Connect with us

Business

Business chiefs urge Trump to ease up on immigration crackdown after Georgia raid

Published

on

Business chiefs urge Trump to ease up on immigration crackdown after Georgia raid


EPA/Shutterstock A still frame showing people with their hands up leaning against a bus from a video made available by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement via the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) shows an immigration raid at the Hyundai-LG vehicle assembly plant in Ellabell, Georgia, USA, 04 September 2025EPA/Shutterstock

President Donald Trump is facing calls from business leaders to “turn the page” on his immigration crackdown after a raid at a Hyundai plant in the US state of Georgia.

It was the largest such raid in US immigration history, sweeping up 475 workers, including about 300 people from South Korea.

The decision to target the project, backed by a company the president has celebrated for putting money and factories in the US, sparked shock and outrage in South Korea, where politicians and business leaders have warned it will chill willingness to invest in the US.

In the US, business groups said the raid was likely to hit local business activity as well, as it scares off key parts of the workforce.

“Those actions are having ripple and ancillary effects on others, real and unintended, unfortunately whether they’re in legal status or not,” said Jeff Wasden, president of State Business Executives, which represents state lobby groups from businesses across the economy.

He said he had emailed the White House on Monday, hoping the moment provided an opening to shift from enforcement to fixes to the US immigration system.

While praising Trump for stopping the flow of migrants across the border, he said the raids were generating “fear” and “dampening” US economic activity.

“We’ve got to turn the page,” he said. “It’s time to focus on the workforce and how we fix some of these programmes and problems.”

Visa tensions

Since the raid, construction at the site, a partnership between Hyundai and LG Energy Solutions that will make batteries for its electric cars, has halted.

LG and other top South Korean firms have also put new limits on business travel to the US, according to South Korean media.

South Korean officials have indicated that many of those detained who were from South Korea had entered the US on temporary visas that allow workers to visit for business meetings or conferences, but not paid employment in the US.

Such visas have been a common workaround used by businesses in the country, which have long been frustrated that they do not benefit from a more expansive visa programme, like one currently enjoyed by countries such as Australia.

Many Trump supporters oppose loosening visa rules, arguing that such programmes have been used by big business to import cheaper foreign workers and freeze out American citizens.

But as the US pushes to reshore industries such as semiconductors, trade groups say there are not enough workers with the necessary skills in the US.

In a statement to the BBC, Jae Kim, president of the Southeast US Korean Chamber of Commerce, a group aimed at boosting ties between South Korea and the south-eastern US, said it was “not an easy process” for foreign firms to secure visas, especially for temporary workers.

He warned that the hold-ups made it “hard to make such next generation manufacturing projects prosper in the US” and urged a “stronger balance” of US priorities.

In remarks to reporters over the weekend, Trump has acknowledged the complaints about the visa process, telling reporters: “We’re going to look at that whole situation.”

In a follow-up post on social media, Trump said foreign investments were “welcome”, but called on foreign companies to “please respect our Nation’s Immigration Laws”.

“We encourage you to LEGALLY bring your very smart people, with great technical talent, to build World Class products, and we will make it quickly and legally possible for you to do so,” he wrote on Sunday, adding: “What we ask in return is that you hire and train American Workers.”

But it’s not clear to what extent the administration plans to alter its approach.

In an appearance on CNN on Sunday, border czar Tom Homan said more worksite raids were coming.

Trump has previously confronted tensions between his promises to ease the way for business and his aggressive immigration policies.

Before he even took office, his supporters broke out in a bitter online brawl about whether the administration should make it easier for companies to secure visas for high-skilled tech workers.

The fight pitted Elon Musk and other tech gurus who had supported his campaign against former Trump campaign manager Steve Bannon.

Cracks in the coalition emerged again this June, as the White House stepped up its worksite raids, drawing outcry from farmers and hotels. The administration suggested it would modify its approach, only to reaffirm crackdown a few days later.

Jennie Murray, chief executive of the National Immigration Forum, a group that advocates for immigrants and has been involved in discussions about reforms, said the recent messages from the White House had been “mixed”.

But she said some top Trump officials, including those from the labour and agriculture departments, had been receptive to business concerns about workplace raids, which previous presidents have largely avoided due to their controversy and economic costs.

She said she saw those arguments making inroads, especially as economic costs of raids like the one in Georgia become evident.

“The impact is starting to speak for itself,” she said. “As the economy continues to take hits and really starts to slow, which is likely going to happen in the next couple of months, I think there are a lot of folks who are willing to have conversations about what those solutions are.”

But Douglas Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum, a center-right policy institute, said he had seen little sign that the administration was preparing to change its approach.

He added of the president: “He’s highly tuned to pressure. If the pressure becomes large enough, he’ll alter the policy but we haven’t seen that yet.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Donald Trump’s tariff battle: US Supreme Court fast-tracks review; presidential power limits questioned – The Times of India

Published

on

Donald Trump’s tariff battle: US Supreme Court fast-tracks review; presidential power limits questioned – The Times of India


Donald Trump (File photo)

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to take up a fast-track review of the Trump administration’s sweeping global tariffs, setting a November hearing that could decide the fate of one of US President Donald Trump’s most significant economic policies. The justices approved an unusually brisk schedule after a federal appeals court last month struck down much of the program, ruling in a 7-4 decision that Trump unlawfully invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose steep import taxes on major US trading partners. The tariffs, however, will remain in effect during the litigation. Five small businesses and a dozen states had challenged the duties, arguing that Congress — not the president — holds the power to levy taxes. “Congress, not the President alone, has the power to impose tariffs,” said Jeffrey Schwab of the Liberty Justice Center, representing affected enterprises that warn of near-bankruptcy under the duties. The administration countered that the 1977 emergency law gives the president broad authority to regulate imports when national security or the economy is threatened. Solicitor General D. John Sauer warned that the appeals court ruling “casts a pall of uncertainty upon ongoing foreign negotiations that the president has been pursuing through tariffs … jeopardizing both already negotiated framework deals and ongoing negotiations,” as quoted by NYT. The stakes are high: Trump has used tariffs both as leverage in trade talks and as a revenue source, with collections reaching £159 billion by late August — more than double last year’s figure. Officials also cautioned that overturning the tariffs could force the Treasury to refund billions, potentially affecting resources earmarked for fentanyl control and support for Ukraine in its war with Russia. The case marks the first time the Supreme Court will hear full arguments on Trump’s expansive use of emergency powers, after previously granting temporary approvals for other policies. With a conservative majority that includes three Trump appointees, the court will now weigh whether presidential authority under IEEPA extends to such far-reaching trade actions — or whether Congress must reclaim the power to tax.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Contactless card payments could become unlimited under new plans

Published

on

Contactless card payments could become unlimited under new plans


Kevin PeacheyCost of living correspondent, BBC News

Getty Images Person holds a payment card to a reader Getty Images

Contactless card payments are set to exceed £100 and potentially become unlimited under new proposals to allow banks and other providers to set limits.

The proposals from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) mean entering a four-digit PIN to make a card payment could become even more of a rarity for shoppers.

If approved, purchases which can cost more than £100 – such as a big supermarket shop, or large family meal in a restaurant – could be made with a tap of a card.

The move would bring cards in line with payments made through digital wallets on smartphones which have no restriction, and reflects the ongoing changes in the way people pay.

When contactless card payments were introduced in 2007, the transaction limit was set at £10. The limit was raised gradually, to £15 in 2010, to £20 in 2012, then to £30 in 2015, before the Covid pandemic prompted a jump to £45 in 2020, then to £100 in October 2021.

If approved, the latest plan could be put in place early next year.

Every rise has been met with concerns about theft and fraud, and the FCA said card providers would only permit higher-value contactless payments for low-risk transactions and would carry the burden if things went wrong.

However, the freedom for banks to raise or even scrap the contactless limit suggests the four-digit PIN could soon become relatively redundant.

The FCA has proposed the changes, despite the majority of consumers and industry respondents to a consultation favouring the current rules.

Some 78% of consumers who responded said they did not want any change to the limits.

The FCA said it did not expect any quick changes, but providers would welcome the flexibility over time when prices rise and technology advances. They could also give customers the option to set their own limits.

Fraud and theft fears

The idea of high-value payments being made with a tap of a card will raise concern that thieves and fraudsters will target cards.

Various protections are already in place. In addition to the £100 single payment limit, consumers are often required to enter a PIN if a series of contactless transactions totals more than £300, or five consecutive contactless payments are made.

The FCA’s own analysis suggests raising the limits would increase fraud losses, but said detection was improving and would continue to get better.

It said any change would be reliant on providers ensuring payments were low-risk, through their fraud prevention systems.

Consumers would still get their money back if money was stolen by fraudsters, according to David Geale, from the FCA.

“People are still protected. Even with contactless, firms will refund your money if your card is used fraudulently,” he said.

Many banks already allow cardholders to set a contactless limit of lower than £100, or switch it off completely, and the FCA expected this option to be made widely available.

It argued that time savings, less “payment friction”, and a reflection of rising prices over time would make changes in the limits worthwhile.

Payment terminals would also need to be altered, as most are programmed to automatically refuse payments of more than £100 by card.

‘I only use my phone to pay’

Smartphones already have an extra layer of security, through thumbprints or face ID. That allows people to pay without limits.

Nearly three-quarters of 16 to 24-year-olds regularly use mobile payments, according to industry research.

Near the appropriately named Bank Street in Sevenoaks, 24-year-old Demi Grady said she rarely bothered carrying her cards around anymore because she used her phone for everything.

“I was in London the other day, my phone died and I couldn’t pay for stuff because I couldn’t remember my card details,” she said.

Her mum, Carrie, in contrast, uses her card when shopping.

“It would worry me more than be of benefit if they were to lose the limit of £100,” she said.

Robert Ryan in a menswear shop with coats and tops on hangers and shelves behind him.

Robert says the contactless limit can be a useful budgeting reminder

Robert Ryan, who had just bought a “winter-ish jacket” at a Harveys Menswear on Bank Street said he did not regard entering a four-digit number when paying as a hassle. Instead it could be a useful budgeting tool.

“I feel more secure in what I’m buying and it does give me a bit of a prompt to make sure I’m not overspending on my tap-and-go,” he said.

Richard Staplehurst, the owner of the store, said the majority of his customers were paying via a device.

He said that removing any obstacles to payment was great, but he did not want to be landed with a bill if a card was used fraudulently.

Stimulating the UK economy

The idea of removing the contactless limit was highlighted as one way the FCA was responding to the prime minister’s call to regulators to remove restrictions to create more economic growth.

The government has been striving to improve the UK’s economic performance, which has been slow for some time.

Other countries, such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand allow industry to set contactless card limits.

The FCA will consult on its proposals until 15 October.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump meets Scottish First Minister John Swinney to discuss whisky tariffs

Published

on

Trump meets Scottish First Minister John Swinney to discuss whisky tariffs


First Minister John Swinney has met President Donald Trump in the Oval Office to discuss whisky tariffs.

The meeting took place in the Oval Office, where the President was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Mr Swinney says he discussed the possibility for a better tariff deal for Scotch whisky.

A 50-minute meeting took place ahead of the US President’s State Visit to the United Kingdom next week.

The First Minister confirmed to Mr Trump he would attend the State Banquet at Windsor Palace.

He said: “With the US state visit to the UK just days away, we are now entering the critical days on which hopes of a better tariff deal for Scotch whisky rest. Scotch whisky holds a unique position, as it can only legally be produced in Scotland.

“During my discussions with President Trump, I made the case to reduce the tariffs on the Scotch whisky industry – something the US industry supports.

“The United States is the largest market for Scotch whisky but Scottish distillers also spend hundreds of millions of dollars every year buying Bourbon casks from Kentucky.

First Minister of Scotland John Swinney departs the White House following a meeting with US President Donald Trump (Aaron Schwartz/PA)

“The negotiations themselves are, of course, for the UK negotiating team but given whisky exports to the US were worth almost £1 billion in 2024, its importance to the Scottish economy cannot be underestimated and I am determined to do all that I can to protect and safeguard this iconic Scottish product.”

The First Minister also raised the international situation including the ongoing conflict in Gaza and Qatar.

Mr Swinney is in the United States to undertake a series of trade and political meetings involving both main US political parties.

In a video posted to X, he confirmed he had met Mr Trump and discussed whisky tariffs, in particular, the possibility of no tariffs on Scotch whisky.

He said: “I wanted to share an update on my visit to Washington, DC. I spent the morning with representatives of the whisky industry from Scotland and the United States and we discussed the zero-for-zero approach on tariffs, which would help the industry to flourish on both sides of the pond.

“I’ve now taken those arguments to the Oval Office to President Trump, and we’ve had a constructive discussion about the reasons why Scotch whisky would benefit from no tariffs.

“It’s all part of my job to make sure that Scotland’s interests are promoted at all times, and that’s what I’ll always do as First Minister.”

The meeting at the White House was scheduled to last around 30 minutes and took place at 7pm UK time.

Prior to the meeting at the White House, the First Minister met representatives and member companies of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (Discus) and the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) at Mount Vernon, the home of US founding father George Washington and the site of a whisky distillery he opened in 1798 which was operated by his Scottish farm hand, James Anderson.

The First Minister flew to Washington DC on Tuesday, saying he would be “pressing the case” for a better tariff deal for Scotch whisky in key talks in the United States.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending