Connect with us

Entertainment

Reese Witherspoon breaks silence after AI support controversy

Published

on

Reese Witherspoon breaks silence after AI support controversy


Reese Witherspoon breaks silence after AI support controversy

Reese Witherspoon has broken her silence following a wave of criticism over her support for artificial intelligence, insisting that she is not being paid to promote the technology. 

Taking to Instagram on Tuesday, the Morning Show star addressed the backlash that followed her recent “AI revolution” post, clarifying that her interest stems from being a “curious human” rather than a corporate spokesperson. 

While acknowledging that her original comments certainly got people talking, she noted that her children are already learning about these tools and that she is seeing AI impact every sector of business, from “vibe coding” founders to traditional industries.

The Oscar-winning actress had previously sparked controversy by warning that women were 25 percent less likely to use AI than men, despite their jobs being three times more likely to be automated. 

This prompted a fierce reaction from followers who raised concerns about intellectual property theft, the environmental impact of data centres, and the potential for computers to replace human creativity. 

In her latest response, Witherspoon admitted these concerns are valid, stating she understands the worries regarding job security and the environment. 

She also expressed her own reservations about the rise of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), making it clear she does not believe computers should ever replace humanity.

Despite the pushback, Witherspoon remains committed to her “learn along with me” approach, viewing the technological shift as an inevitability for the future of filmmaking. 

She previously told Glamour that while people can lament the change, it is already here, though she believes physical manual building and human ingenuity will always remain the highest forms of art. 

The actress even shared a few of the specific tools she currently uses, including AI Assistant, the search platform Perplexity, and the shopping agent Vetted AI, as part of her effort to stay educated.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

Lexie Brown denies Klay Thompson cheated on Megan Thee Stallion with her

Published

on

Lexie Brown denies Klay Thompson cheated on Megan Thee Stallion with her


The rapper accused the NBA star of ‘horrible’ behaviour throughout their near-one-year relationship 

A WNBA star is setting the record straight about her rumoured involvement in Megan Thee Stallion and Klay Thompson’s breakup.

Seattle Storm Guard Lexie Brown has shut down rumours that she was the woman with whom Thompson allegedly cheated on the Grammy-winning rapper.

“I’ve seen what’s being said online, and I want to be clear, none of it is true, and I have no involvement in this situation,” Brown, 31, wrote on her Instagram Stories on Sunday, April 26.

The basketball pro added, “This week marks the start of an important and exciting new season for me, and my focus is fully on that.”

Lexie Brown denies Klay Thompson cheated on Megan Thee Stallion with her

Brown’s clarification came amid a viral claim that she had a part to play in the shocking break-up, which came to light over the weekend.

On Saturday, April 25, Megan Thee Stallion — real name Megan Jovon Ruth Pete — announced that she broke up with the NBA star due to his alleged unfaithfulness and inability to commit to her despite being together for almost a year.

“Cheating, had me around your whole family playing house… got ‘cold feet,’” Megan wrote on her Instagram Stories. “Holding you down through all your HORRIBLE mood swings and treatment towards me during your basketball season now you don’t know if you can be ‘monogamous’????” added Megan.

Shortly afterwards, X user @Areyoudvmb alleged that Brown has been “posting on her close friends messages between Klay and her that Klay was telling her his and Megan’s relationship is just for social media.” 





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Prince Harry stirs new debate at Palace with bold move: ‘walking liability’

Published

on

Prince Harry stirs new debate at Palace with bold move: ‘walking liability’


Prince Harry stirs new debate at Palace with bold move: ‘walking liability’

Prince Harry may have not realised the consequences of his words that could have caused some trouble for his father King Charles, who is en route to America for the much-anticipated State Visit for the UK.

It is a long-held tradition for the members of the royal families to maintain a diplomatic stance and not explicitly share their political views in public. Even though the Duke of Sussex is no longer a working member of the royal family, he remains the King’s second son, which means his words holds an impact.

Harry’s speech at the Kyiv Security Forum had sent a message to the United States to “honour its international treaty obligations” given its role in global security. Trump has dismissed the comments when they were brought up, stating that Harry “doesn’t speak for the royals”.

However, experts have urged Harry to practice prudence in sensitive matters and not insert himself in serious geopolitical matters.

“Prince Harry’s Ukraine commentary is a jaw-dropping display of a lack of self-perception that demands a reality check,” royal and foreign policy commentator Lee Cohen told Daily Express.

“Those tied to the Crown—working or otherwise—simply do not wade into partisan geopolitics. Yet here is a man who represents no government or institution, spotlighting himself amid a war, all while clinging to the royal associations that he rejected.”

The expert noted that Harry is turning into a “walking liability” for the royals and it could possibly force the Palace or Parliament to take the necessary action in order to “prevent further damage”.





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Iran proposes deal to reopen Strait of Hormuz, defer nuclear talks: report

Published

on

Iran proposes deal to reopen Strait of Hormuz, defer nuclear talks: report


Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Field Marshal Asim Munir welcome Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi upon his arrival, in Rawalpindi, April 25, 2026. — Reuters 
  • Araghchi ‘raised plan’ to defer nuclear talks in Islamabad meetings.
  • Tells mediators no consensus how to address American demands.
  • Ceasefire can be extended or converted into permanent end to war: proposal.

Iran, through Pakistani mediators, has offered a new proposal on reopening the Strait of Hormuz and ending the war, with nuclear negotiations postponed for a later stage, US media outlet Axios reported, citing an American official and two sources with knowledge of the matter.

Hopes of reviving peace efforts receded on Saturday when US President Donald Trump scrapped a visit to Islamabad by his envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi shuttled to and from mediators Pakistan and Oman on Sunday before flying to Russia, with the two sides still seemingly far apart on issues including Iran’s nuclear ambitions and access through the crucial Strait of Hormuz.

Trump said Iran could telephone if it wants to negotiate an end to their two-month war.

“If they want to talk, they can come to us, or they can call us. You know, there is a telephone. We have nice, secure lines,” Trump told “The Sunday Briefing” on Fox News.

“They know what has to be in the agreement. It’s very simple: They cannot have a nuclear weapon; otherwise, there’s no reason to meet,” Trump said.

Iran has long demanded Washington acknowledge its right to enrich uranium, which Tehran says it only seeks for peaceful purposes, but which Western powers say is aimed at building nuclear weapons.

Although a ceasefire has paused full‑scale fighting in the conflict, which began with US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, no agreement has been reached on terms to end a war that has killed thousands, driven up oil prices, fuelled inflation and darkened the outlook for global growth.

Axios, while citing two sources with knowledge, reported that the Iranian foreign minister raised the plan to bypass the nuclear issue during his meetings in Islamabad.

According to one of the sources, Araghchi made it clear to the Pakistani, Egyptian, Turkish and Qatari mediators over the weekend that there’s no consensus inside the Iranian leadership about how to address the US demands.

Under the proposal, Axios reported, the immediate focus would be on reopening the strait and lifting the blockade before moving to broader negotiations.

As part of this framework, the existing ceasefire would either be extended for a prolonged period or converted into a permanent end to the war, the sources said.

The proposal envisages that negotiations on the nuclear issue would begin only at a later stage, after maritime access is restored and blockade-related concerns are addressed.

The White House has received the proposal, though it remains unclear whether Washington is prepared to consider or pursue the framework.

“These are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the US will not negotiate through the press. As the president has said, the United States holds the cards and will only make a deal that puts the American people first, never allowing Iran to have a nuclear weapon,” White House spokesperson Olivia Wales told Axios.

With his approval ratings falling, Trump faces domestic pressure to end the unpopular war. Iran’s leaders, though weakened militarily, have found leverage in negotiations with their ability to stop shipping in the strait, which normally carries a fifth of global oil shipments.

Tehran has largely closed the strait while Washington has imposed a blockade of Iranian ports.

US and Iran’s extensive disagreements

Disagreements between the US and Iran extend beyond Tehran’s nuclear programme and control of the strait.

Trump wants to limit Iran’s support for its regional proxies, including Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, and curb its ability to strike U.S. allies with ballistic missiles. Iran wants a lifting of sanctions and an end to Israeli attacks on Hezbollah.

In Lebanon, Israeli strikes killed 14 people and wounded 37 on Sunday, the health ministry said. The Israeli military warned residents to leave seven towns beyond the “buffer zone” it occupied before a ceasefire that has failed to fully halt hostilities.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending