Connect with us

Business

Supreme Court: No personal oral hearing needed before labelling bank accounts as fraud: SC | India News – The Times of India

Published

on

Supreme Court: No personal oral hearing needed before labelling bank accounts as fraud: SC | India News – The Times of India


The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, issued a decision regarding the classification of bank accounts as fraud. The apex court ordered that banks are not obligated to grant customers a personal oral hearing before declaring their accounts as fraud. However, prior to labelling them, banks must provide customers with a forensic audit report.The ruling follows submissions made earlier this year by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and State Bank of India (SBI), which argued that conducting personal hearings in every case would not be feasible given the scale of fraud in the banking system.Earlier, appearing for SBI, solicitor general Tushar Mehta had told the court that the volume of fraud cases has risen sharply, making individual hearings difficult to implement. He said that introducing such a requirement could disrupt the process of identifying and declaring fraudulent accounts.

Poll

Do you agree with the Supreme Court ruling that banks are not obligated to grant personal oral hearings for fraud declarations?

The court was informed that around 60,000 instances of bank fraud were recorded over the past two financial years, involving Rs 48,244 crore. Breaking down the figures, Mehta said there were 36,060 cases in 2023–24 and 23,953 in 2024–25. The amount involved in 2024–25 stood at Rs 36,014 crore, reflecting a 194 per cent increase from Rs 12,230 crore in the previous year.A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and K V Viswanathan had earlier questioned the absence of personal hearings, noting that such a step is generally linked to principles of natural justice. In response, Mehta maintained that banks do not offer personal hearings in these situations, as it may defeat the purpose of the classification process. He added that there could also be circumstances where providing such hearings is not possible.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Iran war upends spring housing market. Here’s what real estate agents are seeing

Published

on

Iran war upends spring housing market. Here’s what real estate agents are seeing


FILE PHOTO: A for sale sign is shown for a residential home in Encinitas, California, U.S. July 25, 2025.

Mike Blake | Reuters

A version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Property Play newsletter with Diana Olick. Property Play covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, from individuals to venture capitalists, private equity funds, family offices, institutional investors and large public companies. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

The all-important spring housing market is well underway, but expectations are falling short due to the war in Iran and its impact on both the U.S. economy and consumer sentiment. 

Mortgage rates, which were previously forecast to be far lower this spring than last, are now much higher, and concerns over employment and inflation are throwing cold water on pent-up homebuyer demand.

Buyers in the first quarter of this year were more concerned about the economy and mortgage rates than they were about home prices, according to real estate agents who participated in the quarterly CNBC Housing Market Survey. 

“They’re fearful of the war, they’re fearful of gas prices, [for] their job security,” said Faith Harmer, an agent in the Las Vegas metropolitan area.

The CNBC Housing Market Survey is a national inquiry of real estate agents selected randomly across the United States. Responses for the first-quarter survey were collected between March 24 and March 30. This quarter, 70 agents shared their insights.

When asked about their buyers’ primary concern, about one-third of agents said the economy, while another third said mortgage rates. The latter marked a big jump from just 26% in the fourth quarter. 

Only 9% of agents in the first-quarter survey said prices were their buyers’ biggest concern, down from 18% in the previous period.

This should come as no surprise, as the average rate on the 30-year fixed mortgage hit a low of 5.99% the day before the Iran war started and then began to climb. It’s now hovering around 6.5%. 

Still, while most agents said prices were either flat or falling, nearly twice as many agents, 29%, reported home prices rising during the first quarter than did in the previous quarter. Price dynamics can vary widely depending on the market and region of the country.

But affordability is not improving as much as most experts had forecast. When asked how affordability was hitting buyers, 19% of agents said it was causing them to get out of the market. That was up from just 11% at the end of last year. 

More than half of agents reported at least one contract cancellation.

“Buyers that were on the fence and deciding to buy are now on the fence and going the other direction, saying, ‘I’m not going to buy,'” said Eric Bramlett, an agent in Austin, Texas.  

As buyer demand drops, homes are sitting on the market longer. In the first quarter, 31% of agents reported that their listings were on the market for more than six weeks, compared with 26% in the fourth quarter.

“We just had one recently where they wanted what they wanted, and they wouldn’t come down to a price that the market could bear,” Harmer, the agent in Las Vegas, said. “So, in the end, they just pulled it off the market.”

Sellers are now more worried about that wait time. Fully 37% of responding agents said time on the market was their sellers’ top concern, compared with 30% at the end of last year. 

That took share from price as sellers’ top concern, falling from nearly half of agents ranking it first to 39%. 

Still, fewer agents reported price cuts than the previous quarter, but that may be the result of seasonal dynamics and the impact of lower mortgage rates in the middle of the first quarter, which gave buyers more purchasing power.

That may also be why fewer agents said they had to delist homes compared with the fourth quarter, when agents reported a slower-than-usual fall market with more frustrated sellers.

Even as concerns over the economy and interest rates rise, agents in the first quarter still said the market was either in the buyer’s favor or balanced. The share that called it a buyer’s market did drop quarter to quarter, from 42% to 36%, likely due to those new buyer headwinds – higher mortgage rates, the war and a weaker job market. And sellers are taking note.

“We’ve had two sellers who were planning on listing in May already decide, ‘Let’s hold, let’s search later in the summer for our next home to buy, and then we’ll try and list in the fall,'” said Dana Bull, an agent in the Boston area. “So they originally thought that the spring would be perfect for them, because it just felt like it was going to be the best time, and now they don’t feel as confident, and they want to wait and see.”

Just over half of agents surveyed said they expect the market to improve as the spring goes on, but that share is way down from the end of last year, when there was no war in the picture. 

A higher share of agents said they expect the market to stay the same as last quarter, which is significant, given that the market is going from the historically slowest season for housing to the usually busiest. 

Get Property Play directly to your inbox

CNBC’s Property Play with Diana Olick covers new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, delivered weekly to your inbox.

Subscribe here to get access today.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Oil prices nudge higher amid caution ahead of Trump’s Iran deadline

Published

on

Oil prices nudge higher amid caution ahead of Trump’s Iran deadline



The price of oil moved higher on Tuesday amid caution from investors ahead of Donald Trump’s deadline for Iran to agree to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

The US president has threatened to launch a major attack on Iranian infrastructure if a ceasefire deal is not reached by 1am UK time on Wednesday.

Global financial markets were tentative ahead of the deadline as a result.

The price of Brent crude oil increased by around 1.5% to 111.4 US dollars a barrel in early trading.

It is around 53% higher than before the conflict started at the end of February, and has resulted in sharp increases in petrol and diesel costs as a result.

Traders are still hopeful a diplomatic breakthrough can be secured but have seen little headway from recent peace talks.

In London, the FTSE 100 opened a touch higher but quickly swung into the red. It was down 0.1% at 10,426.05 points shortly before 9am.

Elsewhere, the German Dax index was down 0.2% while the French Cac 40 was up 0.4% in early trading.

Richard Hunter, head of markets at Interactive Investor, said: “In the immediate term investors are facing a binary event – ceasefire or further escalation of the conflict.

“Asian markets provided little direction overnight, leading to a subdued UK mood although the main indices made cautious progress in opening exchanges.

“The FTSE 250 remains down by 3.4% so far this year, weighed down by a cocktail of domestic economic issues and the more general risk-off approach which has blighted other global markets.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Air India revises fuel surcharge amid energy crunch; here’s how much more you will pay – The Times of India

Published

on

Air India revises fuel surcharge amid energy crunch; here’s how much more you will pay – The Times of India


Aviation giant Air India group on Tuesday revised its fuel surcharge across domestic and international routes, as Middle East tensions continued to weigh oil supplies across the globe. The move follows the decision by the ministry of petroleum & natural gas and the ministry of civil aviation to cap the increase in domestic aviation turbine fuel (atf) prices at 25%. For domestic travel, the airline will replace its existing flat surcharge with a distance-linked structure. The revised domestic surcharge will come into effect from 0901 hrs IST on April 8, 2026, and will apply across the group, including Air India Express flights.As per the latest data released by the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the global average jet fuel price nearly doubled within a month, rising from $99.40 per barrel at the end of February to $195.19 for the week ending March 27, 2026.

Here’s how much more you will pay from Wednesday:

  • Passengers flying up to 500 km will pay an additional Rs 299 per sector.
  • Those travelling between 501 and 1,000 km will be charged Rs 399.
  • Journeys of 1,001 to 1,500 km will attract Rs 549.
  • For distances between 1,501 and 2,000 km, the surcharge will be Rs 749.
  • The surcharge will further increase to Rs 899 for sectors beyond 2,000 km.

On the international front, the airline has introduced steeper revisions, citing the lack of similar price controls on ATF. Effective from 0901 hrs IST on April 8, 2026, passengers flying to SAARC destinations (excluding Bangladesh) will pay a surcharge of $24 per sector. Charges for the Middle East have been set at $50, while routes to China and Southeast Asia (excluding Singapore) will attract $100. The surcharge for Singapore stands at $60, and for Africa at $130.For flights to Europe, including the United Kingdom, the surcharge has been fixed at $205. Meanwhile, passengers travelling to North America and Australia will be charged $280 per sector, with these rates taking effect from 0001 hrs IST on April 10, 2026.

Why Air India introduced the surcharge?

The airline pointed out that the increase is not limited to crude oil prices alone. Refinery margins, referred to as ‘crack spread’, have also surged sharply, climbing from $27.83 per barrel for the week ending February 27 to $81.44 by March 27. This combination has intensified cost pressures for airlines worldwide. Air India stated that even after the revision, the updated international fuel surcharge does not fully offset the rise in fuel costs, and a substantial portion continues to be absorbed by the airline. The airline added that revisions for flights to and from Bangladesh, along with Far East destinations such as Japan, Hong Kong and South Korea, will be announced later, subject to regulatory approvals. Air India clarified that tickets issued before the revised timelines will not be subject to the new surcharge unless passengers make changes to their travel plans that require a recalculation of fares.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending