Politics
Iran says its proposal was generous as US insists on ‘unreasonable demands’

Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei says Iran’s proposal for ending the recent war was reasonable, as the United States continues to insist on “unreasonable demands” shaped by the Israeli regime.
Speaking at his weekly press briefing on Monday, Baghaei responded to questions regarding the reaction of the US administration to Iran’s proposal.
“We did not demand any concessions. The only thing we have demanded is Iran’s legitimate rights,” Baghaei said.
Is it unreasonable for Iran to demand an end to the war in the region, a halt to maritime piracy against Iranian ships, and the release of assets belonging to the Iranian people that have been unjustly blocked for years, Baghaei asked.
“Is our proposal for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz unreasonable? Is establishing peace and security across the entire region irresponsible?” Baghaei said.
“Everything we proposed in the plan was reasonable and generous, and it is for the good of the region and the world,” he further said.
He expressed regret that the American side, based on a mindset shaped by the Israeli regime, continues to insist on unreasonable demands.
Baghaei added that all of Iran’s points were supposed to be discussed, but the US side has so far refused to engage with them in good faith.
US President Donald Trump reacted angrily to Tehran’s formal response to the American side, calling it “completely unacceptable.”
Trump also told Axios in an interview that he has discussed Iran’s response with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Islamic Republic of Iran submitted its response to the American side’s proposed text earlier on Sunday.
Tehran has repeatedly emphasized that at this stage, negotiations will only focus on ending the war in the region.
Iran proven a responsible, anti-bully power in region
Regarding the US accusations against Iran, Baghaei said, Iran has proven to be a responsible power in the region, and at the same time, it is anti-bullying.
“It is enough to look at Iran’s record. Were we the ones who deployed troops? Are we the ones bullying countries in the Western Hemisphere? Were we the ones who committed assassinations twice during negotiations?” he added.
He further noted that the very presence of the US in the region is itself an example of creating a cycle of violence.
Iran in contact with China as strategic partner
Regarding Trump’s trip to China, Baghaei said, Trump’s China trip is a bilateral matter and is their own business.
“We are in contact with China as a strategic partner. Our foreign minister traveled to China, and the Chinese are aware of our positions,” he stressed.
According to Baghaei, China knows that the US-Israeli aggression against Iran is not merely an incident but rather part of a global process to escalate unilateralism by the United States.
“Security in the Persian Gulf and West Asia is as important to China as it is to us,” he said, adding that Chinese friends certainly know how to use opportunities to warn against lawlessness.
Europeans should not fall into US-Israeli temptations
Regarding the approach of some European countries to send naval vessels to the region, Baghaei said, “We have conveyed very clearly that Europe should not allow the temptations of the US and the Israeli regime to unintentionally drag them into a crisis from which they will gain nothing.”
He added that European countries should not allow US pressures to become, at least openly, part of actions against international peace and security.
He further stated that any country believing in responsible behavior regarding international peace and security should direct pressure toward the party that disrupted navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.
Bahrain’s citizenship revocations in violation of human rights
In response to the revocation of citizenship of Bahraini citizens on the pretext of sympathizing with Iran, Baghaei said, the actions that Bahrain has taken in the past two months against those who have shown sympathy with Iran constitute a flagrant violation of human rights.
He reiterated that the revocation of citizenship is “a medieval punishment that has been obsolete for years and is contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.”
“We have clearly stated our positions in line with respecting human dignity, and Bahrain’s actions are against human rights,” he emphasized.
Politics
Mahmood, Lammy among senior ministers urging UK PM Starmer to weigh exit: report

- More than 60 Labour MPs reportedly call on UK PM to step down.
- Four govt aides resign amid growing pressure on Starmer leadership.
- PM vows to “prove doubters wrong” after disastrous local election losses.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been told by UK Interior Minister Shabana Mahmood, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy, and a myriad of other senior cabinet ministers to consider setting out a timeline for his departure, The Times newspaper reported on Monday.
The statement comes as pressure continues to mount on Starmer following disastrous local and regional election results for the ruling Labour Party.
The report came as Starmer vowed to prove his doubters wrong and resist growing calls to step down after Labour suffered heavy losses in local and regional elections.
More than 60 of Labour’s 403 MPs reportedly asked him to quit, unconvinced by his pledge to make the party “bolder and better” in response to voter frustration over the pace of change.
The rebels included four government aides who resigned from their posts.
Joe Morris, who served as parliamentary private secretary to Health Secretary Wes Streeting, wrote on X that it was “now clear that the prime minister no longer has the trust or confidence of the public to lead this change”.
Another aide, Tom Rutland, who worked for Environment Secretary Emma Reynolds, said Starmer had “lost authority” among Labour MPs and “will not be able to regain it”.
Melanie Ward, an assistant to Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy, also called for a leadership change.
“Keir Starmer did important work to change the Labour Party, and governing in a time like this will never be easy,” she wrote on X.
“But the message from last week’s elections was clear; the Prime Minister has lost the confidence of the public to lead this change.”
Cabinet Office aide Naushabah Khan, who also resigned, said: “I am calling for new leadership so that we can rebuild trust and deliver the better future that the British people voted for.”
Under Labour Party rules, any challenger would need the backing of 81 MPs — 20% of the parliamentary party — to trigger a leadership contest.
Such a move, however, could open a damaging internal struggle between Labour’s left and right factions over a successor.
Starmer, 63, came to power in July 2024 after a landslide election victory ended 14 years of Conservative rule marked by austerity, Brexit infighting and criticism over the government’s Covid response.
But his premiership has been dogged by policy missteps and controversy, including fallout over the appointment and later dismissal of Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to Washington after reports linked him to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.
While Starmer has struggled to revive economic growth and ease cost-of-living pressures, he has drawn praise for resisting US President Donald Trump over Iran.
Labour’s poor showing in last week’s elections saw major gains for the hard-right Reform UK and the left-wing Greens at Labour’s expense.
The party also lost control of the devolved Welsh parliament to Plaid Cymru for the first time since its establishment in 1999 and failed to recover ground against the Scottish National Party in Scotland.
In a major speech on Monday, Starmer acknowledged public frustration with politics, the state of the country and his own leadership.
“I know I have my doubters, and I know I need to prove them wrong, and I will,” he said.
He promised “a bigger response” rather than “incremental change” on issues including economic growth, closer European ties and energy policy.
Starmer also pledged to fully nationalise British Steel and said Brexit had left Britain “poorer, weaker and less secure”.
He attacked Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as a “chancer” and “grifter” whose pro-Brexit campaign had taken Britain “for a ride”.
“If we don’t get this right our country will go down a very dark path,” he warned.
After the speech, Labour MP Catherine West, who had earlier threatened to trigger a leadership challenge, said she was instead gathering names of MPs who wanted Starmer to announce a timetable for electing a new leader in September.
Starmer vowed to fight any challenge and warned Labour would “never be forgiven” if it repeated the “chaos” of recent Conservative governments, which saw five prime ministers since 2010, including three in four months during 2022.
Health Secretary Streeting and former deputy prime minister Angela Rayner have long been seen as possible challengers, though neither commands universal support inside Labour.
Rayner, while stopping short of demanding Starmer’s resignation, said in a speech on Monday: “What we are doing isn’t working, and it needs to change.”
Politics
Trump says Iran ceasefire on ‘life support’ after rejecting Tehran’s response

- Trump dismisses Tehran’s proposal as “stupid”.
- Says he didn’t even finish reading Iran’s response.
- Iran willing to give US “the nuclear dust”: Trump.
US President Donald Trump on Monday said that a ceasefire with Iran was “on life support” after he rejected Tehran’s response to a US peace proposal, fuelling concerns of a resumption of hostilities in the 10-week-old conflict that has killed thousands and halted vital energy flows.
Days after Washington floated a proposal aimed at reopening negotiations, Iran on Sunday released a response focused on ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, where US ally Israel is fighting Iran-backed Hezbollah.
The response had been swiftly rejected by Trump.
Asked where the Pakistan-brokered ceasefire stands, Trump told reporters: “I would call it the weakest right now, after reading that piece of garbage they sent us. I didn’t even finish reading it.”
In its response, Tehran also demanded compensation for war damage, emphasised its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, and called on the US to end its naval blockade, guarantee no further attacks, lift sanctions and remove a ban on Iranian oil sales.
The US had proposed an end to fighting before starting talks on more contentious issues, including Iran’s nuclear programme.
Tehran defended its stance on Monday.
“Our demand is legitimate: demanding an end to the war, lifting the (US) blockade and piracy, and releasing Iranian assets that have been unjustly frozen in banks due to US pressure,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said.
“Safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz and establishing security in the region and Lebanon were other demands of Iran, which are considered a generous and responsible offer.”
Brent crude oil futures traded 2.7% higher at around $104 a barrel, as the deadlock left the Strait of Hormuz largely closed.
Before the war began on February 28, the narrow waterway carried one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas, and has since become a central pressure point in the conflict.
Disruption caused by the near-closure of the strait has forced oil producers to cut exports, and Opec oil output dropped further in April to the lowest in more than two decades, a Reuters survey showed on Monday.
Trickle of shipping through Hormuz
Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz is at a trickle compared with before the war. Shipping data on Kpler and LSEG showed that three tankers laden with crude exited the waterway last week, with trackers switched off to avoid Iranian attack.
Sporadic flare-ups around the strait in recent days have tested a ceasefire that has paused all-out warfare since it took effect in early April.
In the United States, surveys show the war is unpopular with voters facing sharply higher gasoline prices less than six months before nationwide elections that will determine whether Trump’s Republican Party retains control of Congress.
Washington has also struggled to build international support, with Nato allies refusing to send ships to reopen the waterway without a full peace deal and an internationally mandated mission.
Hakan Fidan, the foreign minister of Turkiye, which has been liaising closely with the US, Iran and mediator Pakistan since the start of the war, will hold talks in Qatar on Tuesday on the conflict and on ensuring navigational safety in the strait, a Turkish diplomatic source said.
Trump to discuss Iran in Beijing
The next diplomatic or military steps remain unclear. Trump is expected to arrive in Beijing on Wednesday, where Iran is set to be among the topics discussed with Chinese President Xi Jinping.
Trump has been leaning on China to use its influence to push Tehran towards a deal with Washington.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Baghaei suggested China could instead use the visit to push back against US objectives in the Gulf.
“Our Chinese friends know very well how to use these opportunities to warn about the consequences of the US’s illegal and bullying actions on regional peace and security,” he said.
Addressing whether combat operations against Iran were over, Trump said in remarks aired on Sunday: “They are defeated, but that doesn’t mean they’re done.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the war was not over because there was “more work to be done” to remove enriched uranium from Iran, dismantle enrichment facilities and address its alleged proxy forces and ballistic missile capabilities.
Netanyahu told CBS News‘ “60 Minutes” that the preferred route was diplomacy, but he did not rule out the use of force.
Clashes have also continued in southern Lebanon between Israel and Hezbollah, despite a US-brokered ceasefire announced on April 16.
Politics
Tens of millions risk hunger as Hormuz standoff blocks fertiliser, says UN official

Tens of millions of people could face hunger and starvation if fertilisers are not soon allowed through the Strait of Hormuz, the head of a UN task force aimed at averting a looming humanitarian crisis told AFP on Monday.
Iran has had the strategic waterway — through which a third of the world’s fertilisers normally pass — in a chokehold for months in retaliation for the war launched by the United States and Israel on February 28, disrupting a trade critical for farmers around the world in a race against the end of planting seasons.
“We have a few weeks ahead of us to prevent what will likely be a massive humanitarian crisis,” Jorge Moreira da Silva, executive director of the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) and leader of the task force, told AFP in an interview in Paris.
“We may witness a crisis that will force 45 million more people into hunger and starvation.”
The UN secretary general created the task force in March to spearhead a mechanism to allow fertilisers and related raw materials such as ammonia, sulphur and urea through the strait.
For weeks, Moreira da Silva has been working to convince the belligerent parties to allow even a few ships through, and has met with “more than 100 countries” to rally UN member state support around the mechanism.
A growing number of countries are showing support for the plan, he said, but the United States and Iran, as well as Gulf countries — who are key fertiliser producers, are not yet fully on board.
While the ultimate hope is for a “lasting peace” deal in the region and “freedom of navigation for all commodities” through the strait, “the problem is the planting season can’t wait”, Moreira da Silva said, with some ending in African nations within weeks.
Global focus has been on the economic impacts of the throttled oil and gas trade, but the United Nations has been sounding the alarm of the threat the blockade poses to the world’s food security, with countries in Africa and Asia likely to be particularly hard hit.
‘Political will’
Moreira da Silva said the United Nations could have the mechanism up and running in seven days but even if the strait were to reopen now, it would take three to four months to return to normality.
“It’s just a matter of time. If we don’t stop the origin of the crisis soon, we will have to deal with the consequences through humanitarian aid.”
While food prices have not exploded yet, Moreira da Silva said, there has been a “massive increase” in fertiliser costs, which experts say would likely lead to a drop in agriculture productivity and send food prices soaring.
Moreira da Silva said moving just an average of five vessels a day of fertilisers and related raw materials through the strait would head off the crisis for farmers.
What’s missing, he said, is “the political will”.
“We can’t procrastinate on what is possible to do, and what is urgent to do— which is let the fertilisers cross the strait and, through that, minimise the risk of massive food insecurity at the global level.”
-
Politics1 week agoIran weighs US reply delivered via Pakistan as Trump signals opposition to deal terms
-
Fashion1 week agoUS cotton export sales show strong recovery, Upland rise 36%
-
Tech1 week agoDHS Demanded Google Surrender Data on Canadian’s Activity, Location Over Anti-ICE Posts
-
Business1 week agoHeineken to invest £44.5m in hundreds of pubs creating 850 jobs
-
Fashion1 week agoMiddle East conflict clouds India’s FY27 GDP forecast of 7-7.4%: Govt
-
Politics1 week agoTwo women die on migrant boat seeking to reach UK
-
Entertainment1 week agoJelly Roll reacts to daughter Bailee Ann’s major life milestone
-
Entertainment1 week agoPassage: In memoriam
