Business
Building wealth for retirement: How to plan Rs 1 lakh monthly passive income? Experts outline safe and risky routes – The Times of India
For most Indians, the fear of outliving retirement savings looms larger than ever as life expectancy rises and medical costs climb. Picture this: your morning coffee in retirement, bills paid, lifestyle intact — and all of it supported by a steady Rs 1 lakh monthly income. Financial planners say this is possible, but the secret lies in building the right retirement corpus and matching it with your risk appetite.Depending on the investment route you choose, the required savings range from Rs 1 crore to Rs 2 crore. Safe options like annuities and fixed deposits can work with Rs 2 crore, while those willing to take higher risks may target the same income with just Rs 1 crore in diversified equity funds.How much do you need to earn Rs 1 lakh a month?To generate Rs 12 lakh annually, the required corpus depends on the rate of return. With Rs 2 crore, investors can choose safer instruments like annuities, debt funds or fixed deposits, which typically offer around 6% returns, according to an ET report. For those with Rs 1.5 crore, instruments offering 8% returns, such as the Senior Citizens’ Savings Scheme, balanced hybrid funds or equity savings funds, may be enough. According to Value Research data (September 2, 2025) quoted in the ET analysis, balanced hybrid and equity savings funds have delivered 8.80% and 8.10% CAGR respectively over the last decade.Risk-tolerant investors with Rs 1.2 crore can aim for products that generate about 10% returns, such as aggressive hybrid, large-cap or large-and-midcap funds, which have delivered 11.98%, 12.75% and 14.69% CAGR respectively in the last 10 years. At the highest-risk level, those with Rs 1 crore can still target Rs 12 lakh annual income by investing in flexicap or multicap funds, which have historically returned over 12% CAGR. Flexicap funds, for instance, gave 13.64% CAGR in the past decade.
Table source: ETWithdrawal-based strategies to keep corpus intactSome planners recommend strategies that preserve capital while providing inflation-adjusted returns. Rohan Goyal of MIRA Money suggests a 4–5% withdrawal rate, requiring Rs 2.4–3 crore to sustainably generate Rs 12 lakh annually. “A 4–5% withdrawal rate is low enough that portfolio growth should outpace withdrawals, making the corpus last decades,” he was quoted as saying.Arun Kumar of FundsIndia advises an 85:15 split between aggressive hybrid and arbitrage funds, with systematic withdrawal plans (SWPs) starting after one year. Withdrawals should pause if the market corrects sharply and shift temporarily to arbitrage funds, resuming later.Elever’s Karan Aggarwal suggests a glide-path approach: begin with a 50:50 split between debt and arbitrage funds, then shift 10% annually towards equity until the sixth year, when equity allocation reaches 50%.Tax rules to rememberTax treatment varies across instruments. Equity funds attract 15–20% short-term capital gains tax and 10–12.5% long-term capital gains tax, while debt funds face 20% with indexation or 12.5% without. Hybrid funds are taxed according to their asset mix, said CA Suresh Surana.Don’t forget inflationA fixed withdrawal of Rs 1 lakh today may lose significant value over 10 years. SWPs that allow part of the corpus to remain invested and continue compounding can help balance current income with future security.Experts say there is no universal formula for securing Rs 1 lakh a month. “Start early, diversify across equity, debt and hybrid options, and review periodically,” one planner said. “What matters most is matching investments with risk appetite and keeping income inflation-adjusted.”(Disclaimer: The opinions, analyses and recommendations expressed herein are those of brokerage and do not reflect the views of The Times of India. Always consult with a qualified investment advisor or financial planner before making any investment decisions.)
Business
Social security benefits to rise 2.8%: Retirees to see $56 monthly boost; senior citizens say increase not enough – The Times of India
The Social Security administration on Friday announced that its benefits will increase by 2.8% in 2026, giving retirees an average monthly boost of more than $56. The rise reflects moderating inflation after several years of higher cost-of-living adjustments (COLA).The increase will take effect in January for nearly 71 million Social Security recipients, while about 7.5 million people receiving Supplemental Security Income will see higher payments starting December 31.The announcement, which was scheduled for last week, was delayed due to the US federal government shutdown.Recipients saw a 2.5% increase in 2025 and a 3.2% rise in 2024, following a historic 8.7% jump in 2023 driven by record-high inflation. The COLA is funded by payroll taxes collected from workers and employers, up to an annual salary cap that will rise to $184,500 in 2026 from $176,100 in 2025.Social Security Administration Commissioner Frank Bisignano said in a statement that the annual adjustment “is one way we are working to make sure benefits reflect today’s economic realities and continue to provide a foundation of security.” However, many seniors believe the increase won’t be enough to meet rising living costs, reported AP.Polling from AARP shows that many older Americans share that concern. Only 22% of Americans over 50 believe a COLA of around 3% is enough to keep up with inflation, while 77% disagree. According to the MIT Living Wage Calculator, a single adult living in Florence, South Carolina, spends about $10,184 annually on housing, $3,053 on medical expenses and $3,839 on food.Emerson Sprick, director of retirement and labor policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said in a statement that cost-of-living increases “can’t solve all the financial challenges households face or all the shortcomings of the program.”The latest adjustment comes as the Social Security Administration faces internal challenges and uncertainty about the program’s long-term future. In July, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Republican administration was committed to protecting Social Security, hours after comments suggesting that a new children’s savings program signed by President Donald Trump was “a back door for privatising Social Security,” as quoted by AP.
Osmond Chia,Business reporter, and
Maia Davies
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country is prepared to resume trade talks with the US “when the Americans are ready.”
His remarks come after US President Donald Trump announced an immediate end to all trade negotiations with Canada over an advert critical of the tariffs he has imposed on the nation.
The advert, sponsored by the Canadian province of Ontario, quotes former US President Ronald Reagan, a Republican and icon of US conservatism, saying tariffs “hurt every American”.
Trump wrote on social media that the advert was “FAKE” and “egregious”, adding that trade talks were “HEREBY TERMINATED”.
Getty ImagesThe Trump administration has imposed a 35% levy on many Canadian imports, as well as individual tariffs targeting particular industries like car and steel manufacturing. Ontario has been particularly hard-hit by these.
Trump has allowed exemptions for goods that fall under a free trade agreement with Mexico and Canada, negotiated during his first term.
But since his election earlier this year, Canada’s Carney has attempted to strike a deal that would ease the tariffs. Three-quarters of Canadian exports are sold to the US, making its economy particularly vulnerable.
This effort has been complicated by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who is one of the most vocal critics of the taxes levied on US firms buying Canadian products.
In the minute-long advert published last week, Reagan’s voice can be heard narrating over images that include the New York Stock Exchange and cranes adorned with both US and Canadian flags.
The video excerpts from a 1987 national radio address by Reagan that focuses on foreign trade.
“When someone says, ‘let’s impose tariffs on foreign imports’, it looks like they’re doing the patriotic thing by protecting American products and jobs. And sometimes, for a short while, it works – but only for a short time,” Reagan says in the advert.
“Over the long run, such trade barriers hurt every American, worker and consumer.
“High tariffs inevitably lead to retaliation by foreign countries and the triggering of fierce trade wars… Markets shrink and collapse, businesses and industries shut down and millions of people lose their jobs.”
The Ronald Reagan Foundation – which is charged with preserving his legacy – released a statement on Thursday saying the advert had used “selective” audio and video of the former president’s remarks.
It said the advert “misrepresents” the former president’s address, without specifying why, and accused the Ontario government of not seeking permission to use and edit the remarks.
The foundation said it was “reviewing its legal options”.
Trump referenced this statement, and said the video was designed to “interfere with” the US Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in November on whether Washington’s sweeping tariffs on many nations’ products are legal.
The court’s decision represents the biggest test of Trump’s presidential authority and signature economic policy, potentially forcing the US to refund billions collected in tariffs.
Prime Minister Carney did not address the advertisement in his remarks early on Friday. He said that Canada has made “a lot of progress” in trade talks with the US, but is also focused on “developing new partnerships” with other countries, including Asia.
He spoke as he was departing Canada for the ASEAN summit in Kuala Lumpur. Trump is also expected to attend.
Ford, meanwhile, posted the full Reagan speech on X and wrote: “Canada and the United States are friends, neighbours and allies. President Ronald Reagan knew that we are stronger together.”
While it only includes excerpts from the original, five-minute-long address, it does not alter Reagan’s words.
The order in which he makes the comments has been changed. The advert’s penultimate sentence is taken from near the beginning of his speech, and a phrase that features about halfway through the advert is likewise taken from an earlier point in the address.
The original address – titled Address to the Nation on Free and Fair Trade – is regarding a specific set of tariffs the Reagan administration had at the time imposed on some Japanese goods.
Reagan seeks to use the speech to explain why he introduced the tariffs in this “special case” despite his belief that “imposing such tariffs or trade barriers and restrictions of any kind are steps that I am loath to take”.
He makes clear that he wants to lift them as soon as possible “to promote the prosperity and economic development that only free trade can bring” – a position he stresses throughout the speech.
Trump later doubled down on his criticism of the advert, writing that “Ronald Reagan did not like Tariffs, when actually he LOVED TARIFFS FOR OUR COUNTRY, AND ITS NATIONAL SECURITY”.
Speaking to White House reporters on Friday morning, US National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said that “frustration has built up over time” with Canada.
“The Canadians have been very difficult,” he said.
A few minutes earlier, he told Fox Business that “sometimes when you’re frustrated, a time-out is the right call.”
“It’s probably a good time to take a break.”
Getty ImagesThe advert was run as part of a campaign worth $75m Canadian dollars (£40m; $54m) on mainstream TV channels in the US.
In a post accompanying the advert last week, Ford wrote that “we’ll never stop making the case against American tariffs on Canada”.
China’s embassy in Washington also used a similar Reagan clip in a post on X to cast doubt on Trump’s global tariffs earlier this year.
Ontario is Canada’s most populous province and its largest regional economy, and has suffered the most as a result of the US tariffs.
Ford hit back at Trump’s earlier tariff threat against Canada by saying he was willing to cut off power supply to the US.
He had also described Washington’s trade policies against Canada as having pulled a knife and “yanked it into us“, and called on US lawmakers to put pressure on Trump.
Trump’s sector-specific levies on Canadian goods include a 50% levy on metals and 25% on automobiles.
The White House’s global tariffs – particularly on steel, aluminium and cars – have hit Canada hard, forcing job losses and putting pressure on businesses.
It is the second time Trump has said he was ceasing trade talks with Canada, after Ottawa announced it would impose a digital services tax on US technology firms earlier this year.
When Canada rescinded the tax, the White House said Carney had “caved” to pressure from Trump.
The Tata Group, one of India’s largest and most respected business conglomerates, is facing growing internal differences over whether its parent company, Tata Sons, should be listed on the stock market. Tata Sons is the unlisted holding company that controls the Tata Group’s vast network of businesses — including Tata Steel, Tata Motors, Tata Consultancy Services, and Air India. According to its 2024–25 annual report, it holds stakes in 355 subsidiaries, 39 joint ventures, and 48 associate companies, and received Rs 36,149 crore in dividends from them last year, reported Mint
Because Tata Sons is unlisted, its shareholders cannot easily sell or “monetize” their holdings. The SP Group, which has been part of Tata Sons since the 1930s, has long wanted a listing to unlock the value of its stake — estimated between Rs 1.5 trillion and Rs 3 trillion, said reports.
The Core Dispute
The SP Group’s demand for listing gained momentum after its representative, Cyrus Mistry, was removed as Tata Sons chairman in 2016, a move that led to a bitter legal and personal fallout between the two groups.
The SP Group, which faces significant debt in its construction and infrastructure businesses, sees the listing as a way to raise funds and strengthen its finances. Earlier this year, credit rating agency ICRA reaffirmed a ‘BBB’ rating with a negative outlook for Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd., pointing to continued pressure on liquidity, said reports.
In contrast, Tata Trusts, which uses its dividends from Tata Sons to fund large-scale philanthropic projects, has no such financial pressure. In 2024–25, it disbursed Rs 902 crore in grants, with most funds directed to social and institutional programs. The Trusts also influence key decisions within Tata Sons, including top appointments and governance matters, and want the group to retain its private, long-term structure. Meanwhile, as per PTI reports, Tata Trusts has circulated a proposal to reappoint Mehli Mistry as a trustee for three of its key philanthropic bodies, a move that would make him a lifetime trustee.
RBI’s Role and the Listing Deadline
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) added to the tension in September 2022, when it classified Tata Sons as an “upper-layer” non-banking financial company (NBFC) — a category that required the company to list its shares within three years, by September 2025.
However, Tata Sons moved to avoid that requirement by retiring debt and surrendering its NBFC licence earlier this year. This would allow it to remain a privately held company. The company is currently awaiting RBI’s approval for its deregistration.
The RBI’s silence on the matter since then has raised eyebrows among market watchers, with some questioning whether the central bank will enforce the original listing rule or allow Tata Sons to remain private.
What’s At Stake
According to experts, for the SP Group, listing Tata Sons could unlock much-needed value and ease its debt burden. In a recent statement, the group called the listing a “moral and social imperative,” arguing that it would “unlock immense value for over 1.2 crore shareholders of listed Tata companies who indirectly have a stake in Tata Sons.”
The Shapoorji Pallonji (SP) Group has renewed its call for public listing. In a strongly worded statement, the group described the IPO as “a moral and social imperative”, saying it would “unlock immense value for over 1.2 crore shareholders of listed Tata companies.
For Tata Trusts, however, a public listing could mean less control over the company that anchors the entire Tata empire. The Trusts’ leadership believes the current structure — where dividends from Tata companies fund its philanthropic work — best preserves the vision of Jamsetji Tata, the group’s founder, noted analysts.
Book excerpt: “Heart Life Music” by Kenny Chesney with Holly Gleason
Sora Has Lost Its App Store Crown to … Dave’s Hot Chicken
Jays’ Bichette, Dodgers’ Kershaw on WS rosters
-
Tech1 week agoWhy the F5 Hack Created an ‘Imminent Threat’ for Thousands of Networks
-
Tech5 days agoHow to Protect Yourself Against Getting Locked Out of Your Cloud Accounts
-
Sports6 days agoPCB confirms Tri-nation T20 series to go ahead despite Afghanistan’s withdrawal – SUCH TV
-
Sports1 week agoU.S. Soccer recommends extending NCAA season
-
Tech6 days agoI Tested Over 40 Heat Protectant Sprays to Find the Best of the Best
-
Tech6 days agoSome major Australian towns still have poor phone reception—it’s threatening public safety
-
Tech5 days agoThe DeltaForce 65 Brings Das Keyboard Into the Modern Keyboard Era—for Better or Worse
-
Tech1 week agoSpit On, Sworn At, and Undeterred: What It’s Like to Own a Cybertruck