Connect with us

Business

De minimis: How US shoppers will be hit as the tariff exemption ends

Published

on

De minimis: How US shoppers will be hit as the tariff exemption ends


Osmond Chia & Laura BlaseyBusiness reporters in Singapore & Washington DC

Getty Images A shopper inspects a a vibrant, patterned outfit she has picked out from a clothes rack. She is dressed in a striped yellow outfit.Getty Images

The US has pulled the plug on a long-running global tariff exemption that has been widely used by buyers of low-cost goods.

From Friday, imports valued at $800 (£592) or less will no longer be duty-free and will face tighter customs checks, in a move set to affect millions of shipments a day.

Last year, almost 1.4 billion packages – worth a total of more than $64bn – entered America without being charged duties under a rule called the de minimis exemption, according to US Customs.

Experts say US President Donald Trump’s policy change will hit small businesses hardest and shoppers should brace for higher prices and fewer options – at least until the dust settles.

“I’ve reached the point of acceptance, but when I first heard the news about two and half, three weeks ago, I felt like it might be the end for my business,” said Katherine Theobalds, founder and creative director of Buenos Aires-based shoe brand Zou Xou. “It still might – that remains to be seen.”

What’s the de minimis rule?

De minimis is a Latin term that broadly translates to “about the smallest things”, often used in legal contexts to describe matters too trivial to merit concern.

The de minimis exemption was introduced in 1938 to avoid the expense of collecting only small amounts of import duties in the US.

The rule’s threshold rose over the years, allowing e-commerce firms and global retailers that ship small packages to the US to thrive.

The exemption was often associated with companies like Chinese e-commerce giants Shein and Temu, which delivered Americans cheap goods that could be quickly shipped from the manufacturing source – with no warehouse stock or associated overhead costs.

But while Shein and Temu helped pioneer this way of working, many other businesses – foreign and domestic, large and small – came to incorporate the “loophole” into their supply chains and sales models.

Executives at Tapestry – the parent company of US fashion brand Coach, which is known for leather bags that sell from roughly $200 to $1,000 – told analysts this month that it expects to take a $160m hit to its profits due to changing tariff policies, with about a third of that attributed to the elimination of the de minimis rule.

Coach has rapidly expanded in recent years in a comeback campaign fuelled by Gen Z shoppers and Tapestry remains confident the momentum will offset some of the impact of tariffs. Still, the elimination of de minimis represents a logistical challenge.

Shipments under the exemption made up more than 90% of all the cargo entering the country, according to US customs.

The president and his predecessor, Joe Biden, criticised the policy as harmful to US businesses and said it has been abused to smuggle illegal goods, including drugs like fentanyl.

In a phone call with reporters on Thursday, Trump’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, said the move will “save thousands of American lives by restricting the flow of narcotics” through the mail, as well as add $10bn a year to US coffers.

AFP via Getty Images Boxes covered in tape and shipping labels are piled up in a DHL shipping facility.AFP via Getty Images

Trump fast-tracked the rule’s repeal with an executive order this year, well ahead of a planned 2027 expiry date.

With the necessary documentation, shippers will pay duties based on the country of origin’s tariff rate. Otherwise, they can choose to pay a fixed fee between $80 and $200 per package, according to the White House.

The second option, which is aimed to give postal services more time to adjust to the change, will only be available for six months.

Mainland China and Hong Kong were the first to be cut from the de minimis rule in May, prompting e-commerce giant Temu to halt direct sales to the US.

Letters and personal gifts worth less than $100 will still be duty-free.

Smaller variety, longer waits

US consumers may see less variety of goods in shops and on e-commerce platforms as businesses get to grips with customs documentation, trade experts have told the BBC.

Smaller firms need time to adjust as they have mostly been spared from such paperwork until now, said Tam Nguyen from logistics administration firm GOL Solution. The company handles exports from South East Asia to the US.

“You need to indicate the source of all the materials in a product, which can come from many countries with different tax rates. This would absolutely make shipments slower.”

The complexity could deter sellers from offering a broader range of products for export, she added.

That could have a particular impact on more niche markets.

Christopher Lundell, is a 53-year-old psychologist based in Portland, Oregon who also DJs and mixes music as a hobby. He is an avid vinyl record collector who recently became aware of the de minimis exemption suspension when he tried to – unsuccessfully – buy a $5 rare record from a seller in the UK.

“He cancelled my order and said, ‘I’m sorry but the UK is not shipping to the United States anymore.'”

Mr Lundell says he tries his best to find US-based record sellers before searching online for overseas sellers based in countries like the UK, Japan and China. He adds that he understands the need to protect US businesses, but says that he believes a blanket suspension of the de minimis exemption is “political theatre”.

Some orders may also be frozen for the next few weeks. Ms Nguyen said clients, including some in the healthcare sector, have halted orders.

Major postal services in the UK, Europe and and the Asia-Pacific region paused deliveries to the US this week.

The operators blamed uncertainty about how the tariffs would work and a lack of time to prepare.

Prices to rise

Without the exemption, businesses will have to factor in tariffs the US has imposed on the country of origin, which came into effect for most nations in August.

Those levies can be as low as 10% for countries like the UK and Australia, while goods from Brazil and India face the highest tariffs at 50%.

Following the change, specific duties will be imposed of $80 per item for countries with tariffs of 16% or less, $160 for shipments from countries with between 16% and 25% tariffs or $200 for items from countries with higher tariffs.

A senior administration official downplayed consumer concerns, saying that the move will “benefit” Americans by making them “safer” and “prosperous”.

Some American businesses welcomed the news, arguing the elimination would level the playing field.

“Gap Inc. welcomes the Administration’s decision to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment worldwide. The de minimis loophole has long provided an opportunity for some importers & retailers to avoid paying their fair share of US duties,” the company said in a statement.

Small firms, in particular, will feel the strain from the costly audits needed to clear US customs, making it tough for sellers to keep prices stable, said trade expert Deborah Elms.

With many postal services holding off on US shipments, sellers may have to pay for more expensive express couriers to reach American buyers for now, said Ms Elms from research firm Hinrich Foundation.

British retailer Wool Warehouse is among firms that have paused orders from the US.

“There is a lot of uncertainty at the moment” due to the short time firms have had to figure out shipment process and fees involved, said managing director Andrew Smith.

His firm hopes to resume orders to the US – its largest export market – within two weeks, he said, adding that time is needed to wait to see how other companies have responded to the changes.

Prices of its goods – mostly wool and crafting materials sourced globally – are likely to rise by up to 15%, said Mr Smith.

The company also plans to revamp its website to indicate the tariff rate chargeable for each product, he said.

“We’re aiming for full transparency so people know what it will cost with certainty and then they can decide whether they want to make the purchase or not.”

At Zou Xou, Ms Theobalds specialises in artisan-made women’s shoes, crafted by small workshops in Argentina, that sell for between $200-$300. She began her career in New York, and has focussed her business on American customers.

She has long operated a two-tier system – customers either receive shoes from a US warehouse where she keeps some stock, or shipped direct from Argentina through DHL.

Larger shipments of shoes into the US were already subject to customs fees, she says, but sending one or two pairs from Buenos Aires to a customer was achieved cheaply and efficiently because of the de minimis exemption.

Now, she’s not sure how to factor in the added costs and is exploring several options and hoping to get more clarity on how to shift her business model.

Equally important, she said, is how businesses like hers explain the changes to consumers.

She worries that even if pricing doesn’t change much, a duty process that seems too complicated could turn off even those who want a higher-end product.

“The reason our customers come to us is because they appreciate the artisanal quality. They could have always gone to a mass retailer,” she says. “But what people will have to think about is ‘does that matter to me all that much, or do I just want a pair of shoes?'”

A boost for China?

US-based retailers stand to gain if prices of goods ordered from overseas rise, Ms Elms said.

“If it’s too expensive, they’ll probably go to Walmart or Target to buy it there,” she said.

But with so many goods being sent from around world now being subject to customs duties, US consumers may once again turn to China for cheaper options.

Chinese companies like Shein and Temu have set up distribution centres in the US that will help ease some of the cost of tariffs, said Ms Nguyen.

And China is “months ahead” in figuring out the paperwork as compared to firms in other countries that are now scrambling to get up to speed, she added.

There may be fewer competitors in the overall market, as the end of the de minimis exemption makes it harder for small businesses to launch e-commerce sites, said Ms Nguyen.

“It used to be: Set up a site, list products and start shipping. But now that low-cost entry point is gone.”

Additional reporting by Nadine Yousif and Bernd Debusmann Jr



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Iran Conflict: Middle East tensions: Global insurers exit Iranian waters as conflict deepens – The Times of India

Published

on

Iran Conflict: Middle East tensions: Global insurers exit Iranian waters as conflict deepens – The Times of India


MUMBAI: India’s trade and energy supplies face fresh risks after reinsurers and Protection & Indemnity (P&I) clubs announced cancellation of war risk insurance for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian waters, following an escalation in the Iran conflict. The cancellations, effective from this week, have left over 150 vessels stranded and disrupted a corridor that handles nearly one-fifth of global oil flows.P&I clubs are mutual, non-profit insurance associations owned by shipowners. They provide third-party liability cover through a pooled premium for risks such as cargo damage, pollution, crew injuries and collisions that are not covered under hull insurance. The clubs also provide legal support and dispute resolution across jurisdictions.“The industry is currently in a wait-and-watch mode, as much depends on how long the conflict persists. If it turns prolonged, insurers are likely to come together to create additional capacity for war-risk cover. Typically, there is an immediate surge in demand when hostilities break out, but that demand tends to ease quickly if the situation stabilises in a short span,” said Tapan Singhel, MD & CEO, Bajaj General Insurance.

No cover as storm brews

Brokers said that in the past when international reinsurers ceased to provide cover for some risks like terrorism the Indian market had provided the capacity by building an insurance pool where domestic companies come together and share the risks. However, this tie state-owned reinsurer GIC Re, which leads domestic marine pools, has itself issued cancellation notices for marine hull war risk covers effective March 3, 2026, mirroring global reinsurers and P&I clubs. The crisis has brought marine insurance centerstage, the share of this line of non-life had shrunk to around 2% of industry premium as risks ebbed due to containarisation and more safety in transport. The size of the premium also determines the capacity of the industry to provide large covers.Their role is central to global shipping. Without P&I cover, shipowners face potentially unlimited liabilities in the event of accidents, pollution or war-related damage. In high-risk zones, the absence of insurance effectively halts voyages, as operators are unwilling to expose vessels to uninsured losses. In previous crises in the Red Sea, war risk exclusions by insurers sharply curtailed traffic and drove up freight rates.In the current episode, major P&I clubs and reinsurers have issued notices cancelling war risk cover for Iranian waters, the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, citing tanker damage, casualties and threats from Iranian forces. Reports of VHF warnings and GPS disruptions have added to concerns. Insurers have invoked standard cancellation clauses following US and Israeli strikes on Iran, with broader policy implications if the conflict further widens.Fresh war risk cover may be available, but at sharply higher premiums. Rates that were around 0.25% of vessel value have surged multiple times, rendering transits commercially unviable for many operators. Even where cover is available, shipowners remain wary of risks such as seizures or missile strikes.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

UK economy could face ‘very significant’ impact from Iran conflict – OBR

Published

on

UK economy could face ‘very significant’ impact from Iran conflict – OBR



The UK economy could face a “very significant” hit from the conflict in Iran, the official budget watchdog has warned.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said that the outlook for inflation would be “particularly uncertain” following spikes in gas and oil prices in recent days following attacks in the Middle East.

It came as the budget watchdog reduced its inflation forecast for this year, indicating that UK inflation will drop to target levels quicker than previously expected.

The OBR also cut its economic growth forecast for this year and revealed a worsening unemployment outlook for the next three years.

In its latest projections alongside the Chancellor’s spring statement, the organisation however highlighted that recent volatility in the Middle East could have an impact on a number of its projections.

The forecasts were prepared before days of recent attacks as part of an intensifying conflict between US-Israeli forces and Iran.

On Tuesday, the OBR said: “Conflict in the Middle East, which escalated as we were finalising this document, could have very significant impacts on the global and UK economies.”

David Miles, from the OBR’s budget responsibility committee, said its predictions that inflation will fall to target levels early this year have become more uncertain after jumps in oil and gas prices linked to recent attacks in the Middle East.

He said: “I think what will happen to inflation is particularly uncertain in the past few days.

“Our central expectation had been that inflation would fall back towards the Bank of England’s 2% target early this year and will be around that level at the end of the year.

“There must be more uncertainty around that right now.”

The trimmed-down inflation projections indicated that this will slow to 2.3% for 2026, down from a previous 2.5% forecast.

Experts said the lower-than-expected rate is partly down to “greater slack in the economy” and falling food and energy prices.

As a result, the OBR indicated that inflation will drop to the 2% target rate set by the Bank of England and the Government later this year.

The Bank has already suggested that inflation – the rate at which the price of goods and services rises – could fall below 2% by April.

The OBR said inflation is expected to remain at the 2% target from 2027 onwards, assuming this is not knocked off course by the potential jump in energy costs.

It came as the Chancellor Rachel Reeves told MPs in Parliament that the OBR said the UK economy would grow more slowly than previously expected in 2026, although growth will pick up in the following years.

UK gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to grow by 1.1% in 2026, as the OBR cut its previous prediction of 1.4% from last November.

The budget watchdog said the downgrade was linked to a growth slowdown late last year, loosening in the labour market and subdued data from recent business surveys.

However, it also lifted its forecasts for growth for both 2027 and 2028, with the economy to expand by 1.6% in both years.

The Chancellor said she had the “right economic plan” for the UK as she laid out her spring statement on Tuesday.

Ms Reeves also said that unemployment is “set to peak later this year” before reducing over the following years.

The OBR said that the UK unemployment rate is on track to peak at about 5.33% in 2026.

Latest data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that unemployment lifted to a five-year-high of 5.2% in the three months to December.

The OBR had previously predicted that the jobless rate would increase to 4.9% in 2026.

New forecasts show that unemployment is then on track to hit 4.9% in 2027 and 4.4% in 2028.

It had previously forecast it would be 4.6% in 2027 and 4.3% the following year.

The new forecasts have also reduced the Government’s borrowing projections for each year until 2031, in a potential boost for the Chancellor.

Reduced borrowing costs, linked to an easing in the yield on Government bonds, also meant that the Government’s headroom to meet its fiscal rules widened to £23.6 billion, compared with £21.7 billion in November’s budget.

Elliott Jordan-Doak, senior UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said: “There were few major surprises in today’s spring statement, with the Chancellor delivering the well-flagged ‘boring budget’ that we and the market were expecting.”

He added: “Chunks of the fiscal forecasts now look dated because of the rapid escalation of events in the Middle East.”

Peter Arnold, EY UK chief economist, said: “The underlying improvement in the UK’s fiscal position was supported by higher actual and expected tax receipts, driven in large part by a stronger equity market performance since November.

“There may now be doubts around how long this stock market performance can be sustained if the conflict in the Middle East is prolonged and global equity market volatility continues.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

IMF says ‘too early’ to gauge West Asia conflict impact as energy prices, markets turn volatile – The Times of India

Published

on

IMF says ‘too early’ to gauge West Asia conflict impact as energy prices, markets turn volatile – The Times of India


With tensions escalating in West Asia, the International Monetary Fund on Tuesday said it is closely tracking the situation but cautioned that it is “too early to assess the economic impact on the region and the global economy,” as disruptions to trade and energy markets intensify.In a statement, the IMF said it has “observed disruptions to trade and economic activity, surges in energy prices, and volatility in financial markets.”“The situation remains highly fluid and adds to an already uncertain global economic environment,” it said, reported ANI.“It is too early to assess the economic impact on the region and the global economy. That impact will depend on the extent and duration of the conflict,” the IMF added.The remarks come as governments evaluate the fallout of the widening hostilities in the region, particularly on oil supplies and global financial stability.In India, Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri earlier said the country is “fully prepared amid evolving situation in the Middle East and energy supplies are robust.”He stated that “the country is well stocked with crude oil and inventories of key petroleum products including petrol, diesel and ATF to deal with short-term disruptions arising from the Middle East.”According to the minister, Indian energy companies have access to supplies that are not routed through the Strait of Hormuz, and such cargoes will remain available to mitigate any temporary disruptions affecting shipments passing through the strait.The Petroleum ministry has also set up a 24×7 Control Room to continuously monitor supply and stock positions of petroleum products across the country.The government is “reasonably comfortable in terms of stocks,” the minister said, adding that safeguarding the interests of Indian consumers remains the highest priority. Based on continuous monitoring, the government is cautiously optimistic that phased measures can be taken, if required, to further mitigate the situation.Government sources said India currently holds about eight weeks of crude oil and petroleum product inventories, including strategic reserves. They added that only about 40 per cent of India’s crude oil imports transit through the Strait of Hormuz, limiting exposure to regional disruptions.Sources maintained that the country remains in a comfortable position on energy security and is closely monitoring developments, while being prepared to manage potential supply-side challenges through adequate inventory levels and diversified sourcing.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending