Connect with us

Business

Cracker Barrel shares rise after restaurant chain gets rid of controversial new logo

Published

on

Cracker Barrel shares rise after restaurant chain gets rid of controversial new logo


A Cracker Barrel sign featuring the old logo is seen outside of a restaurant on August 21, 2025 in Homestead, Florida.

Joe Raedle | Getty Images

Shares of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store rose more than 8% on Wednesday after the restaurant chain said it would scrap its new logo and return to the original one, amid mounting criticism from social media users and even President Donald Trump.

The stock moves on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning have brought Cracker Barrel shares close to restoring their original losses from when the new logo was first announced last week.

“We thank our guests for sharing your voices and love for Cracker Barrel. We said we would listen, and we have. Our new logo is going away and our “Old Timer” will remain,” the company said in a statement Tuesday.

The switch occurred just hours after Trump weighed in on the rebranding, writing on social media “Cracker Barrel should go back to the old logo, admit a mistake based on customer response (the ultimate Poll) and manage the company better than ever before.”

After Trump’s message, shares of Cracker Barrel were up more than 6% at Tuesday’s close.

Trump congratulated the company in a social media post later Tuesday evening after the announcement that the original logo would remain.

“Congratulations ‘Cracker Barrel’ on changing your logo back to what it was. All of your fans very much appreciate it. Good luck into the future. Make lots of money and, most importantly, make your customers happy again!” the post read.

Taylor Budowich, White House deputy chief of staff, also said in a post on X that he had spoken with the company earlier in the evening and Cracker Barrel had thanked the president for weighing in on the matter.

Cracker Barrel’s old and new logo.

Courtesy: Cracker Barrel

The proposed logo redesign, which the company announced last week, removed the image of the restaurant’s “Uncle Herschel” character leaning against a barrel that was prominently featured in the original, leaving behind just the words “Cracker Barrel” against the outline of a yellow barrel. The phrase “Old Country Store” was also removed.

The colors, which the company said were inspired by the restaurant’s eggs and biscuits, stayed close to the original.

Social media users were quick to blast the new logo, calling it “generic,” “soulless” and “bland.” Conservatives in particular accused the restaurant chain of going “woke,” by doing away with the classic American branding.

A YouGov poll of 1,000 adults over the weekend found that 65% of Americans were aware of the new logo and 76% preferred the old one.

The company addressed the backlash in a statement Monday, saying it has “shown us that we could’ve done a better job sharing who we are and who we’ll always be.”

Cracker Barrel has repeatedly stated that the new branding would not change the core values of the company.

“At Cracker Barrel, it’s always been – and always will be – about serving up delicious food, warm welcomes, and the kind of country hospitality that feels like family,” the statement from Tuesday night read. “As a proud American institution, our 70,000 hardworking employees look forward to welcoming you to our table soon.”

Don’t miss these insights from CNBC PRO



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

School costs a ‘real struggle’ for parents in Wales

Published

on

School costs a ‘real struggle’ for parents in Wales


Bethan LewisFamily and education correspondent, BBC Wales News

Vicky Williams says she starts to worry about budgeting for the next school year at Christmas

A mum says she starts to dread the new school year from Christmas because of the cost of uniform and other kits her children will need in September.

Vicky Williams, from Caerphilly, said she gets “anxious” her children will not have everything they need and has to start budgeting months in advance.

It is estimated the minimum cost of sending a child to secondary school has reached almost £2,300 a year, up £600 since 2022, with the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) saying lower and middle-income families face “a real struggle”.

The Welsh government said it was doing everything it could to support families.

Ms Williams starts budgeting at the start of the year for the items her nine and 14-year-old will need.

She said: “I dread it after Christmas – I know if I don’t plan or budget I am going to be struggling August, September time.

“I’ll be getting anxious that my children aren’t going to school with the proper equipment so I’ve got to plan well in advance in order to prepare and be able to afford to buy their uniforms and everything else they need.”

She said while her daughter’s primary school uniform does not require logos, her 14-year-old son needs a separate PE kit, rugby kit and football kit.

A woman with long auburn hair wearing a denim waistcoat standing in front of some terraced houses on an estate.

Vicky Williams’ 14-year-old son has to have separate kits for PE and other sports he takes part in

Trips are another source of stress and even though schools help parents with payment plans, Ms Williams said sometimes there was not enough notice of upcoming expenses.

“You want your children to get involved in everything, want to go out for trips with their friends, go on a bus and have the experience and everything.

“But then when the cost of most trips are so high and it’s not doable for some, then you feel guilty then as a parent that your child is missing out.”

The part-time supermarket delivery driver also has a two-year-old and said she was already anticipating “that constant stress and anxiety on my mind that I’ll have three children in school” in two years’ time.

A woman with long brown hair, wearing a black T-shirt is standing in front of rails of uniform arranged by colour

Schools are sometimes too strict about uniform, says Lisa Watkins

On the Lansbury Park estate, Caerphilly Uniform Exchange sells pre-loved and donated uniform for a minimal cost or items can be swapped for free.

Director Lisa Watkins said about 120 families a month use the Caerphilly shop.

They have other hubs in the borough, an online shop and give free bundles for children referred by schools and social services.

“Some schools have changed their uniform to make things more generic and accessible, but more work could be done definitely”, she said.

“I think that we should be treating school uniform more like workwear. It doesn’t matter if it’s got a hole or a bit of paint on it, you know, that’s kind of what it’s for.”

A graphic with sketches of a boy and a girl in blue school uniform with chequered trousers and skirts and red ties/bow ties. It says Cost of one year at secondary school: Learning £449.67 Transport £390, Packed lunches and snacks £846.15 Uniform, PE Kit, shoes and bags £449.68 Enrichment eg trips, charity days £139.28 and Total £2.274.77. The text is red and orange and the background looks like lined paper from a school notebook

As well as uniform, the shop also supplies other costumes and outfits.

“Prom is a huge cost to parents at the moment. Things like World Book Day, Children in Need, Christmas Nativity, Christmas jumper days,” Ms Watkins said.

“As time progresses, we find all of these different celebrations and things to take part in but I think there’s little thought on how much it actually burdens parents financially.”

She added parents faced “absolutely huge” financial pressures, and did not want to have “the only child that isn’t going to prom, or hasn’t got the fancy dress outfit, or the new football boots.”

A woman with wavy shoulder-length brown hair, wearing round glasses and a black jacket sitting on a light brown sofa in front of a dark grey wall

The Welsh government strengthened its uniform guidance for schools in 2023 “but overall it’s still a big expense”, Ellie Harwood from the Child Poverty Action Group said

A report published by the CPAG in May estimated the minimum cost of education is more than £1,000 for primary school children and almost £2,300 for secondary school children, a rise of 30% on three years ago.

It said the cost of food for the school day and technology for learning were the main sources of increases for secondary school children.

“This is a really significant amount of money for families,” said Ellie Harwood, senior education policy officer for CPAG.

“It can be a real struggle for households on low and middle incomes to meet the cost and obviously the more children you have the greater the cost”.

Ms Harwood said research had suggested uniform costs had “flat-lined”, which she hoped was a “reflection in changes of school policy”.

At primary level in Wales, universal free school meals “saves families around £500 a year per child”, Ms Harwood said, but a strict means test still applied for secondary age children.

She said access to Welsh government support with the costs of school should be expanded .

“There are a lot of households living in poverty in Wales who cannot currently access free school meals or the school essentials grant,” she said.

“They can’t get help with the cost of school trips.

“We know there’s about 25,000 secondary aged learners who are living in poverty who don’t qualify for support with these grants and with free school meals.”

Racks of pre-loved school uniform and school shoes with green polo shirts in the foreground

Campaigners say the income threshold to qualify for the schools essentials grant is too low

The Welsh government said: “We are doing everything we can to support families in Wales”.

“We continue to monitor the potential impact of inflation on the number of learners eligible for a free school meal and the School Essentials Grant.”

It said it recognised the “financial burden” of school uniform.

“Our statutory guidance on school uniform policy says that affordability should be a priority, and branded items should not be compulsory.

“We are currently reviewing the impact of the changes to the guidance”.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Semiconductor push: India hosts 20% of world’s chip design engineers; consumption set to cross $120 billion by 2030 – The Times of India

Published

on

Semiconductor push: India hosts 20% of world’s chip design engineers; consumption set to cross 0 billion by 2030 – The Times of India


India accounts for around 20 per cent of the world’s chip design engineers, placing it as a key player in the global semiconductor design ecosystem, according to a report by Bastion Research.According to news agency ANI, the report underlined India’s strong position in the global semiconductor chain, noting, “India is already an important piece in the global semiconductor design. You may be surprised to know that approximately 20 per cent of the world’s chip design engineers are based here.”Global technology leaders, including Qualcomm, Intel, Nvidia, Broadcom, and MediaTek have set up large R&D and design centres across Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Noida. This strong presence has enabled India to emerge as one of the world’s leading hubs for chip design, as per ANI.Explaining the division of work worldwide, the report said engineers in the United States define the high-level chip architecture, such as deciding the type of chip, its end use, features, and launch strategy. Indian engineering teams, by contrast, take on the critical execution work — translating architecture into logic, simulating and testing chips, optimising performance, writing drivers and firmware, and fine-tuning electronic design automation tools. The report stressed this was not a “boss versus worker” setup but rather complementary roles between US and Indian teams.The Bastion Research findings also noted India’s policy push to strengthen its semiconductor ecosystem. The government launched the Semicon India Programme in 2021 with incentives worth around Rs 76,000 crore to attract global manufacturers.India’s semiconductor consumption is projected to rise sharply. “We consume about $24 billion worth semiconductors and it is expected to rise to upwards of $100-120 billion by 2030. When India starts to produce those chips, our share will definitely rise,” Sandeep Kumar, CEO of L&T Semiconductor Technologies and chairman of the Semiconductor Product Leadership Forum, was quoted as saying by ANI.The Forum, launched by the India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA), aims to build an ecosystem for product design, IP creation, and high-value innovation. It is targeting the launch of around 100 new companies by 2035, expected to absorb nearly five lakh workers, including a large number of engineers.Meanwhile, India recently rolled out its first domestically produced chip at CG Semi’s Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test (OSAT) facility in Sanand, Gujarat. Union IT minister Ashwini Vaishnaw, who inaugurated the facility last week, said Prime Minister Narendra Modi will “soon” dedicate the country’s first chip produced there.The government has so far approved 10 semiconductor manufacturing projects worth over Rs 1.60 lakh crore across six states. Work is also underway on Semicon 2.0, the next phase of India’s semiconductor mission.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Brands make ‘swadeshi’ pitch, pick at US tariffs – The Times of India

Published

on

Brands make ‘swadeshi’ pitch, pick at US tariffs – The Times of India


MUMBAI/NEW DELHI: You have read about it in history books and several decades later, you are seeing it play out in the form of hashtags on social media and witty brand campaigns-call for swadeshi is back, thanks to Trump tariffs. Only this time, brands are leading the charge. From homegrown companies taking jibes at American rivals through ad campaigns to brands urging loyalty to desi labels, firms are riding on the swadeshi mood to market their products. Such strategies do not always translate into sales because when Indians shop, they look for value, not typically the brand tag. But some amount of moment marketing doesn’t harm, especially ahead of the festive season.

Moment marketing

“Such marketing moves by brands are more of an opportunism but Indians are very arm-chair patriotic. If by buying a local product, they think they are being patriotic, they will do it. Such campaigns tend to work in small towns, they rally behind such products,” said Abhijat Bharadwaj, chief creative officer at Dentsu Creative Isobar.Whether it is, Amul’s ‘Swadeshi Swad’ and ‘Made in India…iski tariff karo’ ads and posts on social media platforms such as X or Dabur’s ‘Made in India for Indians’ ad, pitching consumers to make ‘The Swadeshi Choice’, vocal for local is the brand flavour of the season. “Amidst tariff imposition by the USA, India stands strong,” said Amul in a recent post on X. Some corporate chiefs have also backed the call for swadeshi. “Be vocal for local, Buy Swadeshi, Build India,” Gautam Singhania, chairman and managing director at Raymond, which will celebrate its centenary this month posted recently. Several Indian brands today are not only making in India but also taking local products global. In fact, many global brands are expanding their India sourcing capabilities and setting up shops here. Call it an irony but India is now America’s biggest smartphone source, having shipped more smartphones to the US than any other country in Q2 2025, data from Canalys showed.Brands are tapping into the sentiment to strategise. Godrej Enterprises Group (GEG) will focus on its range of AI-enabled smart appliances and IoT-enabled digital locks made locally this festive season. The vocal for local sentiment reflects a powerful shift in India’s consumer mindset, one that celebrates homegrown innovation and self-reliance, said Sumeet Bhojani, head of brand & strategic insights at GEG. “If the stiff tariff issue settles down or the 50% tariff is brought to a much more reasonable number, even this moment shall pass. If not, expect a fair number of Indian brands coming to the fore either overtly, covertly or subliminally and each one wanting to establish their identity,” said business and brand strategy specialist Harish Bijoor, adding that consumers may or may not embrace the moment. Be Indian, buy Indian has been tried many times in India but consumers will not get easily swayed to buy a brand just because of its Indian roots. “They will buy for value. Patanjali had tried the local vs MNC pitch but it didn’t work,” said branding and advertising coach Ambi Parameswaran. Unless there is a crusade to join, nationalism in personal consumption is not an active driver for consumers, added Sandeep Goyal, chairman at Rediffusion.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending