Connect with us

Business

What a United-American merger would mean, from antitrust hurdles to airfare

Published

on

What a United-American merger would mean, from antitrust hurdles to airfare


American Airlines and United Airlines airplanes at the Terminal A at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) in Newark, New Jersey, US, on Thursday, Jan. 12, 2023.

Aristide Economopoulos | Bloomberg | Getty Images

United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby reportedly floated the idea of a potential tie-up with rival American Airlines to the Trump administration earlier this year, a suggestion that if acted upon, would create the world’s largest airline.

While the Trump administration has appeared more open to mega deals than its predecessors, such a merger would face heavy regulatory scrutiny with the top four airlines (those two carriers, plus Delta Air Lines and Southwest Airlines) already dominating about 80% of domestic capacity. If they combined, American and United would have a roughly 40% domestic share, according to airline data firm OAG.

“This would be the biggest of all time. I can’t even see the slightest chance that a court would allow it,” said George Hay, a law professor at Cornell University.

American and United declined to comment on the discussion of a merger, which was reported Monday by Bloomberg. The White House didn’t immediately comment on the reported discussion.

American shares rose 8% Tuesday, but are still down more than 20% since the start of the year. United’s shares rose just over 2%, trimming its losses this year to about 13%.

Seaport Research Partners airline analyst Daniel McKenzie said he attributed the stock move “to short covering rather than the market assigning legitimacy to the merger idea.” He added that the deal would be “be dead on arrival, though politely reviewed until the public backlash became too deafening.”

If the Justice Department “doesn’t object to that, then what would they object to? It is very hard to imagine a deal of that magnitude and concentration going through,” said Samuel Engel, senior vice president at consulting firm ICF.

He said consolidation allows carriers to better control capacity, which in turn can drive up fares, a key consideration generally with antitrust investigations

An American-United merger would likely require significant divestitures on routes where the two carriers’ combining would mean only one or two airlines are serving that route, said TD Cowen airline analyst Tom Fitzgerald, who said 289 routes fit that criteria now.

The Trump administration has shown a warmth toward mergers in the industry, however.

“Is there room for some mergers in the aviation industry? Yeah, I think there is,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy told CNBC’s Phil LeBeau last week, regarding industry consolidation. Duffy said President Donald Trump “loves to see big deals happen, adding that he would “have to review” a tie-up.

The deals chatter comes as the airline industry is facing a profit-eating surge in jet-fuel costs, airlines’ biggest expense after labor.

Airlines are cutting their capacity plans to save on costs, which could further drive up airfare.

“Over my career, I’ve seen many periods of disruption in this industry. And time and again, high fuel prices have been the most powerful catalyst for change, separating the winners and forcing weaker players to rationalize, consolidate or be eliminated, Delta CEO Ed Bastian said on an earnings call last week. “Delta is navigating from an advantaged position.”

Delta completed its merger with Northwest Airlines in 2008, giving it an advantage over other carriers that completed mergers later. The modern American Airlines is the product of a 2013 combination with US Airways, which was where several current airline executives worked, including both United’s Kirby and American CEO Robert Isom.

Kirby, whom American fired in 2016, has gone head-to-head with his former employer, including in key markets like Chicago.

Transportation Sec. Duffy: There's room for airline mergers in the U.S.

Delta and United already account for most of the U.S. industry’s profit.

American had fallen behind both airlines as it struggled to capitalize on higher-spending customers who are driving major airlines’ revenue in recent years. American’s net income was $111 million, on sales of $54.6 billion, last year while United reported net income of $3.35 billion, on $59 billion in sales, according to company filings.

The Biden administration challenged two major airline tie-ups, and won. A federal judge knocked down American’s partnership with JetBlue Airways in the Northeast in 2023 and in early 2024, a court ruled against JetBlue’s planned acquisition of Spirit Airlines, which is now in its second bankruptcy.

JetBlue and United formed a partnership that allows customers to book on each other’s airlines but falls short of the schedule coordination under that failed American deal. Kirby has expressed hesitation about taking that deal further.

“I like the partnership with JetBlue,” Kirby said in Boston last month. “I think highly of their team. They’ve got the right DNA and culture, but … we’re doing a great job growing. I feel really good about our standalone.

“Mergers are big and hard and complicated,” he added.

