensive media reporting.

More than two decades ago, the government domain “freedom.gov” was used for news and “victory” information about the war in Iraq. Since the domain was reregistered on January 12, after years being offline, it has been part of a State Department effort to create an anti-censorship “online portal,” according to a Reuters report this week.

The report says the portal may have been created to “enable people in Europe and elsewhere” to see content banned by their governments, citing hate speech- and terrorism-related content as examples. The website may incorporate VPN technology to get around geolocation blocks. The development of the site, which could help to further fracture differing internet freedom regimes and political tensions between the US and Europe, comes at a time when many US government-funded internet freedom programs have been shut down.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending