Politics
Bill and Hillary Clinton refuse to testify in House Epstein probe

- House panel moves to hold ex-president Bill Clinton in contempt.
- James Comer cites Epstein White House visits, Clinton flights.
- Clintons call subpoenas partisan, accuse probe of political motives.
Bill and Hillary Clinton on Tuesday refused to testify in a Republican-led congressional investigation of the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, saying it was a partisan exercise.
“Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences,” the Clintons wrote in a letter to Republican Representative James Comer, who chairs the House of Representatives Oversight Committee. “For us, now is that time.”
Comer said the committee will meet next week to hold former Democratic President Bill Clinton in contempt. That could potentially lead to criminal charges.
A committee spokesperson said the panel will also begin contempt proceedings against Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, if she does not appear before the panel on Wednesday.

The Clintons said they had tried to provide what “little information” they had to help with the investigation and accused Comer of shifting focus away from the Trump administration’s actions. Epstein died in jail in 2019, during President Donald Trump’s first term in office, while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges. His death was ruled a suicide.
“If the Government didn’t do all it could to investigate and prosecute these crimes, for whatever reason, that should be the focus of your work… There is no evidence that you are doing so,” the Clintons wrote.
“There is no plausible explanation for what you are doing other than partisan politics,” they said.
Epstein White House visits and flights
Comer said “most Americans” want Bill Clinton to answer questions about his ties to Epstein. The Kentucky Republican said Epstein visited the White House 17 times while Clinton was in office and that the former president had flown on Epstein’s plane some 27 times.

Clinton has expressed regret about the relationship and has said he knew nothing about Epstein’s criminal activity. No evidence has surfaced that Clinton was involved in sex trafficking.
“No one’s accusing Bill Clinton of any wrongdoing,” Comer said. “We just have questions.”
The US Justice Department has been releasing files tied to criminal probes of Epstein, who was once friends with Trump and the Clintons, in compliance with a transparency law passed by Congress.
A separate letter sent to the committee on Monday by the Clintons’ attorneys said the subpoenas for their testimony were invalid, unenforceable and “nothing more than a ploy to attempt to embarrass political rivals, as President Trump has directed.”
Politics
Greenland PM backs Denmark ties over US

- FMs of Greenland, Denmark to meet US VP, Sec Rubio tomorrow.
- Greenland residents support Denmark ties, wary of US intervention.
- Danish, Greenlandic ministers seek diplomatic resolution with US.
Nuuk: Residents in Greenland’s snow-covered capital, Nuuk, expressed support for remaining part of Denmark and called for a pause in independence discussions ahead of high-level talks in Washington on Wednesday, as US President Donald Trump intensifies his interest in the Arctic island.
Greenlandic and Danish foreign ministers will meet US Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington on Wednesday after renewed threats of taking control of Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark.
Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen reiterated Greenland’s commitment to Denmark, dismissing the prospect of becoming a US territory.
“We face a geopolitical crisis, and if we have to choose between the US and Denmark here and now, then we choose Denmark,” Nielsen told reporters in Copenhagen on Tuesday, standing alongside Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen. “We stand united in the Kingdom of Denmark.”
Greenland’s political landscape appears to be shifting, with leaders and residents focusing on long-term independence rather than immediate autonomy.
“In the current circumstances, I think it would be wise for Greenland to commit to Denmark for a very, very long time and remain under the NATO security umbrella,” said Finn Meinel, a Nuuk-based lawyer.
Some Greenlanders are worried about potential US intervention. Charlotte Heilmann, a pensioner in Nuuk, shared her reservations: “I can’t imagine living as an American. We are part of Denmark, and NATO, so I don’t understand why he keeps saying he wants to take our country.”
Casper Frank Moller, a tour operator, noted how US threats have brought Greenlanders closer together. “Last year, some people were still focused on fast independence. But after what has happened, there’s more unity among us because we have to stand against this possible annexation. Hopefully, tomorrow’s meeting will lead to a diplomatic solution.”
For us, it’s home
Greenland has been moving towards greater self-governance since 1979. However, cabinet minister Naaja Nathanielsen, responsible for business, energy and minerals, acknowledged there is no immediate rush.
“For others, this might be a piece of land, but for us, it’s home,” she said in London. Nathanielsen added that Greenlanders are content being part of Denmark and see themselves as allies of the US, not as Americans.
Trump’s administration has repeatedly claimed Greenland’s strategic importance to US national security. White House officials have been discussing various plans to bring Greenland under US control, including potential use of the US military and lump-sum payments to Greenlanders as part of a bid to convince them to secede from Denmark.
The hardest part is ahead
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen and Greenlandic counterpart Vivian Motzfeldt had requested the upcoming meeting in Washington in response to Trump’s remarks. Rasmussen emphasised the importance of addressing disputes diplomatically. “Our aim is to move the discussion into a meeting room where we can look each other in the eye,” he said.
Denmark, which has managed Greenland for centuries, faces growing pressure to bolster Arctic defences to counter geopolitical tensions. Danish Defence Minister Troels Lund Poulsen plans to meet NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in Brussels next week, with multinational NATO exercises in Greenland scheduled by 2026.
Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen acknowledged the challenges presented by the heightened US interest. “It is hard to stand up to the US, our most important ally,” she said on Tuesday. “But the hardest part may still be ahead of us.”
Politics
Khalistani activist’s life at risk from India, warns UK intelligence