Read more CNBC airline news

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Business

Scams have grown more sophisticated, but people are fighting back

Published

on

Scams have grown more sophisticated, but people are fighting back


As governments across the world restricted the movements of their citizens during Covid lockdowns from 2020, people spent more time online. We bought more online and socialised more online, and this brought us closer to the people who want to scam us. At the same time, realistic video impersonations, voices, websites, and texts became more commonplace, and scammers increased their use of social media including WhatsApp.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

NaBFID signs pact with PDCOR to expand advisory support for state projects – The Times of India

Published

on

NaBFID signs pact with PDCOR to expand advisory support for state projects – The Times of India


The National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID) has signed a Memorandum of Agreement with Projects Development Company of Rajasthan Limited (PDCOR) to strengthen advisory services for state and city-level infrastructure projects.The agreement will also allow both institutions to jointly explore financing and transaction advisory opportunities, including transaction structuring, commercial and technical due diligence, and support for financial closure of projects undertaken by state governments and urban local bodies across India, according to PTI.“This collaboration seeks to enhance access to long-term institutional finance for State Governments and Urban Local Bodies, while strengthening the infrastructure advisory and financing ecosystem,” Rajkiran Rai G., Managing Director of NaBFID, said.He added that the partnership would help both institutions jointly pursue project advisory opportunities, develop replicable financing frameworks, accelerate financial closures and mobilise capital across the infrastructure value chain.Monika Kalia, DMD-CFO, NaBFID, said the tie-up would leverage the strengths of both organisations to provide much-needed advisory support to states and urban local bodies for impactful urban infrastructure projects.Dileep Chingapurath, Chief Executive Officer, PDCOR, said the agreement would address the long-felt need for end-to-end professional support to structure and mobilise sustainable financing solutions, particularly for state governments and their agencies.“Through this collaboration, both institutions aim to enhance the quality of project preparation, mobilise institutional capital more effectively and accelerate the implementation of sustainable infrastructure projects across states and municipalities,” he said.NaBFID is a Development Financial Institution focused on long-term infrastructure financing, while PDCOR is an undertaking of the Government of Rajasthan.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream – The Times of India

Published

on

Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream – The Times of India


While India will be the sixth largest economy in FY27, it is likely to overtake both the UK, and Japan to bag the fourth spot in FY28. (AI image)

In April 2025 when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released its World Economic Outlook, India was seen overtaking Japan to become the world’s fourth largest economy by the end of 2025-26. One year later, India has slipped to the sixth position on the largest economies rankings, with the United Kingdom reclaiming its spot as the fifth largest economy.In fact, IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook (April 2026) sees India sitting at the sixth spot this financial year too. This projection comes even as India has grown better than expected in FY26 and is seen retaining its tag of being the world’s fastest growing major economy.What has led to the sudden fall? Why has India dropped to the sixth position, falling behind the UK, instead of overtaking Japan to become the fourth largest economy? And what does this setback mean for its dream of becoming the third largest economy by the end of this decade? We decode:

Data drive: India projected as 4th largest, but fell to 6th spot

First let’s look at some IMF data to see which way the Indian economy was headed in April 2025, and what the April 2026 outlook data suggestsAs per April 2025 estimates of IMF, India’s economy would have been at $4601.225 billion at the end of FY 2025-26, overtaking Japan which was estimated at $4373.091 billion. The UK at the 6th spot was projected to have a nominal GDP of $4040.844 billion.However, as per the April 2026 estimates, India’s economy had a nominal GDP of $4,153 billion at the end of FY 2025-26, with the UK overtaking it with $4,265 billion GDP. Japan’s GDP is seen at $4,379 billion.As the above estimates show, India’s GDP estimates have seen a drop over one year, while UK’s nominal GDP has grown better than expected. Japan has been steady.So, what went wrong? Blame the rupee and GDP data itself!

Rupee Depreciation Blow & New GDP Series

The first thing to understand is that IMF’s data on the size of a country’s nominal GDP is in dollar terms. Hence, with global rankings based on dollar‑denominated GDP, they are highly sensitive to exchange rate movements. The biggest party pooper for India’s dream of becoming the fourth largest has been the rupee’s slide. The Indian currency has depreciated more than expected over the last year, dropping from 84.57 versus the US dollar in 2024 to 88.48 in 2025, as per IMF data. The IMF estimates see it at 92.59 this year.Several factors have contributed to the rupee’s decline, including capital outflows, uncertainty related to India-US trade deal up until February, and the recent Middle East conflict which has raised crude oil prices and India’s import bill. Also, the RBI while actively managing volatility in the forex market, is not targeting any particular level of the rupee.Arun Singh, Chief Economist, Dun & Bradstreet India says that India’s recent slip to sixth place in global GDP rankings does not reflect a weakening of the economy, but is largely the result of currency conversion effects and a one‑time statistical revision.The rupee’s depreciation from 2024 to 2026, has mechanically compressed India’s GDP in dollar terms, effectively halving apparent growth despite strong domestic expansion, says Arun Singh.According to Ranen Banerjee, Partner and Leader, Economic Advisory Services, PwC India, GDP in US dollar terms would shave off with rupee depreciation. “We have had almost 7-8% depreciation over the last few months owing to the conflict and portfolio outflows. Thus, in effect in US dollar terms, it is close to shaving out almost a year’s nominal GDP,” he tells TOI.And it’s not just about the Indian economy. The United Kingdom which has overtaken India to bag the 5th spot again also has economic factors working in its favour. UK’s GDP growth at 0.5% has recently beaten forecasts of 0.1% by a wide margin. Not only that, its currency – pound – has actually appreciated against the US dollar.The second factor that has impacted the rankings is India’s adoption of a new base year for its latest GDP series. As per the new data, which also makes use of a more refined methodology, the size of India’s nominal GDP in rupee terms has gone down. Sample this: As per the older base year of 2011-12, India’s GDP at the end of 2025-26 would have been Rs 35,713,886 crore. But under the new series, it is estimated to be Rs 34,547,157 crore. The new calculation methodology and base year revision presents a more accurate picture of the size of the Indian economy.Hence the currency effect has been compounded by a one‑time downward revision following India’s shift to a new GDP base year, which has lowered reported nominal levels without affecting real activity.

New GDP Series: Top 10 Points To Know

Does India’s drop to 6th indicate fundamental weakness?

Experts are confident that India’s growth story is intact and fundamentally strong, a fact that is reflected in projections of it continuing to be the world’s fastest growing major economy. They see technical factors behind the current slip, rather than any deterioration in economic fundamentals.It’s also interesting to note that while India will be the sixth largest economy in FY27, in the upcoming financial year, it is likely to overtake both the UK, and Japan to bag the fourth spot.Arun Singh of Dun & Bradstreet India explains this resilience with numbers:IMF World Economic Outlook (April 2026) data show that India’s GDP at current prices in domestic currency rose strongly from ₹318 trillion in 2024 to ₹346.5 trillion in 2025 and further to ₹384.5 trillion in 2026, translating into robust nominal growth of about 8.9% in 2024–25 and nearly 11% in 2025–26, among the fastest globally. In contrast, other large economies recorded more moderate domestic nominal growth – around 5% in the US, roughly 4% in China, 3–5% in the UK, 3–3.5% in Germany, and lower or volatile growth in Japan – underscoring India’s strong underlying momentum. In times of global economic turmoil, while GDP growth is expected to take some hit, most agencies and experts have pegged India’s growth to be strong. Incidentally, the IMF has even marginally raised its GDP growth forecast for FY27 to 6.5% despite the ongoing Middle East conflict.

IMF World Economic Outlook –  Growth Projections

“In India, growth for 2025 is revised upward by 1.0 percentage point relative to October, to 7.6 percent, reflecting the better-than-expected outturn in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year and sustained strong momentum in the fourth quarter,” IMF said in its latest outlook. “For 2026, growth is revised upward moderately by 0.3 percentage point (0.1 percentage point relative to January) to 6.5 percent, led by positive contributions from the carryover of the strong 2025 outturn and the decline in additional US tariffs on Indian goods from 50 to 10 percent, which outweigh the adverse impact of the Middle East conflict. Growth is projected to stay at 6.5 percent in 2027,” it added.

Will India become 3rd largest anytime soon?

The rupee depreciation and the nominal GDP revision has also pushed back India’s dream of becoming the third largest economy by the end of this decade. In the October 2025 estimates, IMF had said that India will overtake Germany to become third largest by FY30. However, the April 2026 projections see it reaching the third rank only by FY 2030-31.Experts point to the rupee’s depreciation versus the dollar to note that the road ahead is likely to be uncertain. Madan Sabnavis, Chief economist, Bank of Baroda is confident that India will continue to do well in the coming years.“We will definitely improve in terms of GDP growth which will be higher than that of other countries especially UK and Japan which are just above us. However, the rupee value will finally determine how India gets placed on the global scale,” he told TOI.Ranen Banerjee of PwC India sees rupee beginning to get support with the conflict containment, relatively lower oil prices and portfolio flow reversals with valuations getting attractive in recent times. “Thus, we should not be experiencing any further sharp depreciation of the rupee in the immediate term provided the conflict does not escalate and oil prices relatively softening from their highs and come down to a range of $85-90 a barrel,” he says.For Arun Singh of Dun & Bradstreet, looking ahead, India’s relative position in US dollar‑based GDP rankings will remain highly sensitive to currency movements rather than domestic growth dynamics. “Continued global dollar strength or capital‑flow volatility may cause periodic slippage in rankings despite robust fundamentals. Sustaining external macro stability and limiting undue rupee volatility will be crucial for India’s strong growth performance to translate more fully into higher global economic rankings,” Arun Singh told TOI.The Indian economy, largely driven by domestic fundamentals, is not immune to external shocks. High US tariffs of 50% from August 2025 to early February, and the ongoing US-Iran war have spelt back-to-back shocks for the economy. Even as experts stress on the resilience of the growth story, the vulnerability to higher crude oil prices, and other global supply chain disruptions is a reality. In such a scenario, India may well have to contend with fluctuating world rankings, while banking on its strong GDP growth to tide over disruptions.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending