Business
‘Marriage penalty’ in Washington state’s new millionaire tax stirs debate
A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
Washington state’s proposed new income tax includes the largest “marriage penalty” in the nation, placing higher taxes on certain couples who file jointly, according to tax experts.
The state House of Representatives approved Washington’s first-ever income tax, imposing a 9.9% tax on income of more than $1 million a year. Having also passed the state Senate, it will now go to the governor, who plans to sign it into law. Washington is currently one of only nine states with no state income tax, and the new rate would be one of the highest in the nation.
While Democratic legislators call it “the millionaire’s tax,” some taxpayers making far less as individuals will also be subject to the tax thanks to a steep marriage penalty. According to the legislation, the $1 million threshold for the tax applies to individuals, couples and domestic partners. So if a married couple each makes $600,000, their combined income of $1.2 million would trigger the tax.
“According to the statute, it doesn’t matter if you’re single or married, the exemption is $1 million,” said Joe Wallin, an attorney who advises companies and tech founders in Washington. “It should be called the half-millionaire tax.”
While marriage penalties are not uncommon in state or federal tax codes, Washington’s stands out for its size. Most states use two income thresholds for tax brackets, one for individuals and another for couples that’s usually twice as high. Some high-tax states, such as California and New York, only apply marriage penalties for the highest earners, according to the Tax Foundation, a nonprofit tax policy think tank.
In New York, for instance, the income thresholds for each bracket are doubled for joint filers through the 9.65% rate, which applies to income above $1,077,550 for single filers and $2,155,350 for joint filers. But for the special millionaire surtax rates of 10.3% and 10.9% — relevant to those making above $5 million and $25 million in income, respectively — the income thresholds are the same for joint and single filers.
In California, bracket thresholds double for joint filers, except for the 1% Mental Health Services Act, which applies to income above $1 million for both single and married filers.
Jared Walczak, senior fellow of the Tax Foundation, said the marriage penalties in New York and California are relatively small, amounting to a 1% tax rate difference in California and a 0.65% difference in New York. In Washington state, however, the difference can be up to 9.9%.
“In the most extreme case, if you had two single filers who both earned exactly $1 million, they would owe $0, but if they married and earned the same income, they would owe $99,000,” he said. “Washington’s marriage penalty will be the largest by far.”
The state’s Democratic lawmakers and governor haven’t specifically addressed concerns about the marriage penalty. State Sen. Noel Frame, who leads fiscal policy for the state Senate Democrats, said the standard deduction of $1 million per household is the same structure used for the state’s capital gains excise tax, passed by voters in 2021.
“As we work to make the two separate tax structures work together, having consistency in the deduction helps with both administration of the tax by our Department of Revenue and simplicity for taxpayers,” she said in a statement. “Since the tax doesn’t apply to income less than $1 million, there are many high-earning couples that still won’t see much of a tax impact even if their combined incomes are more than $1 million.”
Yet in a state that depends on highly skilled, highly paid workers at companies such as Amazon, Microsoft and other tech companies, many dual-income families could get hit with the tax, analysts said.
“There’s this idea that, ‘We’re just taxing rich dudes with yachts,'” said Brian Heywood, a Washington hedge-fund manager who founded Let’s Go Washington, a conservative political action committee opposed to the tax. “They’ve been less than honest with who they’re going after and what the numbers are.”
Wallin joked that some dual-earning couples might even explore a legal divorce for tax reasons, even if they want to stay effectively married. “The tax savings alone would more than pay the costs of a divorce lawyer,” he said.
The marriage penalty is the latest controversy for Washington’s new income tax, which has become a beacon in the Democratic Party’s movement to raise taxes on the wealthy. From Rhode Island and New York to Virginia and Michigan, Democrats in state legislatures are seeking to counteract rising inequality and federal funding cuts to health care by raising taxes on top earners. California is considering a ballot initiative to create the first state wealth tax, taxing the total net worth of the state’s billionaires.
Washington will be a closely watched experiment in the debate over the impact of higher state taxes on wealth migration.
Two of the state’s most celebrated entrepreneurs — Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Howard Schultz of Starbucks — have already left the state for Florida, which has no income tax. Bezos announced his move to Miami in 2023, after the state’s new capital gains tax of 7% took effect. He sold more than $9 billion worth of Amazon stock in 2024, effectively saving over $600 million in capital gains taxes that he would have had to pay to Washington state.
Schultz recently announced that he had moved from Seattle after 44 years. He said his family office will also move to Miami but that his foundation would continue to operate in Seattle.
“It is our hope that Washington will remain a place for business and entrepreneurship to thrive, creating essential opportunity for those in Seattle and the surrounding areas,” he wrote.
Business
Heineken to boost British pubs with £44 million investment before World Cup
Heineken has announced a substantial investment exceeding £44 million into hundreds of its pubs across the UK, a move expected to create approximately 850 jobs.
The Dutch brewing giant’s Star Pubs operation, which manages 2,350 sites nationwide, is undertaking this significant financial commitment despite a challenging period for the pub sector.
The industry has faced considerable pressure over the past year, grappling with escalating labour costs and increases in national insurance contributions.
Concurrently, consumer spending has been constrained by concerns over inflation and rising unemployment, further impacting pub revenues. However, pubs did receive additional business rates support from the government last month, aimed at alleviating some of these financial burdens.
Lawson Mountstevens, managing director of Star Pubs, indicated that the investment strategy is partly designed to bolster revenues and help the group navigate the recent “sustained increases in running costs”.
This year, £44.5 million will be allocated to upgrades for 647 pubs. A notable 108 of these venues are earmarked for particularly significant cash injections, with each transformation costing at least £145,000.
Heineken clarified that while the majority of its pubs are group-owned, they are independently operated by local licensees. A key focus for this investment, particularly in the lead-up to the 2026 football World Cup, will be on sports-focused venues.
The pub firm and brewer has a history of significant investment in British pubs, having pumped £328 million into the sector since 2018. Work has already commenced at 52 locations, including eight projects dedicated to reopening boarded-up pubs that have endured lengthy closures.
Mr Mountstevens also urged the government to reduce the tax burden on pubs, arguing it would ease cost pressures and foster further job creation within the industry.
He stated: “We can only do so much; the root-and-branch reform of business rates that the industry has been calling for over many years is urgently required, as well as a lowering of the burden of taxation on pubs, including VAT and beer duty.”
He concluded with a direct appeal: “We are calling on the Government to support us in bringing out the best in the Great British pub.”
Business
GameStop makes $55.5bn takeover offer for eBay
GameStop’s boss Ryan Cohen says he sees potential to make eBay a much bigger rival to Amazon.
Source link
Business
US denies Iranian report warship was struck by missiles
It comes as the US said on Monday it will begin to help “guide” vessels out of the Strait of Hormuz.
Source link
-
Tech1 week agoA Brain Implant for Depression Is About to Be Tested in Humans
-
Business1 week agoPakistan’s oil market is fuelling the crisis | The Express Tribune
-
Tech1 week agoAlmost 90% of women leave tech industry within 10 years | Computer Weekly
-
Business1 week ago‘I had £20,000 stolen and had to fight a 13-month fraud reporting rule to get it back’
-
Sports7 days agoPro wrestling star Steph De Lander reveals how colleague’s advice helped lead her to title triumph at ACW
-
Entertainment1 week agoNorway joins Type 26 Frigate Programme to boost NATO naval power
-
Entertainment1 week agoMelania Trump says ABC should ‘take a stand’ on late-night host Kimmel
-
Tech7 days agoThis Ambitious Laptop Doesn’t Leave Much Room for Your Hands
