Tech
Datacentre developers tout benefits to local communities, but do they deliver? | Computer Weekly
Aaron Saran is worried about his family business. His freight distribution company PNL, which has been based in Southall in west London for 30 years, had to move last year after a developer bought the industrial site it operated from to build a datacentre.
PNL’s new premises are smaller and lack a warehouse. Saran found it hard to find a suitable space with reasonable rent and is concerned he will have to move out of Southall and away from clients.
“One side of the business is already gone,” he said. “We don’t know how to grow.”
Neighbouring businesses at PNL’s former location on the International Trading Estate told Computer Weekly they, too, are worse off as a result of the development.
There are around 200 datacentres in the UK, and most artificial intelligence (AI) datacentres are still in planning or under construction. The UK government has gone so far as to designate datacentres as critical national infrastructure, and has announced “AI growth zones” for datacentre construction in parts of the country.
Although datacentres fulfil key functions, powering everything from chatbots to medical imaging, they have prompted protests, controversy and growing scrutiny. AI is driving a sharp increase in datacentre energy demand, with some projections suggesting it will exceed the electricity use of cryptocurrency mining at its peak. And research shows that datacentre energy consumption is straining local power grids and contributing to higher electricity costs for nearby residents.
Developers, meanwhile, are seeing the value of community support and are touting the benefits the developments can bring, from funding for local infrastructure, education and training, to the creation of jobs.
But can these benefits – which rely heavily on negotiation and the goodwill of the developer – make up for the impact a development has?
Can datacentres deliver local benefits?
In Southall, home to a large South Asian community and a significant number of small to medium-sized enterprises, businesses have faced challenges due to rising rents and a decrease in industrial estate capacity. The growing AI datacentre industry – along with other large players such as film studios – is one reason for this, according to a study from Ealing Council in 2022, which noted that “strong demand” for industrial space “could displace small businesses”.
Rent for industrial estates has risen “to a stupid level”, says Saran, making it untenable for transport and logistics companies such as his to stay where they are and close to their customer base. “Local businesses are being pushed out, 15 to 30 miles away,” he says, which he predicts will lead to price increases for customers. “The only way we could possibly grow is by leaving west London altogether. If I do relocate, most of my staff will leave,” he adds.
As a gesture to businesses affected by its development at the industrial estate in Southall, the developer, GTR – backed by private equity firm KKR – has agreed to provide £750,000 towards a “local economy management plan”. This plan is part of a larger agreement called an S106, which is a legally binding contract between a developer and a local planning authority, used to mitigate the impact of a new development on the local area. The agreement also involves the developer committing additional sums in the tens of millions towards training, education and infrastructure improvements in Southall.
According to John Booth, managing director of sustainability-focused IT consultancy Carbon3IT, the implied function of these community benefits agreements is clear: they can be seen as a “bribe” to help “get a project over the line”.
Agreements aim to mitigate local impact
The scope of such an agreement can be broad, although it must be tied in some way to the nature of the development. Agreed-upon benefits can range from money for training and education, to revamped local parks, healthcare and infrastructure.
The plan for the datacentre in Southall aims to “address potential disruption arising from the loss of traditional industrial units” by “assisting affected businesses” and providing “support for business relocations to minimise economic disruption”.
Computer Weekly spoke with six businesses on Saran’s old estate, which said they had been adversely affected by the development. They claimed they had not received the support they needed, and that they had not heard of a plan to help “affected businesses”.
Some companies said they had lost business as a result of the move, and several said they were struggling to find an affordable site to move to. Two businesses said they had been evicted after struggling to move, with one – metalworks firm Makson’s – being asked to pay £1,800 plus VAT per day for a security guard to let them in to get their belongings back, as well as legal costs of £1,750 plus VAT (halved from £3,500 plus VAT, as a gesture of goodwill).
GTR told Computer Weekly that Ealing Council was responsible for managing and delivering the plan to help affected businesses. Ealing Council did not respond to questions from Computer Weekly.
“The GTR team has worked closely with all tenants throughout the process, and we continue to assist those who remain on site. Supporting tenants effectively [and] efficiently is a priority for us, and a professional commitment that we take very seriously,” said GTR founder and CEO Franek Sodzawiczny in an emailed comment.
Why community engagement makes commercial sense
As people globally have pushed back against datacentre developments, engaging with communities has become a commercial decision, according to industry experts.
Corporations are considering their interactions with communities more carefully, with a focus on messaging. In the US, Big Tech has spent a lot on advertising to help the image of datacentres.
In some instances, corporations have taken a more outwardly aggressive tack. At the end of January, the chief executives of American datacentre company Digital Realty, Blackstone-owned datacentre operator QTS and Japanese IT services company NTT Data announced that their companies would go “on the offensive” around datacentres.
“We stand on the foundation that we’re doing the right things in these communities,” said co-chief executive of QTS, Tag Greason, quoted in the Financial Times. “Going a little bit on the offensive is part of the plan for a number of us because the opposition is definitely on the offensive.”
But others – including OpenAI and Microsoft – see value in a more cuddly approach. In January, Microsoft announced its intention to build “community-first AI infrastructure”. That move came after the corporation was compelled to axe a datacentre development in Wisconsin in October 2025 after local protests. A few days later, OpenAI announced its developments would be “locally tailored” for each site and “driven by community input and local concerns”.
There are practical reasons to focus on community benefits, according to Venessa Moffat, executive director of UK industry body the Datacentre Alliance. “Structured community partnerships reduce organised opposition and cut planning delays” that could cost a developer tens of millions, wrote Moffat in a document shared with Computer Weekly.
Benefits vary widely across the UK
The UK has seen its share of opposition to datacentres, in the form of council refusals, protests and an ongoing legal case that objects to the lack of an environmental impact assessment.
In Hertfordshire village Abbots Langley, a controversial datacentre by developer Greystoke was given a green light by the government after the local council initially rejected it. Despite having been “deeply disappointed” when the development was pushed through, local council leader Stephen Giles-Medhurst seemed optimistic when he spoke to Computer Weekly in January.
“We all realised the chances of getting this refused were zero,” he said. “We have to move with the times.” Developer Greystoke was “receptive and open”, according to Giles-Medhurst, who added: “If we can get this right, we can get some real tangible benefits for the community.”
The benefits at Abbots Langley include a nature reserve and around £12m towards a local training and skills fund. Approximately £105,000 more will go to development-related sustainable transport. There are also plans for infrastructure to channel waste heat to a nearby housing development. The council is still in talks with the developer to negotiate further benefits, said Giles-Medhurst.
In the UK, the benefits a datacentre can bring to an area vary widely and can depend on the negotiating power of the council and the willingness of the developer to comply. Although this is the first datacentre to be built in Abbots Langley, Giles-Medhurst cited the council’s experience with Warner Brothers, which has been in the area since 2010, as giving the council knowledge of what could be asked for.
Developers often employ planning consultants. This can create “an imbalance of power” due to the complicated nature of the negotiations, said Kath Scanlon, distinguished policy fellow at the London School of Economics and deputy director at LSE London, an urban research group.
Negotiating leverage can also depend on site and location, said Scanlon. Land that is particularly valuable, such as in London and the South-East, gives the council more clout to get funding.
As a result, some agreements show a variety of benefits with higher sums involved, while others are more limited in their contributions.
For example, the GTR development in Southall has allocated a minimum of £20m in its community benefits agreement for highway improvement, air quality mitigation, carbon offsetting, employment and training, cycle infrastructure, bus services and street improvement, as well as an improvement to a bridge.
Meanwhile, the West London Technology Park development in Iver, Buckinghamshire, by Greystoke is set to receive £5m towards air quality mitigation. The development is the subject of a legal case that raises objections to the lack of an environmental impact assessment. The council had rejected two planning applications since 2022, but the appeal by Greystoke against the second of these was “recovered” by the newly installed Labour government in mid-2025.
As a result, benefit negotiations were overseen by the Planning Inspectorate rather than the council.
Nscale’s AI Campus in Loughton
There are other developments without this type of benefit agreement. These include Nscale’s Loughton AI Campus and the Cobalt Park development in Newcastle, associated with OpenAI.
When asked, a spokesperson for Nscale said the application had been made by a different company, and Nscale took it over with planning terms already in place. The spokesperson said Epping Forest Council had “opted to secure all requirements via 21 planning conditions rather than an S106 agreement”.
“Nscale was not a party to those original discussions, but as the new operator, we are fully committed to complying with all 21 conditions – including infrastructure and environmental safeguards,” said the spokesperson.
For Cobalt Park, developer Highbridge Properties, North Tyneside Council and OpenAI did not respond to questions about why an S106 wasn’t required.
Others involve large sums that aren’t mentioned in an S106. Investment management company Blackstone announced a development in Blyth, Northumberland, that included £110m to be put towards “long-term investment in growth and employment opportunities” in the region, but it wasn’t included in the development’s benefits agreement.
Why some perks are controversial
Meanwhile, some negotiated benefits have caused controversy. In a community feedback document from Greystoke’s Abbots Langley application, residents expressed derision about the proposed nature reserve.
“The communities of Abbots Langley and Bedmond can already access and walk among the existing green belt land via local footpaths,” wrote one resident. “Therefore, the ‘country park’ being put forward as a so-called benefit by the developers does not offer any gain and brings no additional benefit for local people or the environment.”
Another local resident wrote that the reserve’s location is “somewhat remote from the local population and with poor vehicular access”.
Another commenter accused the developers of seeking “to bribe local people with the idea of a country park”, adding: “This insults our intelligence. They would be giving us nothing.”
Council leader Giles-Medhurst acknowledged this view, but said it was “part of the planning permission”.
Can datacentres deliver on jobs?
Another widely advertised benefit that has caused controversy is jobs. The creation of thousands of jobs is often advertised as part of a datacentre’s benefits, but reporting has shown that most of these are short-term construction jobs.
“I don’t think it’s a plausible way to address growth at the whole economy level,” says economist and former Labour party adviser James Meadway, speaking of AI datacentre developments, claiming datacentres are “not going to create [many] jobs”.
In Southall, some businesses from the industrial estate are still waiting to be served their notice to vacate, while others continue to search for other sites and deal with the disruption to their businesses.
“This situation has affected our live projects, staff livelihoods and the families that depend on their income for living, [as well as] the overall business,” said director and co-owner of Makson’s, Pritesh Makwana.
Tech
The Smart Home Gadgets to Amp Up Your Curb Appeal
I tried the battery version, which does require you recharge it every couple of weeks, but the wired-in version is the top recommendation on our guide to the Best Video Doorbells.
A Better Birdhouse
I had a new-to-me problem this spring: bird invasion. A little bird made a nest in my front-door wreath without us noticing. One evening, my sister opened the door, and the bird flew out of the nest and straight into our house. After a 30-minute battle to get it outside again (and keep my cat from eating it), it wasn’t until we saw the bird fly off the door again the next day that we realized it was calling our home its home, too.
If this is a common problem at your house, our resident bird-gear tester Kat Merck has a solution: a smart nesting box. Birdfy makes a few different smart bird feeders we like for bird-watching, and the Nest Duo is a birdhouse that lets you watch the birds while they nest inside of it. It’s a slim, attractive box that will add to your front yard’s style while also packing two solar-powered cameras (one facing the entrance, one focused inside) so you can bird-watch from multiple angles. It comes with different hole sizes to appeal to different species, metal predator guards to prevent chewing around the hole, and a remote control to reset or recharge the camera without disturbing your feathered neighbors.
Stylish Smart Lights
I’ve liked Govee’s smart outdoor string lights before, usually for my holiday decor, and have previously recommended something similar with a bistro-light-like look that happened to be smart. These clear bulb string lights are part of Govee’s current lineup and have a contemporary twist with a triangle in the center instead of the wire filament. These are a fun option for outdoor lights you can enjoy on warm nights, and they can do every color and shade of white without looking as bulky as permanent outdoor lights. (Added bonus, these lights are also Matter compatible!)
Fresh Bulbs
If you have light fixtures you want to remote-control, add an outdoor smart bulb. There are tons to choose from, and you can usually find one from any brand you already have at home. The only downside is that outdoor-rated smart bulbs are usually 4.75-inch-diameter PAR38-style bulbs, so they’re best for downward-facing floodlights on your porch or balcony. They’ll likely be too big to fit in a wall fixture as a replacement for a normal-sized bulb. Don’t just grab any smart bulb—not all are outdoor-rated. Check for mentions of outdoor use and waterproof ratings to make sure they’re safe to use. I’m a big fan of Cync bulbs, and the brand has an outdoor version of the Cync Full Color bulbs I like to use indoors. You’ll be able to add fun colors as well as shades of white, so you can turn the porch a spooky orange or red for Halloween, pink for Valentine’s Day, or the colors of your favorite sports team on game day.
Remote-Controlled Garage
If your garage is the centerpiece of your home’s curb appeal, you can control it as easily as a smart door by adding a smart controller. You can do two different styles: I have the Chamberlain MyQ professionally installed smart garage opener, which means the device that controls my garage has these smarts built into it (plus a camera, but I find it doesn’t work great with how far the device is from my Wi-Fi router), or you can get a smart garage controller that can add smart features onto an existing garage door. Both let you check whether the garage is open or closed and operate it remotely, and you can add a video keypad that doubles as a video doorbell and can let you open or close the garage without your phone.
Smart Shades
The front of my home faces west, so it’s absolutely baking at the end of the day. What I need to add are some of our favorite smart shades to automate closing the shades on that side of the house at the right time of day. These also give your home a nice, cohesive look and immediate, controllable privacy from the outside world. WIRED reviewer Simon Hill recommends the SmartWings shades as his top picks, and Lutron’s Caseta shades if you’re looking for a more upgraded look.
Invisible Swaps
Looking to add some smarts without touching your existing setup? These switch-ups can make your front door and yard smart without being visible.
Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.
Tech
The Best Movies to Stream This Month
April might be springtime in the northern hemisphere, but some of the best streaming services seem to think it’s the perfect time for a dry run of spooky season. How else to explain the arrival of some exquisitely dark slices of horror, like 28 Days Later: The Bone Temple arriving on Netflix, Weapons coming to Prime Video, or Shelby Oaks landing on Hulu? If you prefer your off-season Halloween viewing to be in the vein of campy B movies rather than serious scares though, horror specialist Shudder has you covered with Deathstalker, a gloriously cheesy reboot of a near-forgotten ’80s series.
Reality is often scarier than fiction though, as shown by Louis Theroux’s Inside the Manosphere—his first documentary film with Netflix, exploring the dark side of social media and the world of toxic male influencers. (Be sure to read our interview with the filmmaker.) And if the thought of that leaves you wanting something a bit more wholesome to watch, thankfully Zootopia 2 has popped up on Disney+—and there’s even a rabbit in that, for some appropriately springtime imagery.
Here are WIRED’s picks of the best movies to watch right now.
28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
The fourth film in the long-running postapocalyptic horror series switches focus from rampaging rage zombies to a more dangerous threat: humans. OK, OK, “people are the real monsters” isn’t a hot take for the genre, but The Bone Temple offers a unique twist, with 28 Years Later survivor Spike (Alfie Williams) trapped in the company of a murderous gang led by deranged satanist “Sir Lord” Jimmy Crystal (Sinners’ Jack O’Connell). The villain is modeled on disgraced British TV presenter Jimmy Savile, whose sexual abuse crimes hadn’t been revealed by the time of the initial outbreak in 28 Days Later, adding a dash of real-world terror.
As the group stalks what remains of the English countryside, Spike’s only hope might be Dr. Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), whose experiments on curing alpha zombie Samson (Chi Lewis-Parry) might hold humanity’s last hope. Although best watched back to back with its predecessor for the full, horrifying picture, director Nia DaCosta’s chapter stands on its own—and earns bonus points for one of the best uses of Iron Maiden’s “Number of the Beast” in film history.
Louis Theroux: Inside the Manosphere
It’s the silence that does the trick; British documentarian Louis Theroux always knows when not to speak and instead let his subject expose themselves for the world to see. It’s a masterful technique whether Theroux is investigating the Westboro Baptist Church or UFO conspiracy theorists, but it is rarely put to better use than in his latest outing: exploring the online “manosphere” subculture of self-appointed “alphas” offering toxic advice on how to be a “real man.” Speaking with key figures in the loosely defined movement, Theroux’s mild-mannered approach often leaves them to do most of the talking, exposing shockingly misogynistic and extremist views. Even more distressing? The quiet revelation that for many of them their performative masculinity is all just one big grift, and how they rationalize the harm they cause in pursuit of a payout. Depressing but compelling viewing—not all men, but definitely all of these men.
Crime 101
Jewel thief Mike (Chris Hemsworth) is the best in the business, a meticulous planner who pulls off his heists without leaving a shred of evidence—much to the consternation of LAPD detective Lou Lubesnick (Mark Ruffalo), who doesn’t even know exactly who he’s hunting for a string of thefts. Elsewhere in the City of Angels, Sharon (Halle Berry) is an underappreciated VP at an insurance firm, frustrated at being passed over for promotion for years. She’s the perfect insider to help Mike orchestrate an elaborate $11 million diamond heist. But as Lou uncovers evidence connecting to Mike’s past, and the chaotic, violent biker Ormon (Barry Keoghan) aims to take the score for himself, even the most masterful planning can’t prevent everything spiraling dangerously out of control.
Tech
OpenAI Executive Kevin Weil Is Leaving the Company
Kevin Weil, OpenAI’s former chief product officer who was recently tapped to build a new AI workspace for scientists, Prism, is leaving the company, WIRED has confirmed. Weil was previously an early executive leading product at Instagram.
OpenAI is also sunsetting Prism, which the company launched as a web app in January this year to give scientists a better way to work with AI. The company is folding the roughly 10-person team behind it into Thibault Sottiaux’s Codex team. An OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the changes, and tells WIRED this is part of the company’s effort to unify its business and product strategy. OpenAI has broader ambitions to turn Codex, its AI coding application, into an “everything app.”
Weil, who joined OpenAI in June 2024, announced last September that he would be starting a new initiative inside of the company called “OpenAI for Science.” Now, OpenAI is dispersing those employees throughout the company’s product, research, and infrastructure teams. An OpenAI spokesperson reiterated the company’s commitment to accelerating scientific discovery, and says it’s one of the clearest ways AI can benefit humanity.
OpenAI is currently trying to refocus the company around a few key areas, such as enterprise offerings and coding. Last month, OpenAI’s CEO of AGI deployment Fidji Simo told staff that the company needs to simplify its product offerings. The push to divert resources to more consequential efforts resulted in OpenAI discontinuing its Sora video-generation app.
This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
-
Entertainment6 days agoPalace left in shock as Prince William cancels grand ceremony
-
Sports6 days agoThe case for Man United’s Fernandes as Premier League’s best
-
Politics1 week agoChinese, Taiwanese will unite, Xi tells Taiwan opposition leader
-
Entertainment1 week agoDua Lipa hits major career high ahead of wedding with Callum Turner
-
Business6 days agoUK could adopt EU single market rules under new legislation
-
Business1 week ago100% road tax waiver for electric cars, new rules for 2, 3 and 4 wheelers – what Delhi govt’s draft EV policy says – The Times of India
-
Business1 week agoThe FAA wants gamers to apply for air traffic control jobs
-
Fashion6 days agoEnergy emerges as biggest cost driver in textile margins