LONDON: The UK intelligence has advised a high-profile Khalistani Sikh activist in the UK that he faces a threat to his life from the Indian government agents in the UK.
Paramjeet Singh Pamma — the UK and Europe coordinator for Khalistan Referendum campaign and a close associated of slain Hardeep Singh Nijjar and Gurpatwant Singh Pannun — has been advised by the UK intelligence through several visits to increase his security due to intelligence suggesting threats to his safety. Its understood the security warning to Pamma has come from MI5 — the UK premier intelligence agency for the domestic security.
The Guardian newspaper reported that the threat level to Pamma is so serious that he doesn’t live with his family in West London near Southall Gurdwara on the police advice and is not allowed to share his location with anyone due to the imminent threat he is facing due to his activism for Khalistan and the Khalistan Referendum campaign.
It’s understood that Pamma received the latest safety warning from the UK intelligence – that Indian state agents operating on UK soil are out to kill him — consistently over the last several months.
Pamma told The Guardian the threats were linked to the Indian government as part of the relentless transnational repression by the Indian state. The Indian embassy declined to comment.
“The repression we are going through has been relentless, it is crossing borders and reaching into our families now. This is terror, basically, by the Indian government,” said Pamma, who has been forced to live separately from his family after threats.
Pamma said he has regularly been reporting threats to the UK police but they only began to take his complaints seriously after the 2023 killing of Nijjar, a prominent Sikh activist, in Canada, which the country’s then-prime minister, Justin Trudeau, said intelligence agencies had linked to Indian government agents.
In the same year, US prosecutors accused an agent of the Indian government of directing the attempted assassination of SFJ Counsel General Pannun, an American citizen, on US soil.
A Home Office spokesperson said they did not comment on individual cases or intelligence matters. “We are proud of our diverse communities, and British Sikhs make an immense contribution to the strength of our society. Their safety, like that of everyone in the United Kingdom, remains our highest priority,” the spokesperson said.
The Indian government has long been concerned about the Sikh nationalist movement, which is largely diaspora-led, and campaigns for a Sikh homeland known as Khalistan to be created in the Punjab, in north-west India.
In 1985, Khalistani militants smuggled a bomb onto Air India flight 182, which exploded off the coast of Ireland, killing all 329 people onboard — the worst act of aviation terrorism before the 9/11 attacks.
Pamma is reported in Indian media to have previously been a fundraiser for Babbar Khalsa International, which investigators believe was responsible for the bombing. He called the allegations “fake propaganda”, condemned the act of terrorism, and welcomed “any inquiry in any case” against him.
Pamma’s elder brother was killed by Indian police for his Khalistan activism in 1991. Pamma was picked up multiple times and tortured by police before leaving India and being given political asylum in the UK in 2000. He was arrested in 2010 after authorities in Punjab said they suspected him of involvement in a murder but UK counter-terrorism police could find no evidence against him.
In 2015, he was detained while on holiday in Portugal, but a judge threw out India’s attempt to make him stand trial on terrorism charges.
In the same year, senior Indian diplomat Samant Goel approached Pamma in London and asked him to quit Khalistan or face dire consequences. Pamma refused and reported the threats to the UK intelligence. After returning from London, Goel became the chief of India’s external intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (RAW). From his new position, Goel ordered assassination plots of Khalistan Referendum activists in USA, Canada and UK.
According to MI5, foreign governments are increasingly targeting dissidents on UK soil, and the number of investigations into state threats has grown by 48% since 2022. In its 2024-25 report on transnational repression, the Joint Committee on Human Rights listed India as a country of concern.
The Guardian wrote that Pamma’s threat issue has risen as the UK pursues a closer relationship with Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government, seeing it as a key partner to balance China’s growing power.
In 2023, a Birmingham-based Sikh activist, Avtar Singh Khanda, died suddenly after complaining that Indian police were harassing him over the phone and threatening his family in Punjab. A pathologist found that the result of the postmortem did not mean “that a poisoning can be completely excluded”.
Gurcharan Singh, a Sikh nationalist activist, has also been told by UK police that they know of credible threats to his safety.
In West London’s Slough, Singh has a private security team and receives visits from officers nearly every two months. Two days before a planned protest in March against the Indian foreign minister’s visit to London, Singh said he was told in person by two officers that it was not safe to attend and that his safety could not be guaranteed, the Guardian wrote.
Singh’s wife died in May 2023, and he feels there are striking similarities between the circumstances of her death and those of Avtar Singh Khanda.
The High Commission of India in London did not respond to a request for comment.
Politics
Anti-minority hate speech in India rose by 13% in 2025: US research group

- India Hate Lab documented 1,318 instances in 2025.
- Says abuse of minorities risen since Modi took office in 2014.
- Indian government calls such reports biased.
WASHINGTON: Hate speech against minorities, including Muslims and Christians in India, rose by 13% in 2025, with most incidents occurring in states governed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, a Washington-based research group said on Tuesday.
India Hate Lab documented 1,318 instances of what it called hate speech in 2025, up from 1,165 in 2024 and 668 in 2023, at events such as political rallies, religious processions, protest marches and cultural gatherings.
Of that number, 1,164 incidents occurred in states and union territories governed by the BJP, either directly or with coalition political parties, the group said.
The Indian embassy in Washington did not respond immediately to a request for comment. Modi and his party deny being discriminatory and say their policies, including food subsidy programmes and electrification drives, benefit all communities.
April recorded the highest monthly spike, 158 events, with nearly 100 occurring between April 22, after a deadly attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), and May 7, when four days of deadly fighting broke out between India and Pakistan.
Rights groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, say abuse of minorities has risen in India since Modi took office in 2014, pointing to a religion-based citizenship law the UN calls “fundamentally discriminatory,” anti-conversion legislation that challenges freedom of belief, the 2019 removal of Muslim-majority IIOJK’s special status, and the demolition of Muslim-owned properties.
India Hate Lab, founded by US-based Kashmiri journalist Raqib Hameed Naik, is a project of the Center for the Study of Organised Hate, a nonprofit Washington-based think tank. The BJP has previously said India Hate Lab presents a biased picture of India.
India Hate Lab says it uses the UN’s definition of hate speech, which defines it as prejudiced or discriminatory language towards an individual or group based on attributes including religion, ethnicity, nationality, race or gender.
-
Entertainment1 week agoMinnesota Governor Tim Walz to drop out of 2026 race, official confirmation expected soon
-
Sports1 week agoVAR review: Why was Wirtz onside in Premier League, offside in Europe?
-
Business1 week ago8th Pay Commission: From Policy Review, Cabinet Approval To Implementation –Key Stages Explained
-
Politics6 days agoUK says provided assistance in US-led tanker seizure
-
Entertainment6 days agoDoes new US food pyramid put too much steak on your plate?
-
Entertainment6 days agoWhy did Nick Reiner’s lawyer Alan Jackson withdraw from case?
-
Business6 days agoTrump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors
-
Sports1 week agoFACI invites applications for 2026 chess development project | The Express Tribune
